Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Pruned Pareto-optimal sets for the system redundancy allocation problem based on multiple prioritized objectives

  • Published:
Journal of Heuristics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new methodology is presented to solve different versions of multi-objective system redundancy allocation problems with prioritized objectives. Multi-objective problems are often solved by modifying them into equivalent single objective problems using pre-defined weights or utility functions. Then, a multi-objective problem is solved similar to a single objective problem returning a single solution. These methods can be problematic because assigning appropriate numerical values (i.e., weights) to an objective function can be challenging for many practitioners. On the other hand, methods such as genetic algorithms and tabu search often yield numerous non-dominated Pareto optimal solutions, which makes the selection of one single best solution very difficult. In this research, a tabu search meta-heuristic approach is used to initially find the entire Pareto-optimal front, and then, Monte-Carlo simulation provides a decision maker with a pruned and prioritized set of Pareto-optimal solutions based on user-defined objective function preferences. The purpose of this study is to create a bridge between Pareto optimality and single solution approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Aseeri, A., Bagajewicz, M.J.: New measures and procedures to manage financial risk with applications to the planning of gas commercialization in Asia. Comput. Chem. Eng. 28(12), 2791–2821 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbera, S., Hammond, P.J., Seidl, C.: Handbook of Utility Theory. Kluwer Academic, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykasoglu, A., Owen, S., Gindy, N.: A taboo search based approach to find the Pareto optimal set in multiple objective optimization. J. Eng. Optim. 31, 731–748 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branke, J., Deb, K.: Integrating user preferences into evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Jin, Y. (ed.) Knowledge Incorporation in Evolutionary Computation, pp. 461–477. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Branke, J., Kaußler, T., Schmeck, H.: Guidance in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Adv. Eng. Softw. 32, 499–507 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Branke, J., Deb, K., Dierolf, H., Osswald, M.: Finding knees in multi-objective optimization. In: Yao, X. et al. (ed.) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature—PPSN VIII, pp. 722–731. Springer, Birmingham (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulfin, R.L., Liu, C.Y.: Optimal allocation of redundant components for large systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. R-34, 241–247 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming. Wiley, New York (1961)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chern, M.S.: On the computational complexity of reliability redundancy allocation in a series system. Oper. Res. Lett. 11, 309–315 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Coello Coello, C.A.: Handling preferences in evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a survey. Proc. Congr. Evol. Comput. 1, 30–37 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coit, D.W.: System-reliability confidence intervals for complex systems with estimated component reliability. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 46(4), 487–493 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coit, D.W., Smith, A.E., Tate, D.M.: Adaptive penalty methods for genetic optimization of constrained combinatorial problems. INFORMS J. Comput. 8, 173–182 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Corne, D., Jerram, N.R., Knowles, J., Oates, J.: PESA-II: Region-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In: Proc. Genet. Evol. Comput. Conf., pp. 283–290, 2001

  • Cvetkovic, C., Parmee, I.C.: Use of preferences for GA-based multi-objective optimization. Proc. Genet. Evol. Comput. Conf. 2, 1504–1509 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovic, C., Parmee, I.C.: Preferences and their applications in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(1), 42–57 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K.: Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K., Chaudhuri, S.: I-EMO: an interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization tool. KanGAL Report No. 2005003 (2005)

  • Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: The Foundations of Expected Utility. Kluwer Academic, Boston (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J.: Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 416–423 (1993)

  • Fyffe, D.E., Hines, W.W., Lee, N.K.: System reliability allocation and a computational algorithm. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 17, 74–79 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M.: Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 22(3), 618–630 (1968)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ghare, M., Taylor, R.E.: Optimal redundancy for reliability in series system. Oper. Res. 17, 838–847 (1969)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, F., Laguna, M.: Tabu Search. Kluwer Academic, Boston (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, F., Taillard, E., de Werra, D.: A user’s guide to tabu search. Ann. Oper. Res. 41, 3–28 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, R.: Hamiltonian dynamical systems for convex problems of optimal control: implications for the value function. Proc. IEEE Conf. Dec. Control 1, 728–732 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajela, P., Lin, C.-Y.: Genetic search strategies in multicriterion optimal design. Struct. Optim. 4, 99–107 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.P.: Tabu search for multiobjective optimization: MOTS. In: Presented at the 13th International Conference on Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM’97), Cape Down, South Africa, 1997

  • Hansen, M.P.: Tabu search for multiobjective combinatorial optimization: TAMOCO. Control Cybern. 29(3), 799–818 (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, A., Jaumard, B., Ibeiro, C.C., Formosinho Filho, W.P.: A multi-criteria tabu search approach to cell formation problems in group technology with multiple objectives. Rech. Oper./Oper. Res. 28(3), 303–328 (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, T., Coit, D.W.: Variance of system reliability estimates with arbitrarily repeated components. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 50(4), 409–413 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasprzak, E., Lewis, K.: Pareto analysis in multiobjective optimization using the colinearity theorem and scaling method. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 22(3), 208–218 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriwaczek, F., Rustem, B.: Interactive multiple objective decision making based on quadratic programming. Technical Report, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, ISSN: 1469-4174 (2000)

  • Kulturel-Konak, S., Coit, D.W., Smith, A.E.: Efficiently solving the redundancy allocation problem using tabu search. IIE Trans. 35(6), 515–526 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulturel-Konak, S., Norman, B.A., Coit, D.W., Smith, A.E.: Exploiting tabu search memory in constrained problems. INFORMS J. Comput. 14(3), 241–254 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kulturel-Konak, S., Smith, A.E., Norman, B.A.: Multi-objective tabu search using a multinomial probability mass function. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169(3), 915–931 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, W., Prasad, V.: An annotated overview of system-reliability optimization. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 49(2), 487–493 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H., Yen, G.G.: Rank-density-based multiobjective genetic algorithm and benchmark test function study. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7, 325–343 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7, 77–91 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.: Portfolio Selection. Wiley, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, C.A., Mullur, A.A., Messac, A.: Smart Pareto filter: obtaining a minimal representation of multiobjective design space. Eng. Optim. 36, 721–740 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, K.B., Sharma, U.: An efficient algorithm to solve integer programming problems arising in system reliability design. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 40, 81–91 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Montano, B.R., Anandalingam, G., Zandi, I.: A genetic algorithm to policy design for consequence minimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 124, 43–54 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, Y., Miyazaki, S.: Surrogate constraints algorithm for reliability optimization problems with two constraints. IEEE Trans. Reliab. R-30, 175–180 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palli, N., Azram, S., Mccluskey, P., Sundarajan, R.: An interactive multistage epsilon-inequality constraint method for multiple objective decision making. J. Mech. Des. 120, 678–686 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, P., Ouwersloot, H.: Ordinal data in multicriteria decision making: a stochastic dominance approach to siting nuclear power plants. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 56, 249–262 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, R., Liang, K.-H., Newton, C.: A new multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140, 12–23 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, J.D.: Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In: Proc. First Int. Conf. Genet. Algorithms, pp. 93–100, 1985

  • Shelokar, P.S., Jayaraman, V.K., Kulkarni, B.D.: Ant algorithm for single and multiobjective reliability optimization problems. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 18, 497–514 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A., Ahmed, S.: On a class of minimax stochastic programs. SIAM J. Optim. 14(4), 1237–1249 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, C.M., Biscaia, E.C., Jr.: Genetic algorithm development for multi-objective optimization of batch free-radical polymerization reactors. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27(8-9), 1329–1344 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.E., Tate, D.M.: Genetic optimization using a penalty function. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 499–505, 1993

  • Sung, C.S., Cho, Y.K.: Branch-and-bound redundancy optimization for a series system with multiple-choice constraints. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 48(2), 108–117 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, N., Deb, K.: Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. J. Evol. Comput. 2, 221–248 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taboada, H., Coit, D.: Data clustering of solutions for multiple objective system reliability optimization problems. Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag. 4(2), 35–54 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Taboada, H., Baheranwala, F., Coit, D.W., Wattanapongsakorn, N.: Practical solutions of multi-objective system reliability design problems using genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Quality and Reliability. Beijing, China, 2005

  • Todd, D.S., Sen, P.: Directed multiple objective search of design spaces using genetic algorithms and neural networks. Proc. Genet. Evol. Comput. Conf. 2, 1738–1743 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulungu, B., Teghem, J., Ost, C.: Efficiency of interactive multi-objective simulated annealing through a case study. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49, 1044–1050 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van Veldhuizen, D.A., Lamont, G.B.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: analyzing the state-of-the-art. Evol. Comput. 8(2), 125–148 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yano, H.: Interactive fuzzy decision making for multiple decision maker-multiple objective programming problems with fuzzy parameters. In: 17th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 2004

  • Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 3(4), 257–271 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management Information Systems, Penn State Berks, Tulpehocken Road, P.O. Box 7009, Reading, PA, 19610, USA

    Sadan Kulturel-Konak

  2. Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08844, USA

    David W. Coit & Fatema Baheranwala

Authors
  1. Sadan Kulturel-Konak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. David W. Coit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatema Baheranwala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadan Kulturel-Konak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kulturel-Konak, S., Coit, D.W. & Baheranwala, F. Pruned Pareto-optimal sets for the system redundancy allocation problem based on multiple prioritized objectives. J Heuristics 14, 335–357 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-007-9041-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-007-9041-3

Keywords