Abstract
The recognition that the development of Computational Thinking (CT) has been achieved in the educational systems of different countries implies, in some cases, the challenge of integrating its development into mathematics lessons. Although various proposals address the development of CT in the early years of schooling, educational robotics emerges as an alternative. The Bee-Bot robot has been recognized as an appropriate resource for the development of this type of thinking at an early age. For carrying out this qualitative study 25 articles were selected, based on a systematic research literature review, and analyzed to provide didactic orientation for the integration of CT in mathematics lessons with the use of the Bee-Bot robot (or similar). For this purpose, a thematic analysis method was applied to the selected research articles, focusing on the didactic explanations and suggestions for using educational robots to develop computational thinking. The themes used to analyze the data are according to the six dimensions (epistemic, cognitive, interactional, mediational, affective and ecological) of the didactic suitability proposed by the Ontosemiotic approach. The analysis allowed us to classify twelve didactic orientations according to the dimensions. Four of the twelve orientations refer to the epistemic dimension; three to the cognitive dimension; two are related to the interactional dimension; one to the mediational dimension, one to the affective dimension and another to the ecological dimension.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
References
Acosta, L., & Sigut, M. (2005). Matemáticas y robótica [Mathematics and robotics]. https://imarrero.webs.ull.es/sctm05/modulo2lp/1/msigut.pdf. Accessed Oct 2022.
Aho, A. V. (2012). Computation and computational thinking. The Computer Journal, 55(7), 832–885. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxs074
Arlegui, J., & Pina, A. (2016). Didáctica de la robótica educativa [Didactics of educational robotics]. Editorial Dextra. https://www.ingebook.com/ib/NPcd/IB_BooksVis?cod_primaria=1000187&codigo_libro=10415. Accessed Aug 2022.
Atmatzidou, S., Demetriadis, S., & Nika, P. (2018). How does the degree of guidance support students’ metacognitive and problem solving skills in educational robotics? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9709-x
Breda, A., Font, V., & Pino-Fan, L. (2018). Criterios Valorativos y normativos en la didáctica de las matemáticas: El caso del constructo idoneidad didáctica [Valuative and normative criteria in the didactics of mathematics: the case of the didactic suitability construct]. Bolema, 32(60), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v32n60a13
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Breda, A., & Lima, M. (2016). Estudio de caso sobre el análisis didáctico realizado en un trabajo final de un máster para profesores de matemáticas en servicio [Case study on the didactic analysis performed in a final work of a master’s degree for in-service mathematics teachers]. Redimat, 5(1), 74–103. https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2016.1955
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Vol. 1, pp. 25). Vancouver: American Educational Research Association. http://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/ct/files/AERA2012.pdf. Accessed Aug 2022.
Cascales, M., Carrillo, M., & Redond, A. (2017). ABP y Tecnología en Educación Infantil [PBL and Technology in Early Childhood Education]. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 50, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2017.i50.14
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
EDUPLAN. (2021). Propuesta didáctica: proyecto de investigación. http://eduplan.educando.edu.do/uploads/documentos/propuesta/_1_/1443892102.pdf. Accessed Sept 2021.
Forsström, S., & Kaufmann, O. (2018). A literature review exploring the use of programming in mathematics education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(12), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.12.2
Ghitis, T., & Alba, J. (2014). Los robots llegan al aula [Robots come to the classroom]. Revista Infancia Imágenes, 13, 143–147. https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/infancias/article/view/8122
Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1–2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-006-0004-1
Guirao, S. (2015). Utilidad y tipos de revisión de literatura [Usefulness and types of literature reviews]. ENE, 9(2), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1988-348X2015000200002
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
Godino, J. D. (2013). Indicadores de la idoneidad didáctica de procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje de las matemáticas [Indicators of the didactic suitability of teaching and learning processes in mathematics]. Cuaderno de Investigación de Educación Matemática, 8, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.5007/1981-1322.2013v8n1p46
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. London: Sage Publications. https://www.cuzproduces.com/producinganew/files/resources/HART_Doing%20a%20literature%20review_1988_ch1.pdf
Hepp, P., & Jara, I. (2016). Enseñar Ciencias de la Computación: Creando oportunidades para los jóvenes de América Latina [Teaching Computer Science: Creating Opportunities for Latin America's Youth]. CS White Paper Latam. Microsoft. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309761093_Ensenar_Ciencias_de_la_Computacion_Creando_oportunidades_para_los_jovenes_de_America_Latina. Accessed Sept 2022.
Latorre, A. (2004). La investigación-acción. Conocer y cambiar la práctica educativa [Action research. Knowing and changing educational practice] (2nd ed.). Graó. https://www.uv.mx/rmipe/files/2019/07/La-investigacion-accion-conocer-y-cambiar-la-practica-educativa.pdf
MINEDUC. (2021). Programa de Estudio Pensamiento Computacional y Programación 3° y 4° medio [Program of Study: Computational Thinking and Programming 3rd and 4th grade]. https://www.curriculumnacional.cl/614/articles-140146_programa_feb_2021_final_s_disegno.pdf. Accessed Sept 2021.
Ocaña, G. (2012). Robótica como asignatura en enseñanza secundaria. Resultados de una experiencia educativa [Robotics as a subject in secondary education. Results of an educational experience]. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 5(10), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v5i10.940
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. Harvester Press.
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programing for all. Comunications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602690
Sala-Sebastià, G., Breda, A., Seckel, M. J., Farsani, D., & Alsina, À. (2023). Didactic mathematical-computational knowledge of future teachers when solving and designing robotics problems. Axioms, 12, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12020119
Sandín, M. (2003). Investigación Cualitativa en Educación. Fundamentos y Tradiciones. McGraw and Hill Interamericana de España. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0798-97922005000300007
Solís, A. (2013). Uso de la robótica como herramienta motivacional para la enseñanza de la Matemática en la Educación Primaria [Use of robotics as a motivational tool for teaching mathematics in primary education]. (Master's Thesis). Instituto Tecnológico, Costa Rica. https://repositoriotec.tec.ac.cr/handle/2238/6394. Accessed Sept 2021.
Vásquez, E., Bottamedi, J., & Brizuela, M.L. (2019). Pensamiento computacional en el aula: el desafío en los sistemas educativos de Latinoamérica [Computational thinking in the classroom: the challenge for the educational systems in Latin America]. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 7, 36–47. https://revistas.um.es/riite/article/view/397901
Wing, J. (2010). Computational Thinking: What and Why? https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf. Accessed Sept 2021.
Zhang, L., & Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Computers & Education, 141, 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607
Referencias de los artículos seleccionados para el estudio
Alsina, A., & Acosta, Y. (2018). Iniciación al álgebra en Educación Infantil a través del pensamiento computacional: Una experiencia sobre patrones con robots educativos programables [Introduction to algebra in Early Childhood Education through computational thinking: An experience on patterns with programmable educational robots]. Unión, 52, 218–235. https://union.fespm.es/index.php/UNION/article/view/350
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2019). Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018
Arfé, B., Vardanega, T., & Ronconi, L. (2020). The effects of coding on children’s planning and inhibition skills. Computers & Education, 148, 103807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103807
Berciano-Alcaraz, A., Salgado-Somoza, M., & Jiménez-Gestal, C. (2022). Alfabetización computacional en educación infantil: Dificultades y beneficios en el aula de 3 años [Computer Literacy in Early Childhood Education: Difficulties and Benefits in a 3-year-old Classroom]. Educare, 26(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-2.15
Bers, M., González-González, C., & Armas-Torres, M. B. (2019). Coding as a playground: Promoting positive learning experiences in childhood classrooms. Computers & Education, 138, 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.013
Caballero-Gonzalez, Y., & García-Valcárcel, A. (2019). Fortaleciendo habilidades de pensamiento computacional en Educación Infantil: Experiencia de aprendizaje mediante interfaces tangible y gráfica [Strengthening computational thinking skills in Early Childhood Education: Learning experience through tangible and graphical interfaces]. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 18(2), 133–149. https://relatec.unex.es/article/view/3577
Caballero-González, A., & García-Valcárcel, A. (2021). Robots en la educación de la primera infancia: Aprender a secuenciar acciones usando robots programables [Robots in early childhood education: Learning to sequence actions using programmable robots]. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27508
Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Salvini, P., Valente, M., Buselli, E., Menichetti, L., Calvani, A., & Dario, P. (2018). Design and impact of a teacher training course, and attitude change concerning educational robotics. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10, 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0475-6
Critten, V., Hagon, H., & Messer, D. (2021). Can pre-school children learn programming and coding through guided play activities? A case study in computational thinking. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50, 969–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01236-8
Di Lieto, M., Inguaggiato, E., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dell’Omo, M., Laschi, C., Pecini, C., Santerini, G., Sgandurra, G., & Dario, P. (2017). Educational robotics intervention on executive functions in preschool children: A pilot study. Computers in Human Behav, 71, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.018
Diago, P. D., Arnau, D., & González-Calero, J. A. (2018a). Elementos de resolución de problemas en primeras edades escolares con Bee-bot [Elements of early school age problem solving with Bee-bot]. Edma 0–6: Educación Matemática en la Infancia, 7(1), 12–41. https://doi.org/10.24197/edmain.1.2018.12-41
Diago, P. D., Arnau, D., & González-Calero, J. A. (2018b). La resolución de problemas matemáticos en primeras edades escolares con Bee-bot [Mathematical problem solving in early school age with Bee-bot]. Matemáticas, Educación y Sociedad, 1(2), 36–50. https://www.uco.es/ucopress/ojs/index.php/mes/article/view/12835
Diago, P., González-Calero, J., & Yáñez, D. (2022). Exploring the development of mental rotation and computational skills in elementary students through educational robotics. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 32, 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100388
Ferrada, C., Díaz-Levicoy, D., Salgado-Orellana, N., & Parraguez, R. (2019). Propuesta de actividades STEM con Bee-Bot en matemática [STEM activities proposal with Bee-Bot in mathematics]. Edma 0–6: Educación Matemática en la Infancia, 8(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.24197/edmain.1.2019.33-43
Gerosa, A., Koleszar, V., Tejera, G., Gómez-Sena, L., & Carboni, A. (2022). Educational robotics intervention to foster computational thinking in preschoolers: Effects of children’s task engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 904761. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904761
Kong, S., Lai, M., & Sun, D. (2020). Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 151, 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872
Lavigne, H., Lewis-Presser, A., & Rosenfeld, D. (2020). An exploratory approach for investigating the integration of computational thinking and mathematics for preschool children. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1693940
Messer, D., Thomas, L., Holliman, A., & Kucirkova, N. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of an educational programming intervention on children’s mathematics skills, spatial awareness and working memory. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2879–2888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9747-x
Muñoz, L., Villarreal, V., Morales, I., Gonzalez, J., & Nielsen, M. (2019). Developing an interactive environment through the teaching of mathematics with small robots. Sensors, 20(7), 1935. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20071935
Otterborn, A., Schönborn, K., & Hultén, M. (2019). Investigating preschool educators’ implementation of computer programming in their teaching practice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00976-y
Palmér, H. (2017). Programming in preschool—with a focus on learning mathematics. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 8(1), 75–87. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1173690.pdf
Pérez, G., & Diago, P. (2018). Estudio exploratorio sobre lenguajes simbólicos de programación en tareas de resolución de problemas con Bee-bot [An exploratory study on symbolic programming languages in problem-solving tasks with Bee-bot]. Magister, 30(1 and 2), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.17811/msg.30.1.2018.9-20
Ricart, M., Estrada, M., & Margalef, M. (2019). Idoneidad didáctica en educación infantil: Matemáticas con robots Blue-Bot [Didactic suitability in early childhood education: mathematics with Blue-Bot robots]. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 8(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v8i2.11589
Sala-Sebastià, G., Breda, A., Seckel, M. J., Farsani, D., & Alsina, À. (2023). Didactic–mathematical–computational knowledge of future teachers when solving and designing robotics problems. Axioms, 12, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12020119
Seckel, M. J., Vásquez, C., Samuel, M., & Breda, A. (2021). Errors of programming and ownership of the Robot concept made by Trainee Kindergarten Teachers during an induction training. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10708-8
Seckel, M. J., Breda, A., Farsani, D., & Parra, J. (2022). Reflections of future kindergarten teachers on the design of a mathematical instruction process didactic sequences with the use of robots. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(10), em2163. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12442
Schina, D., Valls-Bautista, C., Borrull-Riera, A., Usart, M., & Esteve-González, V. (2021). An associational study: Preschool teachers’ acceptance and self-efficacy towards Educational Robotics in a pre-service teacher training program. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00264-z
Welch, L. E., Shumway, J. F., Clarke-Midura, J., & Lee, V. R. (2022). Exploring measurement through coding: Children’s conceptions of a dynamic linear unit with robot coding toys. Education Sciences, 12, 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020143
Funding
This study was supported by the research projects in teacher training: Fondecyt research project N°11190547, and Grant PID2021-127104NB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by "ERDF A way of making Europe".
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Seckel, M.J., Salinas, C., Font, V. et al. Guidelines to develop computational thinking using the Bee-bot robot from the literature. Educ Inf Technol 28, 16127–16151 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11843-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11843-0