Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivation scenarios and explains different implementation processes for each motivation scenario. The theory was tested in the Australian pharmaceutical industry where it received broad support. In order to enhance its generality, in this study we explore the applicability of part of the IMM theory to a different industry context by addressing the research objective that organisations with the same motive for implementing an IOS initiate the same implementation activities regardless of differences in the industry contexts within which they operate. We have used a multiple case study approach and compared the implementation of a proprietary in-house built e-ordering system in a large Australian pharmaceutical manufacturing company with that of a web-based EDI system used by a large automotive manufacturing company using IMM as a theoretical lens. The empirical results indicate a striking similarity in the implementation processes of these two different IOS applications; this can largely be explained using the IMM theory. Furthermore, the differences in industry contexts do not appear to have a direct influence on the activities associated with implementing these systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allport, G. (1985). The historical background of social psychology. In G. Linszey, E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 1–46). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angeles, R., Corritore, C. L., Basu, S. C., & Nath, R. (2001). Success factors for domestic and international electronic data interchange implementation for US firms. International Journal of Information Management, 21(5), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (2009). Submission to the inquiry into manufacturing in victoria industries. F.C.O.A. Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries, Australia.

  4. Anonymous (2010). Outlook for the automotive manufacturing industry fact sheet. Department of Innovation, Science and Research, Australian Government.

  5. Bernard, L. L. (1926). An introduction to social psychology. New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein, F., Chen, F., & Federgruen, A. (2006). Coordinating supply chains with simple pricing schemes: the role of vendor-managed inventories’. Management Science, 52(10), 1483–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bothner, M. S. (2003). Competition and social influence: the diffusion of the sixth-generation processor in the global computer industry. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 175–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carrol, G. R., & Delacroix, J. (1982). Organizational mortality in the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland: an ecological approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang, H. H., Wang, H. W., & Kao, T. W. (2010). The determinants of long-term relationship on inter-organizational systems performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(2), 106–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, J. C., & Williams, B. C. (1998). The impact of EDI on SMEs: summary of eight British case studies. Journal of Small Business Management, October, 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (2001). Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sokolowski, K., Schmalt, H. D., Lanens, T., & Puca, L. M. (2000). Assessing achivement, affiliation, a power motive all at one—the multi-motive grid. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74(1), 126–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Damsgaard, J., & Lyytinen, K. (1998). Hong Kong’s EDI bandwagon derailed or on the right track? In T. McMaster, E. Mumford & B. Swanson (Eds.), Facilitating technology transfer through partnetship: learning from practice and research (pp. 39–63). New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  14. DiRomualdo, A., & Gurbaxani, V. (1998). Strategic intent for IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1999). The illusory diffusion of innovation: an examination of assimilation gaps. Information Systems Research, 10(3), 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: an empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), 454–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Geri, N., & Ahituv, N. (2008). A theory of constraints approach to interorganizational systems implementation. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 6, 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han, K., & Kaufman, R. J. (2008). Relative importance, specific investment and ownership in interorganizational systems. Information Technology Management, 9, 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harrington, K. V., & Beard, J. W. (1996). The appropriate use of computer-based information technologies in organizations: an impression management framework. In J. W. Beard (Ed.), Impression management and information technology (pp. 133–143). New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms: a study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibrahim, M., & Ribbers, P. M. (2009). The impacts of competence-trust and openness-trust on interorganizational systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 18, 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnston, R. B., & Gregor, S. (2000). A theory of industry-level activity for understanding the adoption of interorganisational systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 9(4), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Keen, P. (1997). The process edge. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kheng, C. B., & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2002). The adoption of electronic procurement in Singapore. Electronic Commerce Research, 2(1–2), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuan, K. K. Y., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework. Information & Management, 38, 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kurnia, S., & Johnston, R. B. (2000). Understaning the adoption of ECR: a broader perspective. In Proceedings of the 13th international bled electronic commerce conference (pp. 372–390), Bled, Slovenia, 19–21 June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kurokawa, S., & Rassameethes, B. (2008). Determinants of EDI adoption and integration by U.S. and Japanese automobile supplies. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 18, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  28. http://mentalhelp.net/psyhelp, accessed 10th June, 2003

  29. Loong, A. C. Y., & Keng-Boon, O. (2008). Adoption of interorganizational system standards in supply chains: an empirical analysis of RosettaNet standards. Industrial Management & Data, 108(4), 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mackay, D. R. (1993). The impact of EDI on the components sector of the Australian automotive industry. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2(3), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Maehr, M. L., & Braskamp, L. A. (1986). The motivation factor. Massachusetts: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  32. More, E., & McGrath, G. M. (2000). Transforming healthcare in Australia: The PeCC initiative. PeCC Report (pp. 1219–1226).

  33. Nuttin, J. (1984). Motivation, planning, and action. Leuven: Leuven University Press,

    Google Scholar 

  34. Peffers, K., Santos, B. L. D., & Thurner, P. (1998). Motivation, implementation, and impact of electronic data interchange among US and German firms. Information Services & Use, 18(3), 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Petri, H. L. (1996). Motivation: theory, research, and applications. Pacific Grove: ITP Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Porter, M. E., & Miller, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rahim, M., Shanks, G., & Johnston, R. (2002). A framework for understanding the motivations for inter-organisational systems adoption: an empirical assessment. In Proceedings of the thirteenth Australasian conference on information systems (ACIS’2002) (pp. 453–463), Melbourne, Australia, 4–6 December 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rahim, M., Shanks, G., & Johnston, R. (2004). Understanding IOS adoption processes in three Victoria-based hospitals: an organisational motivation perspective. In Proceedings of the fifteenth Australasian conference on information systems (ACIS’2004) (pp. 304–314), Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rahim, M. M., Shanks, G., & Sarker, P. (2007). Organizational motivation and inter-organizational systems adoption process: empirical evaluation in the Australian automotive industry. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 5(3), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Reeve, J. (1992). Understanding motivation and emotion. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Robey, D., Im, G., & Wareham, J. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(9), 497–518.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sarker, S., & Lee, A. S. (2003). Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation. Information & Management, 40(8), 813–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schermerhorn, J. R. (1975). Determinants of interorganizational cooperation’. The Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 846–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Scoular, R. (2005). Review of post 2005 automotive policy arrangements. Submission to the Productivity Commission. Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited, Australia.

  45. Sila, I. (2007). Adoption of internet-baswed interorganizational systems in supply chain management and their impact on performance. The Business Review, 9(1), 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Simon, H. (1965). Administrative behaviour. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Smithson, S., & Hirschheim, R. A. (1998). Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(3), 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Soliman, K. S., & Janz, B. D. (2004). An exploratory study to identify the critical factors affecting the decision to establish internet-based inter-organizational information systems. Information & Management, 41(6), 697–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Son, J. Y., Narasimhan, S., Riggions, F.J., & Kim, N. (2008). Understanding the development of IOS-based trading partner relationships: a structural model with empirical validation. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 18, 34–60.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sriram, R. S., Arunachalam, V., & Ivancevich, D. M. (2000). EDI adoption and implementation: an examination of perceived operational and strategic benefits and controls. Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt inter-organizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 105–132.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Toates, F. (1986). Motivational systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Webster, J. (1995). Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 4(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wright, D. (2002). The drug bargaining game: pharmaceutical regulation in Australia. Australia: The University of Technology Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yin, R. K. (2004). Case study research: design and methods. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., & Xu, S. (2003). Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(3), 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Caulfield School of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC3145, Australia

    Md Mahbubur Rahim

  2. Department of Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia

    Graeme Shanks

  3. Centre for Innovation, Technology & Organisation, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Ireland

    Robert B. Johnston

Authors
  1. Md Mahbubur Rahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Graeme Shanks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert B. Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Mahbubur Rahim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahim, M.M., Shanks, G. & Johnston, R.B. A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities. Electron Commer Res 11, 215–243 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation