Skip to main content
Log in

Using a video annotation tool to enhance student-teachers’ reflective practices and communication competence in consultation practices through a collaborative learning community

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated how peer comments made using a video annotation tool (VAT) through an online learning community improved student-teachers’ level of reflective thinking and communication competence throughout the simulated (i.e., role-play) context of consultation practice. Eighty student-teachers from two classes of the course “Comprehensive School Guidance” participated in this study, and all recorded two videos for their tripartite practice on parent consultation for self-evaluation and peer comment. Forty student-teachers were in the comparison class and provided general comments to their peers on the learning platform, while those in the experimental class used the VAT on the learning platform to provide specific comments to their peers. Two post-practice online questionnaires and reflective journal entries, which aimed to measure communication competence and reflective thinking ability, were administered to the student-teachers after the first and second consultation practice. The reflective journal entries were segmented into units of analysis that were scored using a 4-level model of reflective thinking (from 1 to 4), with a higher score indicating demonstration of a higher level of reflective thinking for that particular segment. Both the number of reflective notes made and the average level of reflective thinking in student-teachers’ journal entries were indicators of reflective thinking ability. Two mixed ANOVAs were conducted to examine whether student-teachers in the experimental (VAT) class improved their reflective thinking ability and communication competence more significantly than those in the comparison (non-VAT) class. The results showed that student-teachers in both the VAT and non-VAT classes had statistically higher scores for communication competence and reflective thinking in the second role-play practice. Student-teachers with the support of VAT, in comparison to those without, significantly improved their average reflective thinking ability. Focus group interviews were also conducted to investigate how VAT could support student-teachers’ learning process and to learn their perceptions of the strengths and limitations of the VAT. The results indicated that the VAT could enhance student-teachers’ learning by reducing communication barriers created by the tendency to avoid direct observations of peers’ weaknesses, enhancing reflection-in-action during practice, and contextualizing written comments by referring to specific video segments. However, student-teachers felt that the VAT should also allow users to draw on the video screens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Abbreviations

VAT:

Video Annotation Tool

References

  • Amobi, F. A. (2005). Preservice teachers' reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teacher and School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. C. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives. Flaxton: Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, C. (2015). Reflection in teacher education: Issues emerging from a review of current literature. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R., Wutich, A., & Ryan, G. W. (2016). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, W. R., Kallenbach, W., Morris, M., & Friebel, A. (1969). Videotape feedback and microteaching in a teacher training model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 37(4), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Michalec, P., Timmons, M., & Siddle, J. (1997). Student teaching portfolios: A tool for promoting reflective practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(5), 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britzman, D. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R., Nueckles, M., & Rambow, R. (1999). Adaptivity and anticipation in expert laypeople communication. In S. E. Brennan, A. Giboin, & A. Traum (Eds.), Psychological models of communication in collaborative systems (pp. 17–24). Menlo Park: AAAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., Pryzwansky, W. B., & Schulte, A. C. (2006). Psychological consultation: Introduction to theory and practice (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L. A., & Recesso, A. (2006). Promoting reflection among science student teachers using a web-based video analysis tool. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(1), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, P. S., Chen, H. C., Huang, Y. M., Liu, C. J., Liu, M. C., & Shen, M. H. (2016). A video annotation learning approach to improve the effects of video learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colasante, M. (2011). Using video annotation to reflect on and evaluate physical education pre-service teaching practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.983.

  • Correa Molina, E., Collin, S., Chaubet, P., & Gervais, C. (2010). Concept de réflexion: Un regard critique. Éducation et Francophonie, 38(2), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (2000). Getting into the habit of reflection. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(3), 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In C. A. McMurray (Ed.), The relation of theory in the education of teachers. (third yearbook of the National Society for the scientific study of education, part 1) (pp. 9–30). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Bureau (2010). Delineation of roles of key personnel. http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/teacher/student-guidance-discipline-services/projects-services/sgs/guidance-in-secondary-schools/roles4_e.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2018.

  • Farrell, T. S. C. (2004). Reflective practice in action: 80 reflective breaks for busy teachers. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. C., & Latta, M. M. (2001). What constitutes becoming experienced in teaching and learning? Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 885–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, B. J., & Davis, E. (2006). Teacher learning research and the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 535–550). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukkink, R. G., Trienekens, N., & Kramer, L. J. C. (2011). Video feedback in education and training: Putting learning in the picture. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Fischer, M. R., Hoppe-Seyler, T., Karsten, G., Kiessling, C., Möller, G. E., Wiesbeck, A., & Prenzel, M. (2015). Fostering professional communication skills of future physicians and teachers: Effects of e-learning with video cases and role-play. Instructional Science, 43(4), 443–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, R. (2008). Structures for facilitating student reflection. College Teaching, 57(1), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guli, L. A. (2005). Evidence-based parent consultation with school-related outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 20(4), 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gysbers, N. (2000). Implementing a whole school approach to guidance through a comprehensive guidance program. Asian Journal of Counselling, 7(2), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Bencze, L., Vaillancourt, B. D., & Yoon, S. (2003). New applications for multimedia cases: Promoting reflective practice in preservice teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 483–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holodick, N.A., Scappaticci, F.T., Drazdowski, T. (1999). Developing Reflective Practices of Preservice Teachers through a Video Assessment Program. In J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1999--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1141–1146).

  • Hui, E. K. P. (2000). Guidance as a whole school approach in Hong Kong: From remediation to student development. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 22(1), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivey, A. E., Ivey, M. B., Zalaquett, C. P. (2013). Intentional interviewing and counseling: Facilitating client development in a multicultural society. Nelson Education.

  • Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2000). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jianhua, Z., & Akahori, K. (2001). Web-based collaborative learning methods and strategies in higher education. In ITHET 2019 (pp. 4–6). Kumamoto: ITHET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo, I. H., Kang, S., & Yoon, M. (2014). Effects of communication competence and social network centralities on learner performance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 108–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, M. (1994). Assessing the interpersonal communication competence of vocational teachers: Contemporary issues and dilemmas. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 69–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., & Kim, D.-J. (2012). Effect of screen size on multimedia vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, J. G., Cole, A. L., & Presswood, C. S. (2008). Through preservice teachers' eyes: Exploring field experiences through narrative and inquiry. Halifax: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C. (2010). Using a web-enabled video system to support student–teachers’ self-reflection in teaching practice. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1772–1782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C., Shroff, R. H., & Hung, H. K. (2009). A web enabled video system for self reflection by student teachers using a guiding framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 544–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2010). Going to the core: Deepening reflection by connecting the person to the profession. In N. Lyons (Ed.), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry (pp. 531–554). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, R. A., & Pesut, D. J. (2004). Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: Self-regulated learning theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(4), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. Y., Chen, L. J., Yen, Y. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2020). Impact of video annotation on undergraduate nursing students’ communication performance and commenting behaviour during an online peer-assessment activity. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (2004). The essential communication: What parents and teachers can learn from each other. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y., Teater, B., Hsu, K. S., Greene, G. J., Fraser, J. S., Solovey, A. D., & Grove, D. (2013). Systems collaboration with schools and treatment of severely emotionally disturbed children or adolescents. Children & Schools, 35(3), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levett-Jones, T. L. (2007). Facilitating reflective practice and self-assessment of competence through the use of narratives. Nurse Education in Practice, 7(2), 112–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liston, D. P., & Zeichner, K. M. (1990). Reflective teaching and action research in preservice teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 16(3), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lung, C. L. (2013). Roles and functions of the class teacher: Guidance for pupils’ personal growth on a school basis. In P. Y. Y. Luk-Fong & Y. C. Lee-Man (Eds.), School guidance and counselling: Trends and practices (pp. 175–196). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luttenberg, J., & Bergen, T. (2008). Teacher reflection: The development of a typology. Teachers and Teaching, 14(5–6), 543–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, J., Ellis, J., Anwar, T., & Roehrig, G. (2014). Beginning science teachers’ use of a digital video annotation tool to promote reflective practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 458–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M., & Stephenson, M. (2005). Developing reflective practice in student teachers: Collaboration and critical partnerships. Teachers and Teaching, 11(1), 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Torregrosa, A. B., Díaz-Martín, C., & Ibáñez-Cubillas, P. (2017). The use of video annotation tools in teacher training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 458–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picci, P., Calvani, A., & Bonaiuti, G. (2012). The use of digital video annotation in teacher training: The teachers’ perspectives. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 600–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, M. (2008). The development of critical thinking skills using a web-based video analysis system. In Annual meeting of the American educational research association (pp. 1–15). New York: AERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools: Technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D. L., Larson, S., Shinitzky, H., Chernoff, R., Serwint, J. R., Adamo, G., & Wissow, L. (2004). Use of an innovative video feedback technique to enhance communication skills training. Medical Education, 38(2), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2013). Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonenboom, J., Tattersall, C., Miao, Y., Stefanov, K., Aleksieva-Petrova, A. (2007). A four-stage model for lifelong competence development. Service Oriented Approaches and Lifelong Competence Development Infrastructures, 131.

  • Shantz, D., & Ward, T. (2000). Feedback, conversation and power in the field experience of preservice teachers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(4), 288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shek, M. M. P. (2013). Hong Kong school guidance and counselling service: Development and approach. In P. Y. Y. Luk-Fong & Y. C. Lee-Man (Eds.), School guidance and counselling: Trends and practices (pp. 55–76). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • So, W. W. M., Pow, J. W. C., & Hung, V. H. K. (2009). The interactive use of a video database in teacher education: Creating a knowledge base for teaching through a learning community. Computers & Education, 53(3), 775–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2016). Cognitive psychology. Scarborough: Nelson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46(1), 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlier, D. (2005). Mediating the meaning of evidence through epistemological diversity. Nursing Inquiry, 12(2), 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenholm, S., & Jensen, A. (2008). Interpersonal communication. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, T. R., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valli, L. (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warden, B. J. (2004). Self-evaluation of reflective thinking among preservice and in-service teachers. Alva: Northwestern Oklahoma State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C. (2001). Comprehensive guidance programs in an international context. Professional School Counseling, 4, 262–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, S. (2014). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377–397.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners' agentic wngagement with feedback: A systematic review and taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, N. N., & Jarvis, Y. (2007). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: A model for teaching and learning clinical skills in a technologically rich and authentic learning environment. Nurse Education Today, 27(1), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. C., & Kao, H. C. (2008). Streaming videos in peer assessment to support training pre-service teachers. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, M. S., Yoo, I. Y., & Lee, H. (2010). Nursing students’ self-evaluation using a video recording of Foley catheterization: Effects on students’ competence, communication skills, and learning motivation. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(7), 402–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, M. T., Lam, M. P., Shek, D. T. L. (2001). Involvement and training needs in counseling and guidance among guidance teachers in Hong Kong. Paper presented in Hong Kong professional Counselling association biannual international conference. Hong Kong, China.

  • Yuen, M., Chan, R., Lau, P., Lam, M. P., & Shek, D. T. (2004). The Counselling self-estimate inventory (COSE): Does it work in Chinese counsellors? Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 17(2), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative paradigms of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the reviewers of the Education University of Hong Kong Learning and Teaching Quality Committee for their helpful comments on this project.

Funding

This work was supported by the Education University of Hong Kong Teaching Development Grant (Grant number: T0192).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Yee-Lap To.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shek, M.MP., Leung, KC. & To, P.YL. Using a video annotation tool to enhance student-teachers’ reflective practices and communication competence in consultation practices through a collaborative learning community. Educ Inf Technol 26, 4329–4352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10480-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10480-9

Keywords