Abstract
Even though there is an abundance of research on computer supported education (CSE), digital literacy (DL), technological literacy (TL), and internet literacy (IL), the correlation between them and their effect on each other have not been analyzed in the literature. However, no study has been conducted on the correlation between and effect of CSE, DL, TL, and IL and which additionally explains their relationship to each other. This study aims to analyze the effect levels among the latent variables of DL, TL, and IL, and the attitude toward applying CSE and these latent variables’ ratios to each other. For this purpose, eight hypotheses were developed after reviewing the literature. A relational descriptive model is used to detect the presence and extent of covariance. The participants of this study were 510 prospective teachers. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the scales were performed. The hypotheses of the research were tested with the structural equation model. As a result, it was revealed that DL, TL, and IL together significantly affect and explain the attitude towards CSE. Different suggestions have been developed based on the results of the research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Akdeniz, A. R., Öztürk, M., & Bakırcı, H. (2017). The effect of computer-supported teaching applicatons on 8th grade students' academic success and knowledge retention in science. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 14(2), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.26650/hayef.2017.14.2.0007
Aktürk, O., Şahin, İ., & Sünbül, A. M. (2008). Bilgisayar öğretmen adaylarının web temelli öğretim hakkındaki görüşleri [Opinions of computer teacher candidates about web-based teaching], VIIII Internetional Educational Technology Conference, 6–9 May Eskişehir-Turkey.
Amiel, T. (2006). Mistaking computers for technology: Technology literacy and the digital divide. AACE Journal, 14(3), 235–256.
Anıl, Ö., Batdı, V., & Küçüközer, H. (2018). The effect of computer-supported education on student attitudes: A meta-analytical comparison for the period 2005-2015. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0285
Arbuckle, J. (2009). Amos 18 user’s guide. IBM/SPSS Incorporated.
Arslan, A. (2006). The attitude scale toward making computer-supported education. Yüzüncü Yıl University, The Journal of Education, 3(2), 34–43.
Aşıcı, M. (2009). Literacy as a personal and social value. Journal of Values Education, 7(17), 9–25.
Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre-service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12437
Asrifan, A., Zita, C. T., Vargheese, K. J., Syamsu, T., & Amir, M. (2020). The effects of call (computer assisted language learning) toward the students’ English achievement and attitude. Journal of Advanced English Studies, 3(2), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.47354/jaes.v3i2.88
Åžakar, B. E., Gökbay, İ. Z., & Karahoca, A. (2016). Assessment of readiness for learning and academic success on computer assisted learning: A study on computer integrated manufacturing with lathe. Global Journal of Information Technology: Emerging Technologies, 6(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjit.v6i1.396
Backer, L. D., Keer, H. V., Smedt, F. D., Merchie, E., & Valcke, M. (2022). Identifying regulation profiles during computer-supported collaborative learning and examining their relation with students’ performance, motivation, and self-efficacy for learning. Computers & Education, 179(2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104421
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
Bariham, I. (2019). Influence of teachers’ gender and age on the integration of computer assisted instruction in teaching and learning of social studies among basic schools in tamale metropolis. Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(2), 52–69.
Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
Bauer, A. T., & Ahooei, E. M. (2018). Rearticulating internet literacy. Journal of Cyberspace Studies, 2(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.22059/JCSS.2018.245833.1012
Bayrakçı, S. (2020). Digital literacy as a whole of digital competences: Scale development study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Marmara University.
Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş, AMOS uygulamaları [Introduction to structural equation modeling, AMOS applications]. Ezgi Pub.
Becker, J. D., Hodge, C. A., & Sepelyak, M. W. (2010). Assessing technology literacy: The Case for an authentic, project-based learning approach, http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/edlp_pubs.
Berkant, H. G. (2016). Faculty of education students’ computer self-efficacy beliefs and their attitudes towards computers and implementing computer supported education. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.15.123
Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(2015), 21–35. https://www.idunn.no/doi/pdf/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-03
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabi [handbook of data analysis for social sciences]. Pegem A Pub.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Calaguas, N. P., & Consunji, P. M. P. (2022). A structural equation model predicting adults’ online learning self-efcacy. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10871-y
Çam, E., & Kiyici, M. (2017). Perceptions of prospective teachers on digital literacy. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 29–44.
Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.008
Chen, C. H., & Chen, A. Y. (2012). Instructional approaches on science performance, atitude and inquıry ability in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 113–122.
Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799–843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584
Chetty, K., Qigui, L., Gcora, N., Josie, J., Wenwei, L., & Fang, C. (2017). Bridging the digital divide: Measuring digital literacy. Economics, 12(23), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-23
Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002
Christ, W. G., & Potter, W. J. (1998). Media literacy, media education, and the academy. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02733.x
Compton, V., & Compton, A. (2013). Teaching the nature of technology: Determining and supporting student learning of the philosophy of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9176-2
Covello, S., & Lei, J. (2010). A review of digital literacy assessment instruments. Syracuse University, School of Education/IDD & E, https://www.coursehero.com/file/54626140/A-Review-of-Digital-Literacy-Assessmentpdf/.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Hyler, M. E. (2020). Preparing educators for the time of COVID … and beyond. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1816961
Davies, R. (2011). Understanding technology literacy: A framework for evaluating educational technology integration. Echtrends Tech Trends, 55(5), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0527-3
Dinçer, S. (2015). Effects of computer-assisted learning on students’ achievements in Turkey: A meta-analysis. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 12(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10136a
Ellington, A. J., Wilson, J. H., & Nugent, J. S. (2011). Use of tablet PCs to enhance instruction and promote group collaboration in a course to prepare future mathematics specialists. Mathematics and Computer Education, 45(2), 92–105.
Ercan, İ., & Kan, İ. (2004). Reliability and validity in the scales. Journal of Uludağ University Medical Faculty, 30(3), 211–216.
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9(2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.28945/1621
Estes, J. S. (2019). A call for teacher preparation programs to model technology integration into the instructional process. In M. Khosrow (Ed.), Pre-service and in-service teacher education: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1442–1458), IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7305-0.ch067.
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2020), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Ferdousi, B. (2019). The effect of computer self-efficacy and attitude on undergraduate students’ intention to use emerging technology in classroom learning. Journal of Computer Sciences and Applications, 7(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.12691/jcsa-7-1-8
Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publication Ltd..
Fister, K. R., & McCarthy, M. L. (2008). Mathematics instruction and the tablet PC. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701690303
Forret, M., Fox-Turnbull, W., Granshaw, B., Harwood, C., Miller, A., O’Sullivan, G., & Moira, P. (2013). Towards a pre-service technology teacher education resource for New Zealand. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9199-8
Fraillon, J., Schulz, W., & Ainley, J. (2013). International computer and information literacy study: Assessment framework. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). MultiCopy.
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7_7
Fuji, K., & Yoshida, F. (2015). Mobile phone-related behaviors and problems in Japan. In Z. Yan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mobile phone behavior (pp. 1079–1088). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8239-9.ch088
Gamire, E., & Pearson, G. (2006). Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Committee on assessing technological literacy. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11691.
García-Martín, J., & García-Sanchez, J. N. (2017). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of the competence dimensions of digital literacy and of psychological and educational measures. Computers & Education, 107(2017), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.010
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Rivero-Ortega, R., Rodríguez-Conde, M. J., & Rodríguez-García, N. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 on higher education: An experience-based approach. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Information technology trends for a global and interdisciplinary research community (pp. 1–18). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4156-2.ch001
Georgina, D. A., & Olson, M. R. (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty self-perceptions. Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.002
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub.
Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389751
Guillen, J. (2014). Digital literacies. Routledge.
Güneş, E., & Bahçıvan, E. (2018). A mixed research-based model for pre-service science teachers' digital literacy: Responses to “which beliefs” and “how and why they interact” questions. Computers & Education, 118(2018), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.012
Hadar, L., Ergas, O., Alpert, B., & Ariav, T. (2020). Rethinking teacher education in a VUCA world: Student teachers’ social-emotional competencies during the covid-19 crisis. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1807513
Hansen, J. W. (2003). To change perceptions of technology programs. Journal of Technology Studies, 29(2), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v29i2.a.10
Haseski, H. İ., & İlic, U. (2020). The effect of computer ii course on the achievements of pre-service teachers and their attitudes towards computer-assisted instruction. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 5(11), 1–34.
Hasse, C. (2017). Technological literacy for teachers. Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1305057
Hatlevik, I. K. R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2018), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935
Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2018). Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Education, 118(2018), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.011
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P. C., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Computers & Education, 138(2019), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012
Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P. C., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2020). Interaction in computer supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the implementation phase. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(23), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00202-5
Heydon, R. M. (2007). Making meaning together: Multi-modal literacy learning opportunities in an inter-generational art programme. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500422665
Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Barron, A. E. (2013). Are gender differences in perceived and demonstrated technology literacy significant? It depends on the model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2013), 639–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9304-7
Horton, L. M., Kim, K., Kothaneth, S., & Amelink, C. T. (2011). Macroergonomic analysis of ınstructional technology adoption: A case study on tablet PC adoption, Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2%2D%2D18310.
Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2020). Ready, set, go! Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching in secondary education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huerta, E., & Sandoval-Almazán, R. (2007). Digital literacy: Problems faced by telecenter users in Mexico. Information Technology for Development, 13(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20071
Ilomäki, L., Kantosalo, A., & Lakkala, M. (2011). What is digital competence? Linked portal. Brussels: European Schoolnet. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33734457.pdf.
Jong, T. D., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002179
Kan, A. U., & Yel, E. (2019). The relationship between self-efficacy beliefs of teacher candidates and their attitudes about computer-assisted instruction. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(3), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2019.03.017
Kara, S. (2020). Prospective visual arts teachers’ innovation skills and attitudes towards computer assisted instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i2.60
Karagülle, S., Varkı, E., & Hekimoğlu, E. (2019). An investigation of the concept of program literacy in the context of apllicability and functionality of educational program. Journal of Educational Reflections, 3(2), 85–97.
Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research methods]. Nobel Pub.
Kayış, A. (2006). Güvenilirlik analizi [Reliability analysis]. In Ş. Klayalcı (Ed.), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri [SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques] (pp. 403–426). Asil Broadcast Distribution Ltd.
Khalifeh, G., Noroozi, O., Farrokhnia, M., & Talaee, E. (2020). Higher education students’ perceived readiness for computer-supported collaborative learning. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4020011
Kim, E., & Yang, S. (2015). Internet literacy and digital natives’ civic engagement: Internet skill literacy or internet information literacy? Journal of Youth Studıes, 19(4), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1083961
Kline, P. (1999). A handbook of psychological testing. Routledge.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guılford Press.
Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382
Konstantinidou, E., & Scherer, R. (2022). Teaching with technology: A large-scale, international, and multilevel study of the roles of teacher and school characteristics. Computers & Education, 179(2022), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104424
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2007). Designing for mobile and wireless learning. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (180–192). Taylor and Francis E-Library.
Kumar, S., & Mahajan, P. (2013). Computer literacy and student demographics: A study of select Indian universities. Library Hi Tech News, 30(10), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-10-2013-0062
Kurudayıoğlu, M., & Tüzel, S. (2010). The types of literacy of the 21st century, changing text comprehension and Turkish teaching. Journal of Turkology Research, XXVIII, 283–298.
Kutluca, T., & Ekici, G. (2010). Examining teacher candidates’ attitudes and self-efficacy perceptions towards the computer-assisted education. Hacettepe University The Journal of Education, 38(2010), 177–188.
Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-17752017000100002
Lee, S. J., & Chae, Y. G. (2012). Balancing participation and risks in children’s internet use: The role of internet literacy and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(5), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0552
Lee, Y. H., Ko, C. H., & Chou, C. (2015). Re-visiting ınternet addiction among Taiwanese students: A cross-sectional comparison of students’ expectations, online gaming, and online social ınteraction. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(2015), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9915-4
Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Cheung, K. W. (2019). Learner perceptions versus technology usage: A study of adolescent English learners in Hong Kong secondary schools. Computers & Education, 133(2019), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.005
Lee, K., Courtney, M., McGlashan, A., Neveldsen, P., & Toso, M. (2020). Initial teacher education students’ perceptions of technolog and technology education in New Zealand. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(3), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09516-6
Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. N. (2012). Impact of ınternet literacy, internet addiction symptoms, and internet activities on academic performance. Sosial Science Computer Review, 30(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439311435217
Liao, Y. C. (2007). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on students’achievement in Taiwan: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 48(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.005
Liaw, S. S., Chen, G. D., & Huang, H. M. (2008). Users’ attitudes toward web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Computers & Education, 50(3), 950–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.007
Lieberman, D. A., & Linn, M. C. (1991). Learning to learn revisited: Computers and the development of self-directed learning skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1991.10781968
Lim, J., & Newby, T. J. (2021). Preservice teachers’ attitudes toward web 2.0 personal learning environments (PLEs): Considering the impact of self-regulation and digital literacy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2021), 3699–3720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10432-3
Link, T. M., & Marz, R. (2006). Computer literacy and attitudes towards e-learning among first year medical students. BMC Medical Education, 6(34), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-34
List, A., Brante, E. W., & Klee, H. L. (2020). A framework of pre-service teachers’ conceptions about digital literacy: Comparing the United States and Sweden. Computers & Education, 148(2020), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103788
Litt, E. (2013). Measuring users’ ınternet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media and Society, 15(4), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813475424
Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152
Livingstone, S. (2008). Internet literacy: Young people’s negotiation of new online opportunities. In T. McPherson (Ed.), Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected (pp. 101–122). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262633598.101
Lodhi, M. A., Ayesha, F., Farzana, İ., Amin, N., Khalid, F., & Siddiqa, A. (2019). Attitude of male and female students towards computer assisted language learning at intermediate level. English Language Teaching, 12(3), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n3p108
Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, 36(2), 115–128.
Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249
McCoy, C. (2010). Perceived self-efficacy and technology proficiency in undergraduate college students. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1614–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.003
Miao, T. C., Gu, C. H., Liu, S., & Zhou, Z. K. (2020). Internet literacy and academic achievement among Chinese adolescent: A moderated mediation model. Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1831074
Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123(2018), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
Munoz-Carril, P. C., Hernandez-Sell, N., Fuentes-Abeledo, E. J., & Gonzalez-Sanmamed, M. (2021). Factors influencing students’ perceived impact of learning and satisfaction in computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 174(2021), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104310
Noh, Y. (2017). A study on the effect of digital literacy on information use behavior. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 49(1), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000615624527
OECD. (2015). Students, computers, and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en
Önder, F., & Sılay, İ. (2016). The effect of enriched e-book supported laboratuary activities on pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer supported education. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(3), 945–960.
Önder, F., Çelik, P., & Silay, İ. (2011). Attitude of teacher candidates toward making computer supported education. Procedia Computer Science, 3(2011), 967–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.158
Osborne, J. W. (2014). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265248967_Best_Practices_in_Exploratory_Factor_Analysis.
Ozdamli, F., & Tavukcu, T. (2016). Determination of secondary school students' attitudes towards tablet pc supported education. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 22(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-022-01-0004
Porebska, A., & Wantuch, A. (2015). The role of computer-supported tools in the education of future engineers. The case of electrical engineering laboratory, 2015 8th International Conference on Human System Interaction (pp. 135–140), https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2015.7170656.
Potyrała, K., & Tomczyk, L. (2021). Teachers in the lifelong learning process: Examples of digital literacy. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1876499
Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2002). Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample sizes. Behavior Genetics, 32(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015210025234
Raji, B. (2019). Significance and challenges of computer assisted education programs in the UAE: A case study of higher learning and vocational education. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9767-6
Raju, N. S., Laffitte, L. J., & Byrne, B. M. (2002). Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.517
Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2021). Digital literacy: A review in the south Pacifc. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09280-4
Reisinger, Y., & Mavondo, F. T. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Critical issues and new development. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 21(4), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v21n04_05
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers and Education, 58(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
Santoso, A., & Lestari, S. (2019). The roles of technology literacy and technology ıntegration to ımprove students’ teaching competencies, KnE Social Sciences / International Conference on Economics, Education, Business and Accounting (3rd ICEEBA) (pp. 243–256). https://knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/view/4010
Schacter, J., & Fagnano, C. (1999). Does computer technology improve student learning and achievement? How, when, and under what conditions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.2190/VQ8V-8VYB-RKFB-Y5RU
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128(2019), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
Schittek, M., Mattheos, N., Lyon, H. C., & Attström, R. (2001). Computer assisted learning. A review. European Journal of Dental Education, 5(3), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0579.2001.050301.x
Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00032-7
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851319
Sefton-Green, J., Nixon, H., & Erstad, E. (2009). Reviewing approaches and perspectives on “digital literacy”. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800902741556
Seo, Y. J., & Bryant, D. P. (2009). Analysis of studies of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities. Computers & Education, 53(3), 913–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.002
Sharma, B. (2017). Computer assisted learning - a study. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education & Technology, 4(2), 102–105.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
The Royal Society (2012). Shut down or restart? The way forward for computing in UK schools. : Royal Academy of Engineering. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/education/computing-in-schools/2012-01-12-computing-in-schools.pdf
Tour, E., Creely, E., & Waterhouse, P. (2021). “It’s a black hole . . .”: Exploring teachers’ narratives and practices for digital literacies in the adult EAL context. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(3), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713621991516.
Trey, L., & Khan, S. (2008). How science students can learn about unobservable phenomena using computer-based analogies. Computers & Education, 51(2), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.019
Tsai, M. J. (2002). Do male students often perform better than female students when learning on computers? A study of Taiwanese eighth graders' computer education through strategic and cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.2190/9JW6-VV1P-FAX8-CGE0
Turgut, M. F., & Baykul, Y. (2013). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education]. Pegem A Pub.
UNESCO (2018). ICT competency standards for teachers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721/PDF/265721eng.pdf.multi.
Uşun, S. (2000). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de bilgisayar destekli öğretim [Computer-supported instruction in the world and in Turkey]. Pegem A Pub.
van Rensburg, H. J., & Son, J. B. (2010). Improving English language and computer literacy skills in an adult refugee program. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 6(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.6.1.69
Vernanda, D., Abdullah, A. G., & Rohendi, D. (2018). Internet literacy of vocational high school teachers. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012032/pdf
Vijayalakshmi, A., Lin, M. H. J., & Laczniak, R. N. (2020). Evaluating adolescents’ responses to ınternet ads: Role of ad skepticism, internet literacy, and parental mediation. Journal of Advertising, 49(3), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1770639
Wayangkau, I. H., & Loupatty, M. (2017). Designing computer-assisted instruction for the elementary schools’ teachers of Merauke District, Papua, Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 476–481. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-5-3
Wegmann, E., Stodt, B., & Brand, M. (2015). Addictive use of social networking sites can be explained by the interaction of internet use expectancies, internet literacy, and psychopathological symptoms. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(3), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.021
World Economic Forum (2016). The future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Global challenge insight report, world economic forum. Geneva. 2016. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf
Yasan Ak, N. (2020). Development of internet literacy self-efficacy scale for pre-service teachers. Turkish. Journal of Education, 9(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.664706
Yeşilyurt, E., Ulaş, A. H., & Akan, D. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of attitude toward applying computer-supported education. Computers in Human Behavior, 64(2016), 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.038
Yiğit, E. Ö. (2011). Determination of the technological literacy levels of pre-service teachers of social studies and their views on technology integrated social studies. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Marmara University.
Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2022). Examination of the efectiveness of the task and group awareness support system used for computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2020), 1355–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09741-0
Yondler, Y., & Blau, I. (2021). What is the degree of teacher centrality in optimal teaching of digital literacy in a technology-enhanced environment? Typology of teacher prototypes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Ahead-of-Print, https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1950084.
Zhao, P., Kynäshlahti, H., & Sintonen, S. (2018). A qualitative analysis of the digital literacy of arts education teachers in Chinese junior high and high schools. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616658341
Zurkowski, P. (1974). The information service environment relationships and priorities. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yeşilyurt, E., Vezne, R. Digital literacy, technological literacy, and internet literacy as predictors of attitude toward applying computer-supported education. Educ Inf Technol 28, 9885–9911 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11311-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11311-1