Skip to main content
Log in

Functional forms in studies of reputation in online auctions

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies have examined how various factors affect prices in online auctions. These studies assume that the relationship between price and the seller’s reputation take a variety of functional forms, most frequently linear or linear-log. Others divide the sellers into categories by their reputations, and control for dummy variables indicating the seller’s category. Identifying the correct functional form is a critical issue for research on any topic involving online auctions. Studies that assume the wrong functional form run the risk of generating biased and inconsistent estimates of the effect of their variables of interest. In this study, the price-reputation relationship is estimated under each of these functional forms using data from auctions of three different products. The estimated effect of reputation on price is substantially larger when using a categorical specification. The models are then subjected to specification tests which suggest that the categorical model is the most appropriate choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. (2002). Evidence on the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bajari, P., & Hortaçsu, A. (2004). Economic insights from Internet auctions. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(2), 457–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1981). Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica, 49(3), 781–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dellarocas, C. (2005). Reputation mechanism design in online trading environments with pure moral hazard. Information Systems Research, 16(2), 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eaton, D. H. (2005). Valuing information: evidence from guitar auctions on eBay. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 24(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hou, J. (2007). Price determinants in online auctions: a comparative study of eBay China and US. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8(3), 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Houser, D., & Wooders, J. (2006). Reputation in auctions: theory, and evidence from eBay. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15(2), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kauffman, R. J., & Wood, C. A. (2005). Doing their bidding: an empirical examination of factors that affect a buyer’s utility in Internet auctions. Information Technology and Management, 7(3), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Livingston, J. A. (2005). How valuable is a good reputation? A sample selection model of Internet auctions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(3), 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lucking-Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasad, N., & Reeves, D. (2007). Pennies from eBay: the determinants of price in online auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics, 55(2), 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald, C. G., & Slawson, V. C. Jr. (2002). Reputation in an Internet auction market. Economic Inquiry, 40(3), 633–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Melnik, M. I., & Alm, J. (2002). Does a seller’s ecommerce reputation matter? Evidence from eBay auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(3), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Melnik, M. I., & Alm, J. (2005). Seller reputation, information signals, and prices for heterogeneous coins on eBay. Southern Economic Journal, 72(2), 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. In Baye, M. (Ed.) Advances in applied microeconomics : Vol. 11. The economics of the Internet and e-commerce. Oxford: JAI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K. (2006). The value of reputation on eBay: a controlled experiment. Experimental Economics, 9(2), 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds, S. S., & Wooders, J. C. (2006). Auctions with a buy price. Economic Theory, online early release.

  20. Signorino, C. S., & Yilmaz, K. (2003). Strategic misspecification in regression models. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 551–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, R. T., & Minton, R. B. (2004). Calculus: concepts and connections. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Song, J., & Baker, J. (2007). An integrated model exploring sellers’ strategies in eBay auctions. Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2007). Introduction to econometrics, 2/E. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2009). Introductory econometrics: a modern approach (4th edn.). Mason: Thompson Southwestern.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yin, P. (2007). Empirical tests of information aggregation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(6), 1179–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Livingston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Livingston, J.A. Functional forms in studies of reputation in online auctions. Electron Commer Res 10, 167–190 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9049-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9049-x

Keywords

Navigation