Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

SME participation in cross-border e-commerce as an entry mode to foreign markets: A driver of innovation or not?

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of globalization, it is not just large corporates that need to update their technologies and processes to maintain competitiveness. Small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) also need to innovate if they are to satisfy customer preferences in both domestic and foreign markets. Today, internationalization is considered to be an essential factor in promoting SME innovation. However, it is often difficult for SMEs to innovative with overseas customers because many lack easy access to foreign markets. Compared to other traditional entry modes, cross-border e-commerce, with its low costs and high levels of control, can help to remove some of the barriers to internationalization for SMEs. In turn, it may be that cross-border e-commerce also promotes innovation in these firms. We gathered data on 781 Chinese SMEs to test several hypotheses surrounding this notion. The results of panel regression estimates indicate that cross-border e-commerce does indeed have a direct and positive effect on market innovation. More importantly, it has an indirect and positive impact on technology and process innovation by fully mediating the effects of an entrepreneurial orientation. These results shed light on how cross-border e-commerce impacts SME innovation performance, providing valuable implications for both academics and SME managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) finance, available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/smefinance. Assessed 14 of April 2020.

  2. http://www.51ifind.com/index.php?c=index&a=contact.

  3. https://www.baiten.cn/.

References

  1. Pavitt, K. (1988). The size and structure of British technology activities: What we do and do not know. Scientometrics, 14(3), 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amini, A. (2004). The distributional role of small business in development. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(3/4), 370–383.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wolff, J. A., & Pett, T. L. (2000). Internationalization of small firms: An examination of export competitive patterns, firm size, and export performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(2), 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taghizadeh, S. K., Rahman, S. A., & Hossain, M. M. (2018). Knowledge from customer, for customer, or about customer: Which triggers innovation capability the most? Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1), 162–182.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Soriano, D. R., & Dobon, S. R. (2009). Linking globalization of entrepreneurship in small organizations. Small Business Economics, 32(3), 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paul Geroski, S. M., & Van Reenen, J. (1993). The profitability of innovating firms. The RAND Journal of Economics., 24(2), 198–211.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2018). Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: A study in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 824–849.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Preston, A. L. (1997). small and medium-sized enterprises, technology; and globalization: introduction to a special issue on small and medium-sized enterprises in the global economy. Small Business Economics, Special Issue on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Global Economy, 9(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. García-Lillo, F., Úbeda-García, M., & Marco-Lajara, B. (2017). The intellectual structure of human resource management research: a bibliometric study of the international journal of human resource management, 2000–2012. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(13/14), 1786–1815.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buckley, P. J., & Tian, X. (2017). Transnationality and financial performance in the era of the global factory. Management International Review, 57, 501–528.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chiva, R., Ghauri, P., & Vidal, J. (2013). organizational learning, innovation and internationalization: A complex system model. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 687–705.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Erramilli, V. (2004). Resource-based explanation of entry mode choice. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 12(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brouthers, K., & Brouthers, L. (2013). Institutional, cultural, transaction cost and entry mode influences on performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruneel, J., & De Cock, R. (2016). Entry mode research and SMEs: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(S1), 135–167.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ryssel, R., Ritter, T., & Georg Gemünden, H. (2004). The impact of information technology deployment on trust, commitment and value creation in business relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(3), 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Garrett, R. K., & Danziger, J. N. (2007). Which telework? Defining and testing a taxonomy of technology-mediated work at a distance. Social Science Computer Review, 25(1), 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Palos-Sanchez, P., Saura, J. R., Velicia-Martin, F., & Cepeda-Carrion, G. (2021). A business model adoption based on tourism innovation: Applying a gratification theory to mobile applications. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(2), 100149.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sorescu, A. (2017). Data-driven business model innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 691–696.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, H., Kelley, D., Lee, J., & Lee, S. (2012). SME survival: The impact of internationalization, technology resources, and alliances. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xiaoguang Qi, J. H. C., Junyan, Hu., & Li, Y. (2020). Motivations for selecting cross-border e-commerce as a foreign market entry mode. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, L., Chai, Y., Liu, Y., & Xu, Y. (2015). Qualitative analysis of cross-border e-commerce based on transaction costs theory. In 2015 IEEE 12th international conference on e-business engineering (ICEBE).

  26. Gomez-Herrera, E., Martens, B., & Turlea, G. (2014). The drivers and impediments for cross-border e-commerce in the EU. Information Economics and Policy, 28, 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.

    Google Scholar 

  28. O’Dwyer, M., Gilmore, A., & Carson, D. (2009). Innovative marketing in SMEs: A theoretical framework. European Business Review, 21(6), 504–515.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shujahat, M., Sousa, M. J., Hussain, S., Nawaz, F., Wang, M., & Umer, M. (2019). Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: The neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity. Journal of Business Research, 94, 442–450.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tavassoli, S., & Karlsson, C. (2016). Innovation strategies and firm performance: Simple or complex strategies? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(7), 631–650.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gregory Henley, L. (2007). Extending innovation boundaries: corporate venture capital gives large firms a strategic option. Journal of Business Strategy, 28(5), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Genc, E., Dayan, M., & Genc, O. F. (2019). The impact of SME internationalization on innovation: The mediating role of market and entrepreneurial orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Alvarez, R., & Robertson, R. (2004). Exposure to foreign markets and plant-level innovation: Evidence from Chile and Mexico. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 13(1), 57–87.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Salomon, R. M., & Shaver, J. M. (2005). Learning by exporting: New insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2), 431–460.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Love, J. H., & Ganotakis, P. (2013). Learning by exporting: Lessons from high-technology SMEs. International Business Review, 22(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Soontornthum, T., Cui, L., Lu, V. N., & Su, J. (2020). Enabling SMEs’ learning from global value chains: Linking the logic of power and the logic of embeddedness of interfirm relations. Management International Review, 60(2), 543–571.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Styles, C., Mort, G. S., & Weerawardena, J. (2006). Networking capability and international entrepreneurship. International Marketing Review, 23(5), 549–572.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Terziovski, M. (2010). Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 892–902.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lee, Y., Shin, J., & Park, Y. (2012). The changing pattern of SME’s innovativeness through business model globalization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 832–842.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pangarkar, N. (2008). Internationalization and performance of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of World Business, 43(4), 475–485.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Golovko, E., & Valentini, G. (2011). Exploring the complementarity between innovation and export for SMEs’ growth. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(3), 362–380.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dai, L., Maksimov, V., Gilbert, B. A., & Fernhaber, S. A. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation and international scope: The differential roles of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 511–524.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Basile, R. (2001). Export behaviour of Italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: The role of innovation. Research Policy, 30(8), 1185–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zucchella, A., & Siano, A. (2014). Internationalization and innovation as resources for SME growth in Foreign markets. International Studies of Management & Organization, 44(1), 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Frey, M., Iraldo, F., & Testa, F. (2013). The determinants of innovation in green supply chains: evidence from an Italian sectoral study. R&D Management, 43(4), 352–364.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J., Sharp, J. A., & Wang, C. (2008). The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation, 28(1), 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cassiman, B., & Golovko, E. (2011). Innovation and internationalization through exports. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stefan Lachenmaier, L. W. (2006). Does innovation cause exports? Evidence from exogenous innovation impulses and obstacles using German micro data. Oxford Economic Papers, 58(2), 317–350.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Barney, J. B. (2000). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. In J. A. C. Baum & F. Dobbin (Eds.), Economics meets sociology in strategic management (pp. 203–227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Morgan, N. A., Vorhies, D. W., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2006). Resource–performance relationships in industrial export ventures: The role of resource inimitability and substitutability. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(5), 621–633.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Elia, S., Giuffrida, M., Mariani, M. M., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Resources and digital export: An RBV perspective on the role of digital technologies and capabilities in cross-border e-commerce. Journal of Business Research, 132, 158–169.

    Google Scholar 

  53. George, G., Wiklund, J., & Zahra, S. A. (2005). Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31(2), 210–233.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mudambi, R., Piscitello, L., & Rabbiosi, L. (2014). Reverse knowledge transfer in MNEs: Subsidiary innovativeness and entry modes. Long Range Planning, 47(1), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Robles, F., El-Ansary, A., & Root, F. R. (1988). Entry Strategies for International Markets. Journal of Marketing, 52(4), 128.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chang, B.-J., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2014). The impact of entry mode portfolio and internationalization on firm performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 15093.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Malhotra, N. K., Agarwal, J., & Ulgado, F. M. (2003). Internationalization and entry modes: A multitheoretical framework and research propositions. Journal of International Marketing, 11(4), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Brouthers, K. D., & Brouthers, L. E. (2003). Why service and manufacturing entry mode choices differ: The influence of transaction cost factors, risk and trust. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5), 1179–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Petrou, A. P. (2009). Foreign market entry strategies in retail banking: Choosing an entry mode in a landscape of constraints. Long Range Planning, 42(5), 614–632.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mattoo, A., Olarreaga, M., & Saggi, K. (2004). Mode of foreign entry, technology transfer, and FDI policy. Journal of Development Economics, 75(1), 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tan, B., Erramilli, K., & Liang, T. W. (2001). The influence of dissemination risks, strategic control and global management skills on firms’ modal decision in host countries. International Business Review., 10(3), 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Holtgrave, M., & Onay, M. (2017). Success through trust, control, and learning? Contrasting the drivers of SME performance between different modes of Foreign market entry. Administrative Sciences., 7(2), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies., 17(3), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Willcocks, L. P. (2018). Global business management foundation (2nd ed.). Stratford upon Avon: Steve Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Datta, D. K., Hemnann, P., & Rasheed, A. A. (2002). Choice of foreign market entry modes: Critical review and future directions. Advances in Comparative International Management., 14(02), 85–153.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hill, C., & Kim, P. H. C. (2010). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal., 11(2), 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Pedersen, T., Petersen, B., & Benito, G. (2002). Change of foreign operation method: impetus and switching costs. International Business Review., 11(3), 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Morschett, D., Schramm-Klein, H., & Swoboda, B. (2010). Decades of research on market entry modes: What do we really know about external antecedents of entry mode choice? Journal of International Management., 16(1), 60–77.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tse, P. (2000). The hierarchical model of market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies., 31(4), 535–554.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Johnson, J., & Tellis, G. J. (2008). Drivers of success for market entry into China and India. Journal of Marketing., 72(3), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Gkypali, A., Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2021). Export status and SME productivity: Learning-to-export versus learning-by-exporting. Journal of Business Research., 128, 486–498.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Guri, R., Noseleit, F., & Faria, P. (2021). Learning by exporting via organizational innovation. Academy of Management Proceedings., 2021(1), 13118.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Alon, I., Chen, S., & Mandolfo, M. (2019). Supply chain—Marketing integration. Business Process Management Journal., 25(2), 368–378.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wu, C., Huang, F., Huang, C., & Zhang, H. (2018). Entry mode, market selection, and innovation performance. Sustainability., 10(11), 4222.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Li, L., & Qian, G. (2008). Partnership or self-reliance entry modes: Large and small technology-based enterprises’ strategies in overseas markets. Journal of International Entrepreneurship., 6(4), 188–208.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Liñán, F., Paul, J., & Fayolle, A. (2020). SMEs and entrepreneurship in the era of globalization: advances and theoretical approaches. Small Business Economics., 55(3), 695–703.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Akhter, S. H., & Robles, F. (2006). Leveraging internal competency and managing environmental uncertainty. International Marketing Review., 23(1), 98–115.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ekeledo, I., & Sivakumar, K. (2004). The Impact of E-Commerce on Entry-Mode Strategies of Service Firms: A Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions. Journal of International Marketing., 12(4), 46–70.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hutchinson, K., Quinn, B., & Alexander, N. (2006). SME retailer internationalisation: Case study evidence from British retailers. International Marketing Review., 23(1), 25–53.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Agndal, H., & Chetty, S. (2007). The impact of relationships on changes in internationalisation strategies of SMEs. European Journal of Marketing., 41(11–12), 1449–1474.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Shen, Z., Puig, F., & Paul, J. (2017). Foreign market entry mode research: A review and research agenda. The International Trade Journal., 31(5), 429–456.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Yamin, M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2006). Online internationalisation, psychic distance reduction and the virtuality trap. International Business Review., 15(4), 339–360.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ding, F., Huo, J., & Campos , J. K. (2017) The development and current of cross-border e-commerce. In: Proceedings of the international conference on transformations and innovations in management (ICTIM 2017). QIngdao China.

  85. Chen, S., He, Q., & Xiao, H. (2020). A study on cross-border e-commerce partner selection in B2B mode. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09403-6.

  86. Hsiao, Y.-H., Chen, M.-C., & Liao, W.-C. (2017). Logistics service design for cross-border E-commerce using Kansei engineering with text-mining-based online content analysis. Telematics and Informatics., 34(4), 284–302.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Xiao, L., & Zhang, Y. (2020). An analysis on the policy evolution of cross-border ecommerce industry in China from the perspective of sustainability. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09427-y.

  88. Cortés, P., & de la Rosa, F. E. (2013). Building a global redress system for low-value cross-border disputes. International and Comparative Law Quarterly., 62(2), 407–440.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Pezderka, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2011). A conceptualization of e-risk perceptions and implications for small firm active online internationalization. International Business Review., 20(4), 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Jansson, J., Nilsson, J., Modig, F., & Hed Vall, G. (2017). Commitment to sustainability in small and medium-sized enterprises: The influence of strategic orientations and management values. Business Strategy and the Environment., 26(1), 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Wu, C., Huang, F., Huang, C., & Zhang, H. (2018). Entry mode, market selection, and innovation performance. Sustainability., 10(10), 4222.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Teece, D. J. (1986). Transactions cost economics and the multinational enterprise an assessment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization., 7(1), 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Mroczek, K. (2014). Transaction cost theory—Explaining entry mode choices. Poznań University of Economics Review., 14(1), 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? the implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. The Academy of Management Journal., 38(1), 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Castellani, D., & Zanfei, A. (2007). Internationalisation, innovation and productivity: How do firms differ in Italy? The World Economy., 30(1), 156–176.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Goldsby, T.J. and J.A. Eckert. (2003). Electronic transportation marketplaces: a transaction cost perspective. Industrial Marketing Management. 32(3): p. 187–198.

  97. Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J., Sharp, J. A., & Wang, C. (2008). The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation, 28(1–2), 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Cui, Y., Mou, J., Cohen, J., & Liu, Y. (2019). Understanding information system success model and valence framework in sellers’ acceptance of cross-border e-commerce: a sequential multi-method approach. Electronic Commerce Research., 19(4), 885–914.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Banerjee, S., Prabhu, J. C., & Chandy, R. K. (2015). Indirect Learning: How Emerging-Market Firms Grow in Developed Markets. Journal of Marketing., 79(1), 10–28.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing., 16(5), 429–451.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science., 29(7), 770–791.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Hoskisson, R. E., Covin, J., Volberda, H. W., & Johnson, R. A. (2011). Revitalizing entrepreneurship: The search for new research opportunities. Journal of Management Studies., 48(6), 1141–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice., 24(1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal., 14(2), 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Cui, L., Fan, D., Guo, F., & Fan, Y. (2017). Explicating the relationship of entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: Underlying mechanisms in the context of an emerging market. Industrial Marketing Management., 71, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies., 35(2), 124–141.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Clercq, D. D., & Crijns, S. H. (2005). The internationalization of small and medium-sized firms. Small Business Economics., 24(4), 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Ciravegna, L., Majano, S. B., & Ge, Z. (2014). The inception of internationalization of small and medium enterprises: The role of activeness and networks. Journal of Business Research., 67(6), 1081–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Li, Y. H., Huang, J. W., & Tsai, M. T. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management., 38(4), 440–449.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (2015). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Entrepreneurship Research Journal., 10(1), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of business venturing., 20(1), 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2010). The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management., 47(4), 443–464.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Porter, M. E. S. S. (2001). Innovation: Location matters (cover story). Mit Sloan Management Review (Cambridge), 42(4), 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J., & Clegg, J. (2012). The effects of global knowledge reservoirs on the productivity of multinational enterprises: The role of international depth and breadth. Research Policy., 41(5), 848–861.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Ferraris, A., Santoro, G., & Papa, A. (2018). The cities of the future: Hybrid alliances for open innovation projects. Futures, 103, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Diez, R., & Javier. (2002). Metropolitan innovation systems: A comparison between Barcelona, Stockholm, and Vienna. International Regional Science Review., 25(1), 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology by Henry Chesbrough. Academy of Management Perspectives., 20(2), 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  118. AliReseach. (2016). The future of trade: Cross-border e-commerce connects the world. https://i.aliresearch.com/img/20160901/20160901101059.pdf.

  119. Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management., 45(2), 278–293.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Chen, Z., & Zhang, J. (2019). Types of patents and driving forces behind the patent growth in China. Economic Modelling., 80, 294–302.

    Google Scholar 

  121. CNIPA. (2020). Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (Amended in 2020). In C.N.I.P. Administration, Editor, Beijing. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202011/82354d98e70947c09dbc5e4eeb78bdf3.shtml.

  122. Bena, J., Ortiz-Molina, H., & Simintzi, E. (2021). Shielding firm value: Employment protection and process innovation. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.10.005.

  123. Geiger, S., & Gross, N. (2017). Market failures and market framings: Can a market be transformed from the inside? Organization Studies., 39(10), 1357–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Li, Y., Wang, J., Li, X., & Zhao, W. (2007). Design creativity in product innovation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology., 33(3), 213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics., 22(2), 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Balasubramanian, N., & Lee, J. (2008). Firm age and innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change., 17(5), 1019–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Reenen, J. V. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies., 66(3), 529–554.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Cui, J.a.L., Xiaogang. (2018). Innovation. Social Science Electronic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Shum, P., & Lin, G. (2010). A resource-based view on entrepreneurship and innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation Management., 11(3), 264–281.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Geelen, T., Hajda, J., & Morellec, E. (2019). Debt, innovation, and growth. In: 4th finance theory group European summer meeting Madrid (pp. 19–79). CEMFI.

  131. Yoo, J., & Kim, J. (2019). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental uncertainty on Korean technology firms’ R&D investment. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity., 5(2), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Williams, C., & Lee, S. H. (2009). Resource allocations, knowledge network characteristics and entrepreneurial orientation of multinational corporations. Research Policy., 38(8), 1376–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  133. O’Brien, R. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity., 41(5), 673–690.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Doom, S. V., et al. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: Drawing attention to the senior team. Journal of Product Innovation Management., 30(5), 821–836.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Dess, G. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2005). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives., 19(1), 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Xue, W., Li, D., & Pei, Y. (2016). The development and current of cross-border e-commerce. In WHICEB 2016 proceedings (Vol. 53).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Planning Office of Philosophy on Social Science (China) #18CGL002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zhejiang Informatization Development Institute, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China

    Lipeng Pan & Xiao Fu

  2. Western Sydney University, 169 Macquarie Street, Parramatta, NSW, Australia

    Yongqing Li

Authors
  1. Lipeng Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiao Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yongqing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lipeng Pan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A. Definition of variables

Appendix A. Definition of variables

Variables

Description

Source

TI

Technological innovation—measured as the number of invention patent applications lodged by a firm in a given year

Baiten

PI

Process innovation—measured as the number of model patent applications lodged by a firm in a given year

Baiten

MI

Market innovation—measured as the number of design patent applications lodged by a firm in a given year

Baiten

CBEC

A dummy variable—equal to 1 when firm has used cross-border e-commerce as a foreign market entry model in the year t, and 0 otherwise

1. China.cn (China suppliers)

2. Made-in-chian.com

3. Alibaba.com

4. EC Plaza

EO

Entrepreneurial orientation—measured as the ratio of research and development investment to corporate net income

IFind

SIZE

Firm size—equal to the natural logarithm of total sales

IFind

ROA

Return on assets—measured as net operating income divided by total assets at year-end

IFind

LEV

Leverage—equal to the corporate interest-bearing debt ratio

IFind

MV

Market value—measured as the price per share of a listed company multiplied by the total number of shares issued

IFind

SHARES

Negotiable share—measured as the total number of shares the company can trade on the stock market

IFind

PC

Production capacity—measured as the percentage of production employees in total employees

IFind

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, L., Fu, X. & Li, Y. SME participation in cross-border e-commerce as an entry mode to foreign markets: A driver of innovation or not?. Electron Commer Res 23, 2327–2356 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09539-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09539-7

Keywords