Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Did you act according to your intention? An analysis and exploration of intention–behavior gap in MOOCs

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MOOC learners come from different backgrounds, and they have various motivations and intentions for taking online courses. This study examines learner intentions with subsequent behaviors and the reasons for the intention-behavior gap in MOOCs. A total of four MOOCs from Bilgeİş MOOC Portal was used in this study. This quantitative study with a qualitative follow up includes 9797 participants in total. Learners’ behaviors on the courses were compared with their intentions they stated before starting online courses. Four intention-behavior patterns, which are inclined actors, inclined abstainers, disinclined actors, and disinclined abstainers, were used. MOOC learners mostly wanted to complete the MOOCs and obtain certificates, yet they failed to do so, and their intentions changed. The results showed that intention-behavior gap occurs in the MOOCs as the learner intentions did not result in the intended behaviors. In brief, inclined abstainers were mainly responsible for the intention-behavior gap for failing to act upon their positive intentions, and the main reason behind intention-behavior gap was mostly related to the individual learner, including learner related time issues, learner related general issues, and learner related technical issues. More specifically, learners achieved below their intentions in the courses due to lack of time. This study also confirmed that the intention-behavior gap in MOOCs primarily occurs due to non-MOOC related reasons. That is, learners mainly failed to spare enough time for the MOOCs. Results were discussed and future research directions were provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The anonymized datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azhar, K. A., Iqbal, N., Shah, Z., & Ahmed, H. (2023). Understanding high dropout rates in MOOCs–a qualitative case study from Pakistan. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2200753

  • Cagiltay, K., Esfer, S., & Celik, B. (2020a). Insights into a nationwide pdMOOC portal: bilgeis.net of Turkey. In K. Zhang, C. J. Bonk, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and open education in the global south: challenges, successes, and opportunities (pp. 130–139). Routledge.

  • Cagiltay, N. E., Cagiltay, K., & Celik, B. (2020b). An analysis of course characteristics, learner characteristics, and certification rates in MITx MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4698

  • Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essex, C., & Cagiltay, K. (2001). Evaluating an online course: Feedback from “distressed” students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(3), 233–239.

  • Esfer, S., & Cagiltay, K. (2018). Creating a MOOC portal for workplace learning. In G. Ifenthaler (Ed.), Digital workplace learning (pp. 167–185). Springer.

  • Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.920752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gütl, C., Rizzardini, R. H., Chang, V., & Morales, M. (2014). Attrition in MOOC: Lessons learned from drop-out students. In International workshop on learning technology for education in cloud (pp. 37–48). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderikx, M. A., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017a). Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap. Distance Education, 38(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderikx, M., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017b). To change or not to change? That’s the question… on MOOC-success, barriers and their implications. In European Conference on Massive Open Online Courses (pp. 210–216). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_25

  • Henderikx, M., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2018a). Intention-behavior dynamics in MOOC learning; What happens to good intentions along the way?. In 2018 Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS) (pp. 110–112). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/LWMOOCS.2018.8534595

  • Henderikx, M., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2018b). A classification of barriers that influence intention achievement in MOOCs. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 3–15). Springer.

  • Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Dowell, N., Mills, C., Gašević, D., … Brooks, C. (2018). How do we model learning at scale? A systematic review of research on MOOCs. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 43–86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317740335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133- 160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651

  • Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., Walhout, J., Castaño-Munoz, J., Espasa, A., & Tovar, E. (2015). Setting-up a european cross-provider data collection on open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2150

  • Kizilcec, R. F., & Halawa, S. (2015). Attrition and achievement gaps in online learning. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 57-66). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724680

  • Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBroom, W. H., & Reed, F. W. (1992). Toward a reconceptualization of attitude-behavior consistency. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (1998). ‘Inclined abstainers’: A problem for predicting health-related behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01162.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K. W., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: Motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, J. (2014). MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent. EDUCAUSE Review Online, 8. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/12/mooc-completion-and-retention-in-the-context-of-student-intent

  • Reich, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2019). The MOOC pivot. Science, 363(6423), 130–131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7958

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016). The intention–behavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention—behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Bonafini, F. C., Lockee, B. B., Jablokow, K. W., & Hu, X. (2019). Exploring demographics and students’ motivation as predictors of completion of a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.3730

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is derived from a dissertation by the first author entittled “An examination of presage, process and product dimensions in massive open online courses”. Submitted to Middle East Technical University, September 2020. Author: Berkan Celik, Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Kursat Cagiltay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey

    Berkan Celik

  2. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Kursat Cagiltay

  3. The Digital Economy Research Center, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), Baku, Azerbaijan

    Kursat Cagiltay

Authors
  1. Berkan Celik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kursat Cagiltay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berkan Celik.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

There is no conflict of interest among authors.

Ethics approval

Necessary ethical approval was obtained from Applied Ethics Research Center of the researchers’ university.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Celik, B., Cagiltay, K. Did you act according to your intention? An analysis and exploration of intention–behavior gap in MOOCs. Educ Inf Technol 29, 1733–1760 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11859-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11859-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation