Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are we leaving students behind? Self-directed learning in an ICT challenged country

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the preparedness and experience of students for the fast-paced convergence of ICT and higher education. Overall, 366 distance students with a history of self-directed learning through correspondence courses were profiled using structured text-based online interviews. Twelve students’ attributes on ICT material possession and competencies and experience of Open Distance and Open Learning (ODeL) were collected and analysed. The findings show that the majority of students (72%) who had prior knowledge about the basic concepts of ODeL modalities indicated satisfaction with the e-learning environment while the learning mode is challenging for traditional students (28%). Statistically significant positive correlations (ρ = 0.00) were observed between ICT competencies or preparedness: the level of prior academic qualifications (HAQ: r2 = 0.35); key challenge faced (KC: r2 = 0.26); and the convenience of ODeL (C.ODeL: r2 = 0.18). To ensure that students are not left behind with the proliferation of ICT in distance education, principal component analysis revealed that having prior knowledge about the ODeL modalities is an important attribute that contributes to students’ preparedness for the e-learning environment, thus bridging the variance between the expected expectations and the actual expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the sensitive and identifiable nature of our qualitative data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abdurakhmanova, G., Shayusupova, N., Irmatova, A., & Rustamov., D. (2020). The role of the digital economy in the development of the human capital market. International Journal of Psychological Rehabilitation, 25(7), 1475–7192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrianaivo, M., & Kpodar, K. R. (2011). ICT, financial inclusion, and growth: Evidence from African countries. IMF Working Papers, 2011(073). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781455227068.001.

  • Arinto, P. B. (2016). Issues and challenges in open and distance e-learning: Perspectives from the Philippines. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(2), 162–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aung, T.N., & Khaing, S.S. (2016). Challenges of implementing e-learning in developing countries: A review. In International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing (pp. 405–411). Springer.

  • Bai, Y., Yao, L., Wei, T., Tian, F., Jin, D. Y., Chen, L., & Wang, M. (2020). Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19. Jama, 323(14), 1406–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., & Fors, U. (2020). Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 957–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisson, G. E., Fisher, M. J., LaBelle, M. W., & Kozmic, S. E. (2015). Defining a mismatch: Differences in usage of social networking sites between medical students and the faculty who teach them. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 27(2), 208–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable: Internet Speed and Economic Development in Africa (2014). Word Wide Broadband Internet League 2021. https://www.cable.co.uk/media-centre/release/New-Worldwide-Broadband-Speed-League-Unveiled-UK-Ranks-31. Accessed 10 Jan 2022.

  • D’Angelo, C. (2018). The impact of technology: Student engagement and success. In Power., R. (Ed.) Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018. EDUC5303G, University of Ontario, Institute of Technology.

  • De Haan, J. (2004). A multifaceted dynamic model of the digital divide. It & Society, 1(7), 66–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Kemp, A. (2008). Analysing the effectiveness of sector support: Primary education in Uganda and Zambia. IDS Bulletin, 39(1), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Din, N., Haron, S., & Rashid, R. M. (2016). Can self-directed learning environment improve quality of life? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edrees, M.E. (2013). eLearning 2.0: Learning management systems readiness. In 2013 Fourth International Conference on e-LearningBest Practices in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards of Excellence and Creativity” (pp. 90–96). IEEE.

  • Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In: Christenson, S., Reschly, A., Wylie, C. (Ed.) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5.

  • Fuady, I., Sutarjo, M. A. S., & Ernawati, E. (2021). Analysis of students’ perceptions of online learning media during the Covid-19 pandemic (study of E-learning media: Zoom, Google meet, Google classroom, and LMS). Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 2(1), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, A. (2009). Conceptions of teaching and learning: Revisiting issues in open, distance and e-learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning, 24(2), 109–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasnell, A., & Mills, R. (2014). The quality and reputation of open, distance and e-learning: What are the challenges? Open Learning, 29(3), 190–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrie, C. R. (2016). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning environments. Brigham Young University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jović, M., Stanković, M. K., & Nešković, E. (2017). Factors affecting students’attitudes towards e-learning. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 22(2), 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanwar, A. S., Carr, A., Ortlieb, K., & Mohee, R. (2018). Opportunities and challenges for campus-based universities in Africa to translate into dual-mode delivery. Distance Education, 39, 140–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, A. (2009). E-learning: You don’t always get what you hope for. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(2), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, P. L. C., Ng, H. K., Tse, A. H., Lu, M., & Wong, B. Y. (2021). eLearning technology and the advancement of practical constructivist pedagogies: Illustrations from classroom observations. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lembani, R., Gunter, A., Breines, M., & Dalu, M. T. B. (2020). The same course, different access: The digital divide between urban and rural distance education students in South Africa. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(1), 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monk, E. F., Guidry, K. R., Pusecker, K. L., & Ilvento, T. W. (2020). Blended learning in computing education: It’s here but does it work? Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musingafi, M. C. C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Shupikai, Z. (2015). Challenges for open and distance learning (ODL) students: Experiences from students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth, L. S., Jovic, S., & Mukherji, B. R. (2021). Reimagining higher education during and post-COVID 19: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 27(2), 141–156.

  • Parkes, M., Stein, S., & Reading, C. (2015). Student preparedness for university e-learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F., Khan, S., & Yang, L. M. (2016). Online versus in-person interviews with adolescents: An exploration of data equivalence. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 361–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slechtova, P. (2015). Attitudes of undergraduate students to the use of ICT in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 1128–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., Kahlke, R., & Judd, T. (2020). Not just digital natives: Integrating technologies in professional education contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šorgo, A., Bartol, T., Dolnicˇar, D., & Podgornik, B. B. (2016). Attributes of digital natives as predictors of information literacy in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 749–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieger, S., & Goritz, A. S. (2006). Using instant messaging for internet-based interviews. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 552e559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tcheng, H., Huet, J.M., Viennois, I., & Romdhane, M. (2007). Telecoms and development in Africa: The chicken or the egg? Convergence Letter, 8(16).

  • Trammell, B. A., & Aldrich, R. S. (2016). Undergraduate students’ perspectives of essential instructor qualities. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tularam, G. A. (2018). Traditional vs non-traditional teaching and learning strategies - the case of E-learning! International Journal for Mathemactics Teaching and Learning, 19(1), 129–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, R. M., Russell, S. J., Croker, H., Packer, J., Ward, J., Stansfield, C., & Booy, R. (2020). School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: A rapid systematic review. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(5), 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warf, B. (2019). Teaching digital divides. Journal of Geography, 118(2), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2014). The relationship of bandwidth, interaction, and performance in online courses: A Study. Africa: Youth employment in Sub-Saharan Africa. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/301371468003940792/pdf/ACS81330WP0P12977300Box385165B00PUBLIC0.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2022.

  • Wu, C. (2006). Blogs in TEFL: A new promising vehicle. Online Submission, 3(5), 69–73.

  • Wu, Y., & Turner, P. (2006). The relationship of bandwidth, interaction, and performance in online courses: A study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration IX (I). Retrieved September 12, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/193170/.

  • Zajda, J., & Rust, V. (2016). Current research trends in globalisation and neo-liberalism in higher education. Globalisation and Higher Education Reforms, 15, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Commonwealth of Learning, British Columbia Canada. Furthermore, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments on the earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reuben Lembani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The ethical clearance certificate to conduct an online survey on open distance education at CBU was issued by the Copperbelt University’ Research Ethics Committee. The certificate dated 8th April 2021 was signed by the Director of Research, Dr. Emmanuel Ogbomida (emmanuel.ogbomida@cbu.ac.zm).

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lembani, R., Mulenga, K., Mwewa, P. et al. Are we leaving students behind? Self-directed learning in an ICT challenged country. Educ Inf Technol 28, 3475–3492 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11318-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11318-8

Keywords