Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A replicated quasi-experimental study on the influence of personality and team climate in software development

  • Published:
Empirical Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports a replication of a quasi-experimental study analyzing how personality factors and team climate influence software development team effectiveness, product quality and team member satisfaction. The replication was designed on the basis of the original quasi-experimental study, both of which were run in an academic setting. In the original study, data were collected from a sample of 35 three-member developer teams. All these teams used an adaptation of extreme programming (XP) to the academic environment to develop the same software system. In the replication, the data were collected from a sample of 34 three- or four-member developer teams working on the same software project. Student teams used a common object-oriented software development paradigm to solve the set problem and applied the Unified Process. In both studies all teams were formed at random, and their members were blind to the quasi-experimental conditions and hypotheses. The replication of this empirical study aims to verify the results of the original quasi-experiment. It examines, first, whether personality factors (neuroticism, extroversion, agreeableness, openness to experience and conscientiousness) are related to the quality of the developed software and team member satisfaction and, second, whether the preferences, perceptions and preferences-perceptions fit for the four team climate factors (participative safety, support for innovation, team vision and task orientation) are related to the quality of the developed software and team member satisfaction. The results of the replication corroborate some of the findings of the original study. On the one hand, the results revealed that there is a significant correlation between the extroversion personality factor and software quality, but no significant correlation between the extroversion personality factor and team satisfaction. Also, we found that the perception of team climate where participative safety is high is related to better quality software. We observed significant relationships between the perception of the four team climate factors and team member satisfaction. Additionally, the results showed a positive relationship between software quality and teams in which the real climate perception at the end of the project is better than preferences stated by team members at the outset of the project for the participative safety factor. Finally, we found that teams where the real climate is better than the stated preferences for the team orientation factor exhibit a direct and positive relationship to team member satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acuña ST, Gómez M, Juristo N (2008) Towards understanding the relationship between team climate and software quality—a quasi-experimental study. Empir Softw Eng 13(4):401–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acuña ST, Gómez M, Juristo N (2009) How do personality, team processes and task characteristics relate to job satisfaction and software quality? Inf Softw Technol 51(3):627–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson N, Burch GJ (2003) The team selection inventory. ASE, NFER-Nelson, Slough

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson N, West M (1994) The team climate inventory. ASE, NFER-Nelson, Windsor

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson N, West M (1998) Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Organ Behav 19(3):235–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson N, West M (1999) The team climate inventory: user’s guide, 2nd edn. ASE, NFER-Nelson, Windsor

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick MR, Mount MK (1991) The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers Psychol 44(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK (1998) Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J Appl Psychol 83:377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry B, Stewart GL (1997) Composition, process and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. J Appl Psychol 82(1):62–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck K (1999) Extreme programming explained: embrace change. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck K, Beedle M, Cockburn A, Cunnimgham W, Fowler M et al (2001) Agile Manifesto [http://agilemanifesto.org/]

  • Bentley J (2000) Programming pearls, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm BW, Abts C, Brown WA, Chulani S, Clark BK, Horowitz E, Madachy R, Reifer DJ, Steece B (2000) Software cost estimation with COCOMO II. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks A, Rooper M, Wood M, Daly J, Miller J (2008) Replication’s role in software engineering. In: Shull F, Singer J, Sjberg D (eds) Guide to empirical software engineering (chapter 14). Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch GJ, Anderson N (2004) Measuring person-team fit: development and validation of the team selection inventory. J Manag Psychol 19(4):406–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver J (2010) Towards reporting guidelines for experimental replications: a proposal. In: 1st International Workshop on Replication in Empirical Software Engineering Research (RESER 2010)

  • Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-experimentation design and analysis issues for the field settings. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR (2002) Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R): Inventario NEO Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual profesional. TEA, Madrid, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz SSJO, da Silva FQB, Monteiro C, Santos P, Rossilei I (2011) Personality in software engineering: preliminary findings from a systematic literature review. In: 15th Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2011), 1–10

  • Curral LA, Forrester RH, Dawson JF, West MA (2001) It’s what you do and the way that you do it: team task, team size, and innovation-related group. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 10(2):187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dybå T, Dingsøyr T (2008) Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf Softw Technol 50:833–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladstein DL (1984) Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness. Adm Sci Q 29(4):499–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez OS (2012) Tipología de Replicaciones para la Síntesis de Experimentos en Ingeniería del Software. Ph.D. thesis. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

  • Goparaju PS, Ayesha F, Sanghamitra P (2011) Soft factors affecting the performance of software development teams. Team Perform Manag 17(3–4):187–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1980) Work redesign. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (2004) Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge-SWEBOK version 2004. IEEE Computer Society, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson I, Booch G, Rumbaugh J (1999) The unified software process development. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Adm Sci Q 40:256–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn KA (1997) A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Adm Sci Q 42:530–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macias F, Holcombe M, Gheorghe M (2003) A formal experiment comparing extreme programming with traditional software construction. In: Fourth Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC 2003), 73–80

  • Mañas MA, González-Romá V, Peiro JM (1999) Work-group climate. Determinants and consequences. Universidad de Almería, Instituto de Estudios Almerienses, Almería

    Google Scholar 

  • Molleman E (2000) The modalities of self-management: the “must”, “may”, “can” and “will” of local decision making. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(8):889–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Molleman E, Nauta A, Jehn KA (2004) Person–job fit applied to teamwork: a multi-level approach. Small Group Res 35(5):515–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peslak A (2006) The impact of personality on information technology team projects. In: 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR. Claremont, California, USA, 273–279

  • Pfleeger SL (2001) Software engineering: theory and practice, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfleeger SL (2005) Soup or art? The role of evidential force in empirical software engineering. IEEE Softw 22(1):66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selby R (2007) Empirical software engineering research roadmap: discussion and summary. In: Basili V, Rombach D, Schneider K, Kitchenham B, Pfahl D, Selby R (eds) Empirical software engineering issues. Critical assessment and future directions, 4336 lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 184–187

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sfetsos P, Stamelos I, Angelis L, Deligiannis I (2009) An experimental investigation of personality types impact on pair effectiveness in pair programming. Empir Softw Eng 14:187–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes JP (1983) Toward an understanding of cohesion in personal change groups. Int J Group Psychother 33:449–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt G, Emans B, Van de Vliert E (2001) Affective reactions to individual task interdependence in outcome interdependence groups. Pers Psychol 54:51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H-L, Tang J-H (2004) Team structure and team performance in IS development: a social network perspective. J Inf Manag 41(3):335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander A (1994) Making groups effective, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by the following projects: Experiment Replication and Synthesis Technologies in SE (MICINN TIN2011-23216) and Go Lite (MICINN TIN2011-24139).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad CEU San Pablo, Campus de Monteprincipe 28668 Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain

    Marta N. Gómez

  2. Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Calle Francisco Tomás y Valiente 11, 28049, Madrid, Spain

    Silvia T. Acuña

Authors
  1. Marta N. Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Silvia T. Acuña
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia T. Acuña.

Additional information

Communicated by: Jeffrey C. Carver, Natalia Juristo, Teresa Baldassarre, Sira Vegas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez, M.N., Acuña, S.T. A replicated quasi-experimental study on the influence of personality and team climate in software development. Empir Software Eng 19, 343–377 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-013-9265-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-013-9265-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation