Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toward a new educational reality: A mapping review of the role of e-assessment in the new digital context

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, education is facing a new reality in which technology and new teaching methods are being quickly introduced into educational systems and institutions. Educational institutions are now dealing with the challenge of providing continuity to e-learning, turning it into a more flexible and up-to-date field, and considering assessment as a quality element in this transition. Therefore, with the aim of determining the current state of the research focused on assessment in digital environments (e-assessment), a mapping of the literature has been carried out. After examining 1,771 results extracted from Web of Science and Scopus and after the application of seven inclusion criteria, a total of 159 publications from the period of the past five years were read. The answer four research questions on the evolution of publications, the authors, the tools used, the contexts, the objects of study, and the future avenues of research, among others. The results show the increasing importance of e-assessment in this new context, moving toward a new reality in which technology plays a decisive and fundamental role in the teaching and learning processes. Thus, educational systems are heading towards a new context in which both teachers and students should rethink their roles and functions leading education to a more flexible, current, and digitally mediated context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Google Sheets repository: bit.ly/3N8xBXf.

References

  • Abdou, R. A. E. (2020). Effects of e-assessment tools in academic achievement and motivation towards learning among preservice kindergarten teachers in Turaif. Amazonia Investiga, 9(28). https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.28.04.24

  • Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 124, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkiş, N., & Coşkunçay, D. F. (2018). Mobile learning acceptance: A systematic literature review. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 20(2), 571–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almossa, S. Y. (2021). University students’ perspectives toward learning and assessment during COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7163–7181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10554-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alrofou, A., Lakulu, M. M., & Almaiah, M. (2019). A systematic review of mobile-based assessment acceptance studies from 2009 to 2019. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 97, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alruwais, N. (2018). Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AlTameemy, F. A. Q., Alrefaee, Y., & Alalwi, F. S. S. (2020). Using blackboard as a tool of e-assessment in testing writing skill in saudi arabia. Retrieved January 1, 2023, from http://repository.psau.edu.sa:80/jspui/handle/123456789/1229784. Accessed 27 Jan 2023.

  • Atoum, Y., Chen, L., Liu, A. X., Hsu, S. D. H., & Liu, X. (2017). Automated online exam proctoring. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 19(7), 1609–1624. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2017.2656064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babo, R., Babo, L., Suhonen, J. T., & Tukiainen, M. (2020). E- Assessment with multiple-choice questions: A 5 Year study of students’ opinions and experience. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 19, 001–029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacca-Acosta, J., & Avila-Garzon, C. (2021). Student engagement with mobile-based assessment systems: A survival analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balta, N., Perera-Rodríguez, V.-H., & Hervás-Gómez, C. (2018). Using Socrative as an online homework platform to increase students’ exam scores. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9638-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, R., & Sangwin, C. (2021). Practical online assessment of mathematical proof. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1896813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. J. (1993). Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21(1), 49–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269308560014

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boote, S. K., Boote, D. N., & Williamson, S. (2021). Assessing graph comprehension on paper and computer with MBA students: A crossover experimental study. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1960247. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1960247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgos-Videla, C. (2021). Innovación y aprendizajes flexibles en entornos formativos universitarios. Innovación y Aprendizajes Flexibles En Entornos Formativos Universitarios, 1–152.

  • Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2021). La evaluación de la educación virtual: Las e-actividades. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.28994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakiroglu, U., Erdogdu, F., Kokoc, M., & Atabay, M. (2017). Students’ preferences in online assessment process: Influences on academic performances. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 132–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chacín, R. (2021). Los docentes y la evaluación en la modalidad virtual. Interacciones, 1(1), Art. 1. Retrieved March 15, 2023, from https://p3.usal.edu.ar/index.php/interacciones/article/view/5531. Accessed 15 Mar 2023.

  • Cheng, X., Chan, L. K., Cai, H., Zhou, D., & Yang, X. (2021). Adaptions and perceptions on histology and embryology teaching practice in China during the Covid-19 pandemic. Translational Research in Anatomy, 24, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2021.100115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, I. D. (2016). What is a “mapping study?” Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 104(1), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, H., Burke, D., Jordan, K., & Wilson, S. W. G. (2021). Learning with technology during emergencies: A systematic review of K-12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1554–1575. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutumisu, M. (2018). The informational value of feedback choices for performance and revision in a digital assessment game. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-03-2018-0017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, C., Pachler, N., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Exploring formative e-assessment: Using case stories and design patterns. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003650052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dascalu, M.-D., Ruseti, S., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., Carabas, M., Rebedea, T., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2021). Before and during COVID-19: A Cohesion Network Analysis of students’ online participation in moodle courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, D., Kummer, T.-F., & Singh, K. (2019). Evaluating the impact of online discussion boards on student engagement with group work. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 902–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMara, R., Chen, B., Hartshorne, R., & Thripp, R. (2017). Elevating participation and outcomes with computer-based assessments: An immersive development workshop for engineering faculty. Computers in Education Journal, 8, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermo, J. (2009). e-Assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perceptions of e-assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00915.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom. Theory into Practice, 55(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doğan, N., Kibrislioglu Uysal, N., Kelecioglu, H., & Hambleton, R. (2020). An Overview of E-Assessment. 35, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020063669

  • Domingo-Coscollola, M., Bosco, A., Carrasco-Segovia, S., & Sánchez, J. A. (2020). Fomentando la competencia digital docente en la universidad: Percepción de estudiantes y docentes. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.340551

  • Dorris, C., Winter, K., O’Hare, L., & Lwoga, E. T. (2021). PROTOCOL: A systematic review of mobile device use in the primary school classroom and its impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1155

  • Dutton, P. J., Bickerstaff, H. E., Rymer, J. M., Webb, M. E., Ballinger-Mills, D., Greenough, A., & Reynolds, P. A. (2017). Investigation of Formative Assessment of Learning (INFORMAL): The Performance Indicator Tool (PIT). Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9307-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egarter, S., Mutschler, A., & Brass, K. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on digital medical education: Compatibility of digital teaching and examinations with integrity and ethical principles. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00084-8

  • Faber, J. M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A. J. (2017). The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: Results of a randomized experiment. Computers & Education, 106, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forero-Peña, D. A., Carrión-Nessi, F. S., Camejo-Ávila, N. A., & Forero-Peña, M. J. (2020). COVID-19 en Latinoamérica: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura y análisis bibliométrico. Revista de Salud Pública, 22(2), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v22n2.86878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Aretio, L. (2021). ¿Podemos fiarnos de la evaluación en los sistemas de educación a distancia y digitales? RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.30223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Transformación digital en las universidades: Implicaciones de la pandemia de la COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society: EKS, 22, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.25465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Developing robust state-of-the-art reports: Systematic Literature Reviews. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600

  • Geomar, E. (2020). Percepciones de los estudiantes pre-universitarios sobre el perfil del profesor virtual. Conference proceedings CIVINEDU 2020: 4th International Virtual Conference on Educational Research and Innovation September 23–24, 2020, 2020, ISBN 978–84–09–22966–6, 271–272. Retrieved March 15, 2023, from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7837919. Accessed 15 Mar 2023.

  • Ghouali, K., Benmoussat, S., & Ruiz-Cecilia, R. (2020). E-assessment on the spotlight: Present and future prospects. ReiDoCrea: Revista electrónica de Investigación Docencia Creativa, 9, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.59151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-González, R. A., & Silveira-Bonilla, M. H. (2022). Educación e inteligencia artificial: Nodos temáticos de inmersión. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 82, Article 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande-de-Prado, M., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Almuzara, A. C., & Abella-García, V. (2021). Evaluación en Educación Superior durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. Campus Virtuales, 10(1), Article 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoryeva, N. V., Melikov, I. M., Palanchuk, N. V., Kokhanovskaya, I. I., & Aralova, E. (2021). Opportunities for organizing distance learning presented by the moodle platform: experience in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9, e1259. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE3.1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E., & Noguera, I. (2018). A model for aligning assessment with competences and learning activities in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., Gupta, K., Joshi, A., & Sharma, D. (2019). Tools for E-Assessment Techniques in Education: A Review. En Handbook of Research on E-Assessment in Higher Education (pp. 28–52). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5936-8.ch002

  • Hassan, B., Shati, A. A., Alamri, A., Patel, A., Asseri, A. A., Abid, M., Al-Qahatani, S. M., & Satti, I. (2020). Online assessment for the final year medical students during covid-19 pandemics; the exam quality and students’ performance. Onkologia i Radioterapia, 1–6.

  • Heil, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Online assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3398

  • Humanante-Ramos, P., Fernández-Acevedo, J., & Jiménez, C. (2019). Aulas virtuales en contextos universitarios: Percepciones de uso por parte de los estudiantes. Revista ESPACIOS, 40(2), 3–20

  • Ifanov, Jessica, P., Salim, S., Syahputra, M. E., & Suri, P. A. (2023). A Systematic literature review on implementation of virtual reality for learning. Procedia Computer Science, 216, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal, P. (2020). Integrating educational technologies to augment learners’ academic achievements. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(02), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, Y. I., Hernández, J., & Rodríguez, E. (2021). Educación en línea y evaluación del aprendizaje: De lo presencial a lo virtual. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 12(23). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v12i23.1005

  • Judge, M. (2021). Covid 19, school closures and the uptake of a digital assessment for learning pilot project during Ireland’s national lockdown. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1917443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., & Brereton, P. (2011). Using mapping studies as the basis for further research: A participant-observer case study. Information & Software Technology, 53, 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khlaisang, J., & Koraneekij, P. (2019). Open online assessment management system platform and instrument to enhance the information, media, and ICT literacy skills of 21st century learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14, 111. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. T. (2002). Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220000662

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiash, I., Shevchuk, I., Borysonok, M., Matviienko, I., Popov, M., Terekhov, V., & Kuchai, O. (2022). Possibilities of Using Multimedia Technologies in Education. 22, 727-732. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.6.91

  • Kühbeck, F., Berberat, P. O., Engelhardt, S., & Sarikas, A. (2019). Correlation of online assessment parameters with summative exam performance in undergraduate medical education of pharmacology: A prospective cohort study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1814-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2021). Experiencing e-assessment during COVID-19: An analysis of Indian students’ perception. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 15(2), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-03-2021-0032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, J., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010

  • Lee, K., & Fanguy, M. (2022). Online exam proctoring technologies: Educational innovation or deterioration? British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.-W., Tsai, C.-W., & Hsu, C.-C. (2020). A comparison of computer-based and game-based formative assessments: A long-term experiment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815219

  • Liu, Y., Béliveau, A., Besche, H., Wu, A. D., Zhang, X., Stefan, M., Gutlerner, J., & Kim, C. (2021). Bayesian mixed effects model and data visualization for understanding item response time and response order in open online assessment. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.607260

  • Marshall, C., & Brereton, P. (2013). Tools to Support Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering: A Mapping Study. Conference: 7th International Symposium on Empirical Software and Measurement (ESEM 2013), 296–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2013.32

  • Mastan, I., Sensuse, D., Suryono, R., & Kautsarina, K. (2022). Evaluation of distance learning system (e-learning): A systematic literature review. Jurnal Teknoinfo, 16, 132. https://doi.org/10.33365/jti.v16i1.1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Soto, T., & Prendes-Espinosa, P. (2023). A systematic review on the role of ICT and CLIL in compulsory education. Education Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010073

  • McCallum, S., & Milner, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of formative assessment: Student views and staff reflections. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellar, H., Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., & Yovkova, B. (2018). Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0025-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimirinis, M. (2019). Qualitative differences in academics’ conceptions of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1493087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misut, M., & Misutova, M. (2017). Software solution improving productivity and quality for big volume students’ group assessment process. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 12(04), Art. 04. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i04.6608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenegro-Rueda, M., Luque-de la Rosa, A., Sarasola Sánchez-Serrano, J. L., & Fernández-Cerero, J. (2021). Assessment in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(19), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, Y. A. R., García, M. G., & López, C. B. (2018). Evaluación de competencias genéricas en la universidad. Estudio comparativo en entorno b-learning y presencial. Estudio comparativo en. Acción Pedagógica, 27(1), 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Guevara, E., Velázquez-García, G., & Barragán-López, J. F. (2021). Análisis sobre la evolución tecnológica hacia la Educación 4.0 y la virtualización de la Educación Superior. Transdigital, 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.56162/transdigital86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Riady, Y., Alqahtani, T. M., Chaerunisaa, A. Y., Wijaya, T. T., Milanda, T., Yusop, F. D., & Albelbisi, N. A. (2023). Covid-19 distance and online learning: A systematic literature review in pharmacy education. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04346-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasab, F. G. (2015). Alternative versus traditional assessment. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(6), Article 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, Q., Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., Ferguson, R., & Whitelock, D. (2017). Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-Based micro-Learning and Assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikou, S., & Economides, A. (2017a). Mobile-Based Assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikou, S., & Economides, A. (2017b). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005

  • Nikou, S., & Economides, A. (2019). A comparative study between a computer-based and a mobile-based assessment: Usability and user experience. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-01-2019-0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ninković, S., Olić Ninković, S., Lazarević, T., & Adamov, J. (2021). Serbian teachers’ perceptions of online assessment during COVID-19 school closure: The role of teachers’ self-efficacy. Educational Studies, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1960151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyland, R., Davies, R. S., Chapman, J., & Allen, G. (2017). Transaction-level learning analytics in online authentic assessments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9122-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, A., Noguera, I., Alexieva, L., Rozeva, A., Kocdar, S., Brouns, F., Ladonlahti, T., Whitelock, D., & Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E. (2019a). Pedagogical approaches for e-assessment with authentication and authorship verification in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3264–3282. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, A., Whitelock, D., Holmes, W., & Edwards, C. (2019b). e-Authentication for online assessment: A mixed-method study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdamli, F., & Karagozlu, D. (2022). Online education during the pandemic: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i16.32287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., …, & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(372). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

  • Palacios, C., Rubio, M., & Arce, M. (2021). Percepciones y experiencias de los estudiantes de Odontología en educación en línea: Una revisión bibliográfica. Applied Sciences in Dentistry, 1(0), Art. 0. https://doi.org/10.22370/asd.2020.1.0.2627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearse-Romera, C. R., & Ruiz-Cecilia, R. (2019). A motivation case study of students learning english at a secondary school in Granada, Spain. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies, 14(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-011X/CGP/v14i01/31-45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo, M. I., Borgobello, A., & Pierella, M. P. (2018). Uso de cuestionarios en investigaciones sobre universidad: Análisis de experiencias desde una perspectiva situada. Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales, 8(2), e046. Retrieved March 16, 2023, from https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/library?a=d&c=arti&d=Jpr9347. Accessed 16 Mar 2023.

  • Pu, S., & Xu, H. (2021). Examining changing assessment practices in online teaching: A multiple-case study of EFL school teachers in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00605-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, L. N. R. (2020). Tendencias de la innovación educativa en los contextos sociales. Análisis del mapeo de literatura. Revista Educación, 44(1), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.33222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riera, J., Ardid, M., Gómez, J. A., Vidaurre, A., & Meseguer, J. M. (2018). Students’ perception of auto-scored online exams in blended assessment: Feedback for improvement. Educación XX1: Revista de La Facultad de Educación, 21(2), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.19559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolim, C., & Isaias, P. (2018). Examining the use of e‐assessment in higher education: Teachers and students’ viewpoints. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12669

  • Ruiz-Morales, Y. (2013). Evaluación de competencias genéricas en la Universidad. Estudio comparativo en entorno b-learning y presencial. Tesis [Tesis Doctoral]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

  • Samala, A. D., Usmeldi, Taali, Ambiyar, Bojic, L., Indarta, Y., Tsoy, D., Denden, M., Tas, N., & Dewi, I. P. (2023). Metaverse technologies in education: A systematic literature review using PRISMA. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(5). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i05.35501

  • Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, G., Roni, C., Berk, M., Delorenzi, E., Sánchez, M., & Eder, M. L. (2021). Evaluación Remota de Aprendizajes en la Universidad: Decisiones docentes para encarar un nuevo desafío. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.29078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellés, N. H., Carril, P. C. M., & Sanmamed, M. G. (2018). La e-evaluación en el trabajo colaborativo en entornos virtuales: Análisis de la percepción de los estudiantes. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 65, Art. 65. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2018.65.997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sembey, R., Hoda, R., & Grundy, J. (2023). Emerging technologies in higher education assessment and feedback practices: A systematic literature review. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4328075

  • Seraj, P. M., Chakraborty, R., Mehdi, T., & Roshid, M. M. (2022). A systematic review on pedagogical trends and assessment practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Education Research International, 2022, e1534018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1534018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirianni, J. M., Ng, Y. J., & Vishwanath, A. (2017). Adopting computer-based assessments: The role of perceived value in classroom technology acceptance. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, C., Lawrie, G., Taptamat, N., Browne, E., Sheppard, K., & Matthews, K. E. (2022). Insights into how academics reframed their assessment during a pandemic: Disciplinary variation and assessment as afterthought. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 588–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1933379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A. (2021). Development and integration of freely available technology into online stem courses to create a proctored environment during exams. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i5.4274

  • Snekalatha, S., Marzuk, S. M., Meshram, S. A., Maheswari, K. U., Sugapriya, G., & Sivasharan, K. (2021). Medical students’ perception of the reliability, usefulness, and feasibility of unproctored online formative assessment tests. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(1), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00178.2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St-Onge, C., Ouellet, K., Lakhal, S., Dubé, T., & Marceau, M. (2022). COVID-19 as the tipping point for integrating e-assessment in higher education practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanković, J., Milovanović, S., & Radović, O. (2017). Applying the moodle platform in online student self-assessment. Economic Themes, 55(2), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2017-0016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomas, C., Borg, M., & McNeil, J. (2015). E-assessment: Institutional development strategies and the assessment life cycle. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 588–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2015). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215

  • Vázquez, J. J., Chiang, E. P., & Sarmiento-Barbieri, I. (2021). Can we stay one step ahead of cheaters? A field experiment in proctoring online open book exams. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90, 101653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101653

  • Wang, Z., Gong, S.-Y., Xu, S., & Hu, X.-E. (2019). Elaborated feedback and learning: Examining cognitive and motivational influences. Computers & Education, 136, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, S., Herman, J., & Stewart, R. (2017). Evaluation of performance and perceptions of electronic vs. Paper multiple-choice exams. Advances in Physiology Education, 41, 548–555. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2016

  • Witchel, H. J., Guppy, J. H., & Smith, C. F. (2018). The self-assessment dilemma: An open-source, ethical method using Matlab to formulate multiple-choice quiz questions for online reinforcement. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(4), 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00081.2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, P., & Wang, Y. (2021). Investigating business english teachers’ belief about online assessment: Q methodology conducted during COVID-19 period. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00604-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Yan, X., & Wang, J. (2021). EFL teachers’ online assessment practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Changes and mediating factors. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00589-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zharova, M. V., Trapitsin, S. Yu., Timchenko, V. V., & Skurihina, A. I. (2020). Problems and Opportunities of Using LMS Moodle before and during COVID-19 Quarantine: Opinion of Teachers and Students. 2020 International Conference Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&QM&IS), 554–557. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITQMIS51053.2020.9322906

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Ortiz-López.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ortiz-López, A., Olmos-Migueláñez, S. & Sánchez-Prieto, J.C. Toward a new educational reality: A mapping review of the role of e-assessment in the new digital context. Educ Inf Technol 29, 7053–7080 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12117-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12117-5

Keywords

Navigation