Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impacts of ICT-related factors on students’ digital reading literacy: Evidence from high-performing Asian countries and regions

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital reading literacy has emerged as a pivotal factor contributing significantly to teenagers’ academic and future career successes. Few studies have focused on how ICT-related factors shape students’ digital reading literacy in non-English-speaking contexts. This study explored the impacts of ICT-related home and school factors on digital reading literacy, analyzing data from four non-English-speaking Asian countries and regions participating in PISA 2018, including Hong Kong, South Korea, Macau, and Taiwan. In addition, we compared the identified influential factors between these four countries and regions, as well as with previous studies, for a comprehensive understanding of ICT-related factors of digital reading. The Random Forest model was used to rank the importance of ICT-related factors and identify the top 10 most influential factors of digital reading. The most important ICT-related home factors were parents’ attitudes and participation in digital reading activities. Among ICT-related school factors, the time of ICT use in school, the subject that classes use ICT, and the number of computers were found to be negatively associated with students' digital reading literacy. However, the capacity of schools to use digital devices to improve learning and teaching was positively associated with students’ digital reading literacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are publicly available from the PISA 2018 database (https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2018database/).

References

  • Alanoglu, M., Aslan, S., & Karabatak, S. (2022). Do teachers’ educational philosophies affect their digital literacy? The mediating effect of resistance to change. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3447–3466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10753-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R. (2004). The impact of ICT on literacy education. The impact of ICT on literacy education. (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464649

  • Apps, T., Agostinho, S., & Bennett, S. (2022). ‘Maybe it’s the environment you grow up in?’ Australian primary school students’ reflections on their school-based digital literacy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1973550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attwell, G. (2007). Personal learning environments-the future of eLearning. Elearning papers, 2(1), 1-8.

  • Aydin, M. (2022). A multilevel modeling approach to investigating factors impacting computer and information literacy: ICILS Korea and Finland sample. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1675–1703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10690-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall: Englewood cliffs.

  • Beaulac, C., & Rosenthal, J. S. (2019). Predicting university students’ academic success and major using random forests. Research in Higher Education, 60(7), 1048–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09546-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanati, S., & Buhl, H. M. (2022). The digital home learning environment and its relation to children’s ICT self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09377-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgonovi, F., & Pokropek, M. (2021). The evolution of the association between ICT use and reading achievement in 28 countries. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010933404324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, H., Kwon, C., & An, Y. (2020). Impact of information technology various use on students digital reading achievement. Notice of Removal. https://doi.org/10.1109/icbdie50010.2020.00113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. (2017). Modeling the influences of upper-elementary school students’ digital reading literacy, socioeconomic factors, and self-regulated learning strategies. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1314958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D., & Macleod, G. (2021). Effectiveness of digital tools to support pupils’ reading in secondary school. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 13(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2021040101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, B.-Y., Hwang, H., & Jang, B. G. (2021). Predicting fourth grade digital reading comprehension: A secondary data analysis of (e)PIRLS 2016. International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458–464.

  • Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.42.2.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couronné, R., Probst, P., & Boulesteix, A. (2018). Random forest versus logistic regression: a large-scale benchmark experiment. BMC Bioinformatics, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2264-5

  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. The American Educator, 22(3), 8–15.

  • Cutler, D. R., Edwards, T. C., Beard, K. H., Cutler, A., Hess, K. T., Gibson, J., & Lawler, J. J. (2007). Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology, 88(11), 2783–2792. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0539.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Back, T. T., Tinga, A. M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2021). Learning in immersed collaborative virtual environments: Design and implementation. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(8), 5364–5382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2006238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewi, R., Fahrurrozi., Hasanah, U., Dj, M, Z. (2021). Analysis study of factors affecting students ’digital literacy competency. (2021). İlköğretim Online, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.03.42

  • Dietz-Uhler, B., & Hurn, J. E. (2013). Using learning analytics to predict (and improve) student success: A faculty perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(1), 17–26.

  • Dimopoulos, K., Koutsampelas, C., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2021). Home schooling through online teaching in the era of COVID-19: Exploring the role of home-related factors that deepen educational inequalities across European societies. European Educational Research Journal, 20(4), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211023331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dresang, E. T., & McClelland, K. (1999). Radical change: Digital age literature and learning. Theory into Practice, 38(3), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. G. H. (2020). Borders and bridges. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 30(1–2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00047.han

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Computers & Education, 157, 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, A., & Lin, T.-B. (2021). Official bilingualism in a multilingual nation: a study of the 2030 bilingual nation policy in Taiwan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1909054

  • Fouzia, M., Iqbal, J., Nawaz, S., Javaid, H., Yasin, M., & Mumtaz, H. (2023). Role of education and financial development in economic growth of selected Asian countries. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.20234112

  • Geske, A., & Ozola, A. Y. (2020). Parents’ impact on students’ reading achievement. Sabiedrība, Integrācija, Izglītība. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.5049

  • Goldie, J. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2016.1173661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Fernández, N., & Mediavilla, M. (2021). Exploring the relationship between Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and academic performance: A multilevel analysis for Spain. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 77, 101009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granda Asencio, L. Y., Romero Jaramillo, L. A., & Játiva Macas, D. F. (2021). El docente y la alfabetización digital en la educación del siglo XXI. Sociedad & Tecnología, 4(S2), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v4iS2.158

  • Granda, C. J. M., Asencio, L. Y. G., & Cajamarca, W. a. C. (2021). Rol del docente en la alfabetización digital en el siglo XXI. Sociedad & Tecnología, 4(S2), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.51247/st.v4is2.156

  • Gubbels, J., Swart, N., & Groen, M. A. (2020). Everything in moderation: ICT and reading performance of Dutch 15-year-olds. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-0079-0

  • Güre, Ö. B., Kayri, M., & Erdogan, F. (2020). Analysis of factors effecting PISA 2015 Mathematics Literacy via Educational Data mining. Eğitim Ve Bilim. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2020.8477

  • Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Z., He, Q., & Von Davier, M. (2019). Predictive feature generation and selection using process data from PISA interactive problem-solving Items: An application of random forests. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2461. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2010). The high cost of low educational performance: The long-run economic impact of improving PISA outcomes. OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France.

  • Hasyim, F. (2018). The influence of digital literacy onStudents’ independent language learning. Sustainable teacher professional Development in english language education: Where theory, practice, and policy meet, 126.

  • Hertler, S. C., Figueredo, A. J., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M., & Fernandes, H. B. F. (2018). Urie Bronfenbrenner: toward an evolutionary ecological systems theory. In Springer eBooks (pp. 323–339). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90125-1_19

  • Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02504914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., & Yu, R. (2021). The effects of ICT-based social media on adolescents’ digital reading performance: A longitudinal study of PISA 2009, PISA 2012, PISA 2015 and PISA 2018. Computers & Education, 175, 104342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. S. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, P., & Balasubramanian, P. (2019). Application and uses of information communication technology (ICT) in academic libraries with reference to arts and science colleges in tirunelveli district, tamil nadu: A study. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–12.

  • Jung, I. (2019). Connectivism and networked learning. In Springer briefs in education (pp. 47–55). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_6

  • Kakoura, E., & Drigas, A. (2023). Digital Tools for Children with Reading Difficulties. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 14(3), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2023.14.3.0252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klobucar, A., & O’Neill, M. (2021). Reading and collaboration. In IGI Global eBooks (pp. 177–202). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5849-2.ch008

  • Koh, P. W. (2022). Introduction to the 2020 special issue for the Association for Reading and Writing in Asia (ARWA). Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10273-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2022). ICT and digital reading achievement: A cross-national comparison using PISA 2018 data. International Journal of Educational Research, 111, 101912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, Y. C., Lo, Y. L., & Hsu, Y. S. (2014). The effects of meta-cognitive instruction on students' reading comprehension in computerized reading contexts: A quantitative meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 186–202.

  • Larhmaid, M., Nour, T., & Afflerbach, P. (2019). Assessing the effects of digital technologies on learning behavior and reading motivation among Moroccan EFL university students. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 10(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdldc.2019100101

  • Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT Use: In schools around the world findings from the IEA sites 2006 study. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8928-2

  • Lee, Y. H., & Wu, J. (2012). The effect of individual differences in the inner and outer states of ICT on engagement in online reading activities and PISA 2009 reading literacy: Exploring the relationship between the old and new reading literacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.35.1.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. W. (2005). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies. In International reading association eBooks (pp. 1570–1613). https://doi.org/10.1598/0872075028.54

  • Lim, C. P., & Oakley, G. (2013). Information and communication technologies (ICT) in primary education. In SensePublishers eBooks (pp. 1–18). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-086-6_1

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luu, K., & Freeman, J. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J., & Western, J. (2000). Measurement of the socioeconomic status of Australian higher education students. Higher Education, 39(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003943824357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2019). PIRLS 2021 assessment frameworks. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2021/frameworks/

  • Naumann, J., & Sälzer, C. (2017). Digital reading proficiency in German 15-year olds: Evidence from PISA 2012. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 20(4), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-017-0758-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J. (2016). Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes. In Springer eBooks.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41252-8

  • OECD (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world, PISA. OECD Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

  • Osman, N. H., Hasnan, N., Mohtar, S., Hassan, M. G., & Ahmad, A. (2015). Application of the decision theory for University Industrial Link (UIL). 2nd National Case Study Conference, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.

  • Papanastasiou, E. C., Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2005). An examination of the PISA database to explore the relationship between computer use and science achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(6), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500254824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prostova, D. M., Tikhonova, A. D., & Sosnina, N. G. (2020). Digital education environment in a single information and education space of the region: Sverdlovsk region experience. In Proceedings of the 2nd international scientific and practical conference “Modern management trends and the digital economy: From regional development to global economic growth” (MTDE 2020). 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Management Trends and the Digital Economy: from Regional Development to Global Economic Growth” (MTDE 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200502.171

  • Ra, S., Chin, B., & Lim, C. P. (2016). A holistic approach towards Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for addressing education challenges in Asia and the Pacific. Educational Media International, 53(2), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2016.1211334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramenskaya, L. (2020). The concept of ecosystem in economic and management studies. Упpaвлeнeц, 11(4), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-2

  • Reinking, D. (1997). Me and my hypertext: A multiple digression analysis of technology and literacy (sic). The Reading Teacher, 50(8), 626–643.

  • Rice, M. F., & Ortiz, K. (2021). Parents’ use of digital literacies to support their children with disabilities in online learning environments. Online Learning, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2407

  • Robinson, B. (2008). Using ICT and distance education to increase access, equity and quality of rural teachers’ professional development. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i1.486

  • Rothacher, Y., & Strobl, C. (2023). Identifying informative predictor variables with random forests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986231193327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H. I., Kammerer, Y., Stadtler, M., & Van Den Broek, P. (2018). Chapter 4. Comprehension processes in digital reading. In Studies in written language and literacy (pp. 91–120). https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.17.04sal

  • Schleicher, A. (2019), PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Senkbeil, M. (2022). ICT-related variables as predictors of ICT literacy beyond intelligence and prior achievement. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3595–3622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10759-x

  • Se-Yeoung, C., Kim, J., & Kim, D. (2021). Relationship between teacher’s teaching expertise and digital literacy. In Springer eBooks (pp. 185–195). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2834-4_16

  • Shin, J. C. (2013). Higher education development in East Asian countries focusing on cultural tradition and economic systems. In Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (pp. 11–27). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137347374_2

  • Skrypnik, A. R., & Pakhmutova, M. (2019). Digital educational space as a condition for development of primary school age children. Гepцeнoвcкиe Чтeния: Пcиxoлoгичecкиe Иccлeдoвaния B Oбpaзoвaнии. https://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2019-2-79

  • Skvarc, D. R., Talbot, M., Harries, T., Wilson, C. J., Joshua, N., & Byrne, L. K. (2021). Home information and communication technology use and student academic performance: Encouraging results for uncertain times. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 638319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.638319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. A. (1996). Hypertext. The Electronic Labyrinth. NYU Press.

  • Søby, M. (2013). Synergies for better learning – Where are we now? Digital Kompetanse, 8(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1891-943x-2013-01-02-01

  • Song, J. J. (2011). English as an official language in South Korea. Language Problems and Language Planning, 35(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.35.1.03son

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenschein, S., Stites, M. L., & Ross, A. D. (2021). Home learning environments for young children in the U.S. during COVID-19. Early Education and Development, 32(6), 794–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2021.1943282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stull, J. C. (2013). Family socioeconomic status, parent expectations, and a child’s achievement. Research in Education, 90(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.7227/rie.90.1.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, F., & Ishwaran, H. (2017). Random forest missing data algorithms. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 10(6), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.11348

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Touw, W. G., Bayjanov, J. R., Overmars, L., Backus, L., Boekhorst, J., Wels, M., & Van Hijum, S. a. F. T. (2012). Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? Briefings in Bioinformatics, 14(3), 315–326.https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs034

  • Turel, Y., & Toraman, M. (2015). The relationship between Internet addiction and academic success of secondary school students. Anthropologist, 20, 280–288.

  • Turner, R. (2014). From framework to survey data: inside the PISA assessment process. In Springer eBooks (pp. 127–143). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_6

  • Vadivel, V., Ganesan, A., & Thomas Alwa Edison, K. (2022). Online learning: ICT-based tools for interaction and effectiveness. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 10277–10284.

  • Wheeler, J. (2019). Macau or Macao?--A case study in the fluidity of how languages interact in Macau SAR. Journal of English as an International Language, 14(1), 73–91.

  • Wu, D., Zhou, C., Li, Y., & Chen, M. (2022). Factors associated with teachers’ competence to develop students’ information literacy: A multilevel approach. Computers & Education, 176, 104360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104360

  • Xiao, Y., & Hu, J. (2019). The influence of ICT attitudes on closing the reading literacy gap of students from different economic, social and cultural backgrounds. 2019 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2019.8845359

  • Xiao, Y., Liu, Y., & Hu, J. (2019). Regression analysis of ICT impact factors on early adolescents’ reading proficiency in five high-performing countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01646

  • Yu, H., & Hu, J. (2022). ICT self-efficacy and ICT interest mediate the gender differences in digital reading: A multilevel serial mediation Analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(05), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i05.25691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H., Redzuan, N. R., & Embi, M. A. (2013). A review of advantages and disadvantages of using ICT tools in teaching ESL reading and writing. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(4), 1–18.

  • Zander, P. O. M., & Hussain, F. (2015). Impacting on gender equality through a women’s ICT program in South Asia-An Exploratory Study. In 13th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (pp. 391-401). Department of Informatics, University of Oslo.

  • Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836–1884. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00544.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fu Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 222 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Chen, F. Impacts of ICT-related factors on students’ digital reading literacy: Evidence from high-performing Asian countries and regions. Educ Inf Technol 29, 16717–16747 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12501-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12501-9

Keywords

Navigation