Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) education in primary schools has received a great deal of attention globally, and it is thus important to investigate primary school students’ perceptions and understanding of AI learning. Therefore, in this study, 673 drawings of conceptions of AI learning by third to sixth grade students were collected. Firstly, a drawing analysis approach was used to code the drawings into five categories of 25 elements. Then, the epistemic network analysis approach was used to visualize the structure of the relationships between the elements within the conceptions of AI learning. The study found that (1) primary school students generally held positive attitudes toward AI learning and understood AI learning as programming or robot programming learning; (2) higher grade students showed more constructive learning concepts; and (3) girls had significantly more positive emotions and attitudes toward AI learning than boys, but had less participation in manipulating robotic human activities than boys. The over-reliance on programming and robotics in elementary AI education, as well as gender differences in elementary AI learning need more attention from educators.











Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The data and materials are available upon request to the corresponding author.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
Barton, D., Woetzel, J., Seong, J., & Tian, Q. (2017). Artificial Intelligence: Implications for China. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/China/Artificial%20intelligence%20Implications%20for%20China/MGI-Artificial-intelligence-implications-for-China.ashx
Benson, P., & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27(4), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00045-7
Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., & Liang, J. (2021). Effects of learning physics using augmented reality on students’ self-efficacy and conceptions of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13020
Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Pekrun, R., Loderer, K., Hou, H., & Oades, L. G. (2021). Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1051–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3
Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K. F., & Huang, B. (2020a). Factors Influencing Students’ Behavioral Intention to Continue Artificial Intelligence Learning. 2020 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00040
Chai, C. S., Wang, X., & Xu, C. (2020b). An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior for the Modelling of Chinese Secondary School students’ intention to learn Artificial Intelligence. Mathematics, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112089
Chang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2023). Epistemic Network Analysis of Students’ drawings to investigate their conceptions of Science Learning with Technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10026-9
Chang, T. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2023). From realistic to idealistic online learning: A drawing analysis of the conceptions of university students with different self-regulation levels. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2287246
Chaplin, T. M., & Aldao, A. (2013). Gender differences in emotion expression in children: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 735–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030737
Chen, B., Hwang, G. H., & Wang, S. H. (2021). Gender differences in cognitive load when applying game-based learning with intelligent robots. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 102–115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032859
Cheng, K. H. (2018). Surveying students’ conceptions of learning science by augmented reality and their scientific epistemic beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 14(4), 1147–1159. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/81811
Chiou, G. L., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of and approaches to Learning in Biology: A study of their structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.558131
Chiou, G. L., Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). High school students’ approaches to learning physics with relationship to epistemic views on physics and conceptions of learning physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.794134
Dekhtyar, S., Weber, D., Helgertz, J., & Herlitz, A. (2018). Sex differences in academic strengths contribute to gender segregation in education and occupation: A longitudinal examination of 167,776 individuals. Intelligence, 67, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.11.007
Delaine, D. A., Williams, D. N., Sigamoney, R., & Tull, R. G. (2016). Global Diversity and inclusion in Engineering Education: Developing platforms toward global alignment. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 6(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v6i1.5372
Divjak, B., Svetec, B., Horvat, D., & Kadoić, N. (2023). Assessment validity and learning analytics as prerequisites for ensuring student-centred learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13290
Druga, S., & Ko, A. J. (2021). How do children’s perceptions of machine intelligence change when training and coding smart programs? Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3460712
Eguchi, A. (2022). AI-Powered Educational Robotics as a Learning Tool to promote Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science Education. In M. Merdan, W. Lepuschitz, G. Koppensteiner, R. Balogh, & D. Obdržálek (Eds.), Robotics in Education. RiE 2021. Advances in Intelligent systems and Computing (Vol. 1359, pp. 93–105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82544-7_26
Eguchi, A., Okada, H., & Muto, Y. (2021). Contextualizing AI education for K-12 students to Enhance their learning of AI literacy through culturally responsive approaches. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00737-3
Fernández-Martínez, C., Hernán-Losada, I., & Fernández, A. (2021). Early introduction of AI in Spanish Middle schools. A motivational study. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00735-5
Gao, Q., Zhang, S., Cai, Z., Liu, K., Hui, N., & Tong, M. (2022). Understanding student teachers’ collaborative problem solving competency: Insights from process data and multidimensional item response theory. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101097
Grøndahl Glavind, J., De Oca, M., Pechmann, L., Brauner Sejersen, P., D., & Iskov, T. (2023). Student-centred learning and teaching: A systematic mapping review of empirical research. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(9), 1247–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2241391
Haney, W., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Drawing on education: Using drawings to Document Schooling and Support Change. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 241–272. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.74.3.w0817u84w7452011
Heiniger, M., & Imdorf, C. (2018). The role of vocational education in the transmission of gender segregation from education to employment: Switzerland and Bulgaria compared. Journal for Labour Market Research, 52(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-018-0248-6
Hidayati, D., Novianti, H., Khansa, M., Slamet, J., & Suryati, N. (2023). Effectiveness project-based learning in ESP Class: Viewed from Indonesian Students‘ learning outcomes. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13, 558–565. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.3.1839
Ho, J. W., & Scadding, M. (2019). Classroom Activities for Teaching Artificial Intelligence to Primary School Students. CoolThink@ JC, 157. In S. C. Kong & D. Andone, G. Biswas, H. U. Hoppe, T. C. Hsu, R. H. Huang, B. C. Kuo, K. Y. Li, C. K. Looi, M. Milrad, J. Sheldon, J. L. Shih, K. F. Sin, K. S. Song, and J. Vahrenhold (Eds.). Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education 2019. Hong Kong: The Education University of Hong Kong.
Ho, E. S., Wright, F. V., & Parsons, J. A. (2021). Animated analysis: Drawing deeper Analytical insights from qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1609406921990494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921990494
Hsieh, W. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Exploring students’ conceptions of science learning via drawing: A cross-sectional analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 274–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280640
Hsieh, W. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Learning illustrated: An exploratory cross-sectional drawing analysis of students’ conceptions of learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220357
Hu, X., He, W., Chiu, T. K. F., & Zhao, L. (2023). Using a teacher scheme for educational dialogue analysis to investigate student–student interaction patterns for optimal group activities in an artificial intelligence course. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8789–8813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11556-w
Huang, X. (2021). Aims for cultivating students’ key competencies based on artificial intelligence education in China. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5127–5147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10530-2
Hwang, G. J., & Fu, Q. K. (2020). Advancement and research trends of smart learning environments in the mobile era. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmlo.2020.103911
Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and Research Trends of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584. Article 6.
Hwang, G. J., Tu, Y. F., & Chu, H. C. (2023). Conceptions of the metaverse in higher education: A draw-a-picture analysis and surveys to investigate the perceptions of students with different motivation levels. Computers & Education, 203, 104868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104868
Jiang, H., Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., Wang, X., & Chen, S. (2023). Modeling the impact of intrinsic coding interest on STEM career interest: Evidence from senior high school students in two large Chinese cities. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2639–2659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11277-0
Jiang, H., Islam, A. Y. M. A., Gu, X., & Guan, J. (2024). How do thinking styles and STEM attitudes have effects on computational thinking? A structural equation modeling analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(3), 645–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21899
Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Hirschmugl-Gaisch, S., & Huber, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence and computer science in education: From kindergarten to university. 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757570
Kim, K., & Kwon, K. (2024). Tangible computing tools in AI education: Approach to improve elementary students’ knowledge, perception, and behavioral intention towards AI. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12497-2
Kim, S., Jang, Y., Choi, S., Kim, W., Jung, H., Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2021). Analyzing teacher competency with TPACK for K-12 AI education. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00731-9
Knox, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learning Media and Technology, 45(3), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1754236
Lee, D., & Kwon, H. (2024). Meta-analysis on effects of artificial intelligence education in K-12 South Korean classrooms. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12738-4
Lee, C. H., Gobir, N., Gurn, A., & Soep, E. (2022). In the Black Mirror: Youth investigations into Artificial Intelligence. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 22(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3484495
Li, X., Jiang, M. Y. C., Jong, M. S. Y., Zhang, X., & Chai, C. S. (2022). Understanding medical students’ perceptions of and behavioral intentions toward learning Artificial Intelligence: A Survey Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8733. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148733
Liang, J., & Tsai, C. (2010). Relational Analysis of College Science-Major Students’ epistemological beliefs toward Science and conceptions of Learning Science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17), 2273–2289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903397796
Liang, J. C., Hwang, G. J., Chen, M. R. A., & Darmawansah, D. (2023). Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: An integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4270–4296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1958348
Lim, E. M. (2023). The effects of pre-service early childhood teachers’ digital literacy and self-efficacy on their perception of AI education for young children. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12969–12995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11724-6
Lin, P. Y., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Guo, Y., & Qin, J. (2021). Modeling the structural relationship among primary students’ motivation to learn artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100006
Lin, X. F., Wang, Z., Zhou, W., Luo, G., Hwang, G. J., Zhou, Y., Wang, J., Hu, Q., Li, W., & Liang, Z. M. (2023). Technological support to foster students’ artificial intelligence ethics: An augmented reality-based contextualized dilemma discussion approach. Computers & Education, 201, 104813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104813
Lin, X. F., Zhou, Y., Shen, W., Luo, G., Xian, X., & Pang, B. (2024). Modeling the structural relationships among Chinese secondary school students’ computational thinking efficacy in learning AI, AI literacy, and approaches to learning AI. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 6189–6215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12029-4
Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277–323.
Mubayi, P., Cheng, E., Terry, H. P., Tilton, A., & Hou, T. (2017). China’s rise in Artificial Intelligence: The New China. Goldman Sachs Equity Research Report.
Murtonen, M., Aldahdouh, T. Z., Vilppu, H., Trang, N. T. T., Riekkinen, J., & Vermunt, J. D. (2024). Importance of regulation and the quality of teacher learning in student-centred teaching. Teacher Development, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2024.2318329
Nash, P., & Shaffer, D. W. (2013). Epistemic trajectories: Mentoring in a game design practicum. Instructional Science, 41(4), 745–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9255-0
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802878
Ng, D. T. K., Su, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Fostering secondary School Students’ AI literacy through making AI-Driven recycling bins. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12183-9
Nguyen, H. (2022). Exploring Group Discussion with Conversational Agents Using Epistemic Network Analysis. In: Wasson, B., Zörgő, S. (Eds.) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1522. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93859-8_25
Park, W., & Kwon, H. (2023). Implementing artificial intelligence education for middle school technology education in Republic of Korea. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09812-2
Park, D., & Shin, S. (2021). A study on the Educational meaning of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence for Elementary Artificial Intelligence Education. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 25(5), 803–812. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.5.803
Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2012). Academic emotions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 3–31). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-001
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Peters-Burton, E. E., Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2023). Student, teacher, and scientist views of the Scientific Enterprise: An Epistemic Network re-analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10254-w
Peterson, E. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Irving, S. E. (2010). Secondary school students’ conceptions of learning and their relationship to achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.004
Picard, D., & Boulhais, M. (2011). Sex differences in expressive drawing. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(7), 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.017
Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., Vettori, G., & Vezzani, C. (2018). The relationship between conceptions of learning and academic outcomes in middle school students according to gender differences. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 16, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.11.001
Polak, S., Schiavo, G., & Zancanaro, M. (2022). Teachers’ Perspective on Artificial Intelligence Education: An Initial Investigation. Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519866
Priya, S., Bhadra, S., Chimalakonda, S., & Venigalla, A. S. M. (2022). ML-Quest: A game for introducing machine learning concepts to K-12 students. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2084115
Rabanaque, S., & Martínez-Fernández, J. R. (2009). Conception of learning and motivation of Spanish psychology undergraduates in different academic levels. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(4), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178765
Régner, I., Steele, J., Ambady, N., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Huguet, P. (2014). Our future scientists: A review of stereotype threat in girls from early elementary school to middle school. Revue Internationale De Psychologie Sociale, 27(3), 13–51.
Rizvi, S., Waite, J., & Sentance, S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence teaching and learning in K-12 from 2019 to 2022: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100145
Sadi, Ö. (2017). Relational Analysis of High School Students’ cognitive self-regulated learning strategies and conceptions of Learning Biology. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00693a
Sadi, O., & Dağyar, M. (2015). High School Students’ epistemological beliefs, conceptions of Learning, and self-efficacy for Learning Biology: A study of their structural models. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1375a
Sahoo, S., & Klasen, S. (2021). Gender segregation in education: Evidence from higher secondary Stream Choice in India. Demography, 58(3), 987–1010. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9101042
Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the Learner’s Perspective. I. Some Common-Sense Conceptions. No. 76. Abstract Reasoning, 25.
Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., Agbo, F. J., & Suhonen, J. (2021). Survey of Resources for Introducing Machine Learning in K-12 Context. 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637393
Sanusi, I. T., Olaleye, S. A., Agbo, F. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2022a). The role of learners’ competencies in artificial intelligence education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100098
Sanusi, I. T., Olaleye, S. A., Oyelere, S. S., & Dixon, R. A. (2022b). Investigating learners’ competencies for artificial intelligence education in an African K-12 setting. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100083
Shaffer, D. W., & Ruis, A. R. (2017). Epistemic network analysis: A worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (Ed.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 175–187). Solar. https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.015
Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on Epistemic Network Analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in Cognitive, Social, and Interaction Data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.3
Stone, P., Brooks, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Calo, R., Etzioni, O., Hager, G., Hirschberg, J., Kalyanakrishnan, S., Kamar, E., Kraus, S., Leyton-Brown, K., Parkes, D., Press, W., Saxenian, A., Shah, J., Tambe, M., & Teller, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (arXiv:2211.06318). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.06318
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049
Su, J., Zhong, Y., & Ng, D. T. K. (2022). A meta-review of literature on educational approaches for teaching AI at the K-12 levels in the Asia-Pacific region. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100065
Su, J., Yang, W., & Zhong, Y. (2023). Influences of gender and socioeconomic status on children’s Use of Robotics in Early Childhood Education: A systematic review. Early Education and Development, 34(4), 910–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2078617
Täks, M., Tynjälä, P., & Kukemelk, H. (2016). Engineering students’ conceptions of entrepreneurial learning as part of their education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1012708
Tan, J., Mao, J., Jiang, Y., & Gao, M. (2021). The influence of Academic emotions on Learning effects: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 9678. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189678
Tang, X. O., & Chen, Y. K. (2018). Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence. East China Normal University.
Tao, X., Goh, W. P., Zhang, J., Yong, J., Goh, E. Z., & Oh, X. (2021). Mobile-based learning of drug prescription for medical education using artificial intelligence techniques. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 15(4), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2021.118436
Toivonen, T., Jormanainen, I., Kahila, J., Tedre, M., Valtonen, T., & Vartiainen, H. (2020). Co-Designing Machine Learning Apps in K–12 With Primary School Children. 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 308–310. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00099
Tsai, C. C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733–1750. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000230776
Tsai, C. C. (2009). Conceptions of learning versus conceptions of web-based learning: The differences revealed by college students. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1092–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.019
Tu, Y. F., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). University students’ conceptions of ChatGPT-supported learning: A drawing and epistemic network analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2286370
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2022). K-12 AI Curricula: A mapping of government-endorsed AI Curricula. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380602
Vachovsky, M. E., Wu, G., Chaturapruek, S., Russakovsky, O., Sommer, R., & Fei-Fei, L. (2016). Toward More Gender Diversity in CS through an Artificial Intelligence Summer Program for High School Girls. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844620
Van Brummelen, J., Tabunshchyk, V., & Heng, T. (2021). Alexa, Can I Program You? Student Perceptions of Conversational Artificial Intelligence Before and After Programming Alexa. Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3460730
Vartiainen, H., Tedre, M., & Valtonen, T. (2020). Learning machine learning with very young children: Who is teaching whom? International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 25, 100182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100182
Vartiainen, H., Toivonen, T., Jormanainen, I., Kahila, J., Tedre, M., & Valtonen, T. (2021). Machine learning for middle schoolers: Learning through data-driven design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 29, 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100281
Velander, J., Taiye, M. A., Otero, N., & Milrad, M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in K-12 education: Eliciting and reflecting on Swedish teachers’ understanding of AI and its implications for teaching & learning. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11990-4
Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in Student Learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of Learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y
Vezzani, C., Vettori, G., & Pinto, G. (2018). University students’ conceptions of learning across multiple domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(4), 665–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0349-6
Virtanen, V., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2010). University students’ and teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences. Instructional Science, 38(4), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9088-z
Wang, T. (2019). Competence for students’ future: Curriculum Change and Policy Redesign in China. ECNU Review of Education, 2(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119850905
Wang, N., & Lester, J. (2023). AI education for K-12: a survey. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. (pp. 44–49). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Wang, Y. L., Liang, J. C., Lin, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Identifying Taiwanese junior-high school students’ mathematics learning profiles and their roles in mathematics learning self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.008
Wenden, A. L. (1999). An introduction to Metacognitive Knowledge and beliefs in Language Learning: Beyond the basics. System, 27(4), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00043-3
Wooldridge, A. R., Carayon, P., Shaffer, D. W., & Eagan, B. (2018). Quantifying the qualitative with epistemic network analysis: A human factors case study of task-allocation communication in a primary care team. IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 8, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2017.1418769
Wu, F., Lu, C., Zhu, M., Chen, H., Zhu, J., Yu, K., Li, L., Li, M., Chen, Q., Li, X., Cao, X., Wang, Z., Zha, Z., Zhuang, Y., & Pan, Y. (2020). Towards a new generation of artificial intelligence in China. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2, 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0183-4
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K. F., Lee, M., Sanusi, I., Dai, Y., & Chai, C. (2022). A Self-determination Theory (SDT) Design Approach for Inclusive and Diverse Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104582
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C. S. (2023). The moderating effects of gender and need satisfaction on self-regulated learning through Artificial Intelligence (AI). Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8691–8713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11547-x
Yang, W. (2022). Artificial Intelligence education for young children: Why, what, and how in curriculum design and implementation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100061
Yau, K. W., Chai, C. S., Chiu, T. K. F., Meng, H., King, I., & Yam, Y. (2023). A phenomenographic approach on teacher conceptions of teaching Artificial Intelligence (AI) in K-12 schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 1041–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11161-x
Yeh, H. Y., Tsai, Y. H., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, H. Y. (2019). Investigating students’ conceptions of technology-assisted Science Learning: A drawing analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-9769-1
Yue, M., Jong, M. S. Y., & Dai, Y. (2022). Pedagogical Design of K-12 Artificial Intelligence Education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315620. Article 23.
Zacharia, C. Z., Hovardas, T., Xenofontos, N., Pavlou, I., & Irakleous, M. (2020). Education and employment of women in science, technology and the digital economy, including AI and its influence on gender equality. Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate-General for. Internal Policies PE 651.042-April 2020.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Bolduc, F., Murray, W. G., & Staffen, W. (2019). A preliminary report of integrating science and computing teaching using logic programming. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 9737-3744. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019737
Zhao, X., & Hu, Y. (2020). A phenomenographic study of Chinese undergraduates’ conceptions of learning in transnational programs. SAGE Open, 10(3), 2158244020957034. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020957034
Zhou, X., Van Brummelen, J., & Lin, P. (2020). Designing AI Learning Experiences for K-12: Emerging Works, Future Opportunities and a Design Framework (arXiv:2009.10228). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.10228
Funding
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72274076) and Funding for Basic Research Operating Expenses of Central Universities ‘Premium Program’ (NO. 2023CXZZ092).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Hanrui Gao, Sunan Zhao and Ying Wang. Project administration were performed by Yi Zhang and Kang Wang. Methodology and supervision were performed Yi Zhang and Gwo-Jen Hwang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Hanrui Gao. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The ethical requirements for research in this selected primary school were followed.
Consent for publication
The publication of this study has been approved by all authors.
Consent to participate
The participants all agreed to take part in this study.
Conflict of interest
There is no potential conflict of interest in this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, H., Zhang, Y., Hwang, GJ. et al. Delving into primary students’ conceptions of artificial intelligence learning: A drawing-based epistemic network analysis. Educ Inf Technol 29, 25457–25486 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12847-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12847-0