Abstract
Numerous studies have examined the positive and negative effects of various types of interactions that occur while children view electronic book (e-book) stories. However, the effects of the different types of interactions have not been compared, and more importantly, the optimal amount and reoccurrence of these interactions on children has not been explored. The present study was designed to fill this gap by examining the effect of amount, type and reoccurrence of e-book interactions on kindergarteners’ new word learning and story comprehension. To do so, 72 children aged 5–6 year-old viewed three picture e-book stories in one session read by digital narrators, and then repeated this procedure in a second session. Each story included a word clarification or a story elaboration type of interaction, which occurred at low (every two screens), medium (every screen), or high frequency (more than once on most screens) during viewing. Following each story, participants were asked to define target words and answer comprehension questions. Results showed that increasing the amount of interactions, whether word clarifications or elaborations, enhanced word learning and story comprehension following the second exposure to the e-book stories. These findings suggest that interruptions during e-book viewing to explain difficult words or expand the plot by inferential information, do not interfere with the narrative course and do not impair learning processes, at least not in the amounts of interactions examined in this study. These conclusions bear practical implications for the design of e-books, and more generally, for the interactive approach adults may adopt when reading a story to children.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Abawaini, F., Dahlan, T. H., & Rachmawati, Y. (2022). Development of family literacy culture through read aloud: Literature review. Proceedings of International Conference on Psychological Studies, 3, 275–281.
Acosta-Tello, E. (2019). Reading aloud: Engaging young children during a read aloud experience. Research in Higher Education Journal, 37, 1–7.
Ard, L. M., & Beverly, B. L. (2004). Preschool word learning during joint book reading: Effect of adult questions and comments. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 26, 17–28.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford University Press.
Barrentine, S. J. (1996). Engaging with reading through interactive read-alouds. The Reading Teacher, 50, 36–43.
Beauchat, K. A. (2008). Making the most of shared reading in preschool. University of Delaware.
Beck, I., & McKeown, M. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume II (pp. 789–814). Longman.
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55, 10–20.
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2007). Increasing young low-income children’s oralvocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. The ElementarySchool Journal, 107, 251–271.
Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in Primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 44–62.
Bus, A. G., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Pellegrin, A. D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65, 1–21.
Bus, A. G., Takacs, Z. K., & Kegel, C. A. T. (2015). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children’s emergent literacy. Developmental Review, 35, 79–97.
Courage, M. L., Bakhtiar, A., Fitzpatrick, C., Kenny, S., & Brandeau, K. (2015). Growing up multitasking: The costs and benefits for cognitive development. Developmental Review, 35, 5–41.
Cunningham, A. E. (2005). Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to children. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Brining research to practice (pp. 45–68). Erlbaum.
De Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2002). Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 145–155.
De Temple, J., & Snow, C. E. (2003). Learning words from books. In A. van Kleeck, S. A. Stahl, & E. B. Bauer (Eds.), On reading books to children: Parents and teachers (pp. 15–34). Erlbaum.
Durso, F. T., & Shore, W. J. (1991). Partial knowledge of word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 190–202.
Elshout-Mohr, M., & van Daalen-Kapteijns, M. M. (1987). Cognitive processes in learning word meanings. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 53–72). Erlbaum.
Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2006). Teaching for comprehending and fluency. Heinemann.
Furenes, M. I., Kucirkova, N., & Bus, A. G. (2021). A comparison of children’s reading on paper versus screen: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91, 483–517.
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 31–60.
Goodsitt, J., Raitan, J. G., & Perlmutter, M. (1988). Interaction between mothers and preschool children when reading a novel and familiar book. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 11, 489–505.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
Greenfield, P. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323, 69–71.
Hoffman, J. V., Roser, N. L., & Battle, J. (1993). Reading aloud in classrooms: From the modal toward a “model.” The Reading Teacher, 46, 496–503.
Johnston, V. (2015). The power of the read aloud in the age of the common core. The Open Communication Journal, 9, 34–38.
Justice, L. M., Meier, J., & Walpole, S. (2005). Learning new words from storybooks: An efficacy study with at-risk kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 17–32.
Karweit, N. (1989). The effects of a story-reading program on the vocabulary and story comprehension skills of disadvantaged preschool and kindergarten students. Early Education and Development, 1, 105–114.
Katzenberger, I. (2009). The Katzenberger language assessment for preschool children. Guy Agencies. In Hebrew.
Keller, C. (2012). Reading aloud – Why take the time? School Library Monthly, 28, 40–41.
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765–778.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Klein, O., & Kogan, I. (2013). Does reading to children enhance their educational success? Short- and long-term effects of reading to children in early childhood on their language abilities, reading behavior and school marks. Child Indicators Research, 6, 321–344.
Kloosterman, R., Notten, N., Tolsma, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2011). The effects of parental reading socialization and early school involvement on children’s academic performance: A panel study of primary school pupils in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 27, 291–306.
Korat, O. (2009). The effects of CD-ROM storybook reading on Israeli children’s early literacy as a function of age group and repeated reading. Education Information Technology, 14, 39–53.
Korat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education, 55, 24–31.
Korat, O., & Blau, H. (2010). Repeated reading of CD-ROM storybook as a support for emergent literacy: A developmental perspective in two SES groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43, 443–462.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2007). Electronic books versus adult readers: Effects on children’s emergent literacy as a function of social class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 248–259.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2008). The educational electronic book as a tool for supporting children’s emergent literacy in low versus middle SES groups. Computers & Education, 50, 110–124.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2010). E-book as a tool for supporting emergent literacy: Evidence from a study with Hebrew speaking children. Literacy and Language, 3, 71–90.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2012). Direct and indirect teaching: Using e-books for supporting vocabulary, word reading, and story comprehension for young children. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46, 135–152.
Korat, O., Levin, I., Atishkin, S., & Turgeman, M. (2013a). E-book as facilitator of vocabulary acquisition: Support of adults, dynamic dictionary and static dictionary. Reading and Writing, 27, 613–629.
Korat, O., Shamir, A., & Heibal, S. (2013b). Expanding the boundaries of shared book reading: E-books and printed books in parent–child reading as support for children’s language. First Language, 33, 504–523.
Korat, O., Tourgeman, M., & Segal-Drori, O. (2022). E-book reading in kindergarten and story comprehension support. Reading and Writing, 35, 155–175.
Kraybill, J. H., & Bell, M. A. (2013). Infancy predictors of preschool and post-kindergarten executive function. Developmental Psychobiology, 55, 530–538.
Kümmerling-Meibauer, B., Meibauer, J., Nachtigäller, K., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2015). Learning from picturebooks: Perspectives from child development and literacy studies. Routledge.
Labbo, L. D., & Kuhn, M. R. (2000). Weaving chains of affect and cognition: A young child’s understanding of CD-ROM talking books. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 187–210.
Lane, H. B., & Wright, T. L. (2007). Maximizing the effectiveness of reading aloud. The Reading Teacher, 60, 668–675.
Lennox, S. (2013). Interactive read-alouds—An avenue for enhancing children’s language for thinking and understanding: A review of recent research. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 381–389.
Lepola, J., Lynch, J., Laakkonen, E., Silvén, M., & Niemi, P. (2012). The role of inference making and other language skills in the development of narrative listening comprehension in 4–6-year-old children. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 259–282.
Lepola, J., Kajamies, A., Laakkonen, E., & Niemi, P. (2020). Vocabulary, metacognitive knowledge and task orientation as predictors of narrative picture book comprehension: From preschool to grade 3. Reading and Writing, 33, 1351–1373.
Lim, J., Whitehead, G. E., & Choi, Y. (2021). Interactive e-book reading vs. paper-based reading: Comparing the effects of different mediums on middle school students’ reading comprehension. System, 97, 102434.
Lynch, J., Anderson, J., Anderson, A., & Shapiro, J. (2008). Parents and preschool children interacting with storybooks: Children’s early literacy achievement. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 48, 227–242.
Martinez, M., & Roser, N. (1985). Read it again: The value of repeated readings during storytime. The Reading Teacher, 38, 382–386.
Martinez, M., & Teale, W. H. (1988). Reading in a kindergarten classroom library. The Reading Teacher, 41, 568–573.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43–52.
Meyer, L. A., Stahl, S. A., Wardrop, J. L., & Linn, R. L. (1994). The effects of reading storybooks aloud to children. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 69–85.
Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., & Friedman, N. P. (2000a). Assessment of executive functions in clinical settings: Problems and recommendations. Seminars in Speech and Language, 21, 169–183.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000b). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
Morrow, L. M., O’Connor, E. M., & Smith, J. K. (1990). Effects of story reading program on the literacy development of at-risk kindergarten children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 255–273.
Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253.
Niklas, F., Cohrssen, C., & Tayler, C. (2016). The sooner, the better: Early reading to children. SAGE Open, 6.
Niklas, F., & Schneider, W. (2013). Home literacy environment and the beginning of reading and writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 40–50.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Penno, J. F., Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Moore, D. W. (2002). Vocabulary acquisition from teacher explanation and repeated listening to stories: Do they overcome the Matthew effect? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 23–33.
Phadung, M., Suksakulchai, S., & Kaewprapan, W. (2016). Interactive whole language e-story for early literacy development in ethnic minority children. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 249–263.
Roberts, T. (2008). Home storybook reading in primary or second language preschool children: Evidence of equal effectiveness for second language vocabulary acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 103–130.
Rosen, L. H., Scott, S. R., & Higgins, M. G. (2023). Books and bullies: Responses to bullying in preschool students. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1–12.
Rosenthal, J., & Ehri, L. C. (2008). The mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 175–191.
Roskos, K., Brueck, J., & Lenhart, L. (2017). An analysis of e-book learning platforms: Affordances, architecture, functionality and analytics. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 12, 37–45.
Scarborough, H., & Dobrich, W. (1994). On the efficacy of reading to preschoolers. Developmental Review, 14, 245–302.
Segal-Drori, O., Korat, O., Shamir, A., & Klein, P. S. (2010). Reading electronic and printed books with and without adult instruction: Effects on emergent reading. Reading and Writing, 23, 913–930.
Sénéchal, M. (1997). The differential effect of storybook reading on preschooler’s acquisition of expressive and receptive vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 24, 123–138.
Sénéchal, M., & Lefevre, J. A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445–460.
Sénéchal, M., Thomas, E., & Monker, J. A. (1995). Individual differences in 4-year-old children’s acquisition of vocabulary during storybook reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 218–229.
Shamir, A., & Korat, O. (2009). The educational electronic book as a tool for supporting children’s emergent literacy. In A. G. Bus & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Multimedia and literacy development (pp. 168–181). Routledge.
Shamir, A., Korat, O., & Shlafer, I. (2011). The effect of activity with e-book on vocabulary and story comprehension: A comparison between kindergarteners at risk of learning disabilities and typically developing kindergarteners. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26, 311–322.
Shoham-Gueta, T. (2017). Repeated e-book reading and its influence on words’ learning and story comprehension among preschoolers and first-graders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bar-Ilan University.
Shore, W. J., & Durso, F. T. (1990). Partial knowledge in vocabulary acquisition: General constraints and specific detail. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 315–318.
Smeets, D. J., & Bus, A. G. (2015). The interactive animated e-book as a word learning device for kindergartners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 899–920.
Stahl, S., & Fairbanks, M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72–110.
Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Liking vs. Loving: A comparative evaluation of theories. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 331–345.
Strasser, K., & Río, F. D. (2014). The role of comprehension monitoring, theory of mind, and vocabulary depth in predicting story comprehension and recall of kindergarten children. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 169–187.
Sulzby, E. (1985). Children’s emergent reading of favorite storybooks: A developmental study. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 458–481.
Tompkins, V., Guo, Y., & Justice, L. M. (2013). Inference generation, story comprehension, and language skills in the preschool years. Reading and Writing, 26, 403–429.
Van Kleeck, A., Vander Woude, J., & Hammett, L. A. (2006). Fostering literal and inferential language skills in Head Start preschoolers with language impairment using scripted book-sharing discussions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 85–95.
Verhallen, M. J. A. J., Bus, A. G., & de Jong, M. T. (2006). The promise of multimedia stories for kindergarten children at risk. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 410–419.
Wasik, B. A., Hindman, A. H., & Snell, E. K. (2016). Book reading and vocabulary development: A systematic review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 37, 39–57.
Wells, G. (1986). Language development in the preschool years. Cambridge University Press.
Whitehurst, G. J., Arnold, D. S., Epstein, J. N., & Angell, A. L. (1994). A picture book reading intervention in day care and home for children from low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 30, 679–689.
Wright, T. S. (2019). Reading to learn from the start: The power of interactive read-alouds. American Educator, 42, 4.
Wright, T. S., Cervetti, G. N., Wise, C., & McClung, N. A. (2022). The Impact of Knowledge-Building through Conceptually-Coherent Read Alouds on Vocabulary and Comprehension. Reading Psychology, 43, 70–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest statement
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
An example of one of the e-books used in this study—“The balloon that wanted to be a kite”, including all dictionary and elaboration interactions which are presented following the corresponding sentences. The underlined interactions were presented in the low-frequency condition. The interactions presented in the medium-frequency condition were those that are underlined and those in italics font. The high-frequency condition included all interactions presented in this appendix. Note that this text was translated from Hebrew. Thus, the level of familiarity and difficulty of the words selected for the dictionary interactions may differ in the two languages.
Screen | Story | Dictionary | Elaborations |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Once there was a balloon, a purple balloon, a big balloon. One summer morning the balloon left his house. It was hot and he wanted to tour. | Tour: travel | The sun: nice balloon, outside there is a nice breeze, it will be pleasant to walk around outside. |
2 | He wandered in the mountains and above the houses. | Wandered: went from place to place | House: Goodbye balloon, how high you are in the sky! |
3 | He floated slowly and he smelled the flowers. | Floated: flew | Flower: Come to us purple balloon. We have a wonderful scent, that will give you feelings of happiness and peace. |
He hummed to himself: “How good it is to be a purple balloon”. | Hummed: sang | Balloon: How fun it is to fly in the air and enjoy the wonderful aromas. | |
4 | He suddenly noticed four kites. | Noticed: saw | Balloon: Hey, here are kites…maybe I will join them and we will travel together. |
“Hello”, said the purple balloon, “What are you doing?”, “We are flying”, replied the blue kite. | Replied: answered | Blue kite: The wind blowing helps us to fly. | |
5 | “Could I fly with you?”, asked the balloon. “You are kidding!! You are a balloon and not a kite”, Said the kites, and turned their back to him. | Turned their back to him: Turned away and left, refused. | Green kite: You are different from us. You cannot fly with us. |
“Perhaps I could take hold of your tail?” | Take hold of: grab, catch | Balloon: It would be more fun for me to fly together with some friends. | |
6 | But the kite laughed at the balloon: “Fat balloon, he’s got a baby in his belly”, the orange kite made fun of him. | Made fun of: laughed at, insulted | Orange kite: You are fat and slow. You cannot fly as fast as us. |
“Leaning balloon, without enough string”, giggled the green balloon. | Giggled: laughed lightly | Green kite: Your string is short, no child can hold on to you from below. | |
7 | “Faceless balloon, that cannot fly”, guffawed the blue kite. | Guffawed: laughed | Blue kite: We do not want you to fly with us. |
“Flea balloon, wart-head”, joked the red kite. | Joked: laughed at | Red kite: If we insult him he will leave. | |
8 | The balloon experienced sadness. “If I could only be a kite…”. | Experienced: felt | Balloon: If I were a kite, I could play with all the kites, and I would not be alone. |
The kites played catch and hide and go seek, they jumped rope, had fun and ran races, and the balloon floated alone on the side and viewed them. | Viewed: looked at | Cloud: The kites do not understand they are hurting you. They do not understand that it is not pleasant to be left alone. | |
9 | Suddenly the wind stopped, and the kites fell slowly to the ground. | Fell: dropped down | Orange kite: Hey friends, without wind we cannot manage to fly in the air. |
Just the purple balloon remained in the air, because balloons do not depend on wind to fly. | Depend: need | Balloon: The kites are not like me, they need wind in order to fly. | |
10 | “Hi purple balloon”, called the blue kite, “take me with you, I will grab your string and we will fly”. | Grab: hold onto | Blue kite: I need your help to continue flying without wind. |
“Take us too, take us too!!!”, pleaded the other kites. | Pleaded: begged | Balloon: Now when there is no wind, the kites need me so they can continue flying. Therefore, they are being nice to me. | |
11 | “You are kidding! You are kites and not balloons. You cannot fly without wind”, responded the balloon, and went flying on his way. | Responded: answered | Balloon: Before you made fun of me and did not want to play with me. Now I do not want to play with you. |
He returned and sang: “How good it is to be a purple balloon”. | Returned: came back to do something he had done before | Balloon: How fun it is that I am a balloon and not a kite! Balloons can fly even when the wind stops! | |
12 | The kites remained sad on the ground, and thought to themselves: “If we could only be balloons…”. | Remained: stayed | Kite: We did not need to make fun of the balloon then. Everyone has his own good qualities. |
Appendix 2
The following are the 7 open-ended comprehension questions the participants answered after viewing the e-book story “The Balloon that Wanted to be a Kite” presented in Appendix 1.
-
1.
Why did the balloon leave his house and want to tour?
-
2.
How did the balloon feel while floating and singing to himself?
-
3.
Why did the kites make fun of the balloon?
-
4.
Why did the balloon feel sad?
-
5.
Why did the kites suddenly fall to the ground, while the balloon remained in the air?
-
6.
Why did the balloon not agree to the kite’s request that he would take them with him?
-
7.
What can be learned from the story? What is the important thing you learned from the story?
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yeari, M., Hadad, A. & Korat, O. The effect of amount, type and reoccurrence of interactions in electronic books on word learning and story comprehension by kindergartners. Educ Inf Technol 29, 6841–6863 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12077-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12077-w