Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How e-learning readiness and motivation affect student interactions in distance learning?

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Student interactions in distance learning have been a critical element of the transactional distance theory. Research shows that student interactions have a positive effect on learning outcomes. However, little is known about how student interactions can be improved. The need to understand student interactions and to determine the relationships between the variables that are effective in these interactions has become evident. This study aims to investigate the impact of e-learning readiness and the motivations of students in distance learning on student interactions. In addition, it was examined whether motivation mediated the relationship between e-readiness and student interactions. The study was conducted with 172 students enrolled in a postgraduate program conducted by distance learning. Results showed that students' e-learning readiness and motivation are essential predictors of student interactions in distance learning. Furthermore, it was found that motivation had a mediation effect on the relationship between e-learning readiness and student interactions. The results of the research are helpful for both instructional designers and instructors of distance learning who want to reduce the transactional distance by increasing student interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos (Version 23.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago, IL: IBM SPSS.

  • Barba, P., Kennedy, G., & Ainley, M. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borotis, S., & Poulymenakou, A. (2004). E-learning readiness components: Key issues to consider before adopting e-learning interventions. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1622–1629). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Bovermann, K., Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning–a mixed methods case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0107-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş, Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4(2), 207–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Merino, D., & Serradell-López, E. (2014). An analysis of the determinants of students’ performance in e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çebi, A., & Güyer, T. (2020). Students’ interaction patterns in different online learning activities and their relationship with motivation, self-regulated learning strategy and learning performance. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3975–3993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10151-1

  • Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M. H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigdem, H., & Yildirim, O. G. (2014). Effects of students’ characteristics on online learning readiness: A vocational college example. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.69439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir-Kaymak, Z., & Horzum, M. B. (2013). Relationship between online learning readiness and structure and interaction of online learning students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekwunife-Orakwue, K. C. V., & Teng, T. L. (2014). The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Computers & Education, 78, 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eom, S. B. (2018). The effects of students’ motivation and student-student dialogue, student-instructor dialogue on students’ perceived e-learning outcomes. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). Association for Information Systems.

  • Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An update. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 185–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGram-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horzum, M. B., Demir-Kaymak, Z., & Gungoren, O. C. (2015). Structural equation modeling towards online learning readiness, academic motivations, and perceived learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(3), 759–770. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.3.2410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaoua, F., Almurad, H. M., Elshaer, I. A., & Mohamed, E. S. (2022). E-learning success model in the context of Covid-19 pandemic in higher educational institutions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kara, M. (2021). Transactional distance and learner outcomes in an online EFL context. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1717454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, K. & Abas, Z. (2004). An assessment of e-learning readiness at the open university Malaysia. International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE2004), Melbourne, Australia.

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mbwesa, J. K. (2014). Transactional distance as a predictor of perceived learner satisfaction in distance learning courses: A case study of bachelor of education arts program, University of Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i2.291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafi, H., Rolheiser, C., Harrison, L., & Heikoop, W. (2018). Connecting learner motivation to learner progress and completion in massive open online courses. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 44(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S.A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Glesinger Hall, C. & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved May 2, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/174879/

  • Paul, R. C., Swart, W., Zhang, A. M., & MacLeod, K. R. (2015). Revisiting Zhang’s scale of transactional distance: Refinement and validation using structural equation modeling. Distance Education, 36(3), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A Manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning. School of Education Building, The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasouli, A., Rahbania, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Students’ readiness for e-learning application in higher education. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3), 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saadé, R. G., He, X., & Kira, D. (2007). Exploring dimensions to online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1721–1739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin, M., Keskin, S., & Yurdugül, H. (2020). Sequential analysis of online learning behaviors according to e-learning readiness. In Online teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 117–131). Springer.

  • Schunk, D. H. (2007). Learning theories and educational perspective (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students. Computers & Education, 75, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, K. K. T., & Swatman, P. M. C. (2006). E-learning readiness in the classroom: A study of Hong Kong primary and secondary teachers. Proceedings of CollECTeR Europe 2006, (pp. 223–237).

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Topal, A. D. (2016). Examination of university students’ level of satisfaction and readiness for e-courses and the relationship between them. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.15.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trespalacios, J., & Lowenthal, P. (2019). What do they really like? An investigation of students’ perceptions of their coursework in a fully online educational technology program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, H. C., & Chou, C. (2020). Online learning performance and satisfaction: Do perceptions and readiness matter? Distance Education, 41(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, K. U. I., Debacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.2190/7BAK-EGAH-3MH1-K7C6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, R., & Keser, H. (2015). The adaptation study of transactional distance scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(4), 91–105. Retrieved May 2, 2021 from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/shw_artcl-1775.html

  • Yurdugül, H., & Demir, Ö. (2017). An investigation of pre-service teachers’ readiness for e-learning at undergraduate level teacher training programs: The case of Hacettepe University. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(4), 896–915. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2016022763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction (Doctoral dissertation). Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Education & Instructional Technology, Trabzon University, Trabzon, Turkey

    Ayça Çebi

Authors
  1. Ayça Çebi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayça Çebi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çebi, A. How e-learning readiness and motivation affect student interactions in distance learning?. Educ Inf Technol 28, 2941–2960 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11312-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11312-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation