Abstract
Competency-oriented student activities are an important means of enabling teachers to move from teaching fundamental knowledge to developing students' subject competencies. To examine mathematics teacher novice–expert differences in organizing competency-oriented activities, this study collected data from three consecutive lessons taught by an expert and a novice teacher respectively. Epistemic network analysis (ENA) was used to identify the co-occurrence and structure of students' activities in each lesson. Results of the coding-and-counting method show statistically significant differences in the types of students’ activities related to mathematics competency across the lessons taught by the expert teacher, but not in those taught by the novice teacher. By recognizing the temporal relationships between different activities, the ENA of the consecutive lessons reveals that the expert teacher facilitated better mathematical content and lesson connectedness by establishing connections between competency-oriented activities following the sequence of understanding-applying-transferring and innovating (Wang et al., 2022). In contrast, the novice teacher organized more mathematics activities on understanding and applying, without building connections via transferring and innovating across three lessons. The results of the ENA are also supported by qualitative analysis. Finally, the implications, limitations, and possibilities for future research are discussed.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10639-024-12467-8/MediaObjects/10639_2024_12467_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this Manuscript and are available from the corresponding author Chunxia Qi on reasonable request.
References
Allayarovna, A. Z. (2022). Using a competency-based approach to conducting circle classes in mathematics lessons. Journal of New Century Innovations, 15(1), 7–11.
Anderson, J., & Taner, G. (2023). Building the expert teacher prototype: A metasummary of teacher expertise studies in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 38, 100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100485
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001).A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arastoopour, G., Shaffer, D. W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., & Chesler, N. C. (2016). Teaching and assessing engineering design thinking with virtual internships and epistemic network analysis. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 1492–1501. Retrieved April 20, 2023 from: https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c320316B.html
Bastian, A., Kaiser, G., Meyer, D., Schwarz, B., & König, J. (2022). Teacher noticing and its growth toward expertise: An expert–novice comparison with pre-service and in-service secondary mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10128-y
Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6
Bloch, I. (2009). Mathematical interactions between teachers and students. How to work on their relevance in training? Petit x, 81, 25–53.
Bloom, B., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives Handbook I: The cognitive Domain. British Journal of Educational Studies, 14(3), 119. https://doi.org/10.2307/3119730
Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312026004473
Cao, Y., & Leung, F. K. (Eds.). (2017). The 21st century mathematics education in China. Springer.
Cheng, J., Bao, J., & Zhang, D. (2021). From “two basics”, to four Basics’ to “core mathematics competencies” in mainland China. In B. Xu, Y. Zhu, & X. Lu (Eds.), Beyond Shanghai and PISA cognitive and noncognitive competencies of Chinese students in mathematics (pp. 1–14). Springer.
Cortina, K. S., Miller, K. F., McKenzie, R., & Epstein, A. (2015). Where low and high inference data converge: Validation of CLASS assessment of mathematics instruction using mobile eye tracking with expert and novice teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9610-5
Csanadi, A., Eagan, B., Kollar, I., Shaffer, D. W., & Fischer, F. (2018). When coding-and-counting is not enough: Using epistemic network analysis (ENA) to analyze verbal data in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9292-z
Demeneva, N., Gutsu, E., Kochetkova, E., Mayasova, T., & Kolesova, O. (2018). Implementation of competency approach in teaching mathematics to primary school children. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 15, 798–818.
Diego-Mantecón, J. M., Haro, E., Blanco, T. F., & Romo-Vázquez, A. (2021). The chimera of the competency-based approach to teaching mathematics: A study of carpentry purchases for home projects. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10032-5
Even, R., Tirosh, D., & Robinson, N. (1993). Connectedness in teaching equivalent algebraic expressions: Novice versus expert teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 5, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217254
Fan, H., Chen, X., & Zhang, J. (2021). Competency-oriented math classroom teaching evaluation based on the rigor/relevance framework ——analysis of national elementary mathematics model lessons (people’s education press edition). Journal of Mathematics Education, 30, 21–25.
Fantilli, R. D., & McDougall, D. E. (2009). A study of novice teachers: Challenges and supports in the first years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6), 814–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.021
Feng, Z. (1986). The generalization experience theory of ability. Journal of Beijing Normal University (social Science), 1(1), 27–34.
Glaser, R., Chi, M. T. H., & Farr, M. J. (1985). The nature of expertise. Columbus, OH: National Center for Research in Vocational Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-11-2021-0103; Retrieved May 16, 2023 from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED261190.pdf
Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2012). What matters most: A comparison of expert and novice teachers’ noticing of mathematics classroom events. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00161.x
Huang, R., Li, Y., & He, X. (2010). What constitutes effective mathematics instruction: A comparison of Chinese expert and novice teachers’ views. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10, 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2010.524965
Jankvist, U. T., & Niss, M. (2015). A framework for designing a research-based “maths counsellor” teacher programme. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90, 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9629-8
Krepf, M., Plöger, W., Scholl, D., & Seifert, A. (2018). Pedagogical content knowledge of experts and novices—What knowledge do they activate when analyzing science lessons? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21410
Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as an argument. Science and Education, 94(5), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395
Kytmanov, A. A., Noskov, M. V., Safonov, K. V., Savelyeva, M. V., & Shershneva, V. A. (2016). Competency-based learning in higher mathematics education as a cluster of efficient approaches. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 30, 1113–1126.
Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2012). Balancing on the edge of competency-oriented versus procedural-oriented practices: Orchestrating whole-class discussions of complex mathematical problems. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24, 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0049-0
Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75. Retrieved March 23, 2023 from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1986-20689-001
Li, Q., Ni, Y. J., & Xiao, N. P. (2005). Elementary school mathematical teachers’ subject matter knowledge: A comparative analysis of expert teachers and non-expert teachers. Journal of Educational Studies, 1(6), 57–64.
Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970–983. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20006
Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. (2011). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
Ministry of Education. (2011). Curriculum standards for mathematics in nine-year compulsory education (2011 version). Beijing Normal University Press.
Ministry of Education. (2015). Guidance on deepening the reform of the title system for primary and secondary school teachers. Ministry of Education of the people’s Republic of China. Retrieved May 21, 2023 from http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1779/201509/t20150902_205165.html
Ministry of Education. (2022). Curriculum standards for mathematics in nine-year compulsory education (2022 version). Beijing Normal University Press.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., & Preuschoff, C. (2014). TIMSS 2015. G4_Booklet_1. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College. Retrieved April 11, 2023 from https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-04/GA54_TIMSS_2015_report_Mullis_Martin.pdf
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290.
Niss, M. A., & Højgaard, T. (2011). Competencies and mathematical learning: Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. Roskilde Universitet.
Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9
Niss, M., Bruder, R., Planas, N., Turner, R., & Villa-Ochoa, J. A. (2017). Conceptualisation of the role of competencies, knowing and knowledge in mathematics education research. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education: ICME-13 (pp. 235–248). Springer International Publishing.
Novak, J. D. (1961). An approach to the interpretation and measurement of problem solving ability. Science Education, 45(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730450206
OECD. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive summary. Paris: OECD. Retrieved April 26, 2023 from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
Palmer, D. J., Stough, L. M., Burdenski, T. K., Jr., & Gonzales, M. (2005). Identifying teacher expertise: An examination of researchers’ decision making. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_2
Parker, R., & Fraillon, J. (2016). Southeast Asia primary learning metrics (Sea-Plm): Global citizenship domain assessment framework. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
Pilous, R., Leuders, T., & Rüede, C. (2023). Novice and expert teachers’ use of content-related knowledge during pedagogical reasoning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 129, 104149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104149
Putnam, R. T. (1987). Structuring and adjusting content for students: A study of live and simulated tutoring of addition. American Educational Research Journal, 24(1), 13–48. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312024001013
Qi, C. X., & He, S. Q. (2019). Diagnosis and improvement of mathematics ability based on the platform of “Smart Learning Partner”. China Educational Technology, 2019(1), 41–47.
Raduan, N. A., & Na, S. I. (2020). An integrative review of the models for teacher expertise and career development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 428–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1728740
Shaffer, D. W. (2017). Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press.
Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.3
Shaffer, D., Hatfield, D., Svarovsky, G., Nash, P., & Mislevy, R. (2009). Epistemic network analysis: A prototype for 21st-century assessment of learning. International Journal of Learning & Media, 1(2), 33–53.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Solmon, M. A., & Lee, A. M. (1991). A contrast of planning behaviors between expert and novice adapted physical education teachers. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 8(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.8.2.115
Stahnke, R., & Blömeke, S. (2021). Novice and expert teachers’ situation-specific skills regarding classroom management: What do they perceive, interpret and suggest? Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103243
Sun, Z., Xu, R., Deng, L., Jin, F., Song, Z., & Lin, C. H. (2023). Beyond coding and counting: Exploring teachers’ practical knowledge online through epistemic network analysis. Computers & Education, 192(2023), 104647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104647
Vandebrouck, F. (Ed.). (2013). Mathematics classrooms: Students’ activities and Teachers’ practices. Sense Publishers.
Vlasenko, K. V., Lovianova, I. V., Armash, T. S., Sitak, I. V., & Kovalenko, D. A. (2021, June). A competency-based approach to the systematization of mathematical problems in a specialized school. In Journal of physics: Conference series (Vol. 1946, No. 1, p. 012003). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1946/1/012003
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21stcentury competencies: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Wang, L., Wang, Q., Kong, S., Hu, J., & Chen, X. (2022). Subject competency framework in fostering high-end lesson study–a case of teaching “properties of iron salts” unit in a senior high school. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 11(2), 73–90.
Wang, S. K., & Ye, L. J. (2020). A comparative study of the teaching language of a novice teacher and an expert teacher in algebra instruction. Research in Mathematical Education, 23(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmed.2020.23.1.13
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2017). See and tell: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ interpretations of problematic classroom management events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.015
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2021). Classroom management scripts: A theoretical model contrasting expert and novice teachers’ knowledge and awareness of classroom events. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09542-0
Yang, X., König, J., & Kaiser, G. (2021). Growth of professional noticing of mathematics teachers: A comparative study of Chinese teachers noticing with different teaching experiences. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01217-y
Yang, Y. (2012). Research on measurement and assessment of the competence in the discipline of chemistry. East China Normal University Press.
Yao, J. X., & Guo, Y. Y. (2018). Core competencies and scientific literacy: The recent reform of the school science curriculum in China. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1913–1933.
Zhang, S., Liu, Q., & Cai, Z. (2019). Exploring primary school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in online collaborative discourse: An epistemic network analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3437–3455. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12751
Zhao, W., Ma, J., & Cao, Y. (2022). What is effective classroom dialog? A comparative study of classroom dialog in Chinese expert and novice mathematics teachers’ classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 964967. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964967
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Qi, C., Liang, H., Zuo, S. et al. Comparing competency-oriented student activities between expert and novice teachers in China: Insights from an epistemic network analysis (ENA). Educ Inf Technol 29, 15375–15402 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12467-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12467-8