Abstract
This study examined whether and how an online mentoring social network (SN) assists students with special needs—Intellectual Disabilities (ID) or Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), in coping with their disabilities and accumulating bonding and bridging types of social capital. The study used a qualitative research paradigm—Netnography to crosscheck observations of the participants' online activities with content analysis of their posts and a network analysis of the participants' interactions with four mentor types – students with disabilities, high-school students, undergraduates and teachers. The findings showed that the online mentoring SN functioned as an assistive technology for students with ID and ASD who actively interacted with other members to accumulate social capital, share information and receive support. The most prevalent categories in the analysis were sharing of personal experiences and interests, and emotion processing, whereas coping with disability and self-introduction were less common. Surprisingly, undergraduate mentors and most of the teachers interacted only within their own groups and not with students. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed.





Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abbas, R., & Mesch, G. (2018). Do rich teens get richer? Facebook use and the link between offline and online social capital among Palestinian youth in Israel. Information, Communication & Society, 21(1), 63–79.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Arlington, VA.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2008). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via internet: Theoretical and practical aspect. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace. Theory, research, applications, (pp. 209–222). Cambridge University Press.
Attwood, A. (1997). Asperger’s syndrome: A guide for parents and professionals. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Blau, I., & Neuthal, T. (2012). Tweeting educational technology: A tale of professional community of practice. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 5(1), 75–80.
Blau, I., Mor, N., & Neuthal, T. (2013). Interacting for learning: Digital portfolios for a learning community in a university course. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 241–255.
Benford, P., & Standen, P. J. (2009). The internet: A comfortable communication medium for autistic people? Journal of Assistive Technologies, 3(2), 44–53.
Boniel-Nissim, M., & Barak, A. (2013). The therapeutic value of adolescents’ blogging about social-emotional difficulties. Psychological Services, 10, 333–341.
Borgström, Å., Daneback, K., & Molin, M. (2019). Young people with intellectual disabilities and social media: A literature review and thematic analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 21(1), 129–140.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Cassiani, C., Stinson, J., & Lindsay, S. (2020). E-mentoring for youth with physical disabilities preparing for employment: A content analysis of support exchanged between participants of a mentored and non-mentored group. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(14), 1963–1970.
Day, S. L., & Edwards, B. J. (1996). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 486–492.
Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(2), 119–146.
Ellison, N., Steinfeld, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘“friends”’: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 1143–1168.
Eshet, Y. (2012). Digital literacy: A revised model. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 267–276.
Esterling, B. A., L’Abate, L., Murray, E. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1999). Empirical foundations for writing in prevention and psychotherapy: Mental and physical health outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 79–96.
Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my facebook wall: Effects of exposure to facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 14(1–2), 79–83.
Hershkovzt, A., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2017). Teacher-student relationship and Facebook-mediated communication: Student perceptions. Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal, 25(53), 91–100.
Holmes, A., & Silvestri, R. (2012). Assistive technology use by students with LD in postsecondary education: A case of application before investigation? Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27(1), 81–97.
Kasperski, R., & Blau, I. (2020). Social capital in high-schools: Teacher-student relationships on an online social network and their association with in-class interactions and learning. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815220
Kozinets, R. V. (2002). Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.
Lacava, P. G., Golan, O., Baron-Cohen, S., & Smith Myles, B. (2007). Using assistive technology to teach emotion recognition to students with Asperger syndrome: A pilot study. Remedial and Special Education, 28(3), 174–181.
Leavitt, A., Burchard, E., Fisher, D., & Gilbert, S. (2009). The influentials: New approaches for analyzing influence on Twitter. A publication of the Web Ecology Project. Retrieved April 17, 2020 from http://tinyurl.com/lzjlzq
Liu, S., Xie, W., Han, S., Mou, Z., Zhang, X., & Zhang, L. (2018). Social interaction patterns of the disabled people in asymmetric social dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1683.
Mahmood, Q. K., Zakar, R., & Zakar, M. Z. (2018). Role of Facebook use in predicting bridging and bonding social capital of Pakistani university students. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 28(7), 856–873.
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2017). Implications of social network sites for teaching and learning. Where we are and where we want to go. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 605–622.
Martin, A. J., Strnadová, I., Loblinzk, J., Danker, J. C., & Cumming, T. M. (2021). The role of mobile technology in promoting social inclusion among adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 34(3), 840–851.
Mazurek, M. O. (2013). Social media use among adults with autism spectrum disorders. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1709–1714.
Noakes, M. A., Schmitt, A. J., McCallum, E., & Schutte, K. (2019). Speech-to-text assistive technology for the written expression of students with traumatic brain injuries: A single case experimental study. School Psychology, 34(6), 656.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.
Perelmutter, B., McGregor, K. K., & Gordon, K. R. (2017). Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: An evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 114, 139–163.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Salimkhan, G., Manago, A., & Greenfield, P. (2010). The Construction of the virtual self on MySpace. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1), article 1.
Sallafranque-St-Louis, F., & Normand, C. L. (2017). From solitude to solicitation: How people with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder use the internet. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(1), 79–96.
Shamambo, L., Niemann, M., Jonas, R., & Douglass, L. M. (2020). Mentorship for youth with chronic neurological conditions in the digital era: An innovative approach to supporting transition. Journal of Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 36, 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spen.2020.100857
Shillingsburg, M. A., Bowen, C. N., & Shapiro, S. K. (2014). Increasing social approach and decreasing social avoidance in children with autism spectrum disorder during discrete trial training. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(11), 1443–1453.
Shkedi, A. (2010). Multiple case narratives: A qualitative approach to studying multiple populations. John Benjamins.
Shpigelman, C. N. (2018). Leveraging social capital of individuals with intellectual disabilities through participation on Facebook. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(1), e79–e91.
Shpigelman, C. N., Reiter, S., & Weiss, P. L. (2008). E-mentoring for youth with special needs: Preliminary results. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 196–200.
Wetherby, A. M., & Prizant, B. M. (2000). Autism spectrum disorders: A transactional developmental perspective. Paul H. Brooks.
Acknowledgements
This study supported by The Open University of Israel Research Authority Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kasperski, R., Blau, I. Can an online mentoring social network assist students with intellectual disabilities or autism in coping with special needs and accumulating social capital?. Educ Inf Technol 28, 6027–6047 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11390-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11390-0