Skip to main content
Log in

A procedure using support vector data description and mutual information for end price assessment in online C2C auction

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a systematic procedure for assessing the end price of an item in a C-to-C auction site. These sites deal with used product and the product features vary substantially even within a single product category that makes price assessment difficult. Besides, the true market demand at a particular time, the effect of spurious bidding activities also contributes to price variation. We suggest removing outliers, selecting the right features and clustering the product data can increase the prediction accuracy. Using a multivariate dataset from eBay on Dell Laptops, we show, the prediction accuracy using back propagation neural network improves considerably when used in combination with the methods for (1) removing outliers using Support Vector Data Description, (2) selecting the right features using mutual information as a measure, and (3) clustering of the datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bajari, P., & Hortacsu, A. (2003). The winner’s curse, reserve prices and endogenous entry: empirical insights from eBay auctions. The RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 329–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Battiti, R. (1994). Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(4), 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Hur, A., Horn, D., Siegelmann, H. T., & Vapnik, V. (2001). Support vector clustering. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2, 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chan, H. C. (2008). Intelligent spider for information retrieval to support mining-based price prediction for online auctioning. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crisianini, N., & Taylor, J. S. (2000). An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghani, R. (2005). Price prediction and insurance for online auctions. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining, Chicago, Illinois, USA, August 21–24 (pp. 411–418).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghani, R., & Simmons, H. (2004). Predicting the end-price of online auctions. In Proceedings of international workshop on data mining and adaptive modelling methods for economics and management held in conjunction with the 15th European conference on machine learning (ECML/PKDDD 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haykin, S. (2004). Neural networks, a comprehensive foundation. Canada: Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kauffman, R. J., & Wood, C. A. (2005). The effects of shilling on final bid prices in online auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 4, 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krishna, V. (2002). Auction theory (1st ed., pp. 14–31). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kwak, N., & Choi, C.-H. (2002). Input feature selection by mutual information based on Parzen window. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(12), 1667–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, C., Chou, S., Chen, C., Ho, T., & Hsieh, Y. (2006). A final price prediction model for online English auctions—a neuro fuzzy approach. In Joint conference on information sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lucking-Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasad, N., & Reeves, D. (2007). Pennies from eBay: the determinants of price in online auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics, 55(2), 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta, K., & Lee, B. (1999). An empirical evidence of winner’s curse in electronic auctions. In Association for information systems, Atlanta, GA, USA (pp. 465–471).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, H., Long, F., & Ding, C. (2005). Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(8), 1226–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scholkopf, B., Mika, S., Burges, C. J. C., et al. (1999). Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods. IEE Transactions on Neutral Networks, 10(5), 1000–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah, H. S., Joshi, N. R., Sureka, A., & Wurman, P. R. (2003). Lecture notes on artificial intelligence. Mining for bidding strategies on eBay. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tabarzad, M. A., Lucas, C., & Haghjoo, P. (2006). A heuristic price prediction and bidding strategy for Internet auctions. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 6(9), 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tax, D. (2001). One-class classification. Ph.D. thesis Delft University of Technology.

  20. Tax, D. M. J., & Duin, R. P. W. (1999). Support vector domain description. Pattern Recognition Letters, 20, 1191–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tax, D. M. J., & Duin, R. P. W. (2004). Support vector data description. Machine Learning, 54, 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van Heijst, D., Potharst, R., & van Wezel, M. (2008). A support system for predicting eBay end prices. Decision Support Systems, 44, 970–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vapnik, V. N. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, S., Jank, W., & Shmueli, G. (2006). Forecasting eBay’s online auction prices using dynamic model, TDM’06, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

  25. Wang, S., Jank, W., & Shmueli, G. (2008). Explaining and forecasting online auction prices and their dynamics using functional data analysis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 26(2), 144–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wasserman, P. D. (1993). Advanced methods in neural computing. New York: Van Nostrand/Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wellman, M. P., Reeves, D. M., Lochner, K. M., & Vorobeychik, Y. (2004). Price prediction in a trading agent competition. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 21, 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xuefeng, L., Lu, L., Lihua, W., & Zhao, Z. (2006). Predicting the final prices of online auction items. Expert Systems with Applications, 31, 542–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mamata Jenamani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jenamani, M., Routray, A. & Singh, V. A procedure using support vector data description and mutual information for end price assessment in online C2C auction. Electron Commer Res 11, 321–340 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-011-9079-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-011-9079-z

Keywords

Navigation