Abstract
Nowadays robotics is one of promising avenues in the sphere of emerging technologies. In the teaching/learning environment we deal with educational robotics, which is a mixture of theory and practice, knowledge of computer technology, Mathematics and Physics. The two vectors are combined in educational robotics: the educational vector and the technological vector. As an academic discipline and an area of practical application, Robotics means a very broad spectrum of modern knowledge of diverse academic engineering specialties (fields of expertise). That means that Robotics is interdisciplinary in nature. The work provides an overview of the research aimed at studying Robot – Man interaction. Besides, the work considers some promising international cooperation between children from around the world on the development of robotics, and the experience and benefits gained from such cooperation. As an example of the international cooperation in the sphere of Robotics, the two countries, Russia and Kazakhstan, are considered. The article gives an example of the international cooperation of some educational centers, describes the experience of the work on robotics with children of various ages, and the cooperation of various schools working in this field in Kazakhstan and Russia. The working experience in the sphere of social robotics aimed at helping people has become a priority for the children from the interdisciplinary teams from Russia and Kazakhstan. Interaction and cooperation in the sphere of robotics was also used for introducing unconventional curricula, which included courses on robotic technologies as tools for considering social aspects of robotics and artificial intelligence.









Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Afari, E., & Khine, M. S. (2017). Robotics as an educational tool: Impact of lego mindstorms. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(6), 437–442.
Ahlgren, D. J., & Verner, I. M. (2013). Socially responsible engineering education through assistive robotics projects: The robowaiter competition. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0137-4.
Armesto, L., Fuentes-Durá, P., & Perry, D. (2016). Low-cost printable robots in education. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 81(1), 5–24.
Badeleh, A. (2019). The effects of robotics training on students’ creativity and learning in physics. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09972-6.
Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Salvini, P., Valente, M., Buselli, E., Menichetti, L., Calvani, A., & Dario, P. (2018). Design and impact of a teacher training course, and attitude change concerning educational robotics. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(5), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0475-6.
Clark, V. L. P., & Creswell, J. W. (2008). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dillenbourg, P. (2016). The Evolution of Research on Digital Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0106-z.
Fabregas, E., Farias, G., Dormido-Canto, S., Guinaldo, M., Sánchez, J., & Bencomo, S. D. (2016). Platform for teaching mobile robotics. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 81(1), 131–143.
Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manuylov G.M. (2002). Socio-psychological diagnosis of the development of personality and small groups. Publishing House of the Institute of Psychotherapy, − 490 p. (p. 107).
Filippov, S., Ten, N., Fradkov, A., & Shirokolobov, I. (2017, April). Robotics education in Saint Petersburg secondary school. In International Conference on Robotics and Education RiE 2017 (pp. 38-49). Springer, Cham.
Gomoll, A., Šabanović, S., Tolar, E., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Francisco, M., & Lawlor, O. (2018). Between the social and the technical: Negotiation of human-centered robotics design in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0454-3.
Ioannou, A., & Makridou, E. (2018a). Exploring the potentials of educational robotics in the development of computational thinking: A summary of current research and practical proposal for future work. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2531–2544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9729-z.
Ioannou, A., & Makridou, E. (2018b). Exploring the potentials of educational robotics in the development of computational thinking: A summary of current research and practical proposal for future work. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2531–2544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9729-z.
Jones, A., & Castellano, G. (2018). Adaptive robotic tutors that support self-regulated learning: A longer-term investigation with primary school children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0458-z.
Kerimbayev, N. (2016). Virtual learning: Possibilities and realization. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1521–1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9397-1.
Kerimbayev, N., Nurym, N., Akramova, А., & Abdykarimova, S. (2020). Virtual educational environment: Interactive communication using LMS Moodle. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 1965–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10067-5.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning (256 pages). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Kopcha, T. J., McGregor, J., Shin, S., Qian, Y., Choi, J., Hill, R., Mativo, J., & Choi, I. (2017). Developing an integrative STEM curriculum for robotics education through educational design research. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1(1), 31–44.
Kuckartz, U. (2014). Mixed methods. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Miller, D. P., Nourbakhsh, I. R., & Siegwart, R. (2008). Robots for education. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Springer handbook of robotics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Petre, M., & Price, B. (2004). Using Robotics to Motivate ‘Back Door’ Learning. Education and Information Technologies, 9, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000027927.78380.60.
Rihtaršič, D., Avsec, S., & Kocijancic, S. (2016). Experiential learning of electronics subject matter in middle school robotics courses. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 205–224.
Stone, A., & Farkhatdinov, I. (2017). Robotics education for children at secondary school level and above. In Annual Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems (pp. 576–585). Springer, Cham.
Wang, W., & Huang, X. D. (2019). Virtual plate based controlling strategy of toy play for robot’s communication development in JA space. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 16(1), 93–101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kerimbayev, N., Beisov, N., Kovtun, А. et al. Robotics in the international educational space: Integration and the experience. Educ Inf Technol 25, 5835–5851 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10257-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10257-6