Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a new student responsive model to support students who use an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) as an E-Learning tool. We proposed a weighted-based model to estimate and suggest learning materials for students who are pursuing a computer-based course. We have built a brand new ITS called WinITS with our proposed responsive student model and deployed it in Hanoi National University of Education-Vietnam (HNUE) in the second semester of the school year 2019-2020 with a computer science course. To compare the effectiveness of applying ITS to the students, we compare test results and analyze some other aspects related to the course. On the other hand, we conducted a survey between two groups: with and without using WinITS. 63 students are volunteers who participated in the case study. Before learning, 43 students from Group 1 will take a short survey of the Felder-Silverman questionnaire to identify learning styles, after that, they go through all the lessons from the course under the support of WinITS, the lessons will be chosen to satisfy student’s need. On another side, 18 students from Group 2 will make the same test to compare the result to Group 1. In the range of research, we illustrate that our implementation shows some encouraging results such as reducing learning time, improving test score by 1.13 standard deviations, and making the lesson more interesting and flexible. The results have revealed some advantages of studying with computer-added compared to the traditional class in various ways and showed the effectiveness of the proposed model in Intelligent Tutoring Systems.








Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Alonso, C., Gallego, D., & Honey, P. (2007). Los Estilos de Aprendizaje: Procedimientos de diagnóstico y mejora. Bilbao: Editorial Mensajero.
Binh, H.T., Quang Trung, N., Nguyen, H.-A.T., & The Duy, B. (2019). Detecting student engagement in classrooms for intelligent tutoring systems. In 2019 23rd International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC) (pp. 145–149): IEEE.
Bishop-Clark, C., & Wheeler, D.D. (1994). The Myers-Briggs personality type and its relationship to computer programming. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 358.
Carbonell, J. (1970). AI In CAI: An artificial-intelligence approach to computer-assisted instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man Machine Systems, 11(4), 190–202.
El-Bishouty, M.M., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Tortorella, R., Yang, J., Chang, T.-W., & Graf, S. (2018). Kinshuk Use of felder and silverman learning style model for online course design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 161–177.
Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(June), 674–681.
Felder, R.M., & Soloman, B.A. (1993). Learning styles and strategies. NCSU 4–6.
Franzoni, A.L., Assar, S., Defude, B., & Rojas, J. (2008). Student learning styles adaptation method based on teaching strategies and electronic media. In 2008 Eighth IEEE conference on advanced learning technologies international: IEEE.
Georgieva, G., Todorov, G., & Smrikarov, A. (2003). A model of virtual university - some problems during its development. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference conference on computer systems and technologies e-Learning - CompSysTech’03: ACM Press.
Graf, S., & Liu, T.-C. (2010). Kinshuk Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116–131.
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1986). Using Your Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Honey.
Khamparia, A., & Pandey, B. (2019). Association of learning styles with different e-learning problems: A systematic review and classification. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1303–1331.
Kline, P. (2015). A Handbook of Test Construction. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Latham, A., Crockett, K., & McLean, D. (2014). An adaptation algorithm for an intelligent natural language tutoring system. Computers & Education, 71, 97–110.
Latham, A.M., Crockett, K.A., McLean, D.A., Edmonds, B., & O’Shea, K. (2010). Oscar: An intelligent conversational agent tutor to estimate learning styles. In International conference on fuzzy systems: IEEE.
LI, K.M. (2015). Learning styles and perceptions of student teachers of computer-supported collaborative learning strategy using wikis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 31(1).
McCrae, R.R., Kurtz, J.E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2010). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1), 28–50.
Mcdaniel, M., Thomas, R., Agarwal, P., McDermott, K., & Roediger, H. (2013). Quizzing in middle-school science: Successful transfer performance on classroom exams. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 360–372.
M.Felder, R. (2020). Index of learning styles questionnaire. http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2020.
MOET. (2020). Report from Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam. shorturl.at/uIRWY. Accessed 30 Jun 2020.
Moodle. (2020). Moodle: A learning platform. https://moodle.org/. Accessed 03 Aug 2020.
Moritz, S.H., Wei, F., Parvez, S.M., & Blank, G.D. (2005). From objects-first to design-first with multimedia and intelligent tutoring. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(3), 99–103.
Mousavinasab, E., Zarifsanaiey, N.R., Niakan Kalhori, S., Rakhshan, M., Keikha, L., & Ghazi Saeedi, M. (2018). Intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods. Interactive Learning Environments.
Muñoz, D.C., Ortiz, A., González, C., López, D. M., & Blobel, B. (2010). Effective e-learning for health professional and medical students: The experience with sias-intelligent tutoring system. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 156(Medical and Care Compunetics 6), 89–102.
Nwana, H. (1990). Intelligent tutoring systems: An overview. Artificial Intelligence Review, 4(4), 251–277.
Oxman, S., & Wong, W. (2014). White paper: Adaptive learning systems. DV X Innovations DeVry Education Group, 2, 1–30.
Savic, G., & Konjovic, Z. (2009). Learning style based personalization of SCORM e-learning courses. In 2009 7th international symposium on intelligent systems and informatics: IEEE.
Sleeman, D., & Brown, J.S. (1982). Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New York: Academic Press Inc.
Source, O. (2020). Sakai collaboration and learning environment. https://www.sakailms.org/. Accessed 10 Feb 2020.
Truong, H.M. (2015). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1185–1193.
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46, 197–221.
VARK. (2020). VARK: A guide to learning styles. http://www.vark-learn.com/english/index.asp. Accessed 10 Mar 2020.
Website. (2020). The peak performance center. https://thepeakperformancecenter.com/. Accessed 10 Feb 2020.
Wei, F., & Blank, G.D. (2006). Student modeling with atomic bayesian networks. In Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 491–502). Berlin: Springer.
Wei, F., & Blank, G.D. (2007). Atomic dynamic bayesian networks for a responsive student model. In Artificial intelligence in education, building technology rich learning contexts that work, volume 158 of Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (pp. 668–670): IOS Press.
Yang, T.C., Hwang, G.J., & Yang, S.J.H. (2013). Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students’ learning styles and cognitive styles. Educational Technology and Society, 16(4), 185–200.
Zywno, M.S. (2003). A contribution to validation of score meaning for Felder- Soloman ’ s Index of Learning Styles. Engineering Education 1–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Binh, H.T., Trung, N.Q. & Duy, B.T. Responsive student model in an intelligent tutoring system and its evaluation. Educ Inf Technol 26, 4969–4991 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10485-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10485-4