Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Neural machine translation in foreign language teaching and learning: a systematic review

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, hardly anyone working in the field of foreign language teaching and learning can imagine life without machine translation (MT) tools. Thanks to the rapid development of artificial intelligence, MT now most widely assumes a new form, the so-called Neural Machine Translation (NMT), which offers the potential for a wide application in foreign language learning (FLL). Therefore, the purpose of this review study is to explore different approaches to the efficient implementation of NMT into FLL and provide specific pedagogical implications for best practices. The PRISMA methodology for systematic reviews and meta-analyses was strictly followed. The search was conducted in two well-established databases, specifically Scopus and Web of Science, to generate sufficient data from research articles for further analysis. The findings of this systematic review indicate that NMT is an efficient tool for developing both productive (speaking and writing) and receptive (reading and listening) language skills, including mediation skills, which are relevant for translation. Moreover, the results show that NMT tools are especially suitable for advanced learners of L2, whose higher proficiency level enables them to critically reflect on the output of NMT texts more than beginners or lower-intermediate learners. Thus, the findings of this review study reveal that NMT has valuable implications for L2 pedagogy since it can serve as a very powerful online reference tool for FLL provided that teachers introduce students to its benefits but also limitations by implementing various teaching approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

The datasets generated for this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Alm, A. (2021, August). Taking tools into their own hands: Independent learner use of Machine Translation to proofread L2 academic writing. Paper presented at the Eurocall 2021 Conference, online

  • Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ‘21) (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery

  • Borodina, M., Golubeva, T. I., Korotaeva, I. E., Shumakova, S. Y., Bessonova, T. V., & Zharov, A. N. (2021). Impact of the Google translate machine translation system on the quality of training student translators. Webology, 18, 68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, N. (2018). Neural machine translation tools in the language learning classroom: Students’ use, perceptions, and analyses. JALT CALL Journal, 14(1), 3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. (2020). Using Google Translate in an authentic translation task: The process, refinement efforts, and students’ perceptions. Current Trends in Translation Teaching and Learning E, 7, 213–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, E. S., & Ahn, S. (2021). The effect of using machine translation on linguistic features in L2 writing across proficiency levels and text genres. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1871029

  • Chung, E. S. (2020). The effect of L2 proficiency on post-editing machine translated texts. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(1), 182–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Delorme Benites, A., Cotelli Kureth, S., Lehr, C., & Steele, E. (2021). Machine translation literacy: a panorama of practices at Swiss universities and implications for language teaching. In N. Zoghlami, C. Brudermann, C. Sarré, M. Grosbois, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds), CALL and professionalisation – short papers from EUROCALL 2021 (pp. 1–8). Research-publishing.net

  • Delorme Benites, A., & Lehr, C. (2021). (in press). Neural machine translation and language teaching – possible implications for the CEFR. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, 2

  • Ducar, C., & Schocket, D. H. (2018). Machine translation and the L2 classroom: Pedagogical solutions for making peace with Google Translate. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 779–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. (2019). The text is reading you: teaching language in the age of the algorithm. Linguistics and Education, 62, 100750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkin, E., & Mejias-Bikani, E. (2016). Using online translators in the second language classroom: ideas for advanced-level Spanish. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), 138–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcada, M. (2017). Making sense of neural machine translation. Translation Spaces, 6(2), 291–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredholm, K. (2019). Effects of Google translate on lexical diversity: vocabulary development among learners of Spanish as a foreign language. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada a la Enseñanza de las Lenguas, 13(26), 98–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, M., & Mundt, K. (2015). Friend or foe? google translate in language for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmich, E. A. (2019). A critical look at the bigger picture: macro-level discourses of language & technology in the US. CALICO Journal, 36(1), 39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmich, E. A., & Vinall, K. (2021). FL instructor beliefs about machine translation: ecological insights to guide research and practice. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning & Teaching, 11(4), 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. (2017). The role of translation technologies in Spanish language learning. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 4(2), 181–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., Schuster, M., Le, Q. V., Krikun, M., Wu, Y., Chen, Z. … Dean, J. (2017). Google’s multilingual neural machine translation system: enabling zero-shot translation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistic, 5, 339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolley, R., & Luciane, M. (2022). Thirty years of machine translation in language teaching and learning: A review of the literature. L2 Journal, 14(1), 26–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. (2019). The text is reading you: teaching language in the age of the algorithm. Linguistics and Education, 62, 100750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, O. (2021). Taking tools into their own hands: Independent learner use of machine translation to proofread L2 academic writing. Eurocall 2021 (pp. 25–27). Online. Aug 2021

  • Kol, S., Schcolnik, M., & Spector-Cohen, E. (2018). Google translate in academic writing courses? The EuroCALL Review, 26(2), 50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M. (2021). The effectiveness of machine translation in foreign language education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1901745

  • Lee, S. M. (2020). The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y. (2021). Gender bias in neural machine translation. Senior Capstone Thesis, University of Pennsylvania. https://www.cis.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Senior_Thesis_Yuxin_Liao.pdf

  • Loock, R. (2020). No more rage against the machine: How the corpus-based identification of machine translationese can lead to student empowerment. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 34, 150–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Maghsoudi, M., & Mirzaeian, V. (2020). Machine versus human translation outputs: Which one results in better reading comprehension among EFL learners? The JALT CALL Journal, 16(2), 69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, M. J., & Carpuat, M. (2018). Fluency over adequacy: a pilot study in measuring user trust in imperfect MT. Proceedings of AMTA 2018 (pp. 17–25). AMTA

  • Mundt, K., & Groves, M. (2016). A double-edged sword: the merits and the policy implications of Google Translate in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtisari, E. T., Widiningrum, R., Branata, J., & Riana, D. S. (2019). Google Translate in language learning: Indonesian EFL students’ attitudes. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(3), 978–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Niño, A. (2020). Exploring the use of online machine translation for independent language learning. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niño, A. (2009). Machine translation in foreign language learning: Language learners´ and tutors´ perceptions of its advantages and disadvantages. ReCALL: the Journal of EUROCALL, 21(2), 241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes Vieira, L., O’Hagan, M., & O’Sullivan, C. (2021). Understanding the societal impacts of machine translation: a critical review of the literature on medical and legal use cases. Information Communication & Society, 24(11), 1515–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan, J. (2014). Don’t bother learning a foreign language! Skype will soon translate spoken foreign words in real time. Daily mail. Retrieved on 20 December 2021 from: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2641653/Dont-bother-learning-foreign-language-Skype-soon-let-translate-spoken-foreign-words-real-time.html

  • Olkhovska, A., & Frolova, I. (2020). Using machine translation engines in the classroom: A survey of translation students’ performance. Advanced Education, 15, 47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, E. (2019a). Training students to use online translators and dictionaries: The impact on second language writing scores. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 8(2), 47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, E. (2019b). Online translator, dictionary, and search engine use among L2 students. CALL-EJ: Computer-Assisted Language Learning-Electronic Journal, 20(1), 154–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, V., & Barker, E. (2021). Systematic reviews: Structure, form and content. Journal of Perioperative Practice, 31(9), 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750458921994693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragni, V., & Nunes Vieira, L. (2021). What has changed with neural machine translation? A critical review of human factors. Perspectives, 30(1), 137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranathunga, S., Lee, E. S. A., Skenduli, M. P., Shekhar, R., Mehreen, A., & Kaur, R. (2021). Neural machine translation for low-resource languages: a survey.Computer Science: Computation and Language.https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.15115

  • Rucart, R. A. (2021, August). Potential and limitations of machine translation to learn English: the case of apprentice engineers. Paper presented at the Eurocall 2021 Conference, online

  • Schmalz, A. (2019). Maschinelle Übersetzung. In V. Wittpahl (Ed.), Künstliche Intelligenz (pp. 194–211). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, P., Leung, K., & Kin, B. (2019). Assessing the accuracy and teachers’ impressions of Google Translate: A study of primary L2 writers in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 56, 18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, S. C. (2020). Chinese students’ perceptions of using Google Translate as a translingual CALL tool in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799412

  • Tsai, S. C. (2019). Using google translate in EFL drafts: a preliminary investigation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 510–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valijäriv, R., & Tarsoly, E. (2019). Language students as critical users of Google Translate: Pitfalls and possibilities. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 12(1), 61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanmassenhove, E., Shterionov, D., & Gwilliam, M. (2021). Machine translationese: effects of algorithmic bias on linguistic complexity in machine translation. Proceedingsofthe16thConferenceoftheEuropeanChapteroftheAssociationforComputationalLinguistics:MainVolume (pp. 2203–2213). Association for Computational Linguistics

  • Wu, Y., et al. (2016). Google’s neural machine translation system: bridging the gap between human and machine translation. Retrieved on 20 December 2021 from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08144

  • Yamada, M. (2019). The impact of Google Neural Machine Translation on post-editing by student translators. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 31, 87–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Zhang, E. (2019). Application of neural network machine translation in college translation teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(19), 16–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X. (2020). Machine translation in foreign language learning classroom - Learners’ indiscriminate use or instructor’s discriminate stance. English Linguistics Research. Sciedu Press, 9(4), 1–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This review study was supported by COST Action CA19102 project ‘Language in the Human-Machine Era’ (LITHME) as well as by Excellence project 2022, run at the University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic

    Blanka Klimova & Marcel Pikhart

  2. Department of Applied Linguistics, Institute of Translation and Interpreting, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland

    Alice Delorme Benites & Caroline Lehr

  3. Department of English Studies, Philosophical Faculty, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany

    Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer

Authors
  1. Blanka Klimova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcel Pikhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alice Delorme Benites
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Caroline Lehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BK and MP conducted a conceptual design of the research and its methodology. All the authors (BK, MP, CS-S, ADB, CL) collected the data. ADB and CL drafted the Introductory chapter, BK and MP worked on the Results, Discussion and Conclusion parts. BK and MP revised the whole manuscript. CS-S edited the whole manuscript. All authors read and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blanka Klimova.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Research involving human participants

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klimova, B., Pikhart, M., Benites, A.D. et al. Neural machine translation in foreign language teaching and learning: a systematic review. Educ Inf Technol 28, 663–682 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11194-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11194-2

Keywords