Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Responsive student model in an intelligent tutoring system and its evaluation

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new student responsive model to support students who use an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) as an E-Learning tool. We proposed a weighted-based model to estimate and suggest learning materials for students who are pursuing a computer-based course. We have built a brand new ITS called WinITS with our proposed responsive student model and deployed it in Hanoi National University of Education-Vietnam (HNUE) in the second semester of the school year 2019-2020 with a computer science course. To compare the effectiveness of applying ITS to the students, we compare test results and analyze some other aspects related to the course. On the other hand, we conducted a survey between two groups: with and without using WinITS. 63 students are volunteers who participated in the case study. Before learning, 43 students from Group 1 will take a short survey of the Felder-Silverman questionnaire to identify learning styles, after that, they go through all the lessons from the course under the support of WinITS, the lessons will be chosen to satisfy student’s need. On another side, 18 students from Group 2 will make the same test to compare the result to Group 1. In the range of research, we illustrate that our implementation shows some encouraging results such as reducing learning time, improving test score by 1.13 standard deviations, and making the lesson more interesting and flexible. The results have revealed some advantages of studying with computer-added compared to the traditional class in various ways and showed the effectiveness of the proposed model in Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, C., Gallego, D., & Honey, P. (2007). Los Estilos de Aprendizaje: Procedimientos de diagnóstico y mejora. Bilbao: Editorial Mensajero.

  • Binh, H.T., Quang Trung, N., Nguyen, H.-A.T., & The Duy, B. (2019). Detecting student engagement in classrooms for intelligent tutoring systems. In 2019 23rd International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC) (pp. 145–149): IEEE.

  • Bishop-Clark, C., & Wheeler, D.D. (1994). The Myers-Briggs personality type and its relationship to computer programming. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell, J. (1970). AI In CAI: An artificial-intelligence approach to computer-assisted instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man Machine Systems, 11(4), 190–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Bishouty, M.M., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Tortorella, R., Yang, J., Chang, T.-W., & Graf, S. (2018). Kinshuk Use of felder and silverman learning style model for online course design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(June), 674–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R.M., & Soloman, B.A. (1993). Learning styles and strategies. NCSU 4–6.

  • Franzoni, A.L., Assar, S., Defude, B., & Rojas, J. (2008). Student learning styles adaptation method based on teaching strategies and electronic media. In 2008 Eighth IEEE conference on advanced learning technologies international: IEEE.

  • Georgieva, G., Todorov, G., & Smrikarov, A. (2003). A model of virtual university - some problems during its development. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference conference on computer systems and technologies e-Learning - CompSysTech’03: ACM Press.

  • Graf, S., & Liu, T.-C. (2010). Kinshuk Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1986). Using Your Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Honey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khamparia, A., & Pandey, B. (2019). Association of learning styles with different e-learning problems: A systematic review and classification. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1303–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (2015). A Handbook of Test Construction. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, A., Crockett, K., & McLean, D. (2014). An adaptation algorithm for an intelligent natural language tutoring system. Computers & Education, 71, 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, A.M., Crockett, K.A., McLean, D.A., Edmonds, B., & O’Shea, K. (2010). Oscar: An intelligent conversational agent tutor to estimate learning styles. In International conference on fuzzy systems: IEEE.

  • LI, K.M. (2015). Learning styles and perceptions of student teachers of computer-supported collaborative learning strategy using wikis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 31(1).

  • McCrae, R.R., Kurtz, J.E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2010). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1), 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdaniel, M., Thomas, R., Agarwal, P., McDermott, K., & Roediger, H. (2013). Quizzing in middle-school science: Successful transfer performance on classroom exams. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 360–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.Felder, R. (2020). Index of learning styles questionnaire. http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2020.

  • MOET. (2020). Report from Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam. shorturl.at/uIRWY. Accessed 30 Jun 2020.

  • Moodle. (2020). Moodle: A learning platform. https://moodle.org/. Accessed 03 Aug 2020.

  • Moritz, S.H., Wei, F., Parvez, S.M., & Blank, G.D. (2005). From objects-first to design-first with multimedia and intelligent tutoring. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(3), 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavinasab, E., Zarifsanaiey, N.R., Niakan Kalhori, S., Rakhshan, M., Keikha, L., & Ghazi Saeedi, M. (2018). Intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods. Interactive Learning Environments.

  • Muñoz, D.C., Ortiz, A., González, C., López, D. M., & Blobel, B. (2010). Effective e-learning for health professional and medical students: The experience with sias-intelligent tutoring system. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 156(Medical and Care Compunetics 6), 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwana, H. (1990). Intelligent tutoring systems: An overview. Artificial Intelligence Review, 4(4), 251–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, S., & Wong, W. (2014). White paper: Adaptive learning systems. DV X Innovations DeVry Education Group, 2, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savic, G., & Konjovic, Z. (2009). Learning style based personalization of SCORM e-learning courses. In 2009 7th international symposium on intelligent systems and informatics: IEEE.

  • Sleeman, D., & Brown, J.S. (1982). Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New York: Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Source, O. (2020). Sakai collaboration and learning environment. https://www.sakailms.org/. Accessed 10 Feb 2020.

  • Truong, H.M. (2015). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1185–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46, 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VARK. (2020). VARK: A guide to learning styles. http://www.vark-learn.com/english/index.asp. Accessed 10 Mar 2020.

  • Website. (2020). The peak performance center. https://thepeakperformancecenter.com/. Accessed 10 Feb 2020.

  • Wei, F., & Blank, G.D. (2006). Student modeling with atomic bayesian networks. In Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 491–502). Berlin: Springer.

  • Wei, F., & Blank, G.D. (2007). Atomic dynamic bayesian networks for a responsive student model. In Artificial intelligence in education, building technology rich learning contexts that work, volume 158 of Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (pp. 668–670): IOS Press.

  • Yang, T.C., Hwang, G.J., & Yang, S.J.H. (2013). Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students’ learning styles and cognitive styles. Educational Technology and Society, 16(4), 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zywno, M.S. (2003). A contribution to validation of score meaning for Felder- Soloman ’ s Index of Learning Styles. Engineering Education 1–16.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoang Tieu Binh.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binh, H.T., Trung, N.Q. & Duy, B.T. Responsive student model in an intelligent tutoring system and its evaluation. Educ Inf Technol 26, 4969–4991 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10485-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10485-4

Keywords

Navigation