Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the factors affecting content dissemination through WeChat official accounts: a heuristic-systematic model perspective

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

WeChat official accounts attract huge traffic and have an extremely high marketing value. However, as the number of accounts on the platform increases, a new concern for the account operators is garnering more traffic than competitors. Here, we employed the heuristic-systematic model to classify the influencing factors affecting information dissemination through WeChat official accounts and provided reference suggestions for the operators. We used data from nine official accounts of Beijing Sootoo Network Company as the research object and employed negative binomial regression. Our empirical results revealed that for entertainment and emotion official accounts, article titles that fit the account theme improved content spread, while they negatively affected traffic on news official accounts. We observed that the first article was advantageous when harnessed properly and that the number of images and amount of text was also crucial. Owing to time and manpower constraints, we only selected nine WeChat official accounts in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cao, X., Gong, M., Yu, L., & Dai, B. (2020). Exploring the mechanism of social media addiction: An empirical study from WeChat users. Internet Research, 30(4), 1305–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, X., Fu, S., & de Vreede, G. J. (2017). Understanding trust influencing factors in social media communication: A qualitative study. International Journal of Information Management, 37, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao, N., & Li, H. (2020). How can social commerce be boosted? The impact of consumer behaviors on the information dissemination mechanism in a social commerce network. Electronic Commerce Research, 20(4), 833–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shao, Z., & Pan, Z. (2019). Building Guanxi network in the mobile social platform: A social capital perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, W., Du, W., Bian, Y., Peng, C. H., & Jiang, Q. (2020). Seeing is not always believing: An exploratory study of clickbait in WeChat. Internet Research, 30(3), 1043–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, R. R., Davison, R. M., & Ou, C. X. (2020). A symbolic interactionism perspective of using social media for personal and business communication. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, R., & Wei, M. (2017). Academic impact evaluation of Wechat in view of social media perspective. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1777–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goh, J. M., Gao, G., & Agarwal, R. (2016). The creation of social value: Can an online health community reduce rural–urban health disparities. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dewan, S., & Ramaprasad, J. (2014). Social media, traditional media, and music sales. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, X., Wang, C., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The dilemma of social commerce. Internet Research, 30(3), 1059–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlosser, A. E., White, T. B., & Lloyd, S. M. (2006). Converting web site visitors into buyers: How web site investment increases consumer trusting beliefs and online purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lien, C. H., & Cao, Y. (2014). Examining WeChat users’ motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth: Evidence from China. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao, L., & Mou, J. (2019). Social media fatigue-technological antecedents and the moderating roles of personality traits: The case of WeChat. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cowart, B. J. (1981). Development of taste perception in humans: Sensitivity and preference throughout the life span. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Z., Liu, L., & Li, H. (2012). Determinants of information retweeting in microblogging. Internet Research, 22(4), 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shao, F., He, Z., Zhu, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Shan, J., & Wang, H. (2020). Internet influence of assisted reproduction technology centers in China: Qualitative study based on WeChat official accounts. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang, T., Wang, Y., Lin, T., & Shangguan, L. (2020). Evaluating Chinese government WeChat official accounts in public service delivery: A user-centered approach. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, M., Yang, L., Chen, W., Luo, H., Zheng, K., Zhang, Y., & Ni, J. (2020). Current status of official WeChat accounts for public health education. Journal of Public Health 1–7.

  19. Kang, M., & Schuett, M. A. (2013). Determinants of sharing travel experiences in social media. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 30, 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Exploring the relationship between college students’use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014). Information systems for symbolic action: Social media and beyond: Beyond being there: The symbolic role of communication and identification in perceptions of proximity to geographically dispersed colleagues. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1219–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ragini, J. R., Anand, P. R., & Bhaskar, V. (2018). Big data analytics for disaster response and recovery through sentiment analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, J., Park, D. H., & Han, I. (2011). The different effects of online consumer reviews on consumers’ purchase intentions depending on trust in online shopping malls: An advertising perspective. Internet Research, 21(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2013). Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Quarterly, 407–426.

  25. Geva, H., Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Saar-Tsechansky, M. (2019). Using retweets when shaping our online persona: Topic modeling approach. MIS Quarterly, 43(2), 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi, J., Hu, P., Lai, K. K., & Chen, G. (2018). Determinants of users’ information dissemination behavior on social networking sites. Internet Research, 28(2), 393–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liang, X., & Yang, Y. (2018). An experimental study of Chinese tourists using a company-hosted WeChat official account. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 27, 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hale, J. L., Lemieux, R., & Mongeau, P. A. (1995). Cognitive processing of fear-arousing message content. Communication Research, 22(4), 459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chaiken, S. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. Unintended Thought, 212–252.

  31. Angst, C. M., & Agarwal, R. (2009). Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quarterly, 339–370.

  32. Zhang, K. Z., Zhao, S. J., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2014). Examining the influence of online reviews on consumers’ decision-making: A heuristic-systematic model. Decision Support Systems, 67, 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, X., Wang, G. A., Fan, W., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Finding useful solutions in online knowledge communities: A theory-driven design and multilevel analysis. Information Systems Research, 31(3), 731–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dillard, J. P., & Pfau, M. (2002). The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976046. Accessed March 15, 2021.

  35. Chen, S., Duckworth, K., & Chaiken, S. (1999). Motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Psychological Inquiry, 10(1), 44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Qahri-Saremi, H., & Montazemi, A. R. (2019). Factors affecting the adoption of an electronic word of mouth message: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(3), 969–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wirth, W., Böcking, T., Karnowski, V., & Von Pape, T. (2007). Heuristic and systematic use of search engines. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, 778–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lucassen, T., Noordzij, M. L., & Schraagen, J. M. (2011). Reference blindness: The influence of references on trust in Wikipedia. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11480848.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2021.

  39. Son, J., Lee, J., Oh, O., Lee, H. K., & Woo, J. (2020). Using a heuristic-systematic model to assess the Twitter user profile’s impact on disaster tweet credibility. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Strekalova, Y. A. (2015). Informing dissemination research: A content analysis of US newspaper coverage of medical nanotechnology news. Science Communication, 37(2), 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Franzosi, R. (2008). Content analysis: Objective, systematic, and quantitative description of content. Content Analysis, 1(1), 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Neuendorf, K. A., & Kumar, A. (2015). Content analysis. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 1–10.

  43. Todd, P. A., McKeen, J. D., & Gallupe, R. B. (1995). The evolution of IS job skills: A content analysis of IS job advertisements from 1970 to 1990. MIS Quarterly, 19(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Denecke, K., & Nejdl, W. (2009). How valuable is medical social media data? Content analysis of the medical web. Information Sciences, 179(12), 1870–1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Goh, K. Y., Heng, C. S., & Lin, Z. (2013). Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 88–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by fund for building world-class universities (disciplines) of Renmin University of China (Project No. KYGJA2022002) and National Demonstration Center for Experimental Education of Information Technology and Management (Renmin University of China).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xusen Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, B., Hu, Y., Cheng, X. et al. Exploring the factors affecting content dissemination through WeChat official accounts: a heuristic-systematic model perspective. Electron Commer Res 23, 2713–2735 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09559-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09559-3

Keywords

Navigation