Abstract
Electronic culture constitutes a new form of social adjustment in the digital era. Our study aims to reveal socio-cultural differentiation in the social group of Russian students whose e-culture is being shaped. Moscow students became our test group. To achieve the research aim we analyzed the concept of “e-culture” focusing on its theoretical and methodological interpretations. The paper provides an overview of current approaches to understanding electronic culture, namely competence- and activity-based approaches, axiological and institutional ones. Cultural studies of classical sociology served as theoretical and methodological basis for our applied research. Sociological approach enables to reveal the position of e-culture in modern society and detect its differentiating action on everyday practices and value system of distinct social groups. Thus, we suggest that we should extend our applied sociological study of students’ e-culture by using a significant indicator, i.e. reflective-axiological attitude towards electronic technologies. We surveyed students of Russian universities and can now conclude that students from different test groups shape their e-culture at their own pace. Reflective-axiological attitude to ICT exerts a significant impact on e-culture formation; due to operational thinking technical students shape their critical reflective attitudes faster than non-technical ones. Most young adults today are common users, which suggests low demand for ICT in educational and professional areas where young people are actively involved. Youth socialization employs traditional forms of information culture, for example, book culture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Akçayır, M., Dündar, H., & Akçayır, G. (2016). What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980? Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.089.
Alekseev, A. Y. (2017). “Third way” to electronic culture [“Tretii put'” k elektronnoi kul’ture]. Philosophical Sciences, 2, 65–71 (In Russian).
Ayala-Perez, T., & Joo-Nagata, J. (2019). The digital culture of students of pedagogy specializing in the humanities in Santiago de Chile. Computers & Education, 133, 1–12.
Baeva, L. V. (2012). Socio-cultural transformations in the context of technological advancements [Sotsiokul'turnye izmeneniia v usloviiakh razvitiia vysokikh tekhnologii]. Innovation theory and expert study, 2(9), 110–118 (In Russian).
Baker, W. M., Lusk, E. J., & Neuhauser, K. L. (2012). On the use of cell phones and other electronic devices in the classroom: Evidence from a survey of faculty and students. Journal of Education for Business, 87(5), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.622814.
Barbuti, N. (2018). From digital cultural heritage to digital culture: Evolution in digital humanities DTUC ‘18. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Digital Tools & Uses Congress, 21, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240117.3240142.
Baron, N. S., & Ylva, H. S. (2010). Cross-cultural patterns in mobile-phone use: Public space and reachability in Sweden, the USA and Japan. New Media & Society, 12(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809355111.
Bollier, D. (1994). The future of community and personal identity in the coming electronic culture. A Report of the Annual Aspen Institute Roundtable on Information Technology (3rd, Aspen, Colorado, August 18–21, 1994). Aspen Inst., Queenstown, MD, 57.
Borda, A., & Bowen, J. P. (2019). Smart сities and digital culture: Models of innovation. In T. Giannini & J. Bowen (Eds.), Museums and digital culture. Springer series on cultural computing (pp. 523–549). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97457-6_27.
Burroughs, B. (2018). House of Netflix: Streaming media and digital lore. Popular communication. The International Journal of Media and Culture., 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2017.1343948.
Cassidys, W., Jackson, M., & Brown, K. N. (2009). Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? Students’ Experiences with Cyber-Bullying School Psychology International, 30(4), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034309106948.
Diehl, W. C., & Prins, E. (2008). Unintended outcomes in second life. Intercultural Literacy and Cultural Identity in a Virtual World, Language and Intercultural Communication, 8(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470802139619.
Douglas, A. C., Mills, J. E., Niang, M., Stepchenkova, S., Byun, S., Ruffini, C., Lee, S. K., Loutfi, J., Lee, J.-K., Atallah, M., & Blanton, M. (2008). Internet addiction: Meta-synthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996-2006. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 3027–3044.
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2009). Movement societies and digital protest: Fan activism and other nonpolitical protest. Online Sociological Theory, 27(3), 220–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01346.x.
Ferreira, С. (2019). Sociology and digital culture. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v7i3.4221.
Guo, R., Dobson, T., & Petrina, S. (2008). Digital natives, digital immigrants: An analysis of age and ICT competency in teacher education. Educational computing research, 38(3), 235–254.
Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113.
Hobbs, R. (2013). Improvisation and strategic risk-taking in informal learning with digital media literacy. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.756517.
Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2823–2837.
Kalimullin, D. D. (2014). Electronic culture as component of information culture of the personality [Elektronnaia kul'tura kak komponent informatsionnoi kul’tury lichnosti]. Herald of Kazan State University of Culture and Arts, 3, 27–32 (In Russian).
Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: Exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332–343.
Kim, S. J., Park, D.-H., Ryu, S.-H., Yu, J., & Ha, J. H. (2013). Usefulness of Young's internet addiction test for clinical populations. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 67(6), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.3109/08039488.2012.748826.
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257–274.
Klueva, N. Y. (2014). Electronic culture [Elektronnaia kul’tura i kommunikatsiia]. Man and Culture, 6, 107–120 http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_14763.html. Accessed 12 October 2020. (In Russian).
Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: «massive» education in the E-learning and digital cultures. MOOC Distance Education, 35(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917704.
Kong, S. C. (2007). The development and validation of an information literacy model for Hong Kong students: Key issues in the professional development of teachers for capacity building. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(1), 57–75.
Lim, S. S., & Soriano, C. (2016). A (digital) giant awakens. Invigorating media studies with Asian perspectives. In S. S. Lim & C. Soriano (Eds.), Asian Perspectives on Digital Culture. Emerging Phenomena, Enduring Concepts. (pp. 3–14). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731650.
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojtb, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56, 429–440.
Marlowe, J. M., Bartley, A., & Collins, F. (2017). Digital belongings: The intersections of social cohesion, connectivity and digital media. Ethnicities, 17(1), 85–102.
Mesch, G. S. (2009). The internet and youth culture. The Hedgehog Review. Spring, 11(1), 50–60.
Mihailidis, P., Fincham, K., & Cohen, J. N. (2014). Toward a media literate model for civic engagement in digital culture: Exploring the civic habits and dispositions of college students on Facebook Atlantic. Journal of Communication, 22, 293–309.
Murzina, K. B. (2014). Way of understanding the electronic culture: From the virtual museum to the hacker ethic [Sposoby ponimaniia elektronnoi kul’tury: Ot virtual'nykh muzeev k khakerskoi etike]. Online scientific journal “Philosophical problems of IT and Cyberspace”, 2(8), 55–64 https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sposoby-ponimaniya-elektronnoy-kultury-ot-virtualnyh-muzeev-k-hakerskoy-etike/viewer. Accessed 12 October 2020. (In Russian).
Palmer, A., Oakley, G., & Pegrum, M. (2017). A culture of sharing: Transnational higher education students’ views on plagiarism in the digital era. Management in Education, 11(4), 381–404.
Parsons, T. (1968). American sociology. Perspectives, problems, methods. New York: Basic Books.
Perrotta, C., Bailey, C., & Garside, C. (2018). Culture, technology and local networks: Towards a sociology of ‘making’ in education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(5), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1375459.
Prensky, M. (2011). Digital natives, digital immigrants. MSB. University Press, 9(5), 1–6.
Pulak, I., & Wieczorek-Tomaszewska, M. (2015). Students' competencies to educational activity in digital environment. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning (IJCEELL), 25(4), 450–465.
Rodzin, S. I., & Titarenko, N. I. (2013). NBIC-technologies, AI and e-culture [NBIC-tekhnologii, iskusstvennyi intellekt i elektronnaia kul’tura]. Information technologies, computer science and engineering education, 2(13), 1–4 (In Russian).
Rogers, W. M., Schmitt, N., & Mullins, M. E. (2002). Correction for unreliability of multifactor measures: Comparison of alpha and parallel forms approaches. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 184–199.
Romakh, O. V. (2007). Man of culture in social space [«Chelovek kul'tury» v sotsial'nom prostranstve]. Analytics of cultural sciences, 7, 96–99 (In Russian).
Sakaiya, T. (1992). The knowledge-value revolution, or, A history of the future. New York, Tokyo, London: Kodansha International.
Saman, T. (2018). Social media pedagogy: Applying an interdisciplinary approach to teach multimodal critical digital literacy. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018756904.
Schwarz, M. (2006). E-Culture: сrossovers and сhallenges: http://www.eculturefactory.de/eculturetrends/download/schwarz.pdf. Accessed 12 October 2020.
Tabachuk, N, P., Ledovskikh, I, A., Shulika, N, A., Kazinets, V, A., & Polichka, A, E. (2018). Internet activity and internet addiction: Where is the borderline in developing One’s information competency? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97828.
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Morrow.
Vilmantė, L., & Persson, D. (2015). Media literacy and digital divide: A cross-cultural case study of Sweden and Lithuania. Creativity Studies, 8(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.3846/23450479.2015.1046407.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kargapolova, E.V., Novikov, A.V., Kargapolov, S.V. et al. E-culture of Russian students: Socio-cultural differentiation. Educ Inf Technol 26, 3497–3512 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10435-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10435-0