Abstract
Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) learning is increasingly valued for its role in promoting higher-order thinking of learners. Despite the widespread application of role scripts in CPS, little is known about the mechanisms by which roles influence learners' cognition and the impact of goal orientation on roles. In this study, we designed role scripts and goal-orientation scripts to facilitate CPS. Then, a total of 32 postgraduate students participated in CPS and they were divided into 8 groups, among which two roles of analyst and commenter were assigned respectively. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis, this study explored the differences between the two roles in terms of discourse space rotation, types of cognitive activities and epistemic network structure, and the function played by goal orientation. Results showed that there was a general structure in CPS, that analysts and commenters have different functional biases, and that goal orientation influences the function of the roles. This study clarified the cognitive contribution of different roles, and the respective strength of different goal orientation. The findings may provide instructors with implications for designing scripts and organizing CPS in the classroom context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Andrews-Todd, & Forsyth, C. M. (2020). Exploring social and cognitive dimensions of collaborative problem solving in an open online simulation-based task. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 105759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.025
Avcı, Ü. (2020). Examining the role of sentence openers, role assignment scaffolds and self-determination in collaborative knowledge building. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09672-5
Avry, S., Chanel, G., Bétrancourt, M., & Molinari, G. (2020). Achievement appraisals, emotions and socio-cognitive processes: How they interplay in collaborative problem-solving? Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 106267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106267
Cai, H., & Gu, X. (2015). Design Research on Cognitive Development in Computer-supported Collaborative Learning Environment. Open Education Research, 21(04), 81–88.
Cai, H., & Gu, X. (2022). Factors that influence the different levels of individuals’ understanding after collaborative problem solving: The effects of shared representational guidance and prior knowledge. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1679841
Chen, C. M., & Kuo, C. H. (2019). An optimized group formation scheme to promote collaborative problem-based learning. Computers & Education, 133(64), 94–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.011
Chen, G., Lo, C. K., & Hu, L. (2020). Sustaining online academic discussions: Identifying the characteristics of messages that receive responses. Computers & Education, 156, 103938.
Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R. A., Abram, P. L., Scarloss, B. A., & Schultz, S. E. (2002). Can Groups Learn? Teachers College Record,104(6), 1045–1068.
Crespo, S., & Harper, Fk. (2020). Learning to pose collaborative mathematics problems with secondary prospective teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101430.
Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers & Education, 47(3), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.001
Fabbri, M. (2020). To assign or not to assign? Role Taking in Higher Education. Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology., 15(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000026
Fiore, S. M., Graesser, A. C., Greiff, S., Griffin, P., Gong, B., Kyllonen, P., Massey, C. S., O’Neil, H. F., Pellegrino, J., Rothman, R. A., Soulé, H., & Davier, A. A. (2017). Collaborative Problem Solving: Considerations for the National Assessment of Educational Progress. National Center for Education Statistics.
Fiore, S. M., Graesser, A., Greiff, S., Griffin, P., Gong, B., Kyllonen, P., & von Davier, A. (2017). Collaborative problem solving: Considerations for the national assessment of educational progress. Alexandria: National Center for Education Statistics.
Fiore, S. M., Graesser, A., & Greiff, S. (2018). Collaborative problem-solving education for the twenty-first-century workforce. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(6), 367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0363-y
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computersupported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748005
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Gervits, F., Eberhard, K., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Team communication as a collaborative process. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 62. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00062
Gillies, R. M. (2019). Promoting academically productive student dialogue during collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.014
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, 9789400723245, 1–345.
Gu, X., Shao, Y., Guo, X., & Lim, C. P. (2015). Designing a role structure to engage students in computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.002
Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content Analysis of Online Discussion in an Applied Educational Psychology Course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115–152. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003764722829
Hare, A. P. (1994). Types of Roles in Small Groups: A Bit of History and a Current Perspective. Small Group Research, 25(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496494253005
Heinimäki, O., Volet, S., Jones, C., Laakkonen, E., & Vauras, M. (2021). Student participatory role profiles in collaborative science learning: Relation of within-group configurations of role profiles and achievement. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100539
Heppner, P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (2006). The Learning Styles Questionnaire 80-Item Version. Peter Honey Publications.
Hu, L. (2021). Conceptualization and operationalization of group thinking sustainability in dialogic collaborative problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100964
Hu, L., & Chen, G. (2021). Exploring turn-taking patterns during dialogic collaborative problem solving. Instructional Science, 50(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09565-2
Huang, C., Han, Z., Li, M., Jong, M. S., & Tsai, C. (2019). Investigating students’ interaction patterns and dynamic learning sentiments in online discussions. Computers and Education, 140, 103589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.015
Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2008). Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange. International. Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9027-z
Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2–3), 211-3<211-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts–a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Lin, C., Barrett, N. E., & Liu, G. (2021). English outside the academic sphere: A mobile-based context-aware comparison study on collaborative and individual learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12514
Liu, L., Hao, J., von Davier, A. A., Kyllonen, P., & Zapata-Rivera, J.-D. (2015). A tough nut to crack: Measuring collaborative problem solving. In Y. Rosen, S. Ferrara, & M. Mosharraf (Eds.), Handbook of research on computational tools for real-world skill development. IGI-Global.
Looi, C., Chen, W., & Ng, F.-K. (2010). Collaborative activities enabled by GroupScribbles (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness. Computers and Education, 54(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.003
López-Fernández, M., González-García, F., & Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2021). Should We Ban Single-Use Plastics? A Role-Playing Game to Argue and Make Decisions in a Grade-8 School Chemistry Class. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(12), 3947–3956. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00580
Mahardale, J. W., & Lee, C. B. (2013). Understanding how social and epistemic scripts perpetuate intersubjectivity through patterns of interactions. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.547204
Marcos-Garcia, J.-A., Martinez-Mones, A., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). DESPRO: A method based on roles to provide collaboration analysis support adapted to the participants in CSCL situations. Computers & Education, 82, 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.027
Meij, V., Veldkamp, S., & Leemkuil, H. (2020). Effects of scripting on dialogues, motivation and learning outcomes in serious games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12851
Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (2019). The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education. Routledge.
Mogan, R., Bulbulia, J., & Fischer, R. (2019). Joint action enhances cohesion and positive affect, but suppresses aspects of creativity when combined with shared goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02790
Morris, R., Hadwin, A. F., Gress, C. L. Z., Miller, M., Fior, M., Church, H., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Designing roles, scripts, and prompts to support CSCL in gStudy. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.001
Mujtaba, S. M., Reynolds, B. L., Parkash, R., & Singh, M. K. M. (2021). Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision. Assessing Writing, 50, 100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100566
Najjemba, J. L., & Cronjé, J. (2020). Engagement with and Participation in Online role play Collaborative Arguments: A Sociocultural Perspective. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(5), 436–448. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.18.5.006
Naykki, P., Isohatala, J., Jarvela, S., Poysa-Tarhonen, J., & Hakkinen, P. (2017). Facilitating socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring in collaborative learning with a regulation macro script – an exploratory study. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9259-5
O’Brien, G., & Bedford, S. B. (2012). Small group work in large chemistry classes: Workshops in first year chemistry. Aiming for excellence in STEM learning and teaching. Proceedings of STEM annual conference. London: Imperial College.
OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. (2019). OECD learning compass 2030 concept note series, from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/. Accessed 27 Feb 2023.
Ouyang, F., Chen, Z., Cheng, M., Tang, Z., & Su, C.-Y. (2021). Exploring the effect of three scaffoldings on the collaborative problem-solving processes in China’s higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 35–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00273-y
Pruner, M., & Liljedahl, P. (2021). Collaborative problem solving in a choice-affluent environment. ZDM, 53, 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01232-7
Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020). Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4
Reddick, R., & Smith, D. L. (2020). Celebrity House Party, or the Networking Role-Playing Game: Using Theatre as a Tool to Increase Social Emotional Learning in Adults with a Focus on Building Success in the Business Sector. Teaching Artist Journal, 18(1–2), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15411796.2020.1800326
Rojas, Nussbaum, M., Chiuminatto, P., Guerrero, O., Greiff, S., Krieger, F., & Van Der Westhuizen, L. (2021). Assessing collaborative problem-solving skills among elementary school students. Computers and Education, 175, 104313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104313
Sassenberg, L., Landkammer, F., & Jacoby, J. (2014). The influence of regulatory focus and group vs. individual goals on the evaluation bias in the context of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.009
Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2007). Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2–3), 225–246.
Scholl, A., Landkammer, F., & Sassenberg, K. (2019). When those who know do share: Group goals facilitate information sharing, but social power does not undermine it. PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213795–e0213795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213795
Seo, K. K. (2007). Utilizing peer moderating in online discussions: Addressing the controversy between teacher moderation and nonmoderation. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 21–36.
Shaffer, D. W. (2017). Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press.
Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.3
Stadler, M., Shubeck, K. T., Greiff, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2020). Some critical reflections on the special issue: Collaboration in the 21st century: The theory, assessment, and teaching of collaborative problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.011
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
Strijbos, J.-W., & De, M. F. (2010). LaatDeveloping the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.014
Tan, S. C., Wang, X., & Li, L. (2022). The Development Trajectory of Shared Epistemic Agency in Online Collaborative Learning: A Study Combing Network Analysis and Sequential Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1655–1681. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211001562
Tawfik, A. A., Koehler, A. A., Gish-Lieberman, J. J., & Gatewood, J. (2021). Investigating the depth of problem-solving prompts in collaborative argumentation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1966821
Tempelaar, D. T., Wosnitza, M., Volet, S., Rienties, B., Giesbers, S. J., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). The role of self- and social directed goals in a problem-based, collaborative learning context. Higher Education, 66(2), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9602-8
Thürmer, J. L., Wieber, F., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2017). Planning and performance in small groups: Collective implementation intentions enhance group goal striving. Frontiers in Psychology, 19(8), 603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00603
Unal, E., & Cakir, H. (2021). The effect of technology-supported collaborative problem solving method on students’ achievement and engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4127–4150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10463-w
van Dijk, A. M., Gijlers, H., & Weinberger, A. (2014). Scripted collaborative drawing in elementary science education. Instructional Science, 42(3), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9286-1
Volet, S., Jones, C., & Vauras, M. (2019). Attitude-, group- and activity-related differences in the quality of preservice teacher students’ engagement in collaborative science learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.05.002
Wang, S., Hou, H., & Wu, S. (2017). Analyzing the knowledge construction and cognitive patterns of blog-based instructional activities using four frequent interactive strategies (problem solving, peer assessment, role playing and peer tutoring): A preliminary study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 65(2), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9471-4
Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and Social Scripts in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., & Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71(3), 286–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000299894
Wu, B., Wang, M., Spector, M., & Yang, S. (2013). Design of a dual-mapping learning approach for problem solving and knowledge construction in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 71–84.
Wu, B., Hu, Y., Ruis, A. R., & Wang, M. (2019). Analysing computational thinking in collaborative programming: A quantitative ethnography approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12348
Ye, J., & Zhou, J. (2022). Exploring the relationship between learning sentiments and cognitive processing in online collaborative learning: A network analytic approach. The Internet and Higher Education, 55, 100875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100875
Yousef, D. (2019). Exploring the reliability and validity of the learning styles questionnaire (LSQ) in an Arab setting. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-10-2018-0113
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to this study and all authors approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics in publishing
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee.
Ethics approval
All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The research participants agreed to participate in the study and their complete anonymity was ensured.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The test and questionnaire were conducted anonymously. Students’ and teachers’ participation was voluntary.
Conflict of interest
There is no potential conflict of interest in this study.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, Y., Li, KR., Sun, Z. et al. Exploring the effects of role scripts and goal-orientation scripts in collaborative problem-solving learning. Educ Inf Technol 28, 12191–12213 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11674-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11674-z