Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Citizen Demand Affects the Process of M-Government Adoption: An Empirical Study in China

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile government applications have been increasingly adopted by governments around the world, but their use by targeted clients is lower than expected and under-examined in the literature. We conceptualize citizen adoption of m-government as a dynamic process composed of three interrelated stages—awareness, current use, and future use. However, we suggest that citizen demand will affect them differently. To test this, we used recent survey data from a Chinese city to examine the antecedents of citizen adoption of an m-government application, a traffic APP. The results reveal that citizens’ commuting demands significantly affected their awareness of the APP, but did not impact their current and planned future uses, which were primarily affected by citizens’ perceptions and habits. These findings help open up the “black box” of citizen adoption, and generate policy suggestions for boosting citizen use, of m-government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdelghaffar, H., & Magdy, Y. (2012). The adoption of mobile government services in developing countries: The case of Egypt. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research, 2(1), 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abu-Shanab, E., & Haider, S. (2015). Major factors influencing the adoption of m-government in Jordan. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 11(4), 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad, M. O., Markkula, J., & Oivo, M. (2012). Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services in Pakistan. In European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern conference on information systems 2012 (118–133).

  4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Almarashdeh, I., & Alsmadi, M. K. (2017). How to make them use it? citizens acceptance of m-government. Applied Computing and Informatics, S2210832716301193.

  6. Al-Thunibat, A., Zin, N., & Sahari, N. (2011). Modelling the factors that influence mobile government services acceptance. African Journal of Business Management, 5(34), 13030–13043.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Cantijoch, M. (2010). Online political participation in Spain: The impact of traditional and internet resources. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(4), 356–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2009). The impact of the digital divide on e-government use. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 132–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bold, T., Kimenyi, M., Mwabu, G., & Sandefur, J. (2014). Can free provision reduce demand for public services? Evidence from Kenyan education. The World Bank Economic Review, 29(2), 293–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2012). Demand for public transport in Germany and the USA: An analysis of rider characteristics. Transport Reviews, 32(5), 541–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carroll, J. (2006). 'What's in It for Me?': Taking M-Government to the People. BLED 2006 Proceedings, 49.

  13. Carter, L., & Weerakkody, V. (2008). E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 473–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chai, S., Das, S., & Rao, H. R. (2011). Factors affecting bloggers’ knowledge sharing: An investigation across gender. Journal of Management Information System, 28(3), 309–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang, C. C. (2015). Exploring mobile application customer loyalty: The moderating effect of use contexts. Telecommunications Policy, 39(8), 678–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chanana, L., Agrawal, R., & Punia, D. K. (2016). Service quality parameters for mobile government services in India. Global Business Review, 17(1), 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chung, J. E., Park, N., Wang, H., Fulk, J., & McLaughlin, M. (2010). Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1674–1684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clotfelter, C. T. (1977). Public services, private substitutes, and the demand for protection against crime. The American Economic Review, 67(5), 867–877.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deep, M., & Sahoo, G. (2011). M-governance for better G2C service. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 16(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Deng, W. (2016). The overall satisfaction rate to the city government mobile apps is lower than 40%, available at: http://sz.people.com.cn/n2/2016/0118/c202846-27570263.html. Accessed 26 June 2016.

  23. E-Government (2010). E-government. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/mobile_goverment

  24. Ekong, U., & Ekong, V. (2010). M-voting: A panacea for enhanced e-participation. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 9(2), 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eom, S. J., & Kim, J. H. (2014). The adoption of public smartphone applications in Korea: Empirical analysis on maturity level and influential factors. Government Information Quarterly, 31, S26–S36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fakhoury, R., & Aubert, B. (2015). Citizenship, trust, and behavioural intentions to use public e-services: The case of Lebanon. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 346–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferro, E., Helbig, N. C., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2011). The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., & Horsburgh, S. (2010). Do they want it? Do they use it? The ‘Demand-Side’ of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Georgescu, M. (2010). The impact of mobile government in organizations: promises and pitfalls. The Annals of the ‘Stefan cel Mare’ University of Suceava. Fascicle of the Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, 10(12), 15–22.

  31. Geyer, J., & Sieg, H. (2013). Estimating a model of excess demand for public housing. Quantitative Economics, 4(3), 483–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2014). Mobile Devices: Federal Agencies’ Steps to Improve Mobile Access to Government Information and Services (GAO-15-69). Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  33. He, A. J., & Ma, L. (2020). Corporate policy entrepreneurship and cross-boundary strategies: How a private corporation champions mobile healthcare payment innovation in China? Public Administration and Development, 40(1), 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspective, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Heeks, R., & Santos, R. (2009). Understanding adoption of e-Government: Principals, agents and institutional dualism. Manchester: IDPM.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Helbig, N., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: implications form the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hsiao, C. H., Chang, J. J., & Tang, K. Y. (2016). Exploring the influential factors in continuance usage of mobile social Apps: Satisfaction, habit, and customer value perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 342–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., & Kuo, S. R. (2013). User acceptance of mobile e-government services: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hussein, R., Mohamed, N., Ahlan, A. R., Mahmud, M., & Aditiawarman, U. (2010). An integrated model on online tax adoption in Malaysia. In European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern conference on information systems 2010 (pp. 1–16).

  40. Ingrams, A. (2015). Mobile phones, smartphones, and the transformation of civic behavior through mobile information and connectivity. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ishmatova, D., & Fedotov, Y. (2010). M-government for education: assessing students’ preferences for mobile campus services. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, 2(2), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jahanshahi, A., Khaksar, S., Yaghoobi, N., & Nawaser, K. (2011). Comprehensive model of mobile government in Iran. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 4(9), 1188–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Joseph, R. C., & Jeffers, P. (2009). E-Government in the Caribbean nations. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 12(1), 52–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kesavarapu, S., & Choi, M. (2009). A theoretical framework of knowledge management in m-government. International Journal of Computer and Communication Technology, 1(1), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kim, B. (2012). The diffusion of mobile data services and applications: Exploring the role of habit and its antecedents. Telecommunications Policy, 36(1), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim, B., & Han, I. (2009). Understanding the adoption of mobile data services: An approach from a value perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 24(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2009). Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful E-commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kim, Y. H., Kim, D. J., & Hwang, Y. J. (2009). Exploring online transaction self-efficacy in trust building in B2C E-commerce. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 21(1), 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kolsaker, A., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2008). Citizens’ attitudes towards e-government and e-governance: A UK study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(7), 723–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kumar, M., & Sinha, O. P. (2007). M-government–mobile technology for e-government (pp. 294–301).

  51. Kunstelj, M., Jukić, T., & Vintar, M. (2007). Analysing the demand side of e-government: What can we learn from Slovenian users?. In: International Conference on Electronic Government (pp. 305–317). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

  52. Lee, M., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2016). Open data and civic apps: First-generation failures, second-generation improvements. Communications of the ACM, 59(1), 82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Liou, K. T. (2008). e-Government development and China’s administrative reform. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(1), 76–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu, T., Yang, X., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Understanding the evolution of public–private partnerships in Chinese e-government: Four stages of development. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(4), 222–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ma, L. (2020). Digital governance in China. In X. Zang & H. S. Chan (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy and Public Administration in China (pp. 122–135). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Government Technological Capacity and Public-Private Partnerships regarding Digital Service Delivery: Evidence from Chinese Cities. International Review of Administrative Science, forthcoming.

  57. MTV Networks, Love 'em or leave 'em: adoption, abandonment and the app-addled consumer, http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mtv-networks-mobile- apps-study-reveals-the-life-cycle-of-an-app-from-discovered-to-discarded- 123348433.html2011.

  58. Ntaliani, M., Costopoulou, C. & Karetsos, S. (2008). Mobile government: A challenge for agriculture. Government Information Quarterly, 25: 4, 699–716.

  59. OECD. (2011). M-government: mobile technologies for responsive governments and connected societies (p. 152). International Telecommunication Union: OECD Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  60. Oehl, B., Schaffer, L. M., & Bernauer, T. (2017). How to measure public demand for policies when there is no appropriate survey data? Journal of Public Policy, 37(2), 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Paulley, N., Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Titheridge, H., Preston, J., Wardman, M., ... & White, P. (2006). The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transport Policy13(4), 295–306.

  62. Reddick, C. G. (2010). Citizen-centric e-government. In Homeland Security Preparedness and Information Systems: Strategies for Managing Public Policy (pp. 45–75). IGI Global.

  63. Reddick, C. G. (2011). Citizen interaction and e-government: Evidence for the managerial, consultative, and participatory models. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(2), 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Reddick, C., & Anthopoulos, L. (2014). Interactions with e-government, new digital media and traditional channel choices: Citizen-initiated factors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(3), 398–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Reddick, C. G., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Determinants of citizens’ mobile apps future use in Chinese local governments: An analysis of survey data. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(2), 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Roy, M.-C., Chartier, A., Crête, J., & Poulin, D. (2015). Factors influencing e-government use in non-urban areas. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(3), 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). E-government adoption model (gam): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Sheng, H., & Trimi, S. (2008). M-government: Technologies, applications and challenges. Electronic Government: an International Journal, 5(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Skoric, M. M., Ying, D., & Ng, Y. (2009). Bowling online, not alone: online social capital and political participation in Singapore. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 14(2), 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Streib, G., & Navarro, I. (2006). Citizen demand for interactive e-government: The case of Georgia consumer services. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(3), 288–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Venkatesh, V., Chan, F. K. Y., & Thong, J. Y. L. (2012). Designing e-government services: Key service attributes and citizens’ preference structures. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1–2), 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wang, C. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of perceived value in Mobile Government continuance use: An empirical research in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang, C., Feng, Y., Fang, R., & Lu, Z. (2012). Model for value creation in mobile government: an integrated theory perspective. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 4(2), 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Xu, C., Peak, D., & Prybutok, V. (2015). A customer value, satisfaction, and loyalty perspective of mobile application recommendations. Decision Support Systems, 79, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Yuan, M., Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Vogel, D., & Chu, C. (2009). Antecedents of coordination effectiveness of software developer dyads from interacting teams: An empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(3), 494–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Zhang, N., Meng, Q., Guo, X., Yin, C., & Luo, H. (2015). Key e-government issues in China: An empirical study based on the orientation-maturity framework. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(3), 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Zheng, Y. (2017). Explaining citizens’ e-participation usage: Functionality of e-participation applications. Administration & Society, 49(3), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Zheng, Y., & Huang, B. (2016). “Internet + government” report (2016)—Mobile government in China: Current situation and future. E-Government, 2016(9), 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zheng, Y., & Schachter, H. L. (2017). Explaining citizens’ E-participation use: The role of perceived advantages. Public Organization Review, 17(3), 409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions. Financial support is from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No.: 71774164). The correspondence should go to Liang Ma at liangma@ruc.edu.cn.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Ma.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The ordered logistic regression model estimates

Variables

Awareness

Current Use

Future Use

 

Coef

SE

Coef

SE

Coef

SE

Independent variables

      

Commuting frequency

0.10*

0.06

0.60***

0.12

0.20

0.12

Commuting distance

0.16**

0.08

0.10

0.12

−0.10

0.14

Commuting complexity

0.28***

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.10

Commuting mode (public transportation)

0.67***

0.18

1.31***

0.31

−0.38

0.33

Peak-hour commuting

0.39***

0.15

0.38

0.25

0.47*

0.28

Perceived congestion

0.11*

0.06

0.09

0.10

0.09

0.11

Parking needs

−0.02

0.06

−0.09

0.10

−0.07

0.11

Control variables

      

Awareness

  

0.87***

0.15

0.14

0.16

Current use

    

0.63***

0.16

Usability

  

0.35*

0.19

0.52**

0.21

Trust

  

−0.32*

0.17

0.31*

0.18

Perceived advantage

  

0.24

0.16

0.50***

0.18

Satisfaction

  

−0.04

0.20

0.93***

0.21

Perceived usefulness

  

0.56**

0.20

1.07***

0.22

ICT use frequency

0.01

0.08

−0.12

0.14

−0.20

0.15

ICT use skills

0.34***

0.10

0.00

0.17

0.10

0.18

New technology acceptance

0.20**

0.08

−0.01

0.15

0.21

0.15

Education

0.04

0.11

0.24

0.20

−0.20

0.21

Income

0.00

0.08

0.11

0.14

0.04

0.16

Occupation (public sectors)

0.12

0.17

−0.08

0.26

0.45

0.28

Gender (male)

−0.41**

0.15

−0.31

0.24

−0.08

0.26

Age

−0.14

0.09

0.08

0.15

0.06

0.16

Location (downtown)

0.15

0.15

−0.13

0.24

−0.11

0.27

Pseudo R-squared

0.1035

0.2110

0.3311

  1. *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Y., Ma, L. How Citizen Demand Affects the Process of M-Government Adoption: An Empirical Study in China. Electron Commer Res 22, 1407–1433 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09470-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09470-3

Keywords