Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Research on cojumps of electronic commerce overnight factors in volatility prediction based on joint BW test

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volatility is an important feature of e-commerce activities, and overnight information has the greatest impact on the market volatility of e-commerce. The identification of contemporaneous jumps (cojumps) is crucial to studying the effect of overnight information on market volatility. This paper takes stock and futures e-commerce as the research object, based on the heterogeneous autoregression model of the Realized Volatility under high-frequency data, not only the characteristics of cojumps between the CSI 300 stock index and the future index are investigated, but also the effects of overnight factors on the future volatility. The results indicate that the Extended-Weighted Realized Volatility (EWRV) modifying both the intraday and overnight effects may be a better estimator of volatility. The joint BW test could be more efficient in the identification of cojumps with significant overnight characteristics. The effect of the overnight cojumps on the future volatility is significantly positive and greater than that of the intraday cojumps. In the Electronic Commerce stock index market, there is not enough evidence of the transmission from the overnight cojumps to the intraday volatility, which means the future index market may have no significant spillover to the stock index market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barndorff-Nielsen, O., & Shephard, N. (2004). Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility and jumps. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilder, D., Shackleton, M. B., & Taylor, S. J. (2013). Cojumps in stocks prices: Empirical evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, H., Yue, M., & Zhao, H. (2015). Cojumps in China’s spot and stock index futures markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 541–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang, Y., & Lin, X. (2015). Consider the fluctuation modeling of common jumps: Based on the high-frequency data perspective. China Management Science, 23(08), 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Qu, H., & Ji, P. (2016). Covariance prediction-based on the multivariate HAR model. Management Science, 29(6), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ma, F., Wei, Y., & Huang, D. (2016). Can overnight returns improve the predictive capabilities of high-frequency volatility models. Systems Engineering Journal, 31(06), 783–797.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Song, Y., & Wang, X. (2017). Does overnight information affect the volatility model capability. Financial Issues Studies, 02, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bollerslev, T., Law, T. H., & Tauchen, G. (2008). Risk, jumps, and diversification. Journal of Econometrics, 144(1), 234–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lahaye, J., Laurent, S., & Neely, C. J. (2011). Jumps, cojumps and macro announcements. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 26(6), 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Frederiksen, P., et al. (2010). Continuous-time models, realized volatiliti-es, and identificationable distributional implications for intraday stock returns. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(2), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bollerslev, T., Todorov, V., & Sophia, Z. L. (2013). Jump tails, extreme dependencies, and the distribution of stock returns. Journal of Econometrica, 172(2), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T. M., & Diebold, F. X. (2001). The distribution of realized stock return volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T. M., & Diebold, F. X. (2003). Modelling and forecasting realized volatility. Econometrica, 71(2), 579–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo, M., & Zhang, S. (2006). VaR computation based on “implemented” volatility and its persistence study. Journal of Northwest A & Forestry University (Social Sciences), 06, 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, L., & Guo, M. (2009). Comparative study of volatility and empowerment achieved. Journal of Northwest A & Forestry University (Social Sciences), 9(02), 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen, P. R., & Lunde, A. (2005). A realized variance for the whole day based on intermittent high-frequency data. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 3(4), 525–554.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bajgrowicz, P., Scaillet, O., & Treccani, A. (2015). Jumps in high-frequency data: Spurious detections, dynamics, and news. Management Science.

  18. de Pooter, M., Martens, M., & van Dijk, D. (2008). Predicting the intraday covariance matrix for S&P 100 stocks using intraday data—but which frequency to use? Econometric Reviews, 27(1–3).

  19. Barndorff-Nielsen, O., & Shephard, N. (2006). Economics of Identificationing for jumps in financial economics using bipower variation. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aït-Sahalia, Y., & Xiu, D. (2016). Increased correlation among asset classes: Are volatility or jumps to blame, or both? Journal of Econometrics, S0304407616300902.

  21. Hawkes, A. G. (2020). Hawkes jump-diffusions and finance: a brief history and review. The European Journal of Finance, 1–15.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors hereby transfer copyrights of the article entitled: Research on Cojumps of electronic commerce overnight factors in volatility prediction based on joint BW test to the Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. The authors agree to publish the above paper on an open access basis in all forms and media, and to publish the paper under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0). However, the authors retain the copyrights of all parts of the article for noncommercial use. All rights other than copyrights, e.g., patent rights, can be excluded from this agreement. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Funding

Science and Technology Project of Chongqing Education Commission (KJQN202001221). National Natural Science Foundation of China (71873023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Finance and Economics, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou, 404130, China

    Liling Deng

  2. School of Finance, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, 116025, China

    Haifang Xiong & Zhiqiang Wang

Authors
  1. Liling Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haifang Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhiqiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liling Deng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, L., Xiong, H. & Wang, Z. Research on cojumps of electronic commerce overnight factors in volatility prediction based on joint BW test. Electron Commer Res 23, 115–135 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09545-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09545-9

Keywords