Skip to main content
Log in

Innovative students’ academic advising for optimum courses’ selection and scheduling assistant: A Blockchain based use case

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advising students through their study plans is one of the essential steps towards academic success. The matching of students’ needs and courses offered at a university requires comprehensive planning and scheduling. To avoid the problem of mismatch, which usually leads to cancellation courses with low enrollment, a decisive advising process is deemed necessary. Although such a topic received attention from previous work in the area, we could not trace any research references to the use of blockchain in solving the complex advising process. This research explores a topic that is still in its infancy. Blockchain is a new technology proposed to create an effective advising system based on a decisive preregistration process. The proposed system has adopted a hybrid approach integrating the client-server legacy centralized methodology with the blockchain decentralized approach. Ethereum blockchain network is used in the proposed system to create a consensus-validated advising environment. The smart contracts used in such a system offer the students the freedom to modify the courses selections, based on the map of several students tentatively registered in the courses at any particular time. The proposed system has been analyzed, designed, implemented, and applied empirically on students’ records extracted from the Banner Enterprise Resources Planning (Banner-ERP) system. The results are promising and provide a proof of concept. The experimental results have also been compared with students’ course requirements reaching a satisfactory level of efficiency in the advising process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abouchedid, K., & Nasser, R. (2002). Assuring quality service in higher education: Registration and advising attitudes in a private university in Lebanon. Quality Assurance in Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880210446866

  • Albalooshi, F., & Shatnawi, S. (2010). Online academic advising support, in technological developments in networking, education and automation, springer, pp. 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9151-2_5.

  • Andrews, T., & Tynan, B. (2012). Distance learners: Connected, mobile and resourceful individuals. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.828

  • Aslam, M.Z, Khan, A. R. (2011). A proposed decision support system/expert system for guiding fresh students in selecting a faculty in Gomal University, Pakistan. arXiv preprint arXiv:1104.1678.

  • Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292–2303. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, J. E. (2008). A study of academic advising satisfaction and its relationship to student worldviews. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.10.3.g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daramola, O., Emebo, O., Afolabi, I.T, & Ayo, C. K. (2014). Implementation of an Intelligent Course Advisory Expert System. International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence (IJARAI), 3(5), pp. 6–12. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJARAI.2014.030502

  • Engin, G., Aksoyer, B., Avdagic, M., Bozanlı, D., Hanay, U., Maden, D., & Ertek, G. (2014). Rule-based expert systems for supporting university students. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, A. and Camilleri, A. F. (2017) Blockchain in education. Inamorato dos Santos, A. (ed.) EUR 28778 EN; https://doi.org/10.2760/60649.

  • Greenspan, G. (2015). Avoiding the pointless blockchain project. Online at  https://www.multichain.com/blog/2015/11/avoiding-pointless-blockchain-project. Accessed 10 Aug 2021

  • Henderson, L. K., & Goodridge, W. (2015). AdviseMe: An intelligent web-based application for academic advising. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 6(8). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2015.060831

  • Herrmann, M., Petzold, J., & Bombatkar, V. (2018). Blockchain-backed analytics. Adding blockchain-based quality gates to data science projects. In 2nd international conference on advanced research methods and analytics (CARMA 2018). Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.4995/CARMA2018.2018.8292.

  • Hou, H. (2017) The application of Blockchain technology in E-government in China. IEEE 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2017.8038519.

  • Hwang, G. J., Chen, C. Y., Tsai, P. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). An expert system for improving web-based problem-solving ability of students. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8664–8672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iatrellis, O., Kameas, A., & Fitsilis, P. (2019). A novel integrated approach to the execution of personalized and self-evolving learning pathways. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 781–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9802-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, D. (2019). Blockchain and trust in a smart city. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 10(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425319832392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laghari, M., & Khawaja, G. (2012). Student advising & planning software. Int. Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3(3), 158–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laghari, M. (2014). Automated course advising system. International journal of machine learning and computing, 4(1), February 2014. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMLC.2014.V4.384.

  • Laghari, M., Al Habsi, S. A. A., Maaz, A., & Al Naqbi, A. (2015). A one-semester course planner for EE students. International research journal of electronics & computer. Engineering, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.24178/irjece.2015.1.1.13

  • Loukil, F., Abed, M., & Boukadi, K. (2021). Blockchain adoption in education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 1–19 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10481-8.

  • McBeath, C., & Atkinson, R. (1992). Curriculum, instructional design and the technologies: Planning for educational delivery. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2251

  • Mohamed, A. (2016). Interactive decision support for academic advising. Quality Assurance in Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-03-2013-0011

  • Mselmi, A. (2020). Blockchain technology and systemic risk. International journal of economics and financial Issues, 10(2). 53–60. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.9069.

  • Nakamoto, S. (2009). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Cryptography Mailing list.

  • Nguyen, V. A., Nguyen, H. H., Nguyen, D. L., & Le, M. D. (2021). A course recommendation model for students based on learning outcome. Education and Information Technologies, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10524-0.

  • Nwagu, K., Omankwu N., & Obinnaya C. (2018). An intelligent advising system that adopts multi-agents technology. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 9(11).

  • Paik, H. Y., Xu, X., Bandara, H. D., Lee, S. U., & Lo, S. K. (2019). Analysis of data Management in Blockchain-Based Systems: From architecture to governance. IEEE Access, 7, 186091–186107. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2961404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil, S., & Puranik, P. (2019). Blockchain technology. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3. https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd23774

  • Pechenkina, E. (2017). Developing a typology of mobile apps in higher education: A national case-study. Austalasian Journal of Education Technology, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3228

  • Pizzolatto, J. (2006). Complex partnerships: Self-authorship and provocative academic advising practices. NACADA Journal, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.12930/0271-9517-26.1.32

  • Siegfried, R. M., Wittenstein, A. M., & Sharma, T. (2003). An automated advising system for course selection and scheduling. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 18(3), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shatnawi, R., Althebyan, Q., Ghalib, B., & AlMaolegi, M. (2014). Building a Smart Academic Advising System Using Association Rule Mining. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407–1807.

  • Streufert, B. (2019). Advising alternatives: A case study. NACADA Review, 1(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACR-18-1011

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Wijngaard, O. (2019) Academic advising: A discipline of praxis. NACADA review: 2019, 1(1), pp. 5-13. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACR-18-1020.

  • Wang, X., Yu, P., Yu, G., Zha, X., Ni, W., Liu, R. P., & Guo, Y. J. (2019, December). A high-performance hybrid Blockchain system for traceable IoT applications. In International Conference on Network and System Security (pp. 721–728). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36938-5_47.

  • Werghi, N., & Kamoun, F. K. (2009). A decision-tree based system for student academic advising and planning in information systems programmes. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2010.029477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young-Jones, A. D., Burt, T. D., Dixon, S., & Hawthorne, M. J. (2013). Academic advising: Does it really impact student success? Quality Assurance in Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293034

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samer Y. Al-Imamy.

Ethics declarations

Statements on open data, ethics and conflict of interest

Survey questions and data may be requested from the author. This work complies with the PMU ethical and cultural rules. The author has no interest or involvement with any institution on regards of this research.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Imamy, S.Y., Zygiaris, S. Innovative students’ academic advising for optimum courses’ selection and scheduling assistant: A Blockchain based use case. Educ Inf Technol 27, 5437–5455 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10844-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10844-1

Keywords

Navigation