Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of metacognitive awareness on Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to assess the impact of metacognitive awareness of the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. The investigation was carried out as descriptive research, involving a normative survey method. The sample consists of 200 preservice teachers in Karaikudi, drawn through a simple random sampling technique. To identify the metacognitive awareness of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge among the preservice teachers, a self-made tool was constructed on the Metacognitive Awareness Scale (MAS) and Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge Assessment Scale (TPACK- AS) were used. The validity of the tools has been determined by following the opinion of the experts and is determined to be valid. The Cronbach's Alpha analysis was used to calculate the reliability value. The reliability value of the Metacognition Awareness Scale (MAS) is 0.78, and Technological Pedagogical and Content KnowledgeAssessment Scale (TPACK-AS) is 0.82. The study attempted to find out the level of metacognitive awareness and Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge among the preservice teachers in relation to the selected demographic variables. The main finding of the present study shows that there is a positive correlation between metacognitive awareness and Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  • Abdellah, R. (2015). Metacognitive awareness and its relation to academic achievement and teaching performance of pre-service female teachers in Ajman University in UAE. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 560–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Açıkgül, K., & Aslaner, R. (2020). Effects of Geogebra supported micro teaching applications and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) game practices on the TPACK levels of prospective teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 2023–2047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The Importance of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness in Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albina, A. P. (2020). Metacognitive Awareness of Mathematics Teachers in Sivaganga District. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, XII (IV), 5503.

  • Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhuyan, S., & Tripathy, M. K. (2020). Techno Pedagogical Skills of Bachelor of Education students of Odisha.

  • Bozorgian, H. (2014). The role of metacognition in the development of EFL learners’ listening skill. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cáceres, M. J., Chamoso, J. M., & Azcárate, P. (2010). Analysis of the revisions that pre-service teachers of mathematics make of their own project included in their learning portfolio. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1186–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetin-Berber, D., & Erdem, A. R. (2015). An investigation of Turkish pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge. Computers, 4(3), 234–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choden, U., & Sherab, K. (2019). Personal and professional needs related to technological, pedagogical, and subject content knowledge (TPACK) of Royal University of Bhutan faculty. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education in the Digital Ecosystem (ICEdDE 2019).

  • Cholidiana, N., Mistar, J., & Ismiatun, F. (2020). The Difference of Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Between Male and Female Efl Students. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran, 15(34).

  • Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 18(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delahaij, R., & van Dam, K. (2016). Coping style development: The role of learning goal orientation and metacognitive awareness. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir, Ö., & Doganay, A. (2019). An Investigation of Metacognition, Self-Regulation and Social Intelligence Scales’ Level of Predicting Pre-Service Teachers’ Lifelong Learning Trends. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(5), 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis, J. (2016). Investigating the relationship between TPACK and the ISTE standards for teachers. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology4(1).

  • Doering, A., Koseoglu, S., Scharber, C., Henrickson, J., & Lanegran, D. (2014). Technology integration in K–12 geography education using TPACK as a conceptual model. Journal of Geography, 113(6), 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doganay, A., & Ozturk, A. (2011). An Investigation of Experienced and Inexperienced Primary School Teachers’ Teaching Process in Science and Technology Classes in Terms of Metacognitive Strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 1320–1325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durdu, L., & Dag, F. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ TPACK development and conceptions through a TPACK-based course. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (online), 42(11), 150–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdig, R. E. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: Understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 749–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. (1998). Thinking about thinking: Developing metacognition in children. Early Child Development and Care, 141(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. (1979a). Theories of learning in educational psychology. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979b). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979c). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. (n.d.). Theories of Learning in Educational Psychology. 3.

  • Gaile, J., & Adams, C. (2018). Metacognition in speech and language therapy for children with social (pragmatic) communication disorders: Implications for a theory of therapy. Internatıonal Journal of Language & Communıcatıon Dısorders, 53(1), 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasempour, Z., Bakar, N., & Jahanshahloo, G. R. (2013). Innovation in teaching and learning through problem posing tasks and metacognitive strategies. International journal of pedagogical innovations, 1(01).

  • Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidson, E. (2018). Challenges to Pedagogical Content Knowledge in lesson planning during curriculum transition: a multiple case study of teachers of ICT and Computing in England (Doctoral dissertation, Durham University).

  • Hsu, Y. S. (2015). The development of teachers’ professional learning and knowledge. Development of science teachers' TPACK, 3–15.

  • Jagadeeswari, A. S., & Chandrasekaran, V. (2014). Promoting metacognitive awareness among higher secondary students. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(14), 1888–1896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, D., Tiwari, G. K., & Awasthi, I. D. (2017). Impact of metacognitive awareness on academic adjustment and academic outcome of the students. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 5(1), 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaleel, S. (2016). A Study on the Metacognitive Awareness of Secondary School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayapraba, G., & Kanmani, M. (2013). Metacognitive awareness in science classroom of higher secondary students. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(3), 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (2007). Speaking, listening, planning and assessing: The teacher’s role in developing metacognitive awareness. Early Child Development and Care, 177(6–7), 569–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (2007). Speaking, listening, planning and assessing: The teacher’s role in developing metacognitive awareness. Early Child Development and Care, 177(6–7), 569–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshpine, T., & Pio, A. (2020). Correlational study on metacognitive awareness and technology usage among pre-service teachers. Journal of xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 12(5), 820–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya, F., & Avgin, S. S. (2016). Investigation of teacher science discipline self-confidence about their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). European Journal of Education Studies.2, (9).

  • Kim, J. H. (2018). The effect of metacognitive monitoring feedback on performance in a computer based training simulation. Applied Ergonomics, 67, 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2011). Modeling pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) perceptions: The influence of demographic factors and TPACK constructs.

  • Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2011). Modeling pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) perceptions: The influence of demographic factors and TPACK constructs.

  • Koştur, M. (2018). Promoting and investigating pre-service middle school mathematics teachers' TPACK-practical development in the context of an undergraduate course.

  • Koştur, M. (2018). Promoting and investigating pre-service middle school mathematics teachers' TPACK-practical development in the context of an undergraduate course.

  • Ku, K. Y., & Ho, I. T. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 251–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurt, S. (2011). Technology adoption and educational change in Turkey. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), 3(2), 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lara Nieto-Márquez, N., Baldominos, A., & Pérez-Nieto, M. Á. (2020). Digital teaching materials and their relationship with the metacognitive skills of students in primary education. Education Sciences, 10(4), 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidor, R. (2004). Developing metacognitive behaviour in physical education classes: The use of task-pertinent learning strategies. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 9(1), 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T. C., Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysaker, P. H., Carcione, A., Dimaggio, G., Johannesen, J. K., Nicolò, G., Procacci, M., & Semerari, A. (2005). Metacognition amidst narratives of self and illness in schizophrenia: Associations with neurocognition, symptoms, insight and quality of life. Acta Psychiatricascandinavica, 112(1), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memnun, D. S., & Akkaya, R. (2009). The levels of metacognitive awareness of primary teacher trainees. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1919–1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, M. (2016). The Impact of Science Teachers' Metacognition on Their Planning Choice of Technology-mediated Inquiry-based Activities (Doctoral dissertation, Universitéd' Ottawa/University of Ottawa).

  • Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S. Y., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 71, 206–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouza, C., Yang, H., Pan, Y. C., Ozden, S. Y., & Pollock, L. (2017). Resetting educational technology coursework for pre-service teachers: A computational thinking approach to the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology33(3).

  • Naaz, S., & Khan, Z. (2018). Measuring the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) of Pre-service Teachers in Relation to their Gender and Streams. Online Submission, 22(1), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding preservice teachers’ technology use through TPACK framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 425–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, G., & Chen, Y. (2014, May). Research on the Use of Metacognitive Strategies of Liberal Arts and Science English Majors. In International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural Communication (ICELAIC-14) (pp. 223–227). Atlantis Press.

  • Papleontiou-Louca, E. (2003). The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher Development, 7(1), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimirad, M., & Shams, M. R. (2014). The effect of activating metacognitive strategies on the listening performance and metacognitive awareness of EFL students. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 162–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, S., Behera, M. P., & Sahu, S. (2021). Metacognitive Awareness on Teaching and Teaching Competence of Secondary Prospective Teachers. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 8(3), 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarwer, G., & Govil, P. (2017). Metacognitive awareness as a predicting variable of achievement in english among secondary school students. Researchers World: Journal of Arts, Science and Commerce, 58–65.

  • Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional science, 26(1-2), 113-125

  • Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, M. (2001). Reading proficiency, reading strategies, metacognitive awareness and L2 readers. The Reading Matrix, 1(1).

  • Sonowal, M. M., & Kalita, M. (2019). Metacognitive Awareness and Goal-Orientation of the Under Graduate (Ug) Students of Dibrugarh District of Assam, India. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, XI (XII), 1563–1569.

  • Spazak, L. (2013). Secondary preservice teachers' perception of preparedness to integrate technology. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

  • Spruce, R., & Bol, L. (2015). Teacher beliefs, knowledge, and practice of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10(2), 245–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, P. W., Cooper, S. S., & Moulding, L. R. (2007). Metacognitive development in professional educators. The Researcher, 21(1), 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. P. (2020). Individual differences in second language listening: Examining the role of knowledge, metacognitive awareness, memory, and attention. Language Learning.

  • Wang, Y., Gu, X., & Liu, S. (2020). The investigation and analysis of pre-service teachers toward TPACK competencies. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8(12), 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and pedagogical understandings of metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R., & Ganie, G. R. (2019). Integration of Technological, Pedagogical and Content knowledge (TPACK): A study on Higher Education Teachers. Indian Psychological Review, 92(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulkiply, N. (2009). Metacognition and its relationship with students’ academic performance. The International Journal of Learning, 15(11), 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Joshpine.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no Conflict of Interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshpine, T., Albina, A.P. Influence of metacognitive awareness on Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Educ Inf Technol 28, 14553–14576 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11764-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11764-y

Keywords

Navigation