Abstract
We study smoking-cessation apps in order to formulate a framework for ethical evaluation, analyzing apps as ‘medium’, ‘market’, and ‘genre’. We center on the value of user autonomy through truthfulness and self-understanding. Smoking-cessation apps usually communicate in an anonymous ‘app voice’, with little presence of professional or other identified voices. Because of the fast-and-frugal communication, truthfulness is problematic. Messages in the ‘quantification’ modules may be read as deceitfully accurate. The app voice frames smoking as a useless, damaging habit indicative of weakness of will, in a ‘cold-turkey’ frame of individual mind-over-body heroism. Thus apps contribute to a stigmatization of smokers and culpabilization of relapses. The potential to support user autonomy through diverse meaningful voices and personalized communication remains yet unused.





Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abroms, L. C., Lee Westmaas, J., Bontemps-Jones, J., Ramani, R., & Mellerson, J. (2013). A content analysis of popular smartphone apps for smoking cessation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(6), 732–736. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.008.
Abroms, L., Padmanabhan, N., Thaweethai, L., & Phillips, T. (2011). iPhone apps for smoking cessation: A content analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(3), 279–285.
Atkinson, B. M. C. (2006). Captology: A critical review. In W. Ijsselsteijn, Y. de Kort, & E. van den Hoven (Eds.), Persuasive technology. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3962, pp. 171–182). Berlin: Springer.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogical imagination: Four essays. In M. Holquist (Ed.) Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Berdichevsky, D., & Neuenschwander, E. (1999). Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 51–58. doi:10.1145/301353.301410.
BinDhim, N. F., McGeechan, K., & Trevena, L. (2014). Who uses smoking cessation apps? A feasibility study across three countries via smartphones [Online]. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2(1). Available from: http://mhealth.jmir.org. Accessed 6 Dec 2015.
Bolt, D. M., Piper, M. E., McCarthy, D. E., Japuntich, S. J., Fiore, M. C., Smith, S. S., & Baker, T. B. (2009). The Wisconsin predicting patients’ relapse questionnaire. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11(5), 481–492.
Bottorff, J. L., Oliffe, J., Kalaw, C., Carey, J., & Mroz, L. (2006). Men’s constructions of smoking in the context of women’s tobacco reduction during pregnancy and postpartum. Social Science and Medicine, 62(12), 3096–3108.
Breland, J. Y., Yeh, V. M., & Yu, J. (2013). Adherence to evidence-based guidelines among diabetes self-management apps. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 3(3), 277–286.
Brown, I., & Adams, A. A. (2007). The ethical challenges of ubiquitous healthcare. International Review of Information Ethics, 8, 53–60.
Choi, J., Noh, G.-Y., & Park, D.-J. (2014). Smoking cessation apps for smartphones: Content analysis with the self-determination theory. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(2), e44. doi:10.2196/jmir.3061.
Cohn, A., Hunter-Reel, D., Hagman, B., & Mitchell, J. (2011). Promoting behavior change from alcohol use through mobile technology: The future of ecological momentary assessment. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 35(12), 2209–2215.
Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 209–232.
Courtwright, A. (2013). Stigmatization and public health ethics. Bioethics, 27(2), 74–80.
Cowan, L. T., Van Wagenen, S. A., Brown, B. A., Hedin, R. J., Seino-Stephan, Y., Hall, P. C., & West, J. H. (2013). Apps of steel: Are exercise apps providing consumers with realistic expectations? A content analysis of exercise apps for presence of behavior change theory. Health Education and Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 40(2), 133–139.
Desantis, A. D. (2003). A couple of white guys sitting around talking: The collective rationalization of cigar smoking. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32(4), 432–466.
Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2011). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media and Society, 14(1), 45–62. doi:10.1177/1461444811410395.
Engestrom, R. (1995). Voice as communicative action. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(3), 192–214.
Etter, J.-F., Le Houezec, J., & Perneger, T. (2003). A self-administered questionnaire to measure dependence on cigarettes: The cigarette dependence scale. Neuropsychopharmacology, 28, 359–370.
Fogg, B. (1998). Persuasive computers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI’98 (pp. 225–232). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/274644.274677
Fogg, B. J. (2009). Creating persuasive technologies: An eight-step design process. In Persuasive’09 (pp. 1–6). Claremont, CA.
Friedman, B. (1996). Value-sensitive design. Interactions, 3(6), 16–23. doi:10.1145/242485.242493.
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2008). Value sensitive design and information systems. In K. E. Himma & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), The handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 69–101). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Fry, G., Grogan, S., Gough, B., & Conner, M. (2008). Smoking in the lived world: How young people make sense of the social role cigarettes play in their lives. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(Pt 4), 763–780.
Gavriluţă, N. (2002). On tolerance and acceptance of the other. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 3, 22–27.
Guttman, N., & Salmon, C. T. (2004). Guilt, fear, stigma and knowledge gaps: Ethical issues in public health communication interventions. Bioethics, 18(6), 531–552.
Hoeppner, B. B., Hoeppner, S. S., Seaboyer, L., Schick, M. R., Wu, G. W. Y., Bergman, B. G., et al. (2015). How smart are smartphone apps for smoking cessation? A content analysis. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv117.
Klasnja, P., & Pratt, W. (2012). Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45(1), 184–198.
Lawn, S. J., Pols, R. G., & Barber, J. G. (2002). Smoking and quitting: A qualitative study with community-living psychiatric clients. Social Science and Medicine, 54(1), 93–104.
Lessig, L. (2000). Code is law. On liberty in cyberspace [Online]. Harvard Magazine. Available from http://harvardmagazine.com. Accessed 15 Nov 2013.
Lewis, B. (2006). Listening to Chekhov: Narrative approaches to depression. Literature and Medicine, 25(1), 46–71.
Lockton, D., Harrinson, D., & Stanton, N. (2008). Design with intent: Persuasive technology in a wider context. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5033, 274–278.
Lupton, D. (2013). Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 393–403.
Macnaughton, J., Carro-Ripalda, S., & Russell, A. (2012). “Risking enchantment”: How are we to view the smoking person? Critical Public Health, 22(4), 455–469.
Matei, Ş., Rughiniş, C., & Rughiniş, R. (2014). Refreshing quantification and other ploys to give up the habit a repertoire of relations, identities, and rhetorical devices in smoking cessation applications. In The 16th international conference on human–computer interaction HCII 2014. Applications and services lecture notes in computer science volume 8512 (pp. 265–276). Crete, Greece: Springer, Berlin.
Meier, E., Tackett, A. P., & Wagener, T. L. (2013). Effectiveness of electronic aids for smoking cessation. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 7(6), 464–472.
Mosa, A. S. M., Yoo, I., & Sheets, L. (2012). A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 12(1), 67.
Nafus, D., & Sherman, J. (2014). This one does not go up to 11: The quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1784–1794.
Pagoto, S., Schneider, K., Jojic, M., DeBiasse, M., & Mann, D. (2013). Evidence-based strategies in weight-loss mobile apps. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(5), 576–582.
Puustinen, R. (2000). Voices to be heard—The many positions of a physician in Anton Chekhov’s short story, a case history. Journal of Medical Ethics: Medical Humanities, 26, 37–42.
Rughiniş, R., Matei, Ş., & Rughiniş, C. (2014). Smoking does not make you happy. Unlearning smoking habits through mobile applications on android OS. In The 6th international conference on computer supported education CSEDU 2014. Barcelona: INSTICC.
Rughiniş, C., & Rughiniş, R. (2014). Influence of daily smoking frequency on passive smoking behaviors and beliefs: Implications for self tracking practices and mobile applications. Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială, 44, 116–131.
Smith, S. S., Piper, M. E., Bolt, D. M., Fiore, M. C., Wetter, D. W., Cincciripini, P. M., & Baker, T. B. (2010). Development of the brief Wisconsin inventory of smoking dependence motives. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12(5), 489–499.
Spahn, A. (2012). And lead us (not) into persuasion…? Persuasive technology and the ethics of communication. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 633–650. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9278-y.
Thaler, R. H., Sunstein, C. R., & Balz, J. P. (2010). Choice architecture [Online]. SSRN Electronic Journal. Availabe from http://ssrn.com. Accessed 6 Dec 2015.
Ubhi, H. K., Michie, S., Kotz, D., Wong, W. C., & West, R. (2015). A mobile app to aid smoking cessation: Preliminary evaluation of SmokeFree28 [Online]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(1). Available from: http://www.jmir.org. Accessed 6 Dec 2015.
Van Singer, M., Chatton, A., & Khazaal, Y. (2015). Quality of smartphone apps related to panic disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, 1–7. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00096.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2006). Persuasive technology and moral responsibility. Toward an ethical framework for persuasive technologies. Persuasive, 6, 1–15.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2008). Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality: A postphenomenological analysis. Human Studies, 31(1), 11–26.
Wellman, R. J., Di Franza, J. R., Morgenstern, M., Hanewinkel, R., Isensee, B., & Sabiston, C. M. (2011). Psychometric properties of the autonomy over tobacco scale in German. European Addiction Research, 18, 76–82.
Welsch, S. K., Smith, S. S., Wetter, D. W., Jorenby, D. E., Fiore, M. C., & Baker, T. B. (1999). Development and validation of the wisconsin smoking withdrawal scale. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7(4), 354–361.
Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Voices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Acknowledgments
This article has been supported by the research project “Sociological imagination and disciplinary orientation in applied social research” (http://igel.ro), taking place in The Research Center in Human Resources, Management and Marketing of the Department of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, with the financial support of UEFISCDI with Grant No. PN-II-RU-TE-2011-3-0143, contract 14/28.10.2011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rughiniş, C., Rughiniş, R. & Matei, Ş. A touching app voice thinking about ethics of persuasive technology through an analysis of mobile smoking-cessation apps. Ethics Inf Technol 17, 295–309 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9385-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9385-1