Abstract
Online reading has become an essential part of our life. Online reading has emerged as an active interdisciplinary field of scientific study in the past two decades. In order to develop a global view of the area, we conducted a bibliometric study on 7486 articles retrieved from WoS and Scopus databases published from 2004 to 2023. We analyzed the development trends in publications and citations, revealed the current major research themes, identified future research topics and most productive authors, affiliations, journals and countries. First, the publications and citations have been growing constantly in the past 20 years. Second, internet, e-book and comprehension have been the most frequently discussed topics. Third, three major themes have been revealed. The first theme emphasized the unique feature of online reading, which included the sub-themes of text features of hypertext, utilization of e-books, online health resources, and social interaction on line. The second theme had to do with education and learning. The third theme was related to health literacy. Fourth, education and medicine would attract researchers’ attention in future research. Finally, the USA leads the total publications in the area of online reading. Our study contributed to the theory building by providing a detailed understanding of online reading research from an international perspective. We used two databases, WoS and Scopus, and improved the development of search terms, data filtering and data analysis. Implications for researchers, scientists and educators were discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
All data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Aaron, P. G., Malatesha, J. R., Gooden, R., & Bentum, K. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities,41(1), 67–84.
Abersek, M. K., Dolenc, K., & Kovacic, D. (2015). Elementary and natural science teachers’ online reading metacognition. Journal of Baltic Science Education,14(1), 121–131.
Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior,4(23), 1–13.
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). H-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics,3(4), 273–289.
Anttonen, R., Räikkönen, E., Kiili, K., & Kiili, C. (2023). Sixth graders evaluating online texts: self-efficacy beliefs predict confirming but not questioning the credibility. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2228834
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017a). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics,11(4), 959–975.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017b). Focus on Domain: 4 Levels of analysis [PowerPoint slides]. Bibliometrix. https://bibliometrix.org/biblioshiny/biblioshiny2.html
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017c). Knowledge Synthesis: 3 Structure [PowerPoint slides]. Bibliometrix. https://bibliometrix.org/biblioshiny/biblioshiny3.html
Baehr, C., & Lang, S. (2019). Hypertext theory: Theoretical foundations for technical communication in the 21st century. Technical Communication,66(1), 93–104.
Baetens, J., & Truyen, F. (2013). Hypertext revisited. Leonardo, 46(5), 477–480.
Barnett, T. (2014). Social reading: The kindle’s social highlighting function and emerging reading practices. Australian Humanities Review,56, 141–162.
Bouclaous, C., Kamand, A., Daher, R., Razim, A., Haddad, I., & Kaedbey, H. D. (2021). Digital health literacy and online information-seeking behaviour of Lebanese university students. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy,18(1), 60–77.
Boyle, S., McCoy, A., McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2017). Using digital texts in interactive reading activities for children with language delays and disorders: A review of the research literature and pilot study. Seminars in Speech and Language,38(4), 263–275.
Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries,3(1), 1–8.
Cabrera, I. (2021). World Reading Habits in 2021 [Infographic]. Global English Editing. https://geediting.com/world-reading-habits-in-2021-infographic/
Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,101(suppl), 5303–5310.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,57, 359–377.
Chen, C. J., & Keong, M. W. Y. (2017). Affording inclusive dyslexia-friendly online text reading. Universal Access in the Information Society,16(4), 951–965.
Chen, C. H., Yang, S. J. H., Weng, J. X., Ogata, H., & Su, C. Y. (2021). Predicting at-risk university students based on their e-book reading behaviours by using machine learning classifiers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,37(4), 130–144.
Chen, L., Yang, M., Gao, F., Fang, Z., Wang, P., & Feng, L. (2023). Mandarin Chinese L1 and L2 complex sentence reading reveals a consistent electrophysiological pattern of highly interactive syntactic and semantic processing: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology,14, 1143062.
Clark, C., & Picton, I. (2020). Children and young people’s reading in 2020 before and during lockdown. National Literacy Trust.
Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher,56(5), 458–464.
Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research,43(4), 352–392.
Coiro, J. (2020). Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy. Reading Research Quarterly,56(1), 9–31.
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet. Reading Research Quarterly,42(2), 214–257.
Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer Magazine,20(9), 17–41.
de Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press.
de los Santos, T. M., & Nabi, R. L. (2019). Emotionally charged: Exploring the role of emotion in online news information seeking and processing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,63(1), 39–58.
Dean, M. D. (2014). A call to embrace social reading in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,53(3), 296–305.
DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1616–1641.
Dillon, T. W., & Emurian, H. H. (1995). Reports of visual fatigue resulting from use of a video display unit. Computers in Human Behavior,11(1), 77–84.
Egert, F., Cordes, A. K., & Hartig, F. (2022). Can e-books foster child language? Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of e-book interventions in early childhood education and care. Educational Research Review,37, 100472.
Erkin, Y., Hanci, V., & Ozduran, E. (2023). Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Medicine,102(16), e33529.
Evett, L., & Brown, D. (2005). Text formats and web design for visually impaired and dyslexic readers: Clear text for all. Interacting with Computers,17, 453–472.
Fairthorne, R. A. (1969). Empirical hyperbolic distributions for bibliometric description and prediction. Journal of Documentation,25(4), 319–343.
Farinosi, M., Lim, C., & Roll, J. (2016). Book or screen, pen or keyboard? A cross-cultural sociological analysis of writing and reading habits basing on Germany, Italy, and the UK. Telematics and Informatics,33(2), 410–421.
Farooq, R. (2023). Knowledge management and performance: A bibliometric analysis based on Scopus and WOS data (1988–2021). Journal of Knowledge Management,27(7), 1948–1991.
Finnemann, N. O. (2017). Hypertext configurations: Genres in networked digital media. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 845–854.
Folb, B. L., Wessel, C. B., & Czechowski, L. J. (2011). Clinical and academic use of electronic and print books: The health sciences library system e-book study at the University of Pittsburgh. Journal of the Medical Library Association,99(3), 218–228.
Girard, A. (2014). Reader’s block: A systematic review of barriers to adoption, access and use in e-book user studies. Information Research-An International Electronic Journal, 19(2), 1–29.
Gorring, H., Duffy, D., Forde, A., Irving, D., Morgan, K., & Nicholas, K. (2023). How research into healthcare staff use and non-use of e-books led to planning a joint approach to e-book policy and practice across UK and Ireland healthcare libraries. Health Information and Libraries Journal,40(1), 114–119.
Gutowski, K. S., Applebaum, S. A., Thomae, B. L., Knight, K. C., Chwa, E. S., & Gosain, A. K. (2023). The quality and readability of online patient information on positional head shape conditions. The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231159972. 10556656231159972.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,102(46), 16569–16572.
Holmberg, C., Berg, C., Dahlgren, J., Lissner, L., & Chaplin, J. E. (2019). Health literacy in a complex digital media landscape: Pediatric obesity patients’ experiences with online weight, food, and health information. Health Informatics Journal,00(0), 1–15.
Hood, W., & Wilson, C. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics,52, 291–314.
Htay, M. N. N., Parial, L. L., Tolabing, M., Dadaczynski, C., Okan, K., Leung, O., & Su, T. T. (2022). Digital health literacy, online information-seeking behaviour, and satisfaction of Covid-19 information among the university students of East and South-East Asia. Plos One,17(4), 1–17.
Kanniainen, L., Kiili, C., Tolvanen, A., Aro, M., Anmarkrud, O., & Leppaanen, P. H. T. (2021). Assessing reading and online research comprehension: Do difficulties in attention and executive function matter. Learning and Individual Differences,87, 1–16.
Kher, A., Johnson, S., & Griffith, R. (2017). Readability assessment of online patient education material on Congestive Heart Failure. Advances in Preventive Medicine,2017, 1–8.
Kucirkova, N. (2019). Children’s reading with digital books: Past moving quickly to the future. Child Development Perspectives,13(4), 208–214.
Law, J., Barny, D., & Poulin, R. (2020). Patterns of peer interaction in multimodal L2 digital social reading. Language Learning & Technology,24(2), 70–85.
Lee, S. Y., Wang, T. J., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, S. C. (2019). Effects of the use of interactive E-books by intensive care unit patients’ family members: Anxiety, learning performances and perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology,50(2), 888–901.
Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication,1(3), 299–325.
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). Newark, DE, International Reading Association.
Leu, D. J., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y., & O’Neil, M. (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension? In L. S. Rush, A. J. Eakle, & A. Berger (Eds.), Secondary school reading and writing, what research reveals for classroom practices. NCTE/NCRL.
Li, J. (2020). Development and validation of second language online reading strategies inventory. Computers & Education,145, 1–13.
Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2018). Web of science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115(1), 1–20.
Li, Q. Y., Wong, J., & Chiu, D. K. W. (2023). School library reading support for students with dyslexia: A qualitative study in the digital age. Library Hi Tech. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2023-0086
Li, W., & Wu, Y. H. (2017). Adolescents’ social reading: Motivation, behaviour, and their relationship. Electronic Library,35(2), 246–262.
Liu, J., Jiang, Q. Y., & Chang, L. Y. (2020). Analysis of hotspots and progress in digital reading research at home and abroad in the recent 20 years. Library,2, 80–92.
Liu, T., Li, Y., Feng, M., Chen, Y., & Zhang, T. (2023). Understanding College Students’ Engagement in Mobile Reading for sustainability in education: A case study from China. Sustainability,15(3), 2848.
Liu, Y., Ji, M., Lin, S. S., Zhao, M., & Lyv, Z. (2021). Combining readability formulas and machine learning for reader-oriented evaluation of online health resources. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions,9, 67610–67619.
López-Escribano, C., Valverde-Montesino, S., & García-Ortega, V. (2021). The impact of e-book reading on young children’s emergent literacy skills-an analytical review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,18(12), 1–20.
Lucia, L., Elena, G., Alessandra, T., Maurizio, B., & Rossana, A. G. (2014). Society@school: Towards an e-Inclusion App for Social Reading. In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Technology-Rich Environments for Learning and Collaboration (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 155–164). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07485-6_16
Maceviciute, E., & Manzuch, Z. (2018). Conceptualising the role of digital reading in social and digital inclusion. Information Research-An International Electronic Journal,23(4), 1–17.
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research,58, 61–68.
Mao, S., Wang, D., Tang, C., & Dong, P. (2022). Students’ online information searching strategies and their creative question generation: The moderating effect of their need for cognitive Closure. Frontiers in Psychology,13, 877061.
Matsumura, K., Nunokawa, H., & Sato, K. (2020). Potential factors and satisfaction of readers in social reading using other’s comments. International Journal of Affective Engineering,19(2), 119–125.
Mayr, P., & Scharnhorst, A. (2014). Scientometrics and information retrieval, weak-links revitalized. Scientometrics,102(3), 2193–2199.
McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2011). The effect of diagrams on online reading processes and memory. Discourse Processes,48(2), 69–92.
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,58(13), 2105–2125.
Meppelink, C. S., Smit, E. G., Diviani, N., & Van Weert, J. C. M. (2016). Health literacy and online health information processing: Unraveling the underlying mechanisms. Journal of Health Communication,00, 1–12.
Meyer, B. J., Wijekumar, K., Middlemiss, W., Higley, K., Lei, P. W., Meier, C., & Spielvogel, J. (2010). Web-based tutoring of the structure strategy with or without elaborated feedback or choice for fifth‐and seventh‐grade readers. Reading Research Quarterly,45(1), 62–92.
Moos, D. C., & Marroquin, E. (2010). Multimedia, hypermedia, and hypertext: Motivation considered and reconsidered. Computers in Human Behavior,26, 265–276.
Mougenot, B., & Doussoulin, J. P. (2022). Conceptual evolution of the bioeconomy: a bibliometric analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability,24(1), 1031–1047.
Naumann, J. (2015). A model of online reading engagement: Linking engagement, navigation, and performance in digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior,53, 263–277.
Niederhauser, D. S., Reynolds, R. E., Salmen, D. J., & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research,23(3), 237–255.
Norman, E., & Furnes, B. (2016). The relationship between metacognitive experiences and learning: Is there a difference between digital and non-digital study media. Computers in Human Behavior,54, 301–309.
Park, H. R. (2018). Influences of reading online texts in Korean English language learners’ cultural identities. Journal of Educational Research,111(4), 385–397.
Park, H. R., & Kim, D. (2011). Reading-strategy use by English as a second language learners in online reading tasks. Computers & Education,57(3), 2156–2166.
Pianzola, F., Rebora, S., & Lauer, G. (2020). Wattpad as a resource for literary studies. Quantitative and qualitative examples of the importance of digital social reading and readers’ comments in the margins. PLoS ONE,15(1), 1–46.
Pianzola, F., Toccu, M., & Viviani, M. (2021). Readers’ engagement through digital social reading on Twitter: The TwLetteratura case study. Library Hi Tech,40(5), 1305–1321.
Poirrier, M., Moreno, S., & HuertaCánepa, G. (2021). Robust h-index. Scientometrics,126(3), 1969–1981.
Puntambekar, S., & Stylianou, A. (2005). Designing navigation support in hypertext systems based on navigation patterns. Instructional Science,33(5–6), 451–481.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Towards an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND.
Rebora, S., Boot, P., Pianzola, F., Gasser, B., Herrmann, J. B., Kraxenberger, M., Kuijpers, M. M., Lauer, G., Lendvai, P., Messerli, T. C., & Sorrentino, P. (2021). Digital humanities and digital social reading. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36, 230–250.
Reiber-Kuijpers, M., Kral, M., & Meijer, P. (2021). Digital reading in a second or foreign language: A systematic review. Computers & Education,163, 1–26.
Ronimus, M., Eklund, K., Pesu, L., & Lyytinen, H. (2019). Supporting struggling readers with digital game-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development,67, 639–663.
Sanchiz, M., Amadieu, F., Lemarié, J., & Tricot, A. (2022). Do graphic and textual interactive content organizers have the same impact on hypertext processing and learning outcome? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35, 433–465.
Seng, J. L., & Wang, I. P. (2002). A database-centric and web-automatic hypertext application design method. Journal of Computer Information Systems,43(1), 91–109.
Sevensma, K. (2013). Negotiating new literacies in science: An examination of at-risk and average-achieving ninth-grade readers’ online reading comprehension strategies. The Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Michigan State University.
Shamir, A., & Lifshitz, I. (2013). E-books for supporting the emergent literacy and emergent math of children at risk for learning disabilities: Can metacognitive guidance make a difference? European Journal of Special Needs Education,28(1), 33–48.
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041.
Soetens, K. C., Vandelanotte, C., de Vries, H., & Mummery, K. W. (2014). Using online computer tailoring to promote physical activity: A randomized trial of text, video, and combined intervention delivery modes. Journal of Health Communication,19(12), 1377–1392.
Song, H. Y., & Jia, X. W. (2022). Research progress, theme and characteristics of digital reading in China. Chinese Editors Journal,1, 78–84.
Staiger, J. (2012). How e-books are used a literature review of the e-book studies conducted from 2006 to 2011. Reference & User Services Quarterly,51(4), 355–365.
Sun, H., Roberts, A. C., & Bus, A. (2022). Bilingual children’s visual attention while reading digital picture books and story retelling. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,215, 105327.
Tian, Y. (2017). Motif: A social reading platform that helps people to filter, memorize, and organize content online. The Unpublished MA thesis, California State University San Marcos.
Vargas, C. R., DePry, J., Lee, B. T., & Bordeaux, J. S. (2016). The readability of online patient information about mohs micrographic Surgery. Dermatologic Surgery,42(10), 1135–1141.
Vargas, C. R., Koolen, P. G. L., Chuang, D. J., Ganor, O., & Lee, B. T. (2014). Online patient resources for breast reconstruction: An analysis of readability. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,134(3), 406–413.
Wang, F. Z., Luo, D., Sun, W. W., Yan, T. T., Hu, D. H., Pan, W., & Luo, A. J. (2019). Health information literacy and barriers of online health information seeking among digital immigrants in rural China: A preliminary survey. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1–8.
Wang, Y. M., Wan, P., Nan, X. X., & Liu, C. C. (2021). Towards digital reading 3.0: Characteristics, application and development of intelligent reading. Modern Distance Education Research,33(5), 26–32.
Wilson, R., Landoni, M., & Gibb, F. (2002). A user-centred approach to e-book design. The Electronic Library,20(4), 322–330.
Xu, L. F., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Knowledge map analysis of digital reading research in China: Based on CSSCI journal papers. Publishing Journal,29(6), 84–96.
Zhang, K., Li, J., & Wang, W. T. (2018). Analysis on research hotspots and development trends of digital reading at home and abroad. Library Development,285, 56–64.
Zhang, L. L., & Li, Z. Y. (2016). Comparative analysis of domestic and international digital reading study. Library and Information Service,60(2), 137–145.
Zhao, W. J., Chen, H. Z., & Jiang, W. J. (2017). Review of domestic and international digital reading study in the recent decade. Library and Information Service,61(18), 128–136.
Zhou, M. M., & Lam, K. L. (2019). Metacognitive scaffolding for online information search in k-12 and higher education settings: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development,67, 1353–1384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, J., Lin, F. & Duan, T. Exploring two decades of research on online reading by using bibliometric analysis. Educ Inf Technol 29, 12831–12862 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12306-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12306-2