Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Research on the influence of social capital on cooperation among subjects in electronic public service supply chain: a supernetwork model analysis

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased public demand for electronic public services has forced the Electronic Public Service Supply Chain (EPSSC) to strengthen inter-departmental cooperation. Traditional measures deployed in the complex process of electronic public service supply rely on higher authorities and related management systems to promote the efficiency of inter-departmental cooperation, and clear limitations have emerged as a result. This paper addresses the inefficiency of inter-departmental cooperation in EPSSC, and engages issues such as ‘buckpassing’ and the lack of a distinction between duty and right. It therefore asserts that social capital within these government departments impacts on the achievement and stability of cooperation, and it draws on a supernetwork model based on variational inequality to analyze this assertion. On this basis, it explores the role of social capital in cooperation among supply chain subjects at different stages of inter-departmental cooperation. Research shows that in the initial stage of cooperation among departments in ESSPC, the rapid accumulation of social capital can promote cooperation among supply chain subjects by increasing homogeneous resources; in the intermediate stage, meanwhile, the rapid accumulation of social capital can promote cooperation by increasing heterogeneous resources. When the inter-department cooperative relationship stabilizes, the excess social capital is not conducive to cooperation among departments in ESSPC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Wang, Q. (2019). The development of e-government is an important starting point for improving the country’s governance capabilities. Study Times, 03, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, A. (2013). Research on the model design and operation mechanism of government electronic service supply chain. Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 06, 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Minogue, M., Polidano, C., & Hulme, D. (1998). Beyond the new public management- changing ideas and practices in governance (pp. 37–42). Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2007). Chinese governance (pp. 10–11). Tsinghua University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu, Y. (2019). The influence of social capital on supply chain quality integration and enterprise performance. Logistics Technology, 42(04), 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wan, Q., Wei, T., & Liu, J. (2019). Bridging the social capital gap: Building a cooperative relationship between corporate social entrepreneurs and individuals at the Bottom of the Pyramid: A single case study based on the LZ rural e-commerce project. Management World, 35(05), 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen, L. (2006). The whole- of- government approach regulation, performance, and public-sector reform. Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies UNIFOB.

  8. Zeng, W. (2008). Reform of “integral government” in the west: Theory, practice, and enlightenment. Journal of Public Management, 4(62–69), 125.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xie, Y. (2004). “Cooperative government”: A new stage of new public management reform. Chinese Administration, 05, 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Perri, 6., Leat, D., Seltzer, K., & Stoker, Gerry. (2002). Towards holistic governance: The new reform agenda, Red Globe Press.

  11. Tricker, B. (1998). Editorial: Platitudes parading as paradigms – reactions to the Preliminary Report of the UK Hampel Committee on Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance an International Review, 6(1), 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, L., & Zeng, W. (2008). Contemporary western “holistic government” public service model and its reference. Chinese Administration, 07, 108–111.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen, X., & Wang, G. (2018). Study on the construction of Singapore’s “smart nation” from the perspective of holistic government. Journal of Information, 11, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tang, Z. (2014). The management system and method to promote the sharing and collaborative construction of e-government. E-government, 05, 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, Y. (2015). Research on the coordinated development of administrative service center and e-government under the perspective of holistic government. E-government, 04, 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, G., Xiao, L., Hu, C., & Zhang, M. (2015). Electronics research on government affairs cross-system collaboration model–Based on the perspective of system elements. Journal of Information, 34(01), 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, K., Wang, N., Huang, L., Wang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2013). Building synergy public service: Research on the top-level design method of government information. Management World, 08, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mark, G. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bao, Y. (1997). Bourdieu interview-cultural capital and social alchemy (p. 202). Shanghai People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, s95–s120.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Putnam, R. D., & Helliwell, J. F. (1995). Turing in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in American. Political Science and Politics, 28(4), 664–683.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, N. (2005). Social capital: Theory on social structure and action (p. 32). Shanghai People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paldam, M. (2000). Social capital: One or many? Definition and measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(5), 629–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, S. (2002). Postmodern western sociological theory (p. 239). Social Science Literature Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  25. James, S. (1999). Coleman (p. 354). Social Science Literature Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jonathan, H. T. (2005). The formation of social capital (pp. 123–124). Renmin University of China Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kenneth, N. (2012). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy, translated by Yu Baoying and Suo Juanjuan. Foreign Theoretical Trends, 12, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Francis, F. (1998). Trust: Social morality and prosperity human creation (p. 405). Yuanfang Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yan, J. (2015). Social capital and State Governance (p. 84). Peking University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(7), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li, S. (2019). The dialectical understanding and practical significance of social capital theory. Guizhou Social Sciences, 1, 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, W. (2016). Robert Putnam’s theoretical development of social capital and its application. Legal System Expo, 03(9), 289–290.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cao, X., & Liu, G. (2013). Analysis of the super network of Industry-University-Research cooperation innovation based on Social capital. Management Review, 04(115–124), 157.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yang, H. (2019). An empirical study on the relationship between corporate social capital and radical innovation–The mediating and moderating effect of cooperative behaviors and environmental scanning. Forecasting, 38(2), 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li, Q., Ma, C., & Zhao, N. (2019). An empirical study on the relationship between social capital, uncertainty and opportunistic behavior in supply chain. Journal of Systems Management, 28(04), 614.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, X., Liu, X., & Zhao, X. (2016). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and innovation performance: From the perspective of supply chain. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 33(04), 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Claro, D. P., Claro, P. B., & Hagelaar, G. (2006). Coordinating collaborative joit efforts with supplies: The effects of trust, transaction specific investment and information metwork in the dutch flower industry. Supply Chain Management, 11(3), 1338–1343.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  40. World Bank. 2015. Social Capital in poverty reduction and economic development. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/socialdevelopment, on 25 October, 2016.

  41. Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: social capital and public life. American Prospect., 30, 340–372.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ploy, S. (2018). Social capital, citizen participation in public administration, and public sector performance in Thailand. World Development, 109, 236–248.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Muhamad, A. A. (2019). Public policy and governance: Theory and practice (pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Apro, R. (2006). Shared accountability for horizontal initiatives: Lessons and good practices for service Canada. School of Public Administration University of Victonia, 03, 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Douglas, W. E., & Raymond, E. (1996). Miles, trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, thousand oaks (pp. 16–38). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou, Z., & Jiang, M. (2013). An analysis of the Chinese government’s interdepartmental coordination mechanism: A narrative and diagnostic framework. Review of Public Administration, 6(1), 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Roula, M., & Dennis, K. (2006). Service supply chain management in e-government operations. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 7(3), 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhu, Z., & Feng, B. (2005). The application of supply chain management ideas in the development of e-government. Chinese Administration, 10, 535.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Huang, L. (2007). Supply chain to the government. Information System Engineering, 06, 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Deng, L., Lu, Y., & Xu, X. (2010). E-government information sharing from the perspective of information supply chain framework. Modern Intelligence, 12, 142–145.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang, A., & Guo, X. (2015). Research on the quality elements of e-government service supply chain: A conceptual analysis framework. Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 05, 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mi, C., & Li, D. (2018). Study on the super network equilibrium of financial markets considering social networks and internet finance. China Management Science, 26(12), 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lu, R., & Guo, J. (2018). Shanghai public transport supernetwork topology features and robustness analysis. Mathematics in Practice and Knowledge, 48(20), 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nagurney, A. (2003). Supply chain supernetworks and environmental criteria. Transportation Research Part D, 08, 185–213.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, Z., & Wang, Z. (2008). A preliminary study of hypernetworks. Journal of Management, 01, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Du, S., Zhu, J., Gao, D., & Du, C. (2013). Supply chain optimization based on Nash bargaining and fair reference decision. Journal of Management Science, 16(03), 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hu, S., Chen, X., & Cai, B. (2017). Game theory analysis of local government debt risk and research on optimal governance. China Soft Science, 08, 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  58. He, Y., & Xiong, H. (2018). PPP model government supervision research from the perspective of game theory. Journal of Engineering Management, 32(6), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Li, R., & Mao, S. (2015). Literature review of public service motivation. Modern Management Science, 02, 100–102.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Long, Y., & Li, G. (2017). Under the horizon of “internet and government affairs” research on cooperative game of information sharing in G2C e-government. Information Science, 35(5), 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Park, S. M., & Word, J. (2012). Driven to service: Intrinsic and ex-trinsic motivation for public and non-profit managers. Public Personnel Management, 41(4), 705–734.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Yan, Z. (2015). The operation of rural social governance embedded in social capital: Taking rural communities in Southern Shanxi as an example. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 15(04), 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sun, X., & Chen, J. (2016). Theoretical research on the influencing factors of knowledge sharing in service-oriented government: Based on self-determination theory and social capital theory. Information Science, 34(6), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wu, P., & Wang, H. (2014). Judgment of important nodes in social information super-networks based on the centrality of feature vectors. Information Theory and Practice, 37(5), 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civil tradition in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organization working together (pp. 44–49). Newbury Park. Calif Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Liu, D., & Lu, L. (2018). Discussion on random variational inequality and its application. Chinese Journal of Multimedia and Network Education, 07, 96–97.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Han, W., & Cheng, X. (2013). Variational inequality introduction: Basic theory, numerical analysis and application (p. 77). Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Liu, Y. (2018). The excessive embedding of social network relationships and the acquisition of corporate resources: A dual intermediary model. Enterprise Economics, 04, 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Chen, S. (2017). From a pressure-based system to a supervisory responsibility system: The transformation and mechanism innovation of government operation mode under the guidance of China’s national modernization. Administrative Forum, 24(05), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  71. He, P., Zhang, J., He, K., & Zeng, Y. (2019). Cognitive social capital and farmers’ participation in environmental governance: Taking straw resource utilization as an example. China Agricultural Resources and Regionalization, 40(8), 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Song, Y., Zhu, M., & Han, Y. (2007). Research on organizational ethical incentive mechanism and strategy. Economic Theory and Economic Management, 05, 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71503128, in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant KJQN201625.

Funding

The authors would like to express their gratitude to EditSprings (https://www.editsprings.com/) for the expert linguistic services provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China

    Airong Zhang & Fengyi Zhang

Authors
  1. Airong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fengyi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Airong Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, A., Zhang, F. Research on the influence of social capital on cooperation among subjects in electronic public service supply chain: a supernetwork model analysis. Electron Commer Res 25, 69–95 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09666-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09666-1

Keywords