Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial mental imagery gap of student–studio lecturer and client–designer/architect by virtual reality and non-virtual reality

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used the verbal protocol method to examine differences in perceptions of spatial mental imagery between students and studio lecturers and between clients and designers/architects, which lead to interpretational bias between groups of respondents regarding interior spaces. Individual perceptions of virtual space dimensions were captured by the 3D application, Associative Words Generator© (AWG©), which revealed impressions of the four respondent groups, using associative concept networks analysis on the visualization of virtual space with a database of 16,200 associative words. This study determined AWG© reduced the visual discrepancy gap during design critic and design consultation. Comparison of the results of the associative words generated during non-VR mental imagery and the VR session (AWG©) indicated that the student group most effectively used the VR. The lecturer group exhibited a thorough understanding of interior design and space architecture in their response in non-VR and VR sessions, which created a mental spatial imagery gap between the students and lecturers. The client group was inexperienced in interior design and architecture, resulting in different outcomes than the designer/architect group. In the VR session, the student and client groups more easily accepted visualizations generated by AWG, because they had fewer experiences and references than the lecturers and designers/architects, and thus, accepted the AWG virtual space visualization stimuli. The lecturer and designer/architect groups shared experiences that affected their expectations in responding to the generated visualizations, resulting in difficulty to accept the AWG virtual space visualization stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data available on request from the authors.

Code availability

(software application or custom code).

Software application available on request from the authors.

References

  • De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek 27. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev, G. V., & Nagai, Y. (2011). A conceptual network analysis of user impressions and meanings of product materials in design. Materials and Design, 32(8–9), 4230–4242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev, G. V., Nagai, Y., Taura, T., Noda, S., & Willy, D. (2012). Analysis of user feelings during interface operation: Implications for creative design. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Design Creativity volume 2, pp. DS73–72.

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3 speech act (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., López-Tarruella Maldonado, J., & Llinares Millán, C. (2017). Psychological and physiological human responses to simulated and real environments: A comparison between Photographs, 360° Panoramas, and Virtual Reality. Applied Ergonomics, 65, 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X., Nanjappan, V., & Georgiev, G. (2021). Seeing from the users’ eyes: An outlook to virtual-reality based empathic design research. Proceedings of the design society international conference on engineering design.

  • Indraprastha, A., & Shinozaki, M. (2012). Computational models for measuring spatial quality of interior design in virtual environment. Building and Environment, 49, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junaidy, D. W., Georgiev, G. V., Kaner, J., & Alfin, E. (2020). Identifying interior spatial dimensions according to user preference: An associative concept network analysis. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 19(3), 309–326

  • Lupyan, G., Abdel Rahman, R., Boroditsky, L., & Clark, A. (2020). Effects of language on visual perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(11), 930–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrvar, A. & Batagelj, V. (2016). Analysis and visualization of large networks with program package Pajek. Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling. 4.

  • Mwihaki, A. (2004). Meaning as use: A functional view of semantics and pragmatics. Swahili Forum, 11, 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagai, Y., Georgiev, G. V., & Zhou, F. (2011). A methodology to analyse in-depth impressions of design on the basis of concept networks. Journal of Design Research, 9(1), 44–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society Inc, 36(3), 402–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taura, T., Yamamoto, E., Fasiha, M. Y. N., & Nagai, Y. (2010) (’10). Virtual impression networks for capturing deep impressions. Design Computing and Cognition DCC J. S. Gero ed. Springer, pp. 559–578.

  • Unger, L., Fisher, A., & V. (2021). The emergence of richly organized semantic knowledge from simple statistics: A synthetic review. Developmental Review: 60, 100949.

  • Westerdahl, B., Suneson, K., Wernemyr, C., Roupé, M., Johansson, M., & Martin Allwood, C. (2006). Users’ evaluation of a virtual reality architectural model compared with the experience of the completed building. Automation in Construction, 15(2), 150–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Institute of Research and Community Services, Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB) Riset Unggulan ITB 2021, Grant 140/IT1.B07.1/TA.00/2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human-Interior Space Research Group, Faculty of Art and Design, Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB), CADL Building, 6th Floor, Ganesa 10 Street, 40132, Bandung, Indonesia

    Muhammad Adharamadinka & Deny Willy Junaidy

  2. Master’s Program in Design, Faculty of Art and Design, Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB), Bandung, Indonesia

    Muhammad Adharamadinka

Authors
  1. Muhammad Adharamadinka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deny Willy Junaidy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deny Willy Junaidy.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Study approval was provided by the officials of the Institute dor Research and Community Services.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Study approval was provided by the officials of the Institute dor Research and Community Services.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adharamadinka, M., Junaidy, D.W. Spatial mental imagery gap of student–studio lecturer and client–designer/architect by virtual reality and non-virtual reality. Educ Inf Technol 28, 8607–8643 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11534-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11534-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation