Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to explore what wireless and wearable technologies individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) use to connect socially, how these technologies are used to facilitation social connectedness, what barriers or challenges exist when using technology to connect socially, and what supports or accessibility features exists to support this goal. An online survey was sent to individuals with IDD, families of individuals with IDD, and service providers who work with this population. Our survey of 51 individuals with IDD, 27 family members, and 20 disability service providers showed that all stakeholders perceived wireless technology as important for supporting social connectedness among individuals with IDD. Across groups, respondents reported that social connectedness among individuals with IDD was most often supported through the use of cell phones and tablets. Respondents identified support from family members and other stakeholders as important facilitators that may enhances the use of wireless technology for social connectedness among individuals with IDD. The most common barriers to the use of wireless technology for social connectedness for individuals with IDD were financial barriers. Together, these findings yield important implications for individuals with IDD, family members, providers, tech developers, and researchers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ayres, K. M., Mechling, L., & Sansosti, F. J. (2013). The use of mobile technologies to assist with life skills/independence of students with moderate/severe intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders: Considerations for the future of school psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 50(3), 259–271.
Balandin, S., & Molka-Danielsen, J. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of virtual worlds as a medium for social inclusion for adults with intellectual disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(17), 1543–1550.
Barlott, T., Aplin, T., Catchpole, E., Kranz, R., Le Goullon, D., Toivanen, A., & Hutchens, S. (2020). Connectedness and ICT: Opening the door to possibilities for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 24(4), 503–521.
Carey, A. C., Friedman, M. G., & Bryen, D. N. (2005). Use of electronic technologies by people with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation, 43(5), 322–333.
Caton, S., & Chapman, M. (2016). The use of social media and people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 41(2), 125–139.
Donehower Paul, C., Jimenez, E., Vinoski Thomas, E., Doulin, A. M., & Hussain, S. Z. (2021). Using wireless technology to support social connectedness in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A focus group study. Journal of Special Education Technology.
Ehsan, A., Klaas, H. S., Bastianen, A., & Spini, D. (2019). Social capital and health: A systematic review of systematic reviews. SSM - Population Health, 8, 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100425
Goggin, G., Ellis, K., & Hawkins, W. (2019). Disability at the centre of digital inclusion: Assessing a new moment in technology and rights. Communication Research and Practice, 5(3), 290–303.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2021). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
Mäkinen, M. (2006). Digital empowerment as a process for enhancing citizens’ participation. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(3), 381–395.
McKenzie, K. (2007). Digital divide: The implications for social inclusion. Learning Disability Practice, 10(6), 16–21.
Moisey, S., & van de Keere, R. (2007). Inclusion and the internet: Teaching adults with developmental disabilities to use information and communication technology. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 35, 72–102.
Palmer, S. B., Wehmeyer, M. L., Davies, D. K., & Stock, S. E. (2012). Family members’ reports of the technology use of family members with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(4), 402–414.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664–683.
Shpigelman, C. N., & Gill, C. J. (2014). Facebook use by persons with disabilities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 610–624.
Tanis, E. S., Palmer, S., Wehmeyer, M., Davies, D. K., Stock, S. E., Lobb, K., & Bishop, B. (2012). Self-report computer-based survey of technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50(1), 53–68.
van Asselt-Goverts, A. E., Embregts, P. J. C. M., Hendriks, A. H. C., Wegman, K. M., & Teunisse, J. P. (2015). Do social networks differ? Comparison of the social networks of people with intellectual disabilities, people with autism spectrum disorders and other people living in the community. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(5), 1191–1203.
Vinoski Thomas, E., Warren-Findlow, J., Webb, J. B., Quinlan, M. M., Laditka, S. B., & Reeve, C. L. (2019). “It’s very valuable to me that I appear capable”: A qualitative study exploring relationships between body functionality and appearance among women with visible physical disabilities. Body Image, 30, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.05.007
Warschauer, M. (2002) Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday, 7, 7.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2016). Self-determination and choice. Handbook of Evidence-based Practices in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 561–584.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Field, S., Doren, B., Jones, B., & Mason, C. (2004). Self-determination and student involvement in standards-based reform. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 413–425.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Smith, S. J., Davies, D. K., & Stock, S. (2008). The efficacy of technology use by people with intellectual disability: A single-subject design meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(3), 21–30.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Tassé, M. J., Davies, D. K., & Stock, S. (2012). Support needs of adults with intellectual disability across domains: The role of technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(2), 11–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Paul, C.D., Thomas, E.V. & Jimenez, E. A survey of wireless technology use to facilitate social connectedness for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Educ Inf Technol 28, 15671–15686 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11794-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11794-6