Abstract
This paper presents a scientometric analysis of task-based teaching and learning using CiteSpace based on the research literature retrieved from the Web of Science core collection between 2013 and 2022. CiteSpace is employed to analyze the data, as it minimizes subjectiveness and increases credibility. A total of 1799 bibliographic records related to task-based teaching and learning were systematically visualized and examined to identify the themes, knowledge evolution, and emerging trends in this field. The results show that five major themes can be identified, including task-based language teaching, instruction, computer-mediated communication, design, and working memory and self-efficacy. Knowledge evolution of task-based teaching and learning experienced three phases of development. Through the burst detection of keywords and cited references, and examining the major citing references of the detected keywords and references, it is found that the emerging trends focus mainly on technology-assisted learning, task design, task evaluation, etc. The findings provide insights for future researchers and educators.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
This is review-based research, and the data will be given upon request.
References
Ahmad, J. (2016). Technology-assisted language learning is a silver bullet for enhancing language competence and performance: a case study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(7), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.7p.118
Aliasin, S. H., Saeedi, Z., & Pineh, A. J. (2019). The relationship between EFL teachers’ perception of task-based language teaching and their dominant teaching style. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2019.1589413
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. D. P. (2017). Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 480–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816654169
Basterrechea, M., & Leeser, M. J. (2019). Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awareness, 28(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1606229
Baralt, M. (2013). The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(4), 689–725. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263113000429
Burston, J. (2017). MALL: global prospects and local implementation. CALL-EJ, 18(1), 1–8.
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M. (Eds.). (2014). Task-based language learning–Insights from and for L2 writing (Vol. 7). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.01byr
Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. H. (2019). TBLT implementation and evaluation: a meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(5), 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817744389
Bygate, M. (Ed.). (2018). Learning language through task repetition (11 vol.). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cao, W. J., & Zhao, R. Y. (2019). Evolution and frontiers of international agricultural diffused pollution research —quantitative analysis based on CiteSpace. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 33(7), 1–9.
Carver, J., & Kim, Y. (2020). French learners’ past-tense development through collaborative writing tasks: the role of procedural and content repetition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 76(2), 114–138. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr-2018-0231
Chen, C. M. (2006). CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: a multiple‐perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507
Chen, J. C. (2016). The crossroads of English language learners, task-based instruction, and 3D multi-user virtual learning in Second Life. Computers & Education, 102, 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.08.004
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40.
East, M. (2012). Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New Zealand. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.3
East, M. (2017). Research into practice: the task-based approach to instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 50(3), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026144481700009x
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Wiley.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203796580
Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: a critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816628627
Ellis, R. (2017). Position paper: moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444817000179
Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019). Task-based language teaching: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643689
Fang, W. C., Yeh, H. C., Luo, B. R., & Chen, N. S. (2021). Effects of mobile-supported task-based language teaching on EFL students’ linguistic achievement and conversational interaction. ReCALL, 33(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344020000208
Fukuta, J. (2016). Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815570142
González-Lloret, M., & Nielson, K. B. (2015). Evaluating TBLT: the case of a task-based spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541745
Harris, J., & Leeming, P. (2022). The impact of teaching approach on growth in L2 proficiency and self-efficacy: a longitudinal classroom-based study of TBLT and PPP. Journal of Second Language Studies, 5(1), 114–143. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.20014.har
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770–778. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2016.90
Hongzhi, N. (2020). Investigation on the Current Situation of Mobile Learning in College English: an empirical study of LongDong Institute. Modern Communication, 14, 198–200. https://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/XKJJ202014095.htm Accessed 9 November 2022
Hsu, T. C. (2017). Learning English with augmented reality: do learning styles matter? Computers & Education, 106, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.007
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 4700–4708. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2017.243
Jackson, D. O., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The cognition hypothesis: a synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63(2), 330–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12008
Jin, Y. R., Ji, S. F., & Yu, J. N. (2018). A visual analysis of hot spots and their evolution of business model innovation. Science Research Management, 39(7), 50.
Ji, Y. (2017, December). Task-based language teaching (TBLT) in Asian EFL classes: Challenges and strategies. In 2017 World Conference on Management Science and Human Social Development (MSHSD 2017), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.2991/mshsd-17.2018.28
Kim, C., Bai, B., Kim, P., & Chon, K. (2018). Review of reviews: a systematic analysis of review papers in hospitality and tourism literature. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 70, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.023
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: what needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41(3), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005
Kim, Y., Choi, B., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, S. (2020). Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of korean grammar: a classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 1362168820912354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820912354
Kleinberg, J. (2002). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/775047.775061
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: state of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580
Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683559
Lai, C., & Li, G. (2011). Technology and task-based language teaching: a critical review. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 498–521. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.498-521
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (2014). An introduction to second language acquisition research. Routledge.
Lecun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
Li, X. Y., & Chen, Y. H. (2018). A visual analysis of the entropy application in the field of domestic social science using citeSpace. Science and Technology Management Research, 38(13), 259–266.
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System, 84, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2019). The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693–722. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716418000796
Lin, C. C. (2021, July). The impact of technology-assisted task-based language teaching on self-regulated learning. In 2021 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 285–287). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icalt52272.2021.00092
Lin, V., Liu, G. Z., Hwang, G. J., Chen, N. S., & Yin, C. (2019). Outcomes-based appropriation of context-aware ubiquitous technology across educational levels. Interactive Learning Environment, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1703012
Liu, Y., & Ren, W. (2021). Task-based language teaching in a local EFL context: Chinese university teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044247
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.
Long, M. H. (2016). In defense of tasks and TBLT: nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190515000057
Lys, F. (2013). The development of advanced learner oral proficiency using iPads. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 94–116.
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444812000365
Mayo, M. D. P. (2018). Child task-based interaction in EFL settings: research and challenges. International journal of English studies, 18(2), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/2/319731
Mayo, M. D. P. G., & Ibarrola, A. L. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 54, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.12.001
Mayo, M. D. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: an exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1185799
Mayo, M. D. P. G., & Agirre, A. I. (2019). Task modality and pair formation method: their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 80, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.011
Mulyadi, D., Wijayatiningsih, T. D., Singh, C. K. S., & Prastikawati, E. F. (2021). Effects of technology enhanced task-based language teaching on learners’ listening comprehension and speaking performance. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14342a
Ooyoung Pyun, D. (2013). Attitudes toward task-based language learning: a study of college korean language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12015
Page, M., & Mede, E. (2018). Comparing task-based instruction and traditional instruction on task engagement and vocabulary development in second language education. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1391163
Park, M., & Slater, T. (2014). A typology of tasks for mobile-assisted language learning: recommendations from a small-scale needs analysis. TESL Canada Journal, 93–93. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1188
Peterson, M. (2011). Towards a research agenda for the use of three-dimensional virtual worlds in language learning. Calico Journal, 29(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.1.67-80
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190515000094
Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Task-based learner production: a substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190516000015
Phung, L. (2017). Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683561
Purdam, K. (2016). Task-based learning approaches for supporting the development of social science researchers’ critical data skills. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1102453
Qiu, X., & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). Content familiarity, task repetition and chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816684368
Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E. N. (2016). The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 828–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu069
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Ruiz-Funes, M. (2015). Exploring the potential of second/foreign language writing for language learning: the effects of task factors and learner variables. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.001
Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2011). Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1
Sample, E., & Michel, M. (2014). An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 23–23. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1185
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sasayama, S. (2016). Is a ‘complex’task really complex? Validating the assumption of cognitive task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12313
Sato, M., & Storch, N. (2022). Context matters: learner beliefs and interactional behaviors in an EFL vs. ESL context. Language Teaching Research, 26(5), 919–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820923582
Shakhsi Dastgahian, E., Turner, M., & Scull, J. (2020). Task-based Pedagogies in Iran: the relationship between oracy and literacy. RELC Journal, 51(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219845932
Shehadeh, A., & Coombe, C. A. (Eds.). (2012). Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (Vol. 4). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.4
Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners (9 vol.). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Si, H. Y., Shi, J. G., Chen, J. D., Wu, G. D., & Wang, H. M. (2019). Reviewing sustainable development research in China from the perspective of China Population, Resources and Environment. China Population Resources and Environment, 29(7), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-583x(07)60010-2
Skehan, P. (2016). Tasks versus conditions: two perspectives on task research and their implications for pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190515000100
Suzuki, Y. (2021). Optimizing fluency training for speaking skills transfer: comparing the effects of blocked and interleaved task repetition. Language Learning, 71(2), 285–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12433
Tasir, Z., Mohamad, M. N. H., Ismail, Z., & Mustafa, N. (2018, April). Development and validation of problem-solving task based-integrated STEM. In 2018 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE) (pp. 17–23). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/latice.2018.00011
Van den Branden, K. (2016). The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190515000070
Weed, M. (2006). Sports tourism research 2000–2004: a systematic review of knowledge and a meta-evaluation of methods. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 11(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775080600985150
Wright, M. C. (2000). Getting more out of less: the benefits of short-term experiential learning in undergraduate sociology courses. Teaching Sociology, 28, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/1319259
Xue, S. (2020). A conceptual model for integrating affordances of mobile technologies into task-based language teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1711132
Ziegler, N. (2016). Taking technology to task: technology-mediated TBLT, performance, and production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190516000039
Acknowledgements
The researchers would like to thank SEGI University Malaysia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest for any of the participants.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jia, S., Bava Harji, M. Themes, knowledge evolution, and emerging trends in task-based teaching and learning: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Educ Inf Technol 28, 9783–9802 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11586-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11586-y