Abstract
Learners in asynchronous discussion forums are inundated with diverse options when it comes to interaction. This enables the embodiment of various styles of participation. On the other hand, the affective domain tends to be overlooked in the online discussion context. The modeling of discussion activities based on both cognitive and affective indicators constitutes this study’s unique aspect. In the study, the impact of social anxiety and participation styles on active participation in discussions were investigated using three-factor social anxiety and four-factor participation style models. In addition, the impact of active participation on academic achievement was also examined. Path analysis was used to explain the predictive correlation among these indicators. Students' participation behaviors in discussions during a three-week implementation were analyzed within the scope of a course taught during the COVID-19 pandemic period. The findings showed that social anxiety and participation styles had a significant impact on active participation, which, in turn, significantly affected academic achievement. The study provides crucial inputs in portraying the characteristics of learners in such a way as to tailor online discussions to their needs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abawajy, J. & Kim, T. (2011). Engaging and effective asynchronous online discussion forums. In T. H. Kim, H. Adeli, H. K. Kim, H. K. Kang, K. J. Kim, A. Kiumi, & B. H. Kang (Eds.), Software Engineering, Business Continuity, and Education (ASEA 2011) (Vol. 257) (pp. 695–705). Springer Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27207-3_75.
Afify, M. K. (2019). The influence of group size in the asynchronous online discussions on the development of critical thinking skills, and on improving students’ performance in online discussion forum. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(5), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.9351
Alkis, Y., Kadirhan, Z., & Sat, M. (2017). Development and validation of social anxiety scale for social media users. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.011
Almusharraf, A., & Almusharraf, N. (2021). Socio-interactive practices and personality within an EFL online learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 3947–3966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10449-8
Alsudais, A. S., Alghamdi, A. S., Alharbi, A. A., Alshehri, A. A., Alzhrani, M. A., Keskin, S., Şahin, M., & Althubaiti, A. M. (2022). Social anxiety in e-learning: Scale validation and socio-demographic correlation study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8189–8201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10919-7
Andresen, M. A. (2009). Asynchronous discussion forums: Success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations (Eric publication number: EJ833430). Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 249–257.
Bahçekapılı, E. (2021). Examining the social anxiety of university students in synchronous online learning environments. Acta Infologica, 5(2), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.934636
Barnett, M. D., Maciel, I. V., Johnson, D. M., & Ciepluch, I. (2021). Social anxiety and perceived social support: Gender differences and the mediating role of communication styles. Psychological Reports, 124(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119900975
Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Sage Press.
Calderon, O., & Sood, C. (2020). Evaluating learning outcomes of an asynchronous online discussion assignment: A post-priori content analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1510421
Campbell-Sills, L., Espejo, E., Ayers, C. R., Roy-Byrne, P., & Stein, M. B. (2015). Latent dimensions of social anxiety disorder: A re-evaluation of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). Journal of Anxiety Disorder, 36, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.09.007
Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. Heimberg, M. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment and treatment (pp. 69–93). Guilford Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum Press.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
Caglar, M., Dincyurek, S., & Arsan, N. (2012). Examination of social anxiety at university level students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43, 106–116.
Dascalu, M. D., Ruseti, S., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., Carabas, M., Rebedea, T., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2021). Before and during COVID-19: A Cohesion Network Analysis of students’ online participation in moodle courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, e106780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106780
Delaney, D., Kummer, T. F., & Singh, K. (2019). Evaluating the impact of online discussion boards on student engagement with group work. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 902–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12614
DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(3), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300303
Drange, T., & Van Wyk, N. (2019). Social anxiety- An increasing challenge for educators [Paper Presentation]. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martinez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), In Proceeding of 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (Edulearn 2019) (pp. 6045–6051). https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.1455
Dringus, L. P., & Ellis, T. (2010). Temporal transitions in participation flow in an asynchronous discussion forum. Computers & Education, 54(2), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.011
Ewert, A., & Sibthorp, J. (2009). Creating outcomes through experiential education: The challenge of confounding variables. Journal of Experiential Education, 31(3), 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590803100305
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. N. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Press.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gerard, P. D., Smith, D. R., & Weerakkody, G. (1998). Limits of retrospective power analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62(2), 801–807.
Goldberg, L. R., Bell, E., King, C., O’Mara, C., McInerney, F., Robinson, A., & Vickers, J. (2015). Relationship between participants’ level of education and engagement in their completion of the understanding dementia massive open online course. Bmc Medical Education, 15, e60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0344-z
Heimberg, R. G., Horner, K. J., Juster, H. R., Safren, S. A., Brown, E. J., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1999). Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz social anxiety scale. Psychological Medicine, 29(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798007879
Hrastinski, S. (2006). Introducing an informal synchronous medium in a distance learning course: How is participation affected? The Internet and Higher Education, 9(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.03.006
Hutchins, N., Allen, A., Curran, M., & Kannis-Dymand, L. (2021). Social anxiety and online social interaction. Australian Psychologist, 56(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2021.1890977
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., Jr., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
Joseph, N., Rasheeka, V. P., Nayar, V., Gupta, P., Manjeswar, M. P., & Mohandas, A. (2018). Assessment of determinants and quality of life of university students with social phobias in a coastal city of south India. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 33, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2018.02.008
Keskin, S., Şahin, M., Uluç, S., & Yurdugul, H. (2020). Online learners’ interactions and social anxiety: The social anxiety scale for e-learning environments (SASE). Interactive Learning Environments (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1769681
Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/2Frde.2013.38.1.52
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261.
Kurnaz, F. B., Ergun, E., & Ilgaz, H. (2018). Participation in online discussion environments: Is it really effective? Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1719–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9688-4
Kurucay, M., & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: why doesn’t he help? Appleton-Century Crofts Publishing.
Lee, B. W., & Stapinski, L. A. (2012). Seeking safety on the internet: Relationship between social anxiety and problematic internet use. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(1), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.11.001
Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141–173. https://doi.org/10.1159/000414022
Markey, P. M. (2000). Bystander intervention in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00056-4
Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2007). When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 49(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.011
Mercado-del-Collado, R., Jacome-Avila, N., Ortega-Guerrero, J. C., Casillas-Alvarado, M. A., & Ramirez-Martinell, A. (2019). Participation patterns and achievement in a MOOC on digital knowledge for Mexican in-service teacher training. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives-Realia, 23, 80–96. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.23.15904
Mercimek, B., & Çaka, C. (2022). Asynchronous environments in online courses: Advantages, limitations, and recommendations. In G. Durak & S. Çankaya (Eds.), Handbook of research on managing and designing online courses in synchronous and asynchronous environments (pp. 96–116). IGI Global Press. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8701-0.
Miltiadous, A., Callahan, D. L., & Schultz, M. (2020). Exploring engagement as a predictor of success in the transition to online learning in first year chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2494–2501. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00794
Moore, M. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 22–28). Routledge Press.
Namaziandost, E., Razmi, M. H., Hernández, R. M., Ocaña-Fernández, Y., & Khabir, M. (2022). Synchronous CMC text chat versus synchronous CMC voice chat: impacts on EFL learners’ oral proficiency and anxiety. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1906362
Naranjo, M., Onrubia, J., & Segués, M. T. (2012). Participation and cognitive quality profiles in an online discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01179.x
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Press.
Ockey, G. J., & Choi, I. (2015). Structural equation modeling reporting practices for language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2015.1050101
Olobatuyi, M. E. (2006). A user’s guide to path analysis. University Press of America.
Pala, F. K., & Erdem, M. (2020). Development of a participation style scale for online instructional discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3213–3233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09817-x
Parks-Stamm, E. J., Zafonte, M., & Palenque, S. M. (2017). The effects of instructor participation and class size on student participation in an online class discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12512
Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8535.2007.00780.X
Pierce, T. (2009). Social anxiety and technology: Face-to-face communication versus technological communication among teens. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1367–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.06.003
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Poellhuber, B., Roy, N., & Bouchoucha, I. (2019). Understanding participant’s behaviour in massively open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3709
Rahman, S., Yasin, R. M., Yassin, S. F. M., & Nordin, N. M. (2011). Examining psychological aspects in online discussion. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3168–3172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.266
Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(8), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00022-3
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930687
Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Chen, B., & Halewood, C. (2015). Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9219-x
Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001
Russell, G., & Shaw, S. (2009). A study to investigate the prevalence of social anxiety in a sample of higher education students in the United Kingdom. Journal of Mental Health, 18(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230802522494
Ruthotto, I., Kreth, Q., Stevens, J., Trively, C., & Melkers, J. (2020). Lurking and participation in the virtual classroom: The effects of gender, race, and age among graduate students in computer science. Computers & Education, 151, e103854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103854
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children’s composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 67–95). John Wiley & Sons Press.
Shalom, J. G., Israeli, H., Markovitzky, O., & Lipsitz, J. D. (2015). Social anxiety and physiological arousal during computer mediated vs. face to face communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.056
Song, D., Rice, M., & Oh, E. Y. (2019). Participation in online courses and interaction with a virtual agent. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3998
Sun, Y. Y., & Gao, F. (2017). Comparing the use of a social annotation tool and a threaded discussion forum to support online discussions. Internet and Higher Education, 32, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.10.001
Sun, Z., Lin, C. H., Wu, M., Zhou, J., & Luo, L. (2018). A tale of two communication tools: Discussion-forum and mobile instant-messaging apps in collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12571
Şahin, M., Keskin, S., & Yurdugül, H. (2020). Sequential analysis of online learning behaviors according to e-learning readiness. In P. Isaias, D. G. Sampson, & D. Ifenthaler. (Eds.), Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age. Springer Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48190-2_7
Topham, P., Moller, N., & Davies, H. (2016). Social anxiety in learning: Stages of change in a sample of UK undergraduates. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.895307
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wei, H. C., Peng, H., & Chou, C. (2015). Can more interactivity improve learning achievement in an online course? Effects of college students’ perception and actual use of a course-management system on their learning achievement. Computers & Education, 83, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.013
West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 209–231). Guilford Press.
Wise, A. F., Hausknecht, S. N., & Zhao, Y. (2014). Attending to others’ posts in asynchronous discussions: Learners’ online “listening” and its relationship to speaking. International Journal Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-014-9192-9
Woods, K., & Bliss, K. (2016). Facilitating successful online discussions. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(2), 76–92. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1117812.pdf.
Yang, X., Li, Y., Tan, C. H., & Teo, H. H. (2007). Students’ participation intention in an online discussion forum: Why is computer-mediated interaction attractive? Information & Management, 44(5), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.04.003
Yen, J. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., Wang, P. W., Chang, Y. H., & Ko, C. H. (2012). Social anxiety in online and real-life interaction and their associated factors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0015
Zheng, B., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Participation, interaction, and academic achievement in an online discussion environment. Computers & Education, 84, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.008
Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34(6), e451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-0004-0
Funding
This work was supported by Van Yuzuncu Yıl University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [Grant numbers SYD-2021–9505], Van, Turkey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethics statement
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the academic ethics commission of Van Yüzüncü Yıl University.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Sample academic discussion questions
-
1.
What are the effects of restrictive precautions for internet access on its correct and effective use?
-
2.
Loneliness/Happiness/Inquisitiveness/Sadness/Joyfulness
Do you think the above-mentioned moods have an effect on compulsive technology usage? Write your thoughts on this subject.
-
3.
What are the positive and negative effects of the anonymization of communications in online social environments?
-
4.
While some people are strictly against stealing hardware products, they may not be against stealing software products. What could be the underlying reasons for people's two-faced ethical stances between these two product types?
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Demir, Ö., Cinar, M. & Keskin, S. Participation style and social anxiety as predictors of active participation in asynchronous discussion forums and academic achievement. Educ Inf Technol 28, 11313–11334 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11517-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11517-3