Abstract
With a strong demand for online education and project management in deeper scope and larger scale to better fit COVID-19 pandemic situation, exploring new knowledge of online education to make it more effective became vital with the new challenges of STEM education. To resolve the above problem, this paper focuses on various aspects of online STEM education project management where the Enhanced Noyce Explorers, Scholars, Teachers (E-NEST) three-tiered structure was implemented during the COVID-19 period. Two City University of New York (CUNY) institutions, New York City College of Technology (City Tech) and Borough of Manhattan Community College (BMCC) used the three-tiered structure referred to as Explorer, Scholar and Teacher which incorporated advancements in teaching internships, professional development workshops and mentorships remotely. Built upon the theories of engagement, capacity and continuity (ECC) and team-based learning (TBL), this remote learning model and infrastructure had a positive impact on STEM education and project management. The technological tools utilized included Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft teams, Blackboard Collaborate Ultra, Skype and SurveyMonkey. The results from qualitative and quantitative data including project evaluation, online surveys and focus group interviews demonstrate that the modified remote learning and management tools were effective. This indicated that the E-NEST model greatly supported student success and faculty in online learning and project management meetings.
The E-NEST STEM education project was compared to two other project management models along with the previous NEST curriculum. Faculty emphasized practicing project management proactively and utilized best practices of classroom and time management consistent with Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and Project Cycle Management (PCM) guidelines. The comparisons attest that the E-NEST project developed excellent and innovative online platforms for student learning with project management and ECC and TBL applications.
Hereafter, this research can be used to constructively develop more online STEM education learning models and platforms and integrate new practice and technology globally. These ideas can contribute to future research that could be applied internationally to STEM education projects in K-12 and higher education institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data Availability
All data analysed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher Education Institutes: a necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16–25. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1259642.pdf.
Arshad, N., Savita, K., & Zulkifli, M. (2020). Review on personality types and learning Styles in Team-based Learning for Information Systems Students. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(6), 330–334. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110643.
Artis, S., & Washington, G. (2021). See It, Do It, Learn It: Integrating Experiential Learning into High School Engineering Outreach Programs. American Society for Engineering Educationhttps://www.jee.org/36119
Buttimer, C., Fang, A., Hillaire, G., Hirsch, K., Larke, L., Littenberg-Tobias, J., Moussapour, R., Napier, A., Reich, J., Slama, R., & Thompson, M. (2020). Remote Learning Guidance from State Education Agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: a first look. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/437e2.
Cakula, S. (2021). Active learning methods for sustainable Education Development. Rural Environment Education Personality, 14, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.22616/REEP.2021.14.006.
Christie, C., & Alkin, M. (2003). The user-oriented evaluator’s role in formulating a program theory: using a theory-driven approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400306.
Crisan, E., Muresan, I., & Ilies, L. (2010). Best Practices in Project Management. Review of International Comparative Management, 11(1), 43–51. https://www.academia.edu/20497918/Best_Practices_in_Project_Management.
Delisle, C., Jugdev, K., & Thomas, J. (2001). Rethinking Project management – old Truths and New Insights. Schulich School of Engineering Research & Publications, 7(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/30197.
Evagorou, M., & Nisiforou, E. (2020). Engaging pre-service teachers in an online STEM fair during COVID-19. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 179–186. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216234/.
Greene, J. (2007). Mixed methods in Social Inquiry. John Wiley & Sons.
Greene, J., & Caracelli, V. (1997). Advances in mixed method evaluation: the Challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New directions in evaluation (74 vol.). Jossey-Bass.
Jolly, E., Campbell, P., & Perlman, L. (2004). Engagement, Capacity and Continuity: A Trilogy for Student Success. GE Foundation. http://www.campbell-kibler.com/trilogy.pdf
Lipomi, D. (2020). Video for active and remote learning. Trends in Chemistry, 2(6), 483–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2020.03.003.
Loftsson, H., & Matthíasdóttir, Á. (2021). Moving Classes in a Large Programming Course Online: An Experience Report. Second International Computer Programming Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2021.2
Michaelsen, L., Sweet, M., & Parmelee, D. (2008). Team-based learning: small group learning’s next big step. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(116), https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.330
National Science Foundation (2021). Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Solicitation NSF 21–578https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2021/nsf21578/nsf21578.htm
Offenbeek, M. (2001). Processes and outcomes of Team Learning. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000690.
Ruder, P., Maier, M., & Simkins, S. (2021). Getting started with Team-Based learning (TBL): an introduction. The Journal of Economic Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2021.1925187.
Safi, F., Wenzel, T., & Trimble Spalding, L. A. (2020). Remote Learning Community: supporting teacher educators during unprecedented Times. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 211–222. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216308/.
Sami, J., & Medsker, L. (2021). Improving Recruitment and Retention of Undergraduates into STEM Teaching. In E. Langran & L. Archambault (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1491–1501.
Shen, F., Roccosalvo, J., Tian, Y., & Zhang, J. (2020). Creating Culturally Responsive Noyce Explorers, Scholars and Teachers. 17th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generationshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43020-7
U.S. News and World Report (2021). CUNY—New York City College of Technology. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/cuny-tech-2696
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all faculty, staff and students who helped and supported the program at City Tech, BMCC and NSF. We also would like to give a special thanks to Professor Gordon Snyder for his help with the project’s evaluations.
Funding
The E-NEST project is supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant Number #1: NSF 1,950,142, $1,444,398, May 1, 2020-April 30, 2025; Grant Number #2: NSF 1,340,007, $1,418,976, January 1, 2014-December 31, 2019, PI: Fangyang Shen; Co-PI: Ahmet Mete Kok, Yi Han, Andrew Douglas, Hon Jie Teo; Project Manager: Janine Roccosalvo).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FS and JR contributed to leading the project design and data analysis. All authors contributed to the infrastructure of the project and data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest or competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, F., Roccosalvo, J., Zhang, J. et al. Online technological STEM education project management. Educ Inf Technol 28, 12715–12735 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11521-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11521-7