Abstract
This study compared students’ perceptions of their e-learning experiences in virtual and blended English for specific purposes (ESP) classes in an English as a foreign language (EFL) context. The study was conducted during an academic semester. The participants were two groups of Saudi ESP undergraduate students who took the same ESP course but in different environments, namely virtual and blended modes. Data were collected via a questionnaire to explore students’ perceptions of the five pedagogical aspects in an e-learning course: course design, student–instructor and student–student interaction, individual learning processes, and learning outcomes. The results revealed that students in both learning modes reported similar evaluations with respect to the clarity of course structure, individual learning processes, and learning outcomes. A particularly important result in this study concerns students’ perceptions of a lack of interaction between student and instructor, as well as among the students themselves, in both virtual and blended learning modes. Nevertheless, students in the virtual group proved to be significantly more capable of using the learning management system and perceived it to be easy to use. They also demonstrated greater enthusiasm about working in small groups with other students than did their counterparts in the blended group. The results have implications for teachers seeking to identify students’ needs before offering online courses and suggesting recommendations to enhance the implementation of future online ESP courses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be available on reasonable request.
References
Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). I’m not against online teaching, but what about us? ICT in Ghana post Covid-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1665–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z
Akbari, J., Tabrizi, H., & Chalak, A. (2021). Effectiveness of virtual vs. non-virtual teaching in improving reading comprehension of iranian undergraduate EFL students. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.907585
Al Zumor, A. W. Q., Refaai, A., Eddin, I. K., & Al-Rahman, F. H. A. (2013). EFL students’ perceptions of a blended learning environment: advantages, limitations and suggestions for improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p95
Al-Asmari, A., & Khan, M. (2014). E-learning in Saudi Arabia: past, present and future. Near and Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education, 1(2), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.5339/nmejre.2014.2
Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: a review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.03
Aldiab, A., Chowdhury, H., Kootsookos, A., Alam, F., & Allhibi, H. (2019). Utilization of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher education system: a case review for Saudi Arabia. Energy Procedia, 160, 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.186
Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers & Education, 127, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.007
Alhamami, M. (2018). Beliefs about and intention to learn a foreign language in face-to-face and online settings. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1387154
Aljaber, A. (2018). E-learning policy in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and successes. Research in Comparative and International Education, 13(1), 176–194.
Aljeraiwi, A., & Sawaftah, W. (2018). The quality of blended learning based on the use of blackboard in teaching physics at King Saud University: students’ perceptions. Journal of Educational & Psycho-Logical Sciences, 19(2), 616–646. https://doi.org/10.12785/JEPS/190221
Alkhalaf, S., Nguyen, A., & Drew, S. (2010). Assessing eLearning systems in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s higher education sector. International Conference on Intelligent Network and Computing (ICINC 2010).
Al-Masaud, K., & Hemeida, A. M. (2014). Impediments of activating e-learning in higher education institutions in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(4), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050403
Alruwaie, M., El-Haddadeh, R., & Weerakkody, V. (2020). Citizens’ continuous use of eGovernment services: the role of self-efficacy, outcome expectations and satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101485
Alzahrani, L., & Seth, K. P. (2021). Factors influencing students’ satisfaction with continuous use of learning management systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: an empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6787–6805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10492-5
Arrosagaray, M., González-Peiteado, M., Pino-Juste, M., & Rodríguez-López, B. (2019). A comparative study of spanish adult students’ attitudes to ICT in classroom, blended and distance language learning modes. Computers & Education, 134, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.016
Asoodar, M., Marandi, S. S., Reza Atai, M., & Vaezi, S. (2014). Learner reflection in virtual vs. blended EAP classes. Computer in Human Behaviour, 41, 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.050
Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010
Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The internet and higher education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
Barr, D., Leakey, J., & Ranchoux, A. (2005). Told like it is! An evaluation of an integrated oral development pilot project. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 55–78.
Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
Barton, E. A., & Dexter, S. (2020). Sources of teachers’ self-efficacy for technology integration from formal, informal, and independent professional learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09671-6
Boling, E., Hough, C., Kirunsky, M., Saleem, H., & Steven, M. (2012). Cutting the distance education: perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006
Bouilheres, F., Le, L. T. V. H., McDonald, S., Nkhoma, C., & Jandug-Montera, L. (2020). Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3049–3069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10100-y
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & López Pérez, M. V. (2014). Evaluation of a blended learning language course: students’ perceptions of appropriateness for the development of skills and language areas. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.770037
Chang, B., & Kang, H. (2016). Challenges facing group work online. Distance education, 37(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1154781
Chang, S. C., & Tung, F. C. (2008). An empirical investigation of students behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00742.x
Chen, C. M. (2009). Personalized E-learning system with self-regulated learning assisted mechanisms for promoting learning performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8816–8829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.026
Chen, J. (2022). Effectiveness of blended learning to develop learner autonomy in a chinese university translation course. Education and Information Technologies, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11125-1
Cho, M. H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: the role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963
Conacher, J. E., & Royall, F. (2007). An evaluation of the use of the internet for the purposes of foreign language learning. The Language Learning Journal, 18(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739885200231
Connolly, T. M., MacArthur, E., Stansfield, M., & McLellan, E. (2007). A quasi-experimental study of three online learning courses in computing. Computers & Education, 49(2), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.001
Costley, J., Southam, A., Bailey, D., & Haji, S. A. (2021). How use of learning management system mediates the relationships between learner interactions and learner outcomes. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 19, 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2020-0236
Crawford-Ferre, H. G., & Wiest, L. R. (2012). Effective online instruction in higher education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11.
Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: what do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13.
Dobbs, R., del Carmen, A., & Waid-Lindberg, C. (2017). Students’ perceptions of online courses: the effect of online course experience. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(1), 98–109.
Donnelly, R. (2010). Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning. Computer & Education, 54, 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.012
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
El-Maghraby, A. S. A. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of Moodle based blended learning in developing writing skills for university students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 7(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.21608/jrciet.2021.134636
Evan, V., Dooley, J., & Patel, K. (2012). Career paths, finance. Express Publishing.
Ferriman, N. (2013). The impact of blended e-learning on undergraduate academic essay writing in English (L2). Computers & Education, 60(1), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.008
Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Lencastre, J. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: a multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2
Fındık-Coşkunçay, D., Alkış, N., & Özkan-Yıldırım, S. (2018). A structural model for students’ adoption of learning management systems: an empirical investigation in the higher education context. Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 13–27.
Fisher, M., & Baird, D. E. (2005). Online learning design that fosters student support, self-regulation, and retention. Campus-wide information systems, 22(2), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740510587100
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
Francescucci, A., & Foster, M. (2013). The VIRI (virtual, interactive, real-time, instructor-led) classroom: the impact of blended synchronous online courses on student performance, engagement, and satisfaction. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(3), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v43i3.184676
Graff, N. (2011). An effective and agonizing way to learn: backwards design and new teachers’ preparation for planning curriculum. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 151–168.
Grgurović, M. (2017). Blended language learning: Research and practice. The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning, 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069.ch11
Hair, J., Hult, T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Inc.
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: a conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2000). Students’ distress with a web-based distance education course. Information Communication and Society, 3(4), 557–579.
Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021
Holley, D., & Oliver, M. (2010). Student engagement and blended learning: portraits of risk. Computers & Education, 54(3), 693–700.
Horspool, A., & Lange, C. (2012). Applying the scholarship of teaching and learning: student perceptions, behaviours and success online and face-to-face. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.496532
Hu, P. J. H., & Hui, W. (2012). Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 782–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.014
Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290252934603
Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12005
Kanno, M. (2020). Maintaining and enhancing students’ collaborative learning in a Japanese EFL higher education context. Journal of Education, Innovation, and Communication, Special Issue, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.34097/jeicom_SP_june2020_4
Kara, M. (2020). Distance education: a systems view of online learning. Educational Review, 72(6), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1766204
Keskin, S., & Yurdugül, H. (2020). Factors affecting students’ preferences for online and blended learning: motivational vs. cognitive. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 22(2), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2019-0011
Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), 107–115. http://academic-conferences.org/ejournals.htm. Accessed 13 Mar 2020
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
Kocoglu, Z., Ozek, Y., & Kesli, Y. (2011). Blended learning: investigating its potential in an english language teacher training program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1124–1134. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.908
Ku, H. Y., Tseng, H. W., & Akarasriworn, C. (2013). Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.019
Lack, K. A. (2013). Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. Ithaka S + R.
Lai, J. W. M., De Nobile, M., Bower, M., & Breyer, Y. (2022). Comprehensive evaluation of the use of technology in education–validation with a cohort of global open online learners. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 9877–9911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10986-w
Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001
Li, R. (2022). Effects of blended language learning on EFL learners’ language performance: an activity theory approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12697
Lima, D. H., Morris, M., & Kupritz, W. (2007). Online vs blended learning: differences in instructional outcomes and learners ‘satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Education, 11(2), 27–42.
Lima, F. B., Lauter, S. L., & Gomes, A. S. (2021). Contracting levels of students’ engagement in blended and non-blended learning scenarios. Computer & Education, 172, 104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104241
López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: students’ perceptions and their relation to outcome. Computer & Education, 56, 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
Lu, D. (2021). Students’ perceptions of a blended learning environment to promote critical thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 696845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696845
Lu, H., Jia, L., Gong, S. H., & Clark, B. (2007). The relationship of Kolb learning styles, online learning behaviors and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 187–196.
Mathew, N. G., Sreehari, P., & Al-Rubaat, A. M. (2019). Challenges and implications of virtual e-Learning platform in EFL context: perspectives of teachers. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 100–116.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–47.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning. US Department of Education.
Moawad, R. A. (2020). Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and academic stress in university students. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 12(1), 100–107.
Muller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: a systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_4
Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M., Thomas, S., Long, K. T., & Le, N. Q. (2019). Transforming a first-year accounting course using a blended learning pathway. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 16, 319–342. https://doi.org/10.28945/4304
Nortvig, A., Petersen, M. A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcomes, student stratification and engagement. Electronic Journal of e-learning, 16, 46–55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1175336. Accessed 2 June 2020
Ohliati, J., & Abbas, B. (2019). Measuring students’ satisfaction in using learning management system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(4), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i04.9427
Okoye, K., Hussein, H., Arrona-Palacios, A., Quintero, H. N., Ortega, L. O. P., Sanchez, A. L., & Hosseini, S. (2022). Impact of digital technologies upon teaching and learning in higher education in Latin America: an outlook on the reach, barriers, and bottlenecks. Education and Information Technologies, 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11214-1
Olejarczuk, E. (2018). ESP learners’ beliefs about CALL–A qualitative perspective. Language Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2018-0009
Ouyang, F., & Chang, Y. H. (2019). The relationships between social participatory roles and cognitive engagement levels in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1396–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12647
Oyarzun, B., Barreto, D., & Conklin, S. (2018). Instructor social presence effects on learner social presence, achievement, and satisfaction. TechTrends, 62(6), 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0299-0
Paechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004
Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: their relation to learning achievement and course satisfaction. Computer & Education, 54, 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004
Palmer, S., & Holt, D. (2010). Students’ perceptions of the value of the elements of an online learning environment: looking back in moving forward. Interactive Learning Environment, 18, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09539960802364592
Park, S. Y., & Song, K. S. (2020). Examining social presence and collective efficacy on international online collaborative learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 31(2), 101–114.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283.
Peters, M., Weinberg, A., & Sarma, N. (2009). To like or not to like! Student perceptions of technological activities for learning French as a second language at five canadian universities. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(5), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.5.869
Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: issue of interaction, presence, and performance in online learning courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1870
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic.
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Ransdell, S. (2013). Meaningful posts and online learning in blackboard across four cohorts of adult learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2730–2732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.021
Reparaz, C., Aznárez-Sanado, M., & Mendoza, G. (2020). Self-regulation of learning and MOOC retention. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106423
Rovai, A. P., & Wighting, M. J. (2005). Feelings of alienation and community among higher education students in a virtual classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.03.001
Salam, M., & Farooq, M. S. (2020). Does sociability quality of web-based collaborative learning information system influence students’ satisfaction and system usage? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00189-z
Salam, M., Awang Iskandar, D. N., & Ibrahim, D. H. A. (2019). Service learning in higher education: a systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education, 20, 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09580-6
Scida, E. E., & Saury, R. E. (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance. A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, 23, 517–531.
Shea, P., Swan, K., Fredericksen, E., & Swan, K. (2002). Student satisfaction and reported learning in the SUNDY learning network. Elements of Quality Online-Education, 3, 145–156.
Shee, D. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: a methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education, 50(3), 894–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.005
Shen, C., & Ho, J. (2020). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: a bibliometric analysis with latent semantic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177
Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102–120.
Simonson, M. (1995). Does anyone really want to learn at a distance? TechTrends, 40(5), 2.
Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2018). Effectiveness of learning in online academic courses compared with face-to-face courses in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12258
Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: students perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1)59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003
Sun, J. N., & Hsu, Y. C. (2013). Effect of interactivity on learner perceptions in web-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.002
Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Education Computing Research, 23, 359–383.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tsai, C. L., Ku, H. Y., & Campbell, A. (2021). Impacts of course activities on student perceptions of engagement and learning online. Distance Education, 42(1), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1869525
Tselios, N., Daskalakis, S., & Papadopoulou, M. (2011). Assessing the acceptance of a blended learning university course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 224–235.
Turugare, M., & Rudhumbu, N. (2020). Integrating technology in teaching and learning in universities in Lesotho: Opportunities and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3593–3612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10093-3
Uğur, B., Akkoyunlu, B., & Kurbanoğlu, S. (2011). Students’ opinions on blended learning and its implementation in terms of their learning styles. Education and Information Technologies, 16(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-009-9109-9
Van Doorn, J. R., & Van Doorn, J. D. (2014). The quest for knowledge transfer efficacy: blended teaching, online and in-class, with consideration of learning typologies for non-traditional and traditional students. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(324), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00324
Vanslambroucka, S., Zhu, C., Pynooa, B., Thomasa, V., Lomaertsa, K., & Tondeur, J. (2018). Students’ motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 33–40.
Wallace, R. M. (2004). A framework for understanding teaching with the internet. American Education Research Journal, 41, 447–489.
Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 460–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021004002
Wang, C., Mirzaei, T., Xu, T., & Lin, H. (2022). How learner engagement impacts non-formal online learning outcomes through value co-creation: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00341-x
Wang, N., Chen, J., Tai, M., & Zhang, J. (2021). Blended learning for chinese university EFL learners: learning environment and learner perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1607881
Wang, W., & Zhan, J. (2020). The relationship between English language learner characteristics and online self-regulation: a structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 12(7), 3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073009
Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
Yang, F., & Tsai, C. (2008). Investigating university student preferences and beliefs about learning in the web-based context. Computer & Education, 50, 1284–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.009
Yang, Y. (2012). Blended learning for college students with English reading difficulties. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.597767
Yang, Y., & Kuo, N. (2021). Blended learning to foster EFL college students’ global literacy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1900874
Yunhadi, W., Armadi, S., & Sudrajat, D. (2020). Is face-to-face and online teaching equal in teaching business English course? Evidence from the University of Kutai Kartanegara, Indonesia. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(22), 116–130.
Zheng, C., Liang, J. C., Li, M., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). The relationship between English language learners’ motivation and online self-regulation: a structural equation modelling approach. System, 76, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.05.003
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. (2001). Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. Z. Zimmerman, & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 289–307). Erlbaum.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank all the participants for their generous participation and sharing to make this project possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zainab Gaffas confirms sole responsibility for the following: study conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, and manuscript preparation and submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
I have no competing interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gaffas, Z.M. Students’ perceptions of e-learning ESP course in virtual and blended learning modes. Educ Inf Technol 28, 10329–10358 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11579-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11579-x