Skip to main content
Log in

Unraveling mobile internet behavior through customer segmentation: a latent class analysis

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates heterogeneous mobile app usage patterns through customer segmentation and further examines how customer characteristics are correlated with these heterogeneous usage patterns. The research utilizes a unique individual-level mobile app usage dataset and employs a latent class model incorporating concomitant variables. The results uncover four mobile customer segments and show that: (1) customer mobility is most positively associated with the usage pattern of Social-Type Users, with the highest social app usage but the lowest entertainment app usage; (2) customer phone price is most positively correlated with the usage pattern of Entertainment-Type Users, with the highest entertainment and e-commerce app usage; and (3) customer’s number of app downloads is most positive for the usage pattern of Information-Type Users, with the highest information and travel app usage. This study contributes to the literatures on customer segmentation and mobile app usage. The findings offer important implications for app managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The name of the company is kept anonymous in accordance with a confidentiality agreement.

  2. The seventeen app subcategories in Anzhi app market include: instant messaging, social networking, video, music, game, work and learning, news and reading, weather and navigation, shopping, finance, photography and beauty, safety, input methods, system tools, desktop themes, integrated services, and browsers.

  3. Source: https://www.latentclassanalysis.com/software/lca-stata-plugin/.

  4. The exposition of “highest or lowest” in this study refers to the focal segment presenting the highest or lowest likelihood of one specific app usage compared to the other three customer segments.

References

  1. Pew Research Center. (2021). Mobile technology and home broadband 2019. Accessed December 19, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/.

  2. eMarketer. (2021). US time spent with mobile 2021. Accessed December 19, 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1045353/mobile-device-daily-usage-time-in-the-us/.

  3. Statista. (2021). Daily mobile app usage in China Q3 2018–Q2 2021, by average number of hours. Accessed December 19, 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1090400/china-average-daily-time-on-mobile-apps/.

  4. Goh, D. H. L., Lee, C. S., & Razikin, K. (2016). Interfaces for accessing location-based information on mobile devices: An empirical evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 2882–2896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Böhmer, M., Hecht, B., Schöning, J., Krüger, A., & Bauer, G. (2011, August). Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: A large-scale study on mobile application usage. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 47–56).

  6. Huang, K., Zhang, C., Ma, X., & Chen, G. (2012, September). Predicting mobile application usage using contextual information. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 1059–1065).

  7. Verkasalo, H. (2009). Contextual patterns in mobile service usage. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(5), 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Han, S. P., Park, S., & Oh, W. (2016). Mobile app analytics: A multiple discrete-continuous choice framework. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 4(40), 983–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon, H. E., So, H., Han, S. P., & Oh, W. (2016). Excessive dependence on mobile social apps: A rational addiction perspective. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 919–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jia, J. S., Jia, J., Hsee, C. K., & Shiv, B. (2017). The role of hedonic behavior in reducing perceived risk: Evidence from postearthquake mobile-app data. Psychological Science, 28(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bijmolt, T. H., Paas, L. J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Country and consumer segmentation: Multi-level latent class analysis of financial product ownership. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(4), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta, S., & Chintagunta, P. K. (1994). On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(1), 128–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000). Market Segmentation. Conceptual and Methodological Foundations. International Series in Quantitative Marketing (2nd ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, W. R. (1956). Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wind, Y. (1978). Issues and advances in segmentation research. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(3), 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kamakura, W. A., & Russell, G. J. (1989). A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(4), 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamakura, W. A., & Wedel, M. (1995). Life-style segmentation with tailored interviewing. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 308–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Papatla, P., & Bhatnagar, A. (2002). Choosing the right mix of on-line affiliates: How do you select the best? Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rohm, A. J., & Swaminathan, V. (2004). A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations. Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 748–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamka, F., Bouwman, H., De Reuver, M., & Kroesen, M. (2014). Mobile customer segmentation based on smartphone measurement. Telematics and Informatics, 31(2), 220–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vallespín, M., Molinillo, S., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2017). Segmentation and explanation of smartphone use for travel planning based on socio-demographic and behavioral variables. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 605–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, Y., Park, I., Cho, S., & Choi, J. (2018). Smartphone user segmentation based on app usage sequence with neural networks. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang, L., Lu, X., & Ba, S. (2016). An empirical study of the cross-channel effects between web and mobile shopping channels. Information & Management, 53(2), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, E., Lin, J. S., & Sung, Y. (2013). To app or not to app: Engaging consumers via branded mobile apps. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 13(1), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, M., Han, S. P., Park, S., & Oh, W. (2016, January). The positive spillover effect of mobile social games on app literacy. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 746–755). IEEE.

  27. Zhao, Z., & Balagué, C. (2015). Designing branded mobile apps: Fundamentals and recommendations. Business Horizons, 58(3), 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goyal, N., Bron, M., Lalmas, M., Haines, A., & Cramer, H. (2018). Designing for mobile experience beyond the native ad click: Exploring landing page presentation style and media usage. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(7), 913–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, X., Dutta, K., Datta, A., & Ge, C. (2018). Identifying functional aspects from user reviews for functionality-based mobile app recommendation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(2), 242–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma, L. & Sun, B. (2016). An integrated analysis of mobile application usage and in app advertising response. Working Paper.

  31. Son, Y., Oh, W., Han, S. P., & Park, S. (2020). When loyalty goes mobile: Effects of mobile loyalty apps on purchase, redemption, and competition. Information Systems Research, 31(3), 835–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghose, A., Guo, X., Li, B., & Dang, Y. (2021). Empowering patients using smart mobile health platforms: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Forthcoming at MIS Quarterly.

  33. Rantanen, T. (2013). Promoting mobility in older people. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 46(Suppl 1), S50–S54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Andrews, M., Luo, X., Fang, Z., & Ghose, A. (2016). Mobile ad effectiveness: Hyper-contextual targeting with crowdedness. Marketing Science, 35(2), 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fang, Z., Luo, X., Andrews, M., & Phang, C. W. (2014). Mobile Discounts: A Matter of Distance and Time, Harvard Business Review, 30–30.

  36. Ghose, A., Goldfarb, A., & Han, S. P. (2013). How is the mobile Internet different? Search costs and local activities. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 613–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ma, B., & Chen, H. (2015, July). Examining the causal relationship between screen size and cellular data consumption. In PACIS (p. 180).

  38. Kamakura, W. A., Ramaswami, S. N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1991). Applying latent trait analysis in the evaluation of prospects for cross-selling of financial services. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. IDC. (2021). Smartphone market share. Accessed December 19, 2021, https://www.idc.com/promo/smartphone-market-share.

  40. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). A comparison between traditional and latent class. In L. Andries van der Ark (Ed.), New Developments in Categorical Data Analysis for the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 41–62). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lanza, S. T., Tan, X., & Bray, B. C. (2013). Latent class analysis with distal outcomes: A flexible model-based approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Andrews, R. L., & Currim, I. S. (2003). Recovering and profiling the true segmentation structure in markets: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(2), 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lanza, S. T., Flaherty, B. P., & Collins, L. M. (2003). Latent class and latent transition analysis. In I. B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of Psychology. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lanza, S. T., Dziak, J. J., Huang, L., Wagner, A. T., & Collins, L. M. (2018). LCA Stata plugin users' guide (Version 1.2.1). University Park: The Methodology Center, Penn State. Available from methodology.psu.edu.

  46. Wang, Q., Yang, X., Song, P., & Sia, C. L. (2014). Consumer segmentation analysis of multichannel and multistage consumption: A latent class MNL approach. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Xuebin Cui acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 72002096) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant 010414370113). Fei Jin acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 72002143), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M663545), the Youth Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education of China (20YJC630053) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (skbsh2020-21).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Jin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author Fei Jin states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, X., Jin, F. Unraveling mobile internet behavior through customer segmentation: a latent class analysis. Electron Commer Res 23, 2379–2398 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09542-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09542-y

Keywords

Navigation