Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do adults and children learn differently from video lectures with an instructor’s deictic gestures?

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence regarding the benefits of an instructor’s deictic gestures in video lectures on adults’ learning may not necessarily be reflective of their effect on children’s learning. Furthermore, there is a lack evidence regarding how deictic gestures specifically affect learners’ learning process. Based in cognitive load theory, with consideration of the signaling principle and embodiment principle in multimedia learning, the present study sought to determine whether an instructor’s deictic gestures affected young adults’ and children’s learning from video lectures differently. Participants consisted of 60 college students as the young adults sample and 63 pupils as the children sample. Each participant viewed one of two video lectures, either with or without the instructor using deictic gestures. During the experiment, participants’ eye movements, prior knowledge, learning process, and learning performance were recorded and measured. The results of nonparametric tests showed that when the instructor used deictic gestures, the children paid more attention to the video content while the young adults reported a higher learning experience. Both groups demonstrated improved learning performance, regardless of age. Our findings highlight the fact that young adults and children do learn differently from video lectures with an instructor using deictic gestures. Furthermore, our findings contribute to understandings regarding the design of video lectures and video-based learning, specifically, that if an instructor is presenting the content in video lectures, they should be encouraged to use deictic gestures to improve students’ learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability statements

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to this study as part of our research program, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Significance for this test was assumed at a p value of < .05 with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant [62007023, 62177027]; the Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province under Grant [2020P021]; and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of China under Grant (Excellent Doctoral Thesis Cultivation Project in Central China Normal University) [2022YBZZ026].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jiumin Yang: Conception and design of study, drafting the manuscript, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content.

Fangfang Zhu: Acquisition of data, analysis and/or interpretation of data, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content.

Yirui Jiang: Conception, acquisition of data, analysis and/or interpretation of data.

Zhongling Pi: Conception and design of study

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongling Pi.

Ethics declarations

Declaration of interest

There is no conflict of interest to report, as we conducted this study as part of our research program. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author statement

All persons who meet authorship criteria are listed as authors, and all authors certify that they have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content, including participation in the concept, design, analysis, writing, or revision of the manuscript. Furthermore, each author certifies that this material or similar material has not been and will not be submitted to or published in any other publication.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, J., Zhu, F., Jiang, Y. et al. Do adults and children learn differently from video lectures with an instructor’s deictic gestures?. Educ Inf Technol 28, 8377–8400 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11523-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11523-5

Keywords