Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The impact of preservice teachers’ cognitive and technological perceptions on their continuous intention to use flipped classroom

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the integration of popular technologies such as social media, smartphones, and tablets in the education system, new online course delivery methods such as flipped classrooms have emerged to enhance teaching and learning. To understand implications of the integration of such technologies in education the study examined the responses of 550 preservice teachers. Participants took their regular classes on a flipped classroom during a semester. After this experience, the participants completed a survey instrument adapted for this study to measure their continuous intention to use flipped classroom. The research model, which is based on technology acceptance model and social cognitive theory, was tested by employing a structural equation modelling approach. Results indicated that self-regulation and self-efficacy have a positive impact on perceived ease of use (PEOU). Whereas, perceived anxiety has a negative impact on the PEOU and self-efficacy. Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between perceived anxiety and PEOU. Further, the results indicated that PEOU has a positive impact on perceived usefulness (PU). Both PU and PEOU have a positive impact on the continuous intention to use flipped classroom for teaching and learning. The findings suggested significant relationships between cognitive and technological factors and continuous intention to use flipped classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

Data is available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghaei, K., Rajabi, M., Lie, K. Y., & Ajam, F. (2019). Flipped learning as situated practice: A contrastive narrative inquiry in an EFL classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10039-9.

  • Al Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Emran, M., & Teo, T. (2019). Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learning adoption? An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10062-w.

  • Andrade, M. S. (2014). Dialogue and structure: Enabling learner self-regulation in technology-enhanced learning environments. European Educational Research Journal, 13(5), 563–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arpaci, I. (2015). A comparative study of the effects of cultural differences on the adoption of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arpaci, I. (2017). The role of self-efficacy in predicting use of distance education tools and learning management systems. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arpaci, I. (2019). A hybrid modeling approach for predicting the educational use of mobile cloud computing services in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arpaci, I., Yardimci Cetin, Y., & Turetken, O. (2015). A cross-cultural analysis of smartphone adoption by Canadian and Turkish organizations. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 18(3), 214–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action (pp. 5–107). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basol, G., & Balgalmis, E. (2016). A multivariate investigation of gender differences in the number of online tests received-checking for perceived self-regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 388–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basol, G., & Balgalmis, E. (2018). The predictors of success in a high-stakes test: Cramschools, test anxiety and self-efficacy. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(9), 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA (vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1-18).

  • Chiang, T. H. C. (2017). Analysis of learning behavior in a flipped programing classroom adopting problem-solving strategies. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, F. K., & Chen, C. (2017). Modified flipped classroom instructional model in “learning sciences” course for graduate students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1–2), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, P. H. P., & Cheng, S. H. (2017). Effects of active learning classrooms on student learning: A two-year empirical investigation on student perceptions and academic performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(2), 269–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, R. J., & Chu, A. Z. (2010). Multi-level analysis of peer support, internet self-efficacy and e-learning outcomes-the contextual effects of collectivism and group potency. Computers & Education, 55(1), 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, D. P., & Brady-Van den Bos, M. (2018). Too much, too soon? A critical investigation into factors that make Flipped Classrooms effective. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–15.

  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. D., & Schlairet, M. C. (2017). Moving toward heutagogical learning: Illuminating undergraduate nursing students’ experiences in a flipped classroom. Nurse Education Today, 49, 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gündüz, A. Y., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2019). Student views on the use of flipped learning in higher education: A pilot study. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2391–2401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09881-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y. (2016). Middle school students’ flipped learning readiness in foreign language classrooms: Exploring its relationship with personal characteristics and individual circumstances. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2016). Teaching in flipped classrooms: Exploring pre-service teachers’ concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 250–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, G. S. (1986). Computer anxiety and management use of microcomputers. Ann Arbor: UMI Research press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiajun, G., Islam, A. A., Teo, T., & Spector, J. M. (2019). Computer-enabled visual creativity: An empirically-based model with implications for learning and instruction. Instructional Science, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09487-0.

  • Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, M. B., Delcourt, M. A., & Powers, S. M. (1994). Computer technologies: Attitudes and self-efficacy across undergraduate disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 35(6), 745–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education (Vol. 41). New York: New York Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leso, T., & Peck, K. L. (1992). Computer anxiety and different types of computer courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(4), 469–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: Getting students to think in class. AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 399, no. 1, pp. 981-988). AIP.

  • Nwoke, M. B., Onuigbo, E. N., & Odo, V. O. (2017). Social support, self-efficacy and gender as predictors of reported stress among inpatient caregivers. The Social Science Journal, 54(2), 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooi, P. B., Jaafar, W. M. B. W., & Baba, M. B. (2018). Relationship between sources of counseling self-efficacy and counseling self-efficacy among Malaysian school counselors. The Social Science Journal, 55(3), 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers, S. F., Boars, M., Schaap, L., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J., & Van Gog, T. (2018). Training self-regulated learning skills with video modeling examples: Do task-selection skills transfer? Instructional Science, 46(2), 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students’ ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers & Education, 102, 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rui, Z., Lian-rui, X., Rong-zheng, Y., Jing, Z., Xue-hong, W., & Chuan, Z. (2017). Friend or foe? Flipped classroom for undergraduate electrocardiogram learning: A randomized controlled study. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saadé, R. G., & Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 8, 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 514–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, D., Shao, F., Wang, H., Yan, M., & Qu, X. (2019). Integrating usability and social cognitive theories with the technology acceptance model to understand young users’ acceptance of a health information portal. Health Informatics Journal, 1460458219879337.

  • Thai, T. N., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003.

  • Tsai, C. H. (2014). Integrating social capital theory, social cognitive theory, and the technology acceptance model to explore a behavioral model of telehealth systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(5), 4905–4925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. C. R., & Chen, Y. (2019). Implementing the flipped classroom approach in primary English classrooms in China. Education and Information Technologies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10039-9.

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, 60250, Tokat, Turkey

    Ibrahim Arpaci

  2. Department of Educational Sciences, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, 60250, Tokat, Turkey

    Gulsah Basol

Authors
  1. Ibrahim Arpaci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gulsah Basol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Arpaci.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arpaci, I., Basol, G. The impact of preservice teachers’ cognitive and technological perceptions on their continuous intention to use flipped classroom. Educ Inf Technol 25, 3503–3514 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10104-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10104-8

Keywords