Abstract
The study was aimed at identifying the potentials of and barriers to the Smart School Project (SSP). Through the use of a mixed methods design, data were garnered from 746 school teachers, principals, and information technology experts, semi-structured interviews with 21 key informants and two researcher-designed questionnaires on the potentials of and barriers to SSP. The qualitative data were analyzed using three-stage coding and quantitative data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis. The findings from the three data collection tools indicate 8 potentials and 9 barriers. SSP potentials include improving teachers’, principals’, and students’ knowledge, skills and attitudes toward using information and communication technology (ICT), access to quality e-content, increasing school facilities, potentials available in the social environment, developing curriculum beyond schools, student participation in the learning process, enhancing school and parent relationship, and social supports and enacted laws. Further, SSP development barriers are comprised of 9 themes including teachers’, principals’ and students’ lack of access to ICT and using it, vagueness in policies, missions, and goals of ICT integration into school curriculum, lack of support system and supervision, lack of specialized training for principals and teachers, barriers concerned with the nature of ICT, incompatibility of curriculum structure with ICT, structural and organizational barriers, cultural conditions and barriers, and lack of space and equipment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Admiraal, W., van Vugt, F., Kranenburg, F., Koster, B., Smit, B., Weijers, S., & Lockhorst, D. (2017). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology into K–12 instruction: evaluation of a technology-infused approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2016.1163283.
Ali, W. W., Nor, H. M., Hamzah, A., & Alwi, N. (2009). The conditions and level of ICT integration in Malaysian Smart Schools. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 5(2), 21–31 https://www.learntechlib.org/p/42320/.
Baek, Y., Jung, J., & Kim, B. (2008). What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 50(1), 224–234 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1296509.
Barbour, M. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature (2009). Computers in Education, 52(2), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.009.
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 209, 240.
Eshkali, M. (2018). The individual and social barriers to school smartization from the viewpoint of secondary school teachers in District Two of Bandar Abbas. Master's Thesis, Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Bandar lengeh Branch.
Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.057.
Goldhammer, F., Gniewosz, G., & Zylka, J. (2016). ICT engagement in learning environments. In Assessing Contexts of Learning (pp. 331–351). Springer, Cham.
Gülbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49(4), 943–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.002.
Hamzah, M. I., Embi, M. A., & Ismail, A. (2010). ICT and diversity in learners’ attitude on smart school initiative. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 728–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.099.
Huang, R., & Price, J. K. (2016). ICT in education in global context. Editors, R. Huang, BN University, Beijing, China, Kinshuk, & Athabasca, Eds.). Albuquerque: Springer, 10, 978–3.
Lim, C. P. (2007). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: pedagogical and policy implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 83–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9025-2.
Mee, A. (2007). E-learning funding for schools: a policy paradox? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00596.x.
Minstry of Education. (2011). Guideline for Smart School Projct. Tehran: Centerfor Statictic and ICT.
Mohajeran, B., Ghaleei, A., & Hamzehrobati, M. (2013). The Main Reasons for the Lack of Correct Formation of the Smart Schools and Presenting Solutions for Developing Them in Mazandaran province. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences (IJVLMS), 4(2), 13–23 http://ijvlms.com/en/articles/58958.html.
Sanchez, J., & Salinas, A. (2008). ICT & learning in Chilean schools: Lessons learned. Computers & Education, 51, 1621–1633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.04.001.
Seraji, F., & Attaran, M. (2011). E-learning: Principles, implementation design and evaluation. Hamedan: Bu - Ali Sina University and Iranian Curriculum Studies Association.
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007.
Shafiepoor Mothlagh, F., & Yarmohammadian, M. H. (2013). Designing a Model for Examining the Factors influencing the Perceived Efficiency Relationship between Student-Teacher in Smart Schools. Research in Curriculum Planning, 10(36), 16–26 http://jsr-e.khuisf.ac.ir/article_534264_en.html.
Sivagami, A., & Samundeeswari, R. (2015). A Study on use of information communication technology in higher education in Thanjavur district. International Journal of Management (IJM), 6(1), 418–426 Retrieved from https://www.iaeme.com.
Tabari, M. (2013). Investigating the barriers and problems of smartization of educational complexes of Tehran’s Education Department from the perspectives of male principals and teachers. Master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch.
Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., van Braak, J., Fraeyman, N., & Erstad, O. (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12380.
Wu, D., Yu, X., Rao, J., & Yu, L. (2016). Comparative study on the status and strategies of infrastructure construction of ICT in education between China and the United States. In ICT in Education in Global Context (pp. 95–106). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Zaini, M., Atan, A., & Idrus, R. M. (2004). The ICT Implementation in the Management of Smart Schools: A Study of Success factor. Journal of Educational Research (Malaysia), 6, 93–102.
Zamani, E., Ghasabpour, B., & Jebel Ameli, J. (2010). Investigating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of smart schools. Journal of Educational Innovation, 36, 100–179.
Zamani, E., Ghasempour, A., Homaei, R., & Mousavi, S. (2016). Investigating the opportunities and threats, strengths and weaknesses of using smart innovations (case study: Isfahan high school teachers). Research in Curriculum Planning, 13(49), 84–98 http://jsr-e.khuisf.ac.ir/article_534435.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seraji, F., Kasani, H.A., Abedi, H. et al. Smart school project in Iran: Potentials and barriers. Educ Inf Technol 25, 4211–4230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10173-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10173-9