Abstract
In synchronous learning, participants interact by viewing each other directly. Deactivation of the video camera and low student involvement can be interpreted variously, including learning seriousness or lack of it, physical presence in the virtual classroom, etc. We studied the connection between video camera use, class involvement and student achievement in a one semester psychometry class. We monitored camera use and class involvement and captured final grades, supplemented with an open-ended questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. A combination of turning a camera on and active participation in the class affected the student grade more strongly (p = 0.88) than class involvement (p = 0.12). Bayes factors showed that a model, enhanced by both activated cameras and student involvement, was 7.14 times more likely to affect grade. Bayes linear regression predicted class participation increased the grade by 3.2 points per meeting, whereas turning the camera on increased it by only 0.9 points per meeting. However, both involvement and turning the camera on were predictors of student achievement. Questionnaire responses showed reasons not turning a camera on included unready to learn (44%), unstable internet connection and limited quota (37%), psychological reasons (11%), devices overheating (4%) and following others (4%). On the other hand, students always turned the camera on because of communication support (49%), evidence of seriousness (25%) and attendance (16%), following others (1%), good internet connection (1%), and respect for the instructors (8%). The students who activated their camera felt supervised and it forced them to study seriously and maintain concentration during class.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldhafeeri, F. M., & Alotaibi, A. A. (2022). Effectiveness of digital education shifting model on high school students’ engagement. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10879-4
Ali, A., Inglis, A., n, Prado, E., & Wundervald, B. (2014). Bayesian linear regression. https://brunaw.com/phd/bayes-regression/report.pdf
Barr, B., & Miller, S. (2013). Higher education: The online teaching and learning experience.Online Teaching and Learning, 23. http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED543912
Beuchot, A., & Bullen, M. (2007). Interaction and interpersonality in online discussion forums Interaction and Interpersonality in. Distance Education, 10, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081285
Bolstad, W. M. (2007). Introduction to Bayesian statistics (2nd ed.). Publication: A John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Boton, E. C., & Gregory, S. (2015). Minimizing attrition in online degree courses. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 62–90. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1051044.pdf
Bouchey, B., Gratz, E., & Kurland, S. (2021). Remote student support during COVID-19: Perspectives of chief online officers in higher education. Online Learning Journal, 25(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2481
Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3565–3576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7123
Costa, K. (2020). Cameras Be Damned. Linkedin.Com. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cameras-damned-karen-costa/
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Research+design+-+Qualitative,+Quantitative,+and+mixed+methods+approaches#0
Falloon, G. (2011). Exploring the virtual classroom: What students need to know (and teachers should consider). Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 7(4), 439–451
Francescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2019). Exclusively synchronous online (VIRI) learning: The impact on student performance and engagement outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318818864
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gherhes, V., Simon, S., & Para, I. (2021). Analysing students ’ reasons for keeping their webcams on or off during online classes. Sustainability, 13(3203), https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063203
González, J. A., Giuliano, M., & Pérez, S. N. (2022). Measuring the effectiveness of online problem solving for improving academic performance in a probability course. Education and Information Technologies, 6437–6457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10876-7
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer - mediated conferencing environment. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
Heflin, H., & Macaluso, S. (2021). Student initiative empowers engagement for learning online. Online Learning Journal, 25(3), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2414
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous E-Learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55. https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/article-downloads/eqm0848.pdf
Huckins, J. F., Alex, W., Wang, W., Hedlund, E., Rogers, C., Wu, J., Obuchi, M., Murphy, E. I., Meyer, M. L., Wagner, D., Holtzheimer, P. E., & Campbell, A. T. (2020). Mental health and behavior of college students during the early phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal smartphone and ecological momentary assessment study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), https://doi.org/10.2196/20185
Indahri, Y. (2020). Distance learning issue in the pandemic era. Info Singkat: A Brief Study of Actual and Strategic Issues, June. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/info_singkat/Info%20Singkat-XII-12-II-P3DI-Juni-2020-201-EN.pdf
JASP Team (2022). JASP (Version 0.16.1) Computer software. https://jasp-stats.org/
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Khan, B. H. (2006). Flexible Learning in an Information Society. USA: Information Science Publishing
Khlaif, Z. N., Salha, S., Fareed, S., & Rashed, H. (2021). The hidden shadow of coronavirus on education in developing countries. Online Learning Journal, 25(1), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2287
Krippendorf, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. In Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203708200
Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how.World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/
Li, Q., Zhou, X., Bostian, B., & Xu, D. (2021). How can we improve online learning at community colleges? Voices from online instructors and students. Online Learning Journal, 25(3), 157–190. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2362
McBrien, J. L., Jones, P., & Cheng, R. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605
Mottet, T. P., & Richmond, V. P. (2000). Student nonverbal communication and its influence on teachers and teaching: A review of literature. In The Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED447526.pdf
Ng, K. C. (2007). Replacing face-to-face tutorials by synchronous online technologies: Challenges and pedagogical implications. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i1.335
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2015). Enhancing the interpretation of significant findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 770–792. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2004.1913
Permai, S. D., & Tanty, H. (2018). Linear regression model using bayesian approach for energy performance of residential building. Procedia Computer Science, 135, 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.219
Reich, J., Buttimer, C. J., Coleman, D., Colwell, R. D., Faruqi, F., & Larke, L. R. (2020). What’s lost, what’s left, what’s next: Lessons learned from the lived experiences of teachers during the pandemic. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/8exp9
Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
Sato, T., Ellison, W., D., & Tsuda, E. (2019). Study habits and learning experiences of undergraduate students in a physical education major online kinesiology course. The Physical Educator, 76, 440–466. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2019-V76-I2-8837
Shahabadi, M. M., & Uplane, M. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176(February), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.453
Sorrells, D., & Wittmer, C. (2020). Reflections on transitioning to remote learning assistance during COVID-19 and possible implications for the future. The Learning Assistance Review, 25(2), 41–48. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A637465133/AONE?u=anon~f61fda 58&sid=googleScholar&xid=3fc4f4ac
Trussell, H. J., & Gumpertz, M. L. (2020). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Online Homework with Handwritten Homework in Electrical and Computer Engineering Classes. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2020.2971198
Yamada, M., & Goda, Y. (2012). Application of social presence principles to CSCL design for quality interactions. In educational stages and interactive learning:from kindergarten to workplace training. In IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0137-6.ch003
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflict.
Supplementary information
Raw data and original native language responses as well as JASP outputs are included in Tables S1 to S4 of the supplementary data.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alim, S., Petsangsri, S. & Morris, J. Does an activated video camera and class involvement affect academic achievement? An investigation of distance learning students. Educ Inf Technol 28, 5875–5892 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11380-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11380-2