Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Application of social network in traditional sciences education on the vocabulary acquisition of secondary English learner students

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning vocabulary is probably the most challenging and time-consuming part of learning a foreign language. Researchers argue that social media could affect learners’ vocabulary acquisition. It is hypothesized that teaching science concepts could accompany vocabulary acquisition. We investigated the possible role of social networks (i.e. Telegram) in the improvement of vocabulary knowledge among undergraduate students from the Iranian University of Medical Sciences during September and October 2017. We conducted a quasi-experimental controlled before-after study and allocated female students to intervention and comparison groups at their academic major level (32 public health students as intervention, vs. 29 subject from nutritional sciences as a comparison). The intervention and comparison groups attended 6 lectures. The learners in the intervention group received additional video and text material through Telegram on a weekly basis and we had an open discussion regarding the important word and concepts. Students in both conditions were given a pretest at the beginning and a posttest at the end to measure growth in vocabulary acquisition. We used a linear regression model, adjusted for concept score, pre-test vocabulary score, lecture attended, education and marital status with pretest scores serving as a covariate. We have investigated 61 subjects, where, 32 participated in the Telegram group discussion related to the science concept. Six standard educational videos delivered through a filmed lecture distributed among the intervention group, each of which was approximately 500 words (ranging from 450 to 707) long. We have observed significant improvement in the vocabulary score of participant in intervention (before = 34.37 vs after = 46.03) and comparison groups (before = 32.79 vs after = 36.31). However, the intervention group significantly outperformed the comparison group, P < 0.05). the current study showed that online collaborative learning (i.e. using Telegram), as an assistance tool in education, can increase the communication between teaching faculty and students in such a way that resulted in significant improvement in the vocabulary score of SLL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Tier two consists of high frequency words that occur across a variety of domains

References

  • Anaraki, F. B. (2008). Development of a flash-based mobile learning system for English as second language.

  • Anaraki, F. B. (2009). A Flash-Based Mobile Learning System for Learning English as Second Language. Paper presented at the 2009 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology.

  • August, D., Shanahan, T., & Escamilla, K. (2009). English language learners: Developing literacy in second-language learners—Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Journal of Literacy Research, 41(4), 432–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • August, D., Artzi, L., & Mazrum, J. (2010). Improving science and vocabulary learning of English language learners. CREATE Brief. Center for Research on the Educational Achievement and Teaching of English Language Learners.

  • Baker, C. (1992). Attitudes and Language Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

  • Bensalem, E., & Al-Zubaidi, K. (2018). The Impact of WhatsApp on EFL Students' Vocabulary Learning. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 9. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3150707 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3150707

  • Brown, C. J., & Zimmermann, J. N. (2001). Apparatus and method for interactive adaptive learning by an individual through at least one of a stimuli presentation device and a user perceivable display. In: Google Patents.

  • Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., ... White, C. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.2.3.

  • Cohavi, A. (2013). How did Whatsapp became the strongest social network? Calcalist. Retrieved from http://www.calcalist.co.il/local/articles/0,7340,L-3593840,00.html

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, V. P. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 617–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cziko, G. A. (1978). Differences in first-and second-language Reading: The use of syntactic, semantic and discourse constraints. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 34(3), 473–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, B., & Grisham, D. L. (2011). eVoc strategies: 10 ways to use technology to build vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 64(5), 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehghan, F., Rezvani, R., & Fazeli, S. (2017). Social networks and their effectiveness in learning foreign language vocabulary: A comparative study using WhatsApp. CALL-EJ, 18(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria, J., & Vogt, M. (2010). Using the SIOP model to improve literacy for English learners. New England Reading Association Journal, 46(1), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elley, W. B. (1991). Acquiring literacy in a second language: The effect of book-based programs. Language Learning, 41(3), 375–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2007). Educational settings and second language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, L. (1991). Second-language learning in children: A model of language learning in social context. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language Processing in Bilingual Children (pp. 49-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620652.005

  • Flynt, E. S., & Brozo, W. G. (2008). Developing academic language: Got words? The Reading Teacher, 61(6), 500–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, G. E. (1991). Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanish-speaking Hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 371–392.

  • George, B. H., & Walker, A. (2017). Social learning in a distributed environment: Lessons learned from online design education. In M. Orey & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 40, pp. 53–66). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaemi, F., & Golshan, N. S. (2017). The impact of telegram as a social network on teaching English vocabulary among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences, 2(5), 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemifardnia, A., Namaziandost, E., & Esfahani, F. R. (2018). The effect of using WhatsApp on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(3), 256–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: A review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ineke, V., Folkert, K., & Marije, M. (2019). Linguistic complexity and instruction in second language acquisition. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.39602.

  • Kachinske, I., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). The interaction between timing of explicit grammar explanation and individual differences in second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(2), 197–232. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19003.kac.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (2008). Language education: Past, present and future. RELC Journal, 39(2), 178–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students' reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57(1), 87–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N., Ranta, L., & Rand, J. (1999). How languages are learned (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marulis, L. M., & Neuman, S. B. (2010). The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children’s word learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 300–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S. J. (2017). Essential Words for the TOEFL. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching, 13(3–4), 221–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motallebzadeh, K., & Samadi, F. (2017, 2017). The effect of using online collaborative tasks on incidental vocabulary learning of impulsive vs. reflective Iranian EFL learners., 6(6), 7. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.6p.127.

  • Nagy, W. E. (1995). On the role of context in first-and second-language vocabulary learning. Retrieved from

  • Nation, I. S. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language Google eBook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norbrook, H., & Scott, P. (2003). Motivation in mobile modern foreign language learning. Paper presented at the MLEARN.

  • Paquette, K. R., & Rieg, S. A. (2008). Using music to support the literacy development of young English language learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(3), 227–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piskorski, M. J. (2011). Social strategies that work. Harvard Business Review, 89(11), 116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qarajeh, M., & Abdolmanafi-Rokni, S. J. (2015). The impact of social networking on the oral performance of EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambe, P. (2011). Exploring the impacts of social networking sites on academic relations in the university. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 10(1), 271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. The handbook of research synthesis, 231–244.

  • Rupley, W. H., & Slough, S. (2010). Building prior knowledge and vocabulary in science in the intermediate grades: Creating hooks for learning. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(2), 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saragi, T., Nation, I. S. P., & Meister, G. F. (1978). Vocabulary learning and reading. System, 6(2), 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, W. M., O’Brien, G., Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., & Christian, D. (2006). Oral language. Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence, New York, Cambridge University Press, 14–63.

  • Saunders, W., Goldenberg, C., & Marcelletti, D. (2013). English language development: Guidelines for instruction. American Educator, 37(2), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning1. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehley, S., & Snow, C. (1992). The conversational skills of school-aged children. Social Development, 1(1), 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shefelbine, J. L. (1990). Student factors related to variability in learning word meanings from context. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(1), 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056001072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)–a literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60–A68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivienne, W. (2016). With Telegram, A Reclusive Social Media Star Rises Again. Fortune. Archived from the original on February 24, 2016.

  • Warschauer, M. (1995). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 7–26.

  • Weng, M. (2010). The effect of vocabulary learning strategy instruction on vocational senior high school EFL students’ vocabulary acquisition and retention. Unpublished Master’s thesis). National Cheng Kung University.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Current study was parts of a research project titled “Evaluating the effectiveness of social network on public health and epidemiology concept and vocabulary acquisition among Public Health and Nutritional Sciences in Ahvaz Jundishapur University”. We acknowledge the students participated in this study. The study approved by the Ethical Committee, Deputy of Research and Development, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR.AJUMS.REC.1396.921).

Funding

The study supported by grants from Educational Development Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (U-96151), and National Center for Strategic Research in Medical Education (960549).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran

    Hossein Saadabadi Motlagh

  2. Department of English, Modern College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India

    Halimeh Khafaie

  3. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

    Ali Asghar Arastoo, Maria Cheraghi & Morteza Abdullatif Khafaie

  4. Educational Development Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Golestan St., Ahvaz, Khuzestan, 15794-61357, Iran

    Morteza Abdullatif Khafaie

Authors
  1. Hossein Saadabadi Motlagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Halimeh Khafaie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Asghar Arastoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria Cheraghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Morteza Abdullatif Khafaie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.K, H.S.M and M.A.K., researched, wrote, discussed and edited the manuscript. A.A.A and M.C contributed to the discussion and edited the manuscript. M.A.K is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morteza Abdullatif Khafaie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author(s) declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Motlagh, H.S., Khafaie, H., Arastoo, A.A. et al. Application of social network in traditional sciences education on the vocabulary acquisition of secondary English learner students. Educ Inf Technol 25, 3071–3085 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10108-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10108-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation