Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An in-depth analysis of information markets with aggregate uncertainty

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The novel idea of setting up Internet-based virtual markets, information markets, to aggregate dispersed information and predict outcomes of uncertain future events has empirically found its way into many domains. But the theoretical examination of information markets has lagged relative to their implementation and use. This paper proposes a simple theoretical model of information markets to understand their information dynamics. We investigate and provide initial answers to a series of research questions that are important to understanding how information markets work, which are: (1) Does an information market converge to a consensus equilibrium? (2) If yes, how fast is the convergence process? (3) What is the best possible equilibrium of an information market? and (4) Is an information market guaranteed to converge to the best possible equilibrium?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen, B. (1964). “Generic Existence of Completely Revealing Equilibria for Economics with Uncertainty When Prices Convey Information.” Econometrica, 49, 1173–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, B. (1982). “Strict Rational Expectation Equilibria with Diffuseness.” Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 20–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashton, A. H., & Ashton, R. H. (1985). “Aggregating Subjective Forecasts: Some Empirical Results.” Management Science, 31, 1499–1508.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aumann, R. J. (1976). “Agreeing to Disagree.” Annals of Statistics, 4(6), 1236–1239.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Batchelor, R. P., & Dua, P. (1995). “Forecaster Diversity and the Benefits of Combining Forecasts.” Management Science, 41, 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berg, J. E., Forsythe, R., Nelson, F. D., & Rietz, T. A. (2001). “Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research.” Forthcoming in C. A. Plott and V. Smith (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. North-Holland.

  7. Berg, J. E., & Rietz, T. A. (2003). “Prediction Markets as Decision Support Systems.” Information Systems Frontiers, 5(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergin, J., & Brandenburger, A. (1990). “A Simple Characterization of Stochastically Monotone Functions.” Econometrica, 58, 1241–1243.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Debnath, S., Pennock, D. M., Giles, C. L., & Lawrence, S. (2003). “Information Incorporation in Online In-Game Sports Betting Markets.” In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’03), San Diego, CA.

  10. Dubey, P., Geanakoplos, J., & Shubik, M. (1987). “The Revelation of Information in Strategic Market Games: A Critique of Rational Expectations Equilibrium.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16, 3105–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Foresight Exchange.http://www.ideosphere.com/fx/

  12. Hollywood Stock Exchange.http://www.hsx.com/

  13. Fama, E. F. (1970). “Efficient Capital Market: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” Journal of Finance, 25, 383–417.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feigenbaum, L. Fortnow, Pennock, D. M., & Sami, R. (2003). “Computation in a Distributed Information Market.” In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’03), San Diego, CA.

  15. Forsythe, R., & Lundholm, F. (1990). “Information Aggregation in An Experimental Market.” Econometrica, 58, 309–47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., Neumann, G. R., & Wright, J. (1991). “Forecasting Elections: A Market Alternative to Polls.” In T. R. Palfrey (ed.), Contemporary Laboratory Experiments in Political Economy, pages 69–111. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., Neumann, G. R., & Wright, J. (1992). “Anatomy of an Experimental Political Stock Market.” American Economic Review, 82(5), 1142–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Forsythe, R., Rietz, T. A., & Ross, T. W. (1999). “Wishes, Expectations, and Actions: A Survey on Price Formation in Election Stock Markets.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39, 83–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. French, S. (1985). “Group Consensus Probability Distributions: A Critical Survey.” Bayesian Statistics, 2, 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Innovation Futures. http://innovationfutures.com/bk/index.html.

  21. Gandar, J. M., Dare, W. H., Brown, C. R., & Zuber, R. A. (1998). “Informed Traders and Price Variations in the Betting Market for Professional Basketball Games.” Journal of Finance, 53(1), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Geanakoplos, J. D., & Polemarchakis, H. M. (1982). “We Can’t Disagree Forever.” Journal of Economic Theory, 28(1), 192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Genest, C., & Zidek, J. V. (1986). “Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography.” Statistical Science, 1(1), 114–148.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grossman, S. J. (1981). “An Introduction to the Theory of Rational Expectations Under Asymmetric Information.” Review of Economic Studies, 48(4), 541–559.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hanson, R. D. (2003). “Combinatorial Information Market Design.” Information Systems Frontiers, 5(1), 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayek, F. A. (1945). “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jackwerth, J. C., & Rubinstein, M. (1996). “Recovering Probability Distribution from Options Prices.” Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1611–1631.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jordan, J. (1982). “Rational Expectations in Microeconomic Models.” Journal of Economic Theory, 26(2), 201–223.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jordan, J., & Radner, R. (1979) “The Nonexistence of Rational Expectations Equilibrium: A Robust Example.” Department of Economics, University of Minnesota (unpublished).

  30. Lundholm, R. (1991). “What Affects the Efficiency of the Market? Some Answers from the Laboratory.” The Accounting Review, 66, 486–515.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Iowa Electronic Market. http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/

  32. McKelvey, R. D., & Page, T. (1986).“Common Knowledge, Consensus, and Aggregate Information.” Econometrica, 54(1), 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  33. NewsFutures. http://us.newsfutures.com

  34. Nielsen, L. T., Brandenburger, A., Geanakoplos, J., McKelvey, R., & Page, T. (1990).“Common Knowledge of an Aggregate of Expectations.” Econometrica, 58(5), 1235–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  35. O’Brien, J., & Srivastava, S. (1991).“Dynamic Stock Markets with Multiple Assets: An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Finance, 46, 1811–38.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pennock, D. M., Lawrence, S., Giles, C. L., & Nielsen, F. A. (2002)“The Real Power of Artificial Markets.” Science, 291, 987–988.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pennock, D. M., Lawrence, S., Nielsen, F. A., & Giles, C. L. (2001).“Extracting Collective Probabilistic Forecasts from Web Games.” In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 174–183, San Francisco, CA.

  38. Plott, C., & Sunder, S. (1988). “Rational Expectations and the Aggregation of Diverse Information in Laboratory Security Markets.” Econometrica, 56, 1085–118.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Radner, R. (1979). “Rational Expectations Equilibrium: Generic Existence and the Information Revealed by Prices.” Econometrica, 47, 655–678.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shapley, L., & Shubik, M. (1977). “Trading Using One Commodity as a Means of Payment.” Journal of Political Economy, 85, 937–968.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Spann, M., & Skiera, B. (2003). “Internet-Based Virtual Stock Markets for Business Forecasting.” Management Science, 49(10), 1310–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sunder, S. (1995). “Experimental Asset Markets.” In J. H. Kagel and A. E. Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics, pages 445–500. Princeton University Press.

  43. Thaler, R. H., & Ziemba, W. T. (1988). “Anomalies: Parimutuel Betting Markets: Racetracks and Lotteries.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(2), 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  44. TradeSports. http://www.tradesports.com/

  45. Wolfers, J., & Zitzewitz, E. (2004). “Prediction Markets.” Journal of Economic Perspective, 18(2), 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiling Chen.

Additional information

The authors acknowledge the support of the eBusiness Research Center at the Pennsylvania State University.

Yiling Chen is a postdoctoral research scientist at Yahoo! Research, New York. She received her Bachelor of Economics degree in Commodity Science from Renmin University of China, in 1996, and her Master of Economics degree in Finance from Tsinghua University, China, in 1999. She worked for PriceWaterhouse Coopers China as a professional auditor from August 1999 to June 2000. From August 2000 to July 2001, she attended Iowa State University, Ames, IA, as a Ph.D. student in economics. She obtained her Ph.D. in Information Sciences and Technology from the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, in 2005. Her research interests lie on the boarder of computer science, economics, and business, including information markets, auction theory, and machine learning.

Tracy Mullen is an assistant professor of information sciences and technology at the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. She has previously worked at Lockheed Martin, Bellcore, and NEC Research. She received her PhD in Computer Science from University of Michigan. Her research interests include information markets, multiagent systems, ecommerce, market-based resource allocation for sensor management, and supply chain simulations using intelligent agents. Her research papers have been published in Decision Support Systems, Electronic Commerce Research, IEEE Computer, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, and Operating Systems Review, among others.

Chao-Hsien Chu is an associate professor of information sciences and technology and the executive director of the Center for Information Assurance at the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. He was previously on the faculty at Iowa State University, Iowa and Baruch College, New York and a visiting professor at University of Tsukuba (Japan) and Hebei University of Technology (China). He is currently on leaves to the Singapore Management University (Singapore) (2005–2006). Dr. Chu received a Ph.D. in Business Administration from Penn State. His current research interests are in communication networks design, information assurance and security (especially in wireless security, intrusion detection, and cyber forensics), intelligent technologies (fuzzy logic, neural network, genetic algorithms, etc.) for data mining (e.g., bioinformatics, privacy preserving) and supply chains integration. His research papers have been published in Decision Sciences, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, IIE Transactions, Decision Support Systems, European Journal of Operational Research, Electronic Commerce Research, Expert Systems with Applications, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Journal of Operations Management, International Journal of Production Research, among others. He is currently on the editorial review board for a number of journals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Mullen, T. & Chu, CH. An in-depth analysis of information markets with aggregate uncertainty. Electron Commerce Res 6, 201–221 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-6958-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-6958-9

Keywords