Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the effect of virtual laboratories on students’ academic performance and attitudes towards learning biology

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research has revealed that learning, especially in the field of science, is strongly affected by various factors. These factors include students’ attitudes towards the subject matter, and the manner in which the subject is taught. Given their close linkage to students’ achievement, attitudes are relevant component in science learning. However, researchers have noticed a decline in students’ attitudes in pursuing science. Thus, the aim of this research was to delve into the impact of virtual laboratories on students’ attitudes toward biology and their performance in biology topics perceived as difficult. The research involved 168 Rwandan upper secondary school students. The study used a survey research combined with a quasi-experimental research design. The control group comprised 83 students and was taught with the conventional teaching method, while the experimental group comprised 85 and was treated under technology-based instruction using virtual laboratories. Furthermore, a focus group interview was used to get qualitative data about attitudinal change before and after the intervention. Concepts of nerve cells and identification of food nutrients, and enzyme activities were the focus of this study. The results indicated an important effect of an intervention to improve students’ attitudes toward the learned topics (p value < 0.05) and performance in favor of the experimental group. The focus group interviews revealed that prion to teaching interventions nerve cells topic was abstract and daunting to students and the visualization exercises helped them to understand while increasing their interest and engagement. However, a significant effect of the treatment on gender was not identified. The study recommends the use virtual laboratories for teaching difficult and abstract concepts to encourage positive attitudes toward learning biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on a reasonable request.

References

  • Abdulrasaq, H., Bello, G., & Abimbola, I. O. (2017). Effects of computer animation instructional package on students’ achievement in practical biology. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(4), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v12i4.2932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acarlı, D. S., & Acarlı, H. A. (2020). Examination of students’ attitudes towards biology and biology course in terms of gender, grade level and pet-keeping. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.328

  • Aebersold, M., Rasmussen, J., & Mulrenin, T. (2020). Virtual everest: Immersive virtual reality can improve the simulation experience. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 38, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afful, A. M., Hamilton, M., & Kootsookos, A. (2020). Towards space science education: A study of students’ perceptions of the role and value of a space science program. Acta Astronautica, 167(August 2019), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.11.025

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes. Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Akani, O. (2015). Laboratory Teaching: Implication on students ’ achievement in Chemistry in secondary schools in Ebonyi State of Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(30), 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akhigbe, J. N., & Ogufere, J. O. Y. A. (2019). Effect of Computer Simulation Instructional Strategy on Students ’ at titude and academic achievement in Genetics. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 305–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aljuhani, K., Sonbul, M., Althabiti, M., & Meccawy, M. (2018). Creating a virtual science lab (VSL): The adoption of virtual labs in Saudi schools. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0067-9

  • Alkhaldi, T., Pranata, I., & Athauda, R. I. (2016). A review of contemporary virtual and remote laboratory implementations: Observations and findings. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0068-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burks, T. N. (2022). Improving student attitudes and academic performance in introductory biology using a project-based learning community. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23(1), https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00216-21

  • Byukusenge, C., Nsanganwimana, F., & Paulo Tarmo, A. (2022). Difficult topics in the revised biology curriculum for advanced level secondary schools in Rwanda: Teachers’ perceptions of causes and remedies. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 1112–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2012225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connie, D., Bain; Margaret, L., & Rice (2006). The influence of gender on attitudes, perceptions, and uses of technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Quantitative qualitative and mixed methods (5th edn.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

  • De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013a). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(130), 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science. 340(6130), 305–308, 340(6130), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

  • Drymiotou, I., Constantinou, C. P., Avraamidou, L., Drymiotou, I., Constantinou, C. P., Avraamidou, L., & Drymiotou, I. (2021). Enhancing students ’ interest in science and understandings of STEM careers: The role of career-based scenarios of STEM careers : The role of career-based scenarios. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1880664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H., & Wiegand, C. (2017). Virtual laboratories in science education: Students’ motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.

  • Fraser, B. J. (1981). TOSRA test of science related attitudes handbook. Australia Council for Educational Research.

  • Hatherly, P. A. (2016). The virtual laboratory and interactive screen experiments. Connecting Research in Physics Education with Teacher Education, 1–7.

  • Hawkins, I., & Phelps, A. J. (2013). Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: Which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00070b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: The state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2l), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90003A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., & Setiawan, W. (2016). Stem virtual lab: An alternative practical media to enhance student’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children’s scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32(2), 125–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2012.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik, V., & Walsh, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Social Sciences, 8(9), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiboss, J., Ndirangu, M., & Wekesa, E. (2004). Effectiveness of a computer-mediated simulations program in school biology on pupils’ learning outcomes in cell theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 207–2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education Contexts, 6(5), 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocijancic, S., & Sullivan, C. O. (2004). Real or virtual laboratories in science teaching – is this actually a dilemma? 3(2), 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, V., & Šorgo, A. (2022). Correlation between the popularity and difficulty of secondary school biology and perceived importance of knowledge acquired for personal wellbeing. In: Korfiatis, K., Grace, M. (Eds.) Current Research in Biology Education. Contributions from Biology Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89480-1_16

  • Lee, E. A. L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1424–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldarelli, G. A., Hartmann, E. M., Cummings, P. J., Horner, R. D., Obom, K. M., Shingles, R., & Pearlman, R. S. (2009). Virtual lab demonstrations improve students’ mastery of basic biology laboratory techniques. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 10(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v10.99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manishimwe, H., Shivoga, W. A., & Nsengimana, V. (2022). Exploring the impact of Enquiry-based instructional strategies on students’ attitudes towards Biology. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 21(12), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.12.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00626a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehmood, N. (2020). Relationship of students’ attitude towards and achievement in Biology across gender and Grade. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 4(II), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2020(4-ii)34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhamad, M., Zaman, H. B., & Ahmad, A. (2012). Virtual biology laboratory (VLab-Bio): Scenario-based learning approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukagihana, J., Nsanganwimana, F., & Aurah, C. M. (2021). Effect of resource-based instructions on pre-service biology teachers’ motivation toward learning biology. Lumat, 9(1), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musengimana, J., Kampire, & Ntawiha, p (2021). Factors affecting secondary schools students’ attitudes toward Learning Chemistry: A review of literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 17(1), https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9379

  • Navarro, M., Förster, C., González, C., & González-, P. (2016). Attitudes toward science: Measurement and psychometric properties of the test of Science- related attitudes for its use in spanish-speaking classrooms. 0693, June, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1195521

  • Njiku, J., Maniraho, J. F., & Mutarutinya, V. (2019). Understanding teachers’ attitude towards computer technology integration in education: A review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 3041–3052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09917-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oluwatelure, T. A., & Oloruntegbe, K. O. (2010). Effects of parental involvement on students’ attitude and performance in science. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 4(1), 1–9.

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitude towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oser, R., & Fraser, B. J. (2015). Effectiveness of virtual laboratories in terms of learning environment, attitudes and achievement among high- school genetics students. Curriculum and Teaching, 30(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/30.2.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C., & Kudzai, C. (2015). Virtual laboratories-a solution for tertiary science education in Botswana? European Journal of Logistics Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 3(1), 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Jovanovi, K., Guetl, C., & Petrovi, V. M. (2016). Computers & education virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Is biology boring? Student attitudes toward biology. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramli, M., Karyanto, P., & Wulandari, S. (2019). How do you teach? Teachers’ perceptions on teaching biology and pedagogical content knowledge skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194(December). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139832

  • Ranaweera, S. P. N., & Montplaisir, L. M. (2010). Students’ illustrations of the human nervous system as a formative assessment tool. Anatomical Sciences Education, 3(5), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, S. M., & Crippen, K. J. (2021). Virtual laboratories in undergraduate science and engineering courses: A systematic review, 2009–2019. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09866-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutten, N., Joolingen, W. R., Van, Veen, J. T., & Van Der (2012). Computers & education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamila, D. D., & Yoon, F. L. (2018). Factors affecting students’ attitude toward Mathematics: A structural equation modeling approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon Barry, K. A., & Stofer, J. L.P. D (2022). High school students’ perceptions of science and scientists improve following university-based online DNA day. Journal of Biological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2012228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelden, E. A., Offerdahl, E. G., & Johnson, G. T. (2019). A virtual laboratory on cell division using a publicly-available image database. CourseSource, 6, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24918/cs.2019.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjøberg Svein;Camilla Schreiner (2019). The ROSE project The development, key findings and impacts of an international low cost comparative project. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/60509049/ROSE_Report

  • Sofiani, D., Maulida, A. S., Fadhillah, N., & Sihite, D. Y. (2017). Gender differences in students’ attitude towards science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012168.

  • Son, J. Y., Narguizian, P., Beltz, D., & Desharnais, R. A. (2016). Comparing physical, virtual, and hybrid flipped labs for general education biology. Online Learning Journal, 20(3), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i3.687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P. C., et al. (2007). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137

  • Toth, E., & Toth, E. E. (2016). Analyzing “real-world” anomalous data after experimention with a virtual laboratory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 157–173.

  • Tytler, R. (2014). Attitudes, identity, and aspirations toward science. In S. Abell, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education volume II (pp. 82–103). Routledge.

  • Udin, W. N., Ramli, M., & Muzzazinah (2020). Virtual laboratory for enhancing students’ understanding on abstract biology concepts and laboratory skills: A systematic review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042025

  • Uitto, A. (2014). Interest, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs explaining upper-secondary school students’ orientation towards biology-related careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1425–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9516-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukswert, J. M., Barker, M. K., & McDonnell, L. (2019). Identifying troublesome jargon in biology: Discrepancies between student performance and perceived understanding. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(1), ar6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0118

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our sincere thanks go to the directorate of research and innovation unit at the University of Rwanda College of Education (UR-CE) for granting ethical clearance and permission to conduct this study. We also thank the African Center of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science (ACEITLMS) for providing us with financial support to successfully conduct this study.

Funding

Corresponding author received the support from the African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Leaning Mathematics and Science (ACEITLMS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science (ACEITLMS), University of Rwanda College of Education (UR-CE), PO BOX 55, Rwamagana, Rwanda

    Céline Byukusenge

  2. University of Rwanda College of Education (UR-CE), PO BOX 55, Rwamagana, Rwanda

    Florien Nsanganwimana

  3. University of Dar es Salaam-School of Education (UDSM- SoED), PO BOX 35048, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Albert Paulo Tarmo

Authors
  1. Céline Byukusenge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Florien Nsanganwimana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Albert Paulo Tarmo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Céline Byukusenge.

Ethics declarations

Competing interestst

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Byukusenge, C., Nsanganwimana, F. & Tarmo, A.P. Investigating the effect of virtual laboratories on students’ academic performance and attitudes towards learning biology. Educ Inf Technol 29, 1147–1171 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12351-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12351-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation