Abstract
A significant number of instructors, researchers and students have claimed that chemistry is a challenging subject to teach and learn at all education levels. Its main learning difficulties are in line with certain sights of its phenomena that are abstract, and some chemistry teachers do not specify what to be learned and assessed in chemistry lesson. The current work investigates the use of formative assessment rubrics for supporting secondary school students’ progressive learning in organic chemistry through a technology-based learning project approach in Rwanda. The investigators used a convergent parallel research design, and quantitative data were gathered by distributing questionnaires to the students, and the answers were statistically analyzed. Qualitative data were obtained through observation and interview and were narratively analyzed. The results from this study showed that rubric-based formative assessment supported students’ learning of organic chemistry via technology-based learning approach. This is accredited to the fact that students were motivated while doing their assessment and they were able to do self-assessment by applying the provided rubrics via technology. The students understood instructors’ expectations, encouraged their learning, sharpened their technology skills, and their knowledge retention was also increased. The instructors were able to grade the students’ tasks fast with the help of an analytic rubric and good formative feedback was availed to students on time. The instructors were also able to diagnose the strengths and weaknesses of the learners and give them quick formative feedback.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 1–7.
Andrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: the good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 1–3.
Anglin, L., Anglin, K., Schumann, P. L., & Kaliski, J. A. (2008). Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of grading through the use of computer-assisted grading rubrics. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00153.x
Anyan, F. (2013). The influence of power shifts in data collection and analysis stages : a focus on qualitative research interview. The Qualitative Report, 18(18), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1525.
Arter, J., & Chappuis, J. (2006). Creating & recognizing quality rubrics. Pearson, 1–59. http://downloads.pearsonassessments.com/ati/downloads/car_studyguide_forprinting_final.pdf
Bahati, B. (2019). Technology-enhanced formative assessement in higher education. Doctoral Thesis in Information Society at Stockholm University, Sweden.
Bahati, B., Tedre, M., Fors, U. N. O., & Mukama, E. (2016). Exploring feedback practices in formative assessment in rwandan higher education: a multifaceted approach is needed. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 4(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2016.4.2.001.
Berry, R. (2011). The assessment as learning ( aal ) framework for teaching and learning – the aal wheel. Assessment and Learning, 2, 51–70.
Canals, L. (2017). Instruments for gathering data. In E. Moore & M. Dooly (Eds), Qualitative approaches to research on plurilingual education (pp. 390–401). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.emmd2016.637.
Chen, H. J., She, J. L., Chou, C. C., Tsai, Y. M., & Chiu, M. H. (2013). Development and application of a scoring rubric for evaluating students’ experimental skills in organic chemistry: An instructional guide for teaching assistants. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(10), 1296–1302. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed101111g
Chowdhury, F. (2018). Application of rubrics in the classroom: a vital tool for improvement in assessment, feedback and learning. International Education Studies, 12(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n1p61
Clark, I. (2011). Formative Assessment: Policy, Perspectives and Practice. Florida Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 4(2), 158–180.
Cooper, B. S., & Gargan, A. (2009). Rubrics in Education: Old Term, New Meanings. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(1), 54–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909100109
Cox, G. C., Morrison, J., & Brathwaite, B.H., (2015), The rubric: an assessment tool to guide students and markers.1stInternational Conference on Higher Education Advances, HEAd´15, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd15.2015.4141.
Dawson, P. (2017). Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
Delgado, M. A., & Fonseca-Mora, M. C. (2010). The use of co-operative work and rubrics to develop competences. Education for Chemical Engineers, 5(3), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2010.05.002
DeWalt, K. M., & DeWalt, B. R. (2002). Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. AltaMira.
Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A., & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using technology for formative assessment to improve students’ learning. TOJET, 17(2), 182–188.
Farley, S. E., & Rose, A. L., Gerard A., (2013). Review of Rwanda’s National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy and Recommendations for Strategy. Rwanda’s National Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy, 1–94. http://globalknowledgeinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/14.08.19_DRAFT_Rwanda-STI-Policy-Review_GKI_2014UpdateFINAL.pdf.
Fay, M. E., Grove, N. P., Towns, M. H., & Lowery, S. (2007). A rubric to characterize inquiry in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 212–219.
Hsu, Y. C., Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, C. C., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Research trends in technology-based learning from 2000 to 2009: a content analysis of publications in selected journals. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 354–370.
Idris, S. H., Jawawi, R., Mahadi, M. A., Matzin, R., Shahrill, M., Jaidin, J. H., Petra, N. A., & Mundia, L. (2017). The use of rubrics in developing students’ understanding of history. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7432
Johan, R., & Harlan, J. (2014). Education nowadays. IJESR, 4(5), 51–56.
Koller, V., Harvey, S., & Magnotta, M. (2006). Technology-based learning strategies. Social Policy Research Associates Inc. http://www.doleta.gov/reports/papers/TBL_Paper_FINAL.pdf.
Lacey, A., Luff, D. (2007). Qualitative Data Analysis. The National Institute for Health Research, 1-46. https://www.rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/9_Qualitative_Data_Analysis_Revision_2009.pdf
Laurian, S., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2013). Effects of Using Rubrics in a University Academic Level Romanian Literature Class. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76(January 2016), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.141
Mahini, F., Forushan, Z. J.-A., & Haghani, F. (2012). The importance of teacher’s role in technology-based education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1614–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.348
Mandela, N. (2003). Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world. Shmoop. https://www.shmoop.com/quotes/education-most-powerful-weapon.html.
Mellati, M. & Khademi, M. (2019). Technology-based education: challenges of blended educational technology. In M. Habib (Ed.), Advanced online education and training technologies (pp. 48–62). New York, NY: IGI Global.
Mugisha, I. S. (2010). Assessment and Study Strategies A study among Rwandan Students in Higher Education (Issue 154). http://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:355043/fulltext01.pdf. Accessed in April December 2020.
Muhammad, A., Lebar, O., & Mokshein, S. E. (2018). Rubrics as assessment , evaluation and scoring tools. International Journal for Academic, 8(10), 1417–1431. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/5309
Ngendahayo, E. (2014). Rethinking Rwandan higher education assessment system and approaches. Rwandan Journal of Education, 2(2), 36–43.
Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M., Thomas, S., & Le, N. Q. (2020). The role of rubrics in learning and implementation of authentic assessment: A Literature review. In M. Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of InSITE 2020: IISIT (pp. 237–276). Informing Science Institute. https://doi.org/10.28945/4606
Nsabayezu, E., Iyamuremye, A., Kwitonda, J. D., & Mbonyiryivuze, A. (2020). Teachers ’ perceptions towards the utilization of WhatsApp in supporting teaching and learning of chemistry during COVID-19 pandemic in Rwandan secondary schools. AJESMS., 16(2), 84.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Combs, J. P. (2011). Data analysis in mixed research: a primer. International Journal of Education, 3(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v3i1.618
Panadero, E. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: a review. Educational Research Review, 9(June), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
Panulla B., Kohler M. (2010). An Ontology for Open Rubric Exchange on the Web. In Open Ed 2010 Proceedings. Barcelona: UOC, OU, BYU. http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/bitstream/10609/5222/6/Panulla.pdf.
Pinto, M., & Leite, C. (2020). Digital technologies in support of students learning in higher education: literature review. Digital Education Review, 6(37), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1344/DER.2020.37.343-360
Popham, W. J. (2006). The role of rubrics in testing and teaching. Routledge taylor & francis group.
Raposo-Rivas, M., & Gallego-Arrufat, M. J. (2016). University students’ perceptions of electronic rubric-based assessment. Digital Education Review, 30, 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2016.30.220-233
Ratheeswari, K. (2018). Recent Trend of Teaching Methods in Education" Organised by Sri Sai Bharath College of Education Dindigul-624710". India Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 2018(3), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.169
Rausch, W. A., & Levi, P. (2008). Asynchronous and Synchronous Cooperation. EQ, 4(January), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66942-5_22
REB. (2015). Competence Based Curriculum For Rwanda Education Board (REB), Scribd, 1-124. https://www.scribd.com/document/377835728/COMPETENCE-BASED-CURRICULUM-FOR-RWANDA-EDUCATION-BOARD-REB.
Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859
Reynders, G., Lantz, J., Ruder, S. M., Stanford, C. L., & Cole, R. S. (2020). Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses. The International Journal of STEM Education, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5
Rivas, M. R., De La Serna, M. C., & Martínez-Figueira, E. (2014). Electronic rubrics to assess competences in ICT subjects. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(5), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.5.584
Roopa, S., & Rani, M. (2012). Questionnaire designing for a survey. The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46(4), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974909820120509s
Seema, A. A. (2021). Use of statistics in research. International Journal for Modern Trends in Science and Technology, 7(11), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.46501/IJMTST0711017
Stošić, L. (2015). The importance of educational technology in teaching. IJCRSEE, 3(1), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2015-3-1-111-114
Ternus, M. P., Plamer, K. L., & Faulk, D. R. (2007). Benchmarking quality in online teaching and learning: a rubric for course construction and evaluation. JET, 7(2), 51–67.
Treagust, D., Nieswandt, M., & Duit, R. (2018). Sources of students difficulties in learning Chemistry. Educación Química, 11(2), 228. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2000.2.66458
Tur, G., Urbina, S., & Forteza, D. (2019). Rubric-based formative assessment in process eportfolio: Towards self-regulated learning. Digital Education Review, 35, 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2019.35.18-35
Vásquez, A., Nussbaum, M., Sciarresi, E., Martínez, T., Barahona, C., & Strasser, K. (2017). The impact of the technology used in formative assessment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(8), 1142–1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116650971
Voinea, L. (2018). Formative assessment as assessment for learning development. The Journal of Pedagogy, 1, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.26755/revped/2018.1/7
Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. JET, 7(1), 12–13.
Acknowledgement
The authors recognize the African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science (ACEITLMS), hosted by the University of Rwanda-College of Education, (UR-CE) for its support and guidance. Prof. Evode Mukama is highly and strongly acknowledged for his guidance and advice from the starting to the ending of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nsabayezu, E., Mukiza, J., Iyamuremye, A. et al. Rubric-based formative assessment to support students’ learning of organic chemistry in the selected secondary schools in Rwanda: A technology-based learning. Educ Inf Technol 27, 12251–12271 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11113-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11113-5