Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effectiveness of using interactive white boards in improving the Arabic listening skills of undergraduates majoring in Arabic language at Kuwaiti universities

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sought to investigate the effectiveness of interactive whiteboards (IWB) on students’ Arabic listening skills at Kuwaiti universities during the second semester of the 2018/2019 academic year. A review of the literature indicates that interactive whiteboards support the language learning, as well as to improve students’ achievement listening skills and motivation in school. The study sample consisted of 60 male students who were equally divided into two groups: the experimental and control groups. Interactive whiteboards strategy was used to determine the effect of teaching method of Arabic listening skills on students’ outcomes. The pretest and posttest scores of both groups were analyzed statistically using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program. The finding of the study indicated significant differences between the groups at the α ≤ 0.05 level in favor of the experimental group. The results showed the following: (1) the use of the interactive white board strategy showed better improvement among the students than the use of the traditional method; (2) the effect size of using the interactive white smart boards was high, and(3) there were statistically significant differences between the mean posttest scores of the two groups in the Arabic listening skills in favor of the experimental group. Based on the findings of this study, the research indicates that (IWB) strategies can be used in teaching Arabic listening skills because of their positive effect on student achievement scores. The study concludes with recommendations for future research in different contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdalbari, M. (2011). Active oral skills. Amman: Dar Al-Masirah for Distribution and Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu Rizq, I. (2012). The impact of using the smart Board Technology in Providing the training teachers the skill of planning in teaching the Arabic language and their attitudes towards it as an instructional tool. International Journal of Instructional Research, United Arab Emirates University, 2, 153–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aktas, S., & Aydin, A. (2016). The effect of the smart board usage in science and technology lessons. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 64, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.64.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Sharawi, M.. (2013a). Companions and righteous people. Alnour Library, Egypt.

  • Al Sharawi, M. (2013b). Companions and Righteous People. The Harmonic Library, Egypt.

  • Alajmi, Bibi & Aldhafeeri, Fayiz (2015). Use and Reluctance: A Study of Faculty Reactions to The Use Of eLearning Systems at Kuwait University. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on knowledge and management. ICKM, At Osaka, Japan. Available at:www.researchgate.net/publication/285592473_Use_and_Reluctance_A_Study_of_Faculty_Reactions_To_The_Use_Of_eLearning_Systems_At_Kuwait_University.

  • Alfahadi, A. M. (2015). The effectiveness of using smart Board Technology in Teaching English as a foreign language to preparatory year students at Tabuk University. Education journal, 4(6), 332–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfelaij, B. (2016). Why integrating technology has been unsuccessful in Kuwait? An exploratory study. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(3–4), 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhajya, M., Sumaia S. and Arourim, M. (2018). The impact of virtual trips on the development of Arabic language oral skills among third grad students in Jordan. Journal of Technology and Science Education. 8(1).

  • Alhumsi, M. & Shabdin, A.. (2016). The Feasibility of Incorporating the Interactive Whiteboard in EFL Primary Classrooms. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies. 2(2).

  • Almajali, H. K., Al Abdallat, S., & Shamayleh, N. (2016). The effectiveness of using smart board for teaching social studies at public schools in Jordan. Global Journal of Educational Foundation, 4(1), 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • AL-Masoud, F.A. (2016) The attitudes of Kuwait University faculty members and undergraduate students toward the use of distance education. Ph.D. thesis, Saint Louis University. Retrieved January 26, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/121097/.

  • Al-Muhirat, N. (2016). The importance of using smart boards in teaching Arabic for secondary stage students from teachers and students’ point of view in Amman (published MA thesis). The Middle East University. Amman. Jordan.

  • Al-Saleem, B. I. A. (2013). The interactive whiteboard in English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom. European Scientific Journal, 8(3), 126–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Wattar, N., & Al-Balhan, E. (2018). The Effectiveness of the E-mind Mapping Strategy for Sixth-Grade Students’ Achievement Level in Learning Arabic Vocabulary in Kuwait. Journal of the New Educational Review, 53(3), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, D. (2011). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change. Information Technology in Education Journal. 15–18.

  • Baker, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with IWBs. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.

  • Balta, N., & Duran, M. (2015). Attitudes of students and teachers towards the use of interactive whiteboards in elementary and secondary school classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology–TOJET, 14(2), 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2008). A study of teachers' integration of interactive whiteboards into four Australian primary school classrooms. Learning, Media, & Technology, 33(4), 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingimlas, K. (2015). The use of smart boards in enhancing learning and teaching in high education. In S. Carliner, C. Fulford & N. Ostashewski (Eds.), proceedings of EdMedia 2015--world conference on educational media and technology (pp. 598-602). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE). Retrieved July 28, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/151486/.

  • Bosamia, Mansi. (2013). Positive and negative impacts of information and communication technology in our everyday life. Conference Paper. available at : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325570282

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutrim Schmid, E., & Whyte, S. (Eds.). (2014). Teaching languages with technology:Communicative approaches to interactive whiteboard use. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlan. (2014). The effect of using the interactive whiteboard in the academic achievement and the continuous learning impact for the students of the seventh grade students in the Arabic language and their attitudes towards it. Al-Manara Journal, 20(2), 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dori, S., & Kurtz, G. (2015). Student’s perceptions meaningful learning via ICT. Paper presented at the 2015 Chais annual meeting, Open University, Raanana.

  • Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Sciences, 1(2), 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, K., Mehboob, P. and Safia, N. (2013) EDUCATION: A change agent to transform the society: Asian. Journal of Social Science & Humanities. Vol, 2(4).

  • Hamadneh, Q., Abu Ghazal, A. (2016). The Trends of the Male and Female Teachers of the BasicStages Towards Using the Smart Board in Bani Kinanah . Directorate of Education. Vol.7, (33).

  • Hassankiadeh, M. G., & Hassankiadeh, S. G. (2013). Smart boards in language classes. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1(4–1), 48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishtaiwa, F.F. & Shana, Z. (2011). The use of interactive whiteboard (IWB) by pre-service teachers to enhance Arabic language teaching and learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 8(2).

  • Jelyani, S. Janfaza, A. Soori A. (2014). Integration of Smart Boards in EFL Classrooms. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies Vol. 2(2).

  • Karsenti, T. (2016). The interactive whiteboard (IWB): Uses, benefits’, and challenges. A survey of 11,683 students and 1,131 teachers. Retrieved January 26, 2019 from http://iwb.crifpe.ca/files/Rapport.pdf.

  • Kırbas, A. (2018). The Effect of Interactive Whiteboard Applications Supported by Visual Materials on Middle School Students' Listening Comprehension and Persistence of Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(n11), 2552–2561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, L. (2009). Reader response meets new literacies: Empowering readers in online learning communities. Reading Teacher, 62(8), 638–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozhgan, A., Ghaffarzadeh, H., & Seyed, H. (2013). Smart boards in language classes. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1(4–1), 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhanna, W. (2013). Attitudes of mathematics teachers toward using a smart board in teaching mathematics. Contemporary Issues In Education Research, 6 (4).

  • Renukadevi, D. (2014). The role of listening in language acquisition; the challenges & strategies in teaching listening. International Journal of Education and Information Studies., 4(1), 59–63.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sadiku, L.M. (2015). The Importance of Four Skills Reading, Speaking, Writing, Listening in a Lesson Hour. European Journal of Language and Literature Studies. 1, Nr. 1.

  • Schmid, E. C. (2010). Developing competencies for using the interactive whiteboard to implement communicative language teaching in the English as a foreign language classroom, technology. Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 159–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoaib, H. (2015). The teacher's guidance in the teaching methods of Arabic language in the primary, intermediate, and secondary levels. Beirut: Scientific Books House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türel, Y. K. (2017). Teaching Turkish as a foreign language with interactive whiteboards: A case study of multilingual learners. Journal of technology knowledge and learning, 24(1), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yáñez, L., & Coyle, Y. (2011). Children’s perceptions of learning with an interactive whiteboard. ELT Journal, 65(4), 446–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoestara, Marisa. (2018). An alternative way to improve EFL students’ listening and speaking performance. Journal of Language Education and Humanities. (6)1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad D. Aldhafiri.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aldhafiri, M.D. The effectiveness of using interactive white boards in improving the Arabic listening skills of undergraduates majoring in Arabic language at Kuwaiti universities. Educ Inf Technol 25, 3577–3591 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10107-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10107-5

Keywords

Navigation