Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Fostering receptive vocabulary development of kindergarten children with the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the impact of two different didactic techniques, blended teaching and teaching by the exclusive use of ICT, on preschool children’s vocabulary development. Additional aim of the present study was to investigate whether the impact of the two didactic techniques is differentiated by several language and non-language factors. The sample consisted of 48 children aged 5–6 years old. The experimental design of the present study included two experimental groups and a business-as-usual control group. In the first experimental group, the blended learning approach was implemented combining face to face and ICT assisted activities for teaching vocabulary. In the second experimental group, vocabulary teaching was accomplished by the exclusive use of ICT. In the business-as-usual control group children participated in curriculum activities anticipated by the typical education program of the kindergarten. Children were pretested and posted for target word knowledge with a researcher designed measure. The results showed that both didactic techniques had a positive impact on young children’s vocabulary development. These outcomes point to the value of using ICT, especially tablet games, for vocabulary instruction in early childhood classrooms. The present study implies that appropriate scaffolding provided in practices using ICT is a teaching recommendation that needs to be adopted to reach the goal of effective vocabulary instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data extracted for the needs of this study as well as the material used so as to conduct it is available for display.

Code availability

The software applications used in this current research were all created through Adobe Flash CS6 and they are all available for display.

References

  • Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangkom, K., & Sukavatee, P. (2021). Effects of oracy building instruction via blended-learning environment on Thai students’ metacognitive awareness and oracy skills. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 240–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of reading aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55, 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Choosing Words to Teach. In I. L. Beck, M. G. McKeown, & L. Kucan (Eds.), Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction (2nd ed., pp. 19–39). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., Ismail, M.A.B., & Hayati, S. A. (2022). A review of using digital game-based learning for preschoolers. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00240-0.

  • Bonk, C., & Graham, C. (2006). Handbook of blended learning environments. Pfeifer.

  • Bouilheres, F., Le., L., McDonald, S., Nkhoma, C., & Jandug-Montera, L. (2020). Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3049–3069.

  • Broemmel, A. D., Moran, M. J., & Wooten, D. A. (January, 2015). The Impact of Animated Books on the Vocabulary and Language Development of Preschool-Aged Children in Two School Settings. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 17(1), 1–14. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1072346.pdf

  • Bus, A. G., Takacs, Z. K., & Kegel, C. A. (2015). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children’s emergent literacy. Developmental Review, 35, 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chlapana, E. (2012). H anaptixi tou dektikou lexilogiou stin elliniki glossa allodapon paidion prosholikis ilikias meso tis anagnosis istorion (Greek receptive vocabulary development by immigrant preschool children (aged 4–6 years old) through storybook reading). Doctoral dissertation, University of Crete.

  • Chlapana, E., & Tafa, E. (2014). Effective practices to enhance immigrant kindergarteners’ second language vocabulary learning through storybook reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1619–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9510-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courage, M. L., Frizzell, L. M., Walsh, C. S., & Smith, M. (2021). Toddlers Using Tablets: They Engage, Play, and Learn. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.564479.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2018). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 6th Edition. Pearson.

  • Dickinson, D. K., St. Pierre, R. B., & Pettengill, J. (2004). High-quality classrooms: A key ingredient to family literacy programs’ support for children’s literacy. In B. Wasik (Ed.), Handbook of family literacy (pp. 137–154). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEK (Fyllo ths efhmeridas ths Kyvernhsews). (2021, December 17). Programma Spoudwn gia thn Prosxoliki Ekpaideysh (Curriculum for Preschool Education). Efhmerida ths kyvernhsews ths ellhnikhs dhmokratias (B'), 76263–76326. Elliniko Typografeio.

  • Griffith, S. F., Hart, K. C., Mavrakis, A. A., & Bagner, D. M. (2022). Making the best of app use: The impact of parent-child co-use of interactive media on children’s learning in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 16(2), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hans, D. M. (2018). Concept of Animated Electronic books in Increasing Young Learners’ Literacy Skills in EFL Classroom. Pedagogy Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Μ. Β., & Staker, Η. (2011). The rise of K–12 blended learning. Innosight Institute.

  • Ministry of Education and Religions / Institute of Educational Policy. (2014). Programma Spoudwn Nipiagwgeiou. (Kindergarten Curriculum). Athens: Ministry of Education and Religions / Institute of Educational Policy.

  • Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K., (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

  • Ihbar, M. Z., & Said, N. E. M. (2019). The effects of blended learning on EFL high school students’ vocabulary mastery. International Journal of Innovative Research and Creative Technology, 4(6), 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihmeideh, F. M. (2014). The effect of electronic books on enhancing emergent literacy skills of pre-school children. Computers & Education, 79, 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaaslan, H., Kilic, N., Guven-Yalcin, G., & Gullu, A. (2018). Students’ reflections on vocabulary learning through synchronous and asynchronous games and activities. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, E. S., Goldstein, H., Spencer, T. D., & Sherman, A. (2015). Effects of automated Tier 2 storybook intervention on vocabulary and comprehension learning in preschool children with limited oral language skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Gilbert, J., Yu, Q., & Gale, C. (2021). Measures matter: A meta-analysis of the effects of educational apps on preschool to grade 3 children’s literacy and math skills. AERA Open, 7, 23328584211004184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, K. S., Logan, J., Justice, L. M., Bowles, R. P., & Piasta, S. B. (2021). The contribution of vocabulary, grammar, and phonological awareness across a continuum of narrative ability levels in young children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(9), 3489–3503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koran, N., Berkmen, B., & Adalıer, A. (2022). Mobile technology usage in early childhood: Pre-COVID-19 and the national lockdown period in North Cyprus. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10658-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korat, O., & Shneor, D. (2019). Can e-books support low SES parental mediation to enrich children’s vocabulary? First Language, 39(3), 344–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalima, D., & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Roles and research trends of touchscreen mobile devices in early childhood education: review of journal publications from 2010 to 2019 based on the technology enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1855210

  • Metsala, J. L., & Kalindi, S. C. (2022). The effects of a computer-based early reading program on the literacy skills of kindergarten students. Computers in the Schools, 1–21.

  • National Research Council (2015). Transforming the workforce for children birth through age 8: A unifying foundation. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/19401.

  • Neumann, M. M. (2018). Using tablets and apps to enhance emergent literacy skills in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NICHD ECCRN. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oikonomidis, V. (2003). To dektiko lexilogio paidiwn ilikias 5,5–6,5 eton. (The receptive vocabulary of children aged 5.5–6.5 years). Athens: Grigoris.

  • Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. (1992). Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, A., Alper, R., Burchinal, M. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2019). Measuring success: Within and cross-domain predictors of academic and social trajectories in elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2017). Mobile educational applications for children. What educators and parents need to know. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation (Special Issue on Mobile Learning Applications and Strategies), 11(3), 256–277.

  • Pham, H. (2011). Theory-based instructional models applied in classroom contexts. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 2(2), 406–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A., Watson, J., Staley, P., Patrick, S., Horn, M., Fetzer, L., & Verma, S. (2015). Blended learning: The evolution of online and face-to-face education from 2008–2015. Promising practices in online learning. Vienna, VA: International Association for K–12 Online Learning.

  • Raven, J. H. (1956). Guide to using the Coloured Progressive Matrices. Sets A, AB, B. London: H.K. Lewis.

  • Reich, S. M., Yau, J. C., Xu, Y., Muskat, T., Uvalle, J., & Cannata, D. (2019). Digital or print? a comparison of preschoolers’ comprehension, vocabulary, and engagement from a print book and an e-book. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419878389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2020). The Common Sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight, 2020. Common Sense Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, L. (2015). The comprehensive emergent literacy model: Early literacy in context. Sage Open, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015577664.

  • Roskos, K. A., Sullivan, S., Simpson, D., & Zuzolo, N. (2016). E-books in the early literacy environment: Is there added value for vocabulary development? Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 30(2), 226–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simos, P., Sideridis, G. D., Protopapas, A., & Mouzaki, A. (2011). Psychometric evaluation of a Receptive Vocabulary Test for Greek elementary students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 37(1), 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets, D. J., & Bus, A. G. (2015). The interactive animated e-book as a word learning device for kindergartners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(4), 899–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, ΚΕ. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strouse, G. A., & Ganea, P. A. (2017). Toddlers’ word learning and transfer from electronic and print books. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suggate, S., Schaughency, Ε, McAnally, Η, & Reese, Ε. (2018). July–September). From infancy to adolescence: The longitudinal links between vocabulary, early literacy skills, oral narrative, and reading comprehension. Cognitive Development, 47, 82–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2014). Can the computer replace the adult for storybook reading? A meta-analysis on the effects of multimedia stories as compared to sharing print stories with an adult. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1366), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatar, B. H., & Gerde, H. K. (2022). Partnering with Families to Use Screen Time for Supporting Early Language and Literacy. The Reading Teacher, 0 (0), 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2150

  • Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakris, P. (1970). H efiia twn ellinopaidwn tis sxolikis ilikias (5 ews 12 eton). The intelligence of Greek school children (5 to 12 years old). Athens: Author.

  • Vasbieva, D. G., Klimova, I. I., Agibalova, E. L., Karzhanova, N. V., & Bírová, J. (2016). Enhancement of students’ vocabulary learning through a blended learning approach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1195–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatalaro, A., Culp, A. M., Hahs-Vaughn, D. L., & Barnes, A. C. (2018). A quasi-experiment examining expressive and receptive vocabulary knowledge of preschool head start children using mobile media apps. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(4), 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, G., Snowling, M. J., Lervåg, A., Buchanan‐Worster, E., Duta, M., Hall, A., ... & Hulme, C. (2021). Early language screening and intervention can be delivered successfully at scale: evidence from a cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(12), 1425–1434.

  • Wilkes, S., Kazakoff, E. R., Prescott, J. E., Bundschuh, K., Hook, P. E., Wolf, R., Hurwitz, L.B. & Macaruso, P. (2020, January 20). Measuring the impact of a blended learning model on early literacy growth. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 1–15.

  • Wright, T. S., & Neuman, S. B. (2014). Paucity and disparity in kindergarten oral vocabulary instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(3), 330–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A. K., & Oyelere, S. S. (2021). Contextualized mobile game-based learning application for computing education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2539–2562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, D., Huang, Y., & Xie, H. (2021). Digital game-based vocabulary learning: Where are we and where are we going? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 751–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood, R., Harmsel, M. T., Schulting, J., Wiefferink, K., & Gerrits, E. (2022). To Game or Not to Game? Efficacy of Using Tablet Games in Vocabulary Intervention for Children with DLD. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preschool Education, University of Crete, Crete, Greece

    Maria Baltzaki & Elissavet Chlapana

Authors
  1. Maria Baltzaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elissavet Chlapana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Maria Baltzaki. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Maria Baltzaki and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Baltzaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

‘Not applicable’.

Ethics approval

A study-specific approval was given by the Appropriate Ethics Committee of University of Crete in order for this current study to be conducted.

Consent to participate

The parents and guardians of the student’s participating in this current study gave their written and signed consent.

Consent for publication

The parents and guardians of the student’s participating in this current study gave their written and signed consent regarding future publication, provided that students’ personal data will not be disclosed. "

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Instructed Words Test (IWT) – Example of pictures used in test.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baltzaki, M., Chlapana, E. Fostering receptive vocabulary development of kindergarten children with the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). Educ Inf Technol 28, 14019–14049 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11707-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11707-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation