Abstract
Google Classroom (GC) has provided affordances for blended learning in higher education. Given this, most institutions, including Malaysian higher educational institutions, are adopting this learning management system (LMS) technology for supporting out of classroom pedagogical. Even though quantitative evidence exists to confirm the usefulness of GC usage, there is the need to also have qualitative narratives from students and instructors to obtain details on actual experiences. In view of this, the study attempted to fill this gap by way of a qualitative approach with data collected from seventeen students and three instructors from a Malaysian higher education institution. The study revealed usefulness and easiness were the main factors influencing the use of GC from both perspectives. However, concerns raised by students were based on privacy issues, peer interaction, and interface design, whereas instructors, while supported some of these concerns, added challenges in access to GC learning analytics and cloud storage. Recommendations from this study may offer some implications for the adaptation of GC in higher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abazi-Bexheti, L., Kadriu, A., Apostolova-Trpkovska, M., Jajaga, E., & Abazi-Alili, H. (2018). LMS solution: Evidence of Google classroom usage in higher education. Business Systems Research, 9(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2018-0003.
Al-Maroof, R. A. S., & Al-Emran, M. (2018). Students acceptance of Google classroom: An exploratory study using PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 13(06), 112. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i06.8275.
Apriyanti, D., Syarif, H., Ramadhan, S., Zaim, M., & Agustina, A. (2019). Technology-based Google classroom in English business writing class. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2018) (Vol. 301, pp. 689–694). Paris, France: Atlantis press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icla-18.2019.113.
Awang, H., Osman, W. R. S., & Aji, Z. M. (2018). A conceptual model to evaluate virtual learning environment among malaysian teachers. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 10(2–4), 59–63.
Bahsh, R. El, & Daoud, M. I. (2016). Evaluating the use of Moodle to achieve effective and interactive learning : A case study at the German Jordanian University. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on open source software computing (OSSCOM 2016). (pp. 16–20). Beirut, Lebanon: IEEE.
Baragash, R. S., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Blended learning: Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.010.
Bayarmaa, N., & Lee, K. (2018). A study on the application of Google classroom for problem based learning. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 19(7), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.7.81.
Bervell, B., & Umar, I. N. (2017). A decade of LMS acceptance and adoption research in sub-Sahara African higher education: A systematic review of models, methodologies, milestones and main challenges. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(11), 7269–7286. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79444.
Bhat, S., Raju, R., Bikramjit, A., & Souza, R. D. (2018). Leveraging e-learning through Google classroom: A usability study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(3), 1–7.
Brown, M. C. (2018). Google classroom for the online classroom: An assessment. Distance Learning, 15(3), 51–56.
Budu, J. (2018). What makes learners share feedback or not in an online community for education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 14(2), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2018040104.
Cigdem, H., & Ozturk, M. (2016). Factors affecting students’ behavioral intention to use LMS at a Turkish post-secondary vocational school. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2253.
Clarkson, J. J., Janiszewski, C., Cinelli, M. D., & Cinelli, M. D. (2013). The desire for consumption knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1313–1329. https://doi.org/10.1086/668535.
Dash, S. (2019). Google classroom as a learning management system to teach biochemistry in a medical school. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(4), 404–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21246.
de Campos Filho, A. S., de Souza Fantini, W., Ciriaco, M. A., dos Santos, J., Moreira, F., & Gomes, A. S. (2019). Health student using Google classroom: Satisfaction analysis. In L. Uden, D. Liberona, G. Sanchez, & S. Rodríguez-González (Eds.), Learning Technology for Education Challenges (LTEC 2019): Communications in Computer and Information Science (pp. 58–66). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_6.
Fisher, R. L., LaFerriere, R., & Rixon, A. (2019). Flipped learning: An effective pedagogy with an Achilles’ heel. Inovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1635904.
Heggart, K., & Yoo, J. (2018). Getting the most from Google classroom: A pedagogical framework for tertiary educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.9.
Hillman, S., Hillman, A., Neustaedter, C., & Pang, C. (2019). “I have a life”: Teacher communication & management outside the classroom. In 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI EA ‘19 (pp. 1–6). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312943.
Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: What works and how?. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(1), 12–18.
Izenstark, A., & Leahy, K. L. (2015). Google classroom for librarians: Features and opportunities. Library Hi Tech News, 32(9), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-05-2015-0039.
Jakkaew, P., & Hemrungrote, S. (2017). The use of UTAUT2 model for understanding student perceptions using Google classroom: A case study of introduction to information technology course. In Proceedings of 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAMT.2017.7904962.
Japar, M., Fadhillah, D. N., & Syarifa, S. (2019). Civic education through e-learning in higher education. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 335(ICESSHum), 505–511.
Jordan, M. M., & Duckett, N. D. (2018). Universities confront ‘tech disruption’: Perceptions of student engagement online using two learning management systems. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 10(1).
Joy, R., & Ventayen, M. (2018). Usability evaluation of Google classroom: Basis for the adaptation of GSuite e-learning platform. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 5(1), 47–51.
Kasuma, S. A. A., Saleh, M. S. M., Akhiar, A., & Ismail, Y. M. B. (2018). Malaysian university students’ preferences of social media and LMS in academia. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 8(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.2018010104.
Kumar, J. A., & Bervell, B. (2019). Google classroom for mobile learning in higher education: Modelling the initial perceptions of students. Education and Information Technologies., 24, 1793–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-09858-z.
MacLeod, J., Yang, H. H., & Shi, Y. (2019). Student-to-student connectedness in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(2), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09214-1.
Madhavi, B. K., & Mohan, V. (2018). Improving attainment of graduate attributes using Google classroom. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(3), 1–6.
Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., & Williams, P. (2011). Google generation II : Web behaviour experiments with the BBC. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 63(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111103768.
Olivier, J. (2016). Blended learning in a first-year language class: Evaluating the acceptance of an interactive learning environment. Literator - Journal of Literary Criticism, Comparative Linguistics and Literary Studies, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v37i2.1288.
Parodi, G., Moreno-de-león, T., Julio, C., & Burdiles, G. (2019). Google or Gutenberg generation: Chilean university students’ reading habits and reading purposes (pp. 85–94). XXVII: Comunicar. https://doi.org/10.3916/C58-2019-08.
Pheeney, C. E. (2019). Harnessing digital tools in collaborative inquiry for contemporary interpretation of the Pancasila. In Proceedings of the 5th international ACM in-cooperation HCI and UX conference on - CHIuXiD’19 (pp. 128–136). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328243.3328259.
Rahim, Y. A., Mohd, O., Sahari, M. A., Safie, N., & Rahim, Z. B. A. (2018). A study on the effects of learning material handling procedures towards information integrity in Moodle learning management system ( LMS ). In 2nd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI 2018) (pp. 81–85). Batam - Indonesia.
Rahmad, R., Adria Wirda, M., Berutu, N., Lumbantoruan, W., & Sintong, M. (2019). Google classroom implementation in Indonesian higher education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012153.
Rajaendram, R. (2019 29). Google classroom gets nod. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/06/29/google-classroom-gets-nod
Rejón-Guardia, F., Polo-Peña, A. I., & Maraver-Tarifa, G. (2019). The acceptance of a personal learning environment based on Google apps: The role of subjective norms and social image. Journal of Computing in Higher Education., 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09206-1.
Subandi, S., Choirudin, C., Mahmudi, M., Nizaruddin, N., & Hermanita, H. (2018). Building interactive communication with Google classroom. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.13), 460. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.13.18141.
Sudarsana, I. K., Putra, I. B. M. A., Astawa, I. N. T., & Yogantara, I. W. L. (2019). The use of Google classroom in the learning process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012165.
Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75(November 2017), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.002.
Ventayen, R. J. M., Estira, K. L. A., De Guzman, M. J., Cabaluna, C. M., & Espinosa, N. N. (2018). Usability evaluation of Google classroom: Basis for the adaptation of GSuite e-learning platform. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 5(51), 47–51.
Walker, S., & Prytherch, D. (2008). How is it for you? (a case for recognising user motivation in the design process). In C. Peter & R. Beale (Eds.), Affect and emotion in human-computer interaction from theory to applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Washington, G. Y. (2019). The learning management system matters in face-to-face higher education courses. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519874037.
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge and thank personals for their efforts in data collection.
Availability of data and material
This work contains confidential data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, J.A., Bervell, B. & Osman, S. Google classroom: insights from Malaysian higher education students’ and instructors’ experiences. Educ Inf Technol 25, 4175–4195 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10163-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10163-x