Abstract
Over the last decades, using e-learning systems as an alternative format of education for traditional classroom has been growing in higher education and due to COVID-19 pandemic, this transition has been unprecedently accelerated. Although there is a large body of research on e-learning, little is known about the extent to which innovative and continuous use of e-learning systems can be influenced by students’ social and motivational factors especially their relational identity and autotelic experience. This study collected data from 400 higher education students through a survey to explore the role of students’ relational identity and autotelic experiences regarding their innovative and continuous use of e-learning systems while considering the mediating role of students’ perception of relatedness. Collected data were analyzed using the structural equation modeling method. The results showed that students' relational identity and autotelic experience significantly influence the innovative and continuous use of e-learning. The results showed that relational identity and autotelic experience positivly associatewith innovative (β = 0.190, t = 3.544; β = 0.405, t = 7.973) and continuous use of e-learning (β = 0.188, t = 3.115; β = 0.344, t = 7.459) and relatedness plays a moderating role between relational identity and continuous use (β = 0.194, t = 4.500, p = 0.000). Relatedness weakens the relationship between relational identity and innovative use of e-learning. However, it reinforces the relationship between relational identity and the continuous use of e-learning. It was found that relatedness strengthens the relationship between autotelic experience with innovative and continuous use of e-learning. The results of this study provide evidence of how students’ social and motivational factors can influence their approaches to the innovative and continuous use of e-learning systems. We discuss these results and provide agenda for future practical and professional work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Aboagye, E., Yawson, J. A., & Appiah, K. N. (2021). COVID-19 and E-learning: The challenges of students in tertiary institutions. Social Education Research, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.212021422
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 157–178,. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
Ahuja, M. K., & Thatcher, J. B. (2005). Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 29(3), 427–459. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148691
Akbari, M. Javadi, N., & Danesh, M. (2022). Factors affecting students' continued intention to use e-learning systems. Technology of Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2022.8233.2640
Alharthi, A. D., Spichkova, M., Hamilton, M., & Alsanoosy, T. (2018). Gender-based perspectives of elearning systems: An empirical study of social sustainability. In B. Andersson, B. Johansson, S. Carlsson, C. Barry, M. Lang, H. Linger, & C. Schneider (Eds.), Designing Digitalization (ISD2018 Proceedings). Lund, Sweden: Lund University. http://aisel.aisnet.org/isd2014/proceedings2018/Transforming/1
Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89
Aubé, C., Brunelle, E., & Rousseau, V. (2014). Flow experience and team performance: The role of team goal commitment and information exchange. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9365-2
Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Open-source software user communities: A study of participation in Linux user groups. Management Science, 52(7), 1099–1115. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0545
Bentley, S. V., Greenaway, K. H., Haslam, S. A., Cruwys, T., Steffens, N. K., Haslam, C., & Cull, B. (2020). Social identity mapping online. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000174
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6%3c740::AID-SCE4%3e3.0.CO;2-3
Bøe, T., Sandvik, K., & Gulbrandsen, B. (2021). Continued use of e-learning technology in higher education: A managerial perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2664–2679. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1754781
Bölen, M. C., Calisir, H., & Özen, Ü. (2021). Flow theory in the information systems life cycle: The state of the art and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12641
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who Is This “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302250897
Cheng, Y. M. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of e-learning acceptance. Information Systems Journal, 21(3), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00356.x
Cheng, M., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2018). Student continuance of learning management system use: A longitudinal exploration. Computers and Education, 120, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.004
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.
Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., Sun, S. Y., Lin, T. C., & Sun, P. C. (2005). Usability, quality, value, and e-learning continuance decisions. Computers and Education, 45(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.001
Choudhury, S., & Pattnaik, S. (2020). Emerging themes in e-learning: A review from the stakeholders’ perspective. Computers & Education, 144, 103657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103657
Chow, W. S., & Shi, S. (2014). Investigating students’ satisfaction and continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation – confirmation model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1145–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.193
Chu, W. W., Ong, E. T., Ayop, S. K., Mohd Azmi, M. S., Abdullah, A. S., Abd Karim, N. S., & Tho, S. W. (2021). The innovative use of smartphone for sound STEM practical kit: A pilot implementation for secondary classroom. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1978963
Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers and Education, 122, 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001
Cocking, D. (2008). Plural selves and relational identity: Intimacy and privacy online. Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.008
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. Optimal Experience, Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, pp. 15–35. Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511621956.002
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Graef, R. (1975). Socialization into sleep: Exploratory findings. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 21(1), 3–18.
Curley, E., & Polites, G. (2020). The Optimal Experience: Social Identity and IT Identity as Antecedents of Group Flow in Social Media Use. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 664–673. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/63821. Accessed 11 Sept 2021
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macro theory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006
Dhir, A., Kaur, P., & Rajala, R. (2020). Continued use of mobile instant messaging apps: A new perspective on theories of consumption, Flow, and planned behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318806853
Drachsler, H., Jansen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2021). Adoption of learning technologies in times of pandemic crisis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1509–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12626
Egbodo, B. A., Odoh, C. O., & Achor, E. E. (2022). Use of E-Learning Strategies and Students’ Retention of Knowledge in Basic Science and Technology. British Journal of Education, 9(12), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.37745/bje.2013
Esteban-Millat, I., Martínez-López, F. J., Pujol-Jover, M., Gázquez-Abad, J. C., & Alegret, A. (2018). An extension of the technology acceptance model for online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(7), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1421560
Finneran, C. M., & Zhang, P. (2005). Flow in computer-mediated environments: promises and challenges. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01504
Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Heo, H., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2021). Enhancing learning engagement during COVID-19 pandemic: Self-efficacy in time management, technology use, and online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1640–1652. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12603
Hew, T. S., & Sharifah, S. L. (2017). Applying Channel Expansion and Self-Determination Theory in predicting use behaviour of cloud-based VLE. Behaviour and Information Technology, 36(9), 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1307450
Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. In S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory: Contemporary global perspectives (pp. 3–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1
Huang, M., Bhattacherjee, A., & Wong, C. S. (2018). Gatekeepers’ innovative use of IT: An absorptive capacity model at the unit level. Information and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.06.001
Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.18.1.17
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2016). A new autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: Teaching in students’ preferred ways. Journal of Experimental Education, 84(4), 686–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522
Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers and Education, 122, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003
Khan, I. U., Hameed, Z., Yu, Y., Islam, T., Sheikh, Z., & Khan, S. U. (2018). Predicting the acceptance of MOOCs in a developing country: Application of task-technology fit model, social motivation, and self-determination theory. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 964–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.009
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Lavoie, R., Main, K., & Stuart-Edwards, A. (2022). Flow theory: Advancing the two-dimensional conceptualization. Motivation and Emotion, 46(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09911-4
Lee, S. M. (2014). The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.12.002
Leyton-Román, M., Guíu-Carrera, M., Coto-Cañamero, A., & Jiménez-Castuera, R. (2020). Motivational variables to predict autotelic experience and enjoyment of students. Analysis in function of environment and sports practice. Sustainability, 12(6), 2352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062352
Li, X., Po-An Hsieh, J. J., & Rai, A. (2013). Motivational differences across post-acceptance information system usage behaviors: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0456
Liao, H. L., & Lu, H. P. (2008). The role of experience and innovation characteristics in the adoption and continued use of e-learning websites. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.006
Liao, C., Chen, J. L., & Yen, D. C. (2007). Theory of planning behavior (TPB) and customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2804–2822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.006
Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Intention to continue using Facebook fan pages from the perspective of social capital theory. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(10), 565–570. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0472
Luo, Z., Song, H., Marnburg, E., & Øgaard, T. (2014). The impact of relational identity on the relationship between LMX, interpersonal justice, and employees’ group commitment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.04.008
Martin, A. J., & Jackson, S. A. (2008). Brief approaches to assessing task absorption and enhanced subjective experience: Examining ‘short’and ‘core’flow in diverse performance domains. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9094-0
Meulenbroeks, R., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2022). Students’ self-reported well-being under corona measures, lessons for the future. Heliyon, e08733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08733
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
Nah, F. F. H., Eschenbrenner, B., & DeWester, D. (2011). Enhancing brand equity through flow and telepresence: A comparison of 2D and 3D virtual worlds. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 731–747. https://doi.org/10.2307/23042806
Nie, Y., Chua, B. L., Yeung, A. S., Ryan, R. M., & Chan, W. Y. (2015). The importance of autonomy support and the mediating role of work motivation for well-being: Testing self-determination theory in a Chinese work organization. International Journal of Psychology, 50(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12110
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-Based Assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83–95.
Pan, Z., Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2017). Who Do You Think You Are? Common and differential effects of social self-identity on social media usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(1), 71–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1296747
Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-Identity and common-Bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205005
Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Rahman, M. H. A., Uddin, M. S., & Dey, A. (2021). Investigating the mediating role of online learning motivation in the COVID-19 pandemic situation in Bangladesh. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1513–1527. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12535
Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L., Kiesler, S., Riedl, J., & Kraut, R. E. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 841–864. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703483
Rezvani, A., Khosravi, P., & Dong, L. (2017). Motivating users toward continued usage of information systems: Self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.032
Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109332834
Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1585–1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.001
Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6
Saga, V. L., & Zmud, R. W. (1994). Nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. IFIP Transactions a: Computer Science and Technology, 45, 67–86.
Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K., & Tarhini, A. (2019). Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9786-3
Sassenberg, K. (2002). Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.27
Schmid, S. E. (2009). Reconsidering autotelic play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 36(2), 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2009.9714759
Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers and Education, 49(2), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
Sharma, R., & Mohan, M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and E-Learning: Best Practices Across the Globe. In Adoption and Implementation of AI in Customer Relationship Management (pp. 1–25). IGI Global.
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482
Sieger, P., Gruber, M., Fauchart, E., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Measuring the social identity of entrepreneurs: Scale development and international validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 542–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.07.001
Simsek, I., Kucuk, S., Biber, S. K., & Can, T. (2021). Online learning satisfaction in higher education amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 247–261.
Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23463672
Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003
Sørebø, Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F., & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers and Education, 53(4), 1177–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.001
Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing Commitment in Personal Relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(3), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/353245
Stevens, T., den Brok, P., Biemans, H., & Noroozi, O. (2020). The Transition to Online Education during the Corona Crisis Situation: The effective adoption of online tools and methods. Retrieved from https://www.4tu.nl/cee/innovation/project/13042/the-transition-to-online-education-during-the-corona-crisis-situation. Accessed 11 Sept 2021.
Stupnisky, R. H., BrckaLorenz, A., Yuhas, B., & Guay, F. (2018). Faculty members’ motivation for teaching and best practices: Testing a model based on self determination theory across institution types. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53(January), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.004
Su, C. Y., & Guo, Y. (2021). Factors impacting university students’ online learning experiences during the COVID-19 epidemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1578–1590. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12555
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39.
Tan, S., Liu, Z., Liu, S., Su, Z., Chai, H., & Liu, S. (2020). Investigating the relationship among students’ interest, flow and their learning outcomes in a blended learning asynchronous forum. CSEDU 2020 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009339300340041
Tania, K. D., Abdullah, N. S., Ahmad, N., & Sahmin, S. (2022a). Continued Usage of E-Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Information Technology Management, 14, 245–254.
Tania, K. D., Abdullah, N. S., Ahmad, N., & Sahmin, S. (2022b). Continued Usage of E-Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Information Technology Management, 14(5th International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology (IRICT 2020)), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2022.85008
Tse, D. C. K., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2019). Beyond challenge-seeking and skill-building: Toward the lifespan developmental perspective on flow theory. Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1579362
Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 71–102. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250959
Vershitskaya, E. R., Mikhaylova, A. V., Gilmanshina, S. I., Dorozhkin, E. M., & Epaneshnikov, V. V. (2020). Present-day management of universities in Russia: Prospects and challenges of e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09978-0
Visentin, M., & Scarpi, D. (2012). Determinants and mediators of the intention to upgrade the contract in buyer–seller relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(7), 1133–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.05.001
Xiang, Y., & Chae, S. W. (2022). Influence of perceived interactivity on continuous use intentions on the danmaku video sharing platform: Belongingness perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 38(6), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1952803
Zhang, S., Chen, G., Chen, X. P., Liu, D., & Johnson, M. D. (2014). Relational versus collective identification within workgroups: Conceptualization, measurement development, and nomological network building. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1700–1731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312439421
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Akbari, M., Danesh, M., Rezvani, A. et al. The role of students’ relational identity and autotelic experience for their innovative and continuous use of e-learning. Educ Inf Technol 28, 1911–1934 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11272-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11272-5
Keywords
Profiles
- Morteza Akbari View author profile